Search blog.co.uk

Posts archive for: 08 December, 2007
  • Ode to a Christmas Tree ...


    Ode to a Christmas Tree ...

    Palash Biswas

    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com

    Subject: Ron Paul defining the neo-cons
    Very informative and well worth watching. Ron Paul identifies the mechanisms and money sources that brought the "neo-cons" to power. He also links them to the revolutionary philosophies of Trotsky and Strauss.
    http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=8w_aT6L44Mg

    A Christmas tree doesn't care if you had other Christmas trees in the past.

    Even a small Christmas tree gives satisfaction.

    A Christmas tree always looks good, even with the lights on.

    A Christmas tree has pretty balls.

    A Christmas tree doesn't follow you around begging if you decide to choose a different one.

    A Christmas tree stays up for 12 days and nights.

    A Christmas tree is always happy with its size.

    A Christmas tree doesn't care if you sit around in your pajamas and watch soap operas all day.

    A Christmas tree doesn't get mad if you break its balls.

    You can throw a Christmas tree out when it starts to get old and droopy.

    You don't have to put up with
    a Christmas tree all year !! ... even !!

    Christmas in Fallujah and no one gives a Damn.
    We are the Armies of the Empire
    http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=WNHF5p4bV_ k&eurl=http: www.informatio nclearinghouse. info/article1884 1.htm
    ICH Page:
    http:
    www.informat ionclearinghouse .info/article188 41.htm
    =
    Lives in the Balance - Jackson Brown
    http://www.spoems. com/video_ lWtsVsLuqB0. html

    The Fruitceller has been DELETED with NO explanation.
    Contact set_free@hotmail. co.uk
    Any of my old subscribers, please contact me at this email,
    and I will try to find another host

    Tags: jackson browne fruitceller war on terror

    If you have any interest in prophecy as far as it pertains to America,
    here's a site you wont want to miss. It has an index at the top of
    its pages that have twelve different articles that really hit the nail
    on the head, as far as what's taking place in America, and as far as
    what Scripture says is yet to come.

    http://www.TheAmeri canNightmare. org/163_The_ Great_Abyss_ A-D.html

    Holly
    realrareflower@ yahoo.com

    Israel furious at US findings on Iran___________ "On Tuesday morning,
    Israel's Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper called the U.S. findings 'a blow
    below the belt.' An analysis in the competing Haaretz newspaper
    suggested that Israel might come to be viewed as a 'panic-stricken rabbit' and
    said that the U.S. intelligence estimate established 'a new, dramatic
    reality: The military option, American or Israeli, is off the table,
    indefinitely.'"
    ________ By Dion Nissenbaum, McClatchy Newspapers Tue Dec 4, 1:29 PM
    ET JERUSALEM

  • Bush's lame-duck presidency waddles into farce

    Bush's lame-duck presidency waddles into farce
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
    Bush prods Congress on AMT, mortgages
    U.S. President George W. Bush Saturday urged Congress to act on fixing a potential middle-class tax problem and reform mortgage lending laws.
    Bush used his weekly radio address to congratulate the Senate for passing legislation to prevent an unexpected tax bill for millions of middle-income Americans, who could get hit with a bigger federal tax liability this year because a decades old law -- the Alternative Minimum Tax, intended to force the wealthy to pay taxes -- was not indexed to inflation.
    "As a result, the AMT's higher tax burden is creeping up on more and more middle-class families, and as many as 25 million Americans would be subject to the AMT," Bush said.
    He accused the House of delaying the AMT fix, although the House has already passed legislation to address the problem.
    Bush also touted his proposal -- announced this week -- to provide some federal help for homeowners who face foreclosure as a result of the subprime mortgage crisis. He said Congress needs to pass legislation to modernize the Federal Housing Administration, and "temporarily reform the tax code to help homeowners refinance during this time of housing market stress."
    From: Dominick Date: Dec 7, 2007 11:07 AM
    Subject: Alexander Cockburn: Lame duck presidency lurches into farce
    To: Undisclosed- Recipient
    Bush's lame-duck presidency waddles into farce

    The humiliating impotence of the president's final year is beginning,

    says alexander cockburn
    The one thing a president cannot afford to be is ridiculous. This week George Bush lurched into that fatal category and into the true twilight of his presidency, festooned with all the traditional discomfitures. Senior aides and close advisors are parleying with literary agents and finding compelling reason to quit the White House and spend more time with their families. In public even the First Lady seems to be edging away from her stricken mate.
    The latest, fatal instrument of Bush's public humiliation is the National Intelligence Estimate proclaiming in its unclassified version that Iran stopped trying to build a nuclear weapon in 2003, thus deliberately, with humiliating clarity contradicting Bush and Cheney's unending invocation of the Iranian nuclear threat.
    Now, in theory, an NIE represents the objective consensus of 16 US intelligence
    agencies on matters of national security. In practice it is a useful guide to how a bunch of bureaucratic knife-fighters assess the balance of forces in Washington.
    In 2002 Bush and Cheney were strong enough to ram their dire assessments of Iraq's WMDs into the infamous October, 2002 NIE that began with the assertion that "We judge that Iraq has continued its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs - if left unchecked, it probably will have a nuclear weapon during this decade."
    The cover story for the recently released NIE on Iran, with its U-turn on previous assessments, is that new information suddenly became available. In practice this means that in the late summer senior intelligence officials figured the consensus in Washington and Wall Street against an attack on Iran was powerful enough for them to lower the boom on the neo-cons.
    The latter have now retreated in disarray to their bunkers at the Weekly Standard and the National Review for a last stand, bellowing that it's a filthy plot by peaceniks in the State Department. Actually, it is, in part, exactly that. It strikes at the neo-cons and it strikes at Israel, which has staked much on firing the US to attack Iran.
    "It's no secret," snarled the National Review, "that careerists at the CIA and State have been less interested in implementing the President's policies on Iran, Iraq, and North Korea than in sabotaging them at every opportunity."
    The Wall Street Journal's nutty editorial page went further, fingering "hyper-partisan anti-Bush officials" including Tom Fingar, formerly of the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research, as drafters of the treacherous NIE.
    Humiliated by the NIE, which flatly contradicted all his recent claims about Iran's rush for nuclear weapons, Bush flailed away in his Tuesday press conference, eliciting contempt as he claimed he'd only just become aware of the NIE. "If that's true," Senator Joe Biden declared, "he has the most incompetent staff in modern American history and he's one of the most incompetent presidents in modern American history."
    Only the former CIA spook Bob Baer - model for George Clooney's CIA role in Syriana - tried to give Bush a better role than mere dupe and fall guy, claiming that Bush himself had pushed for the NIE to go public. The motive? To head off an attack on Iran, which would undercut any American successes in Iraq. One can imagine one of America's more Macchiavelian presidents doing this, such as FDR or LBJ - but Bush?
    The only ray of comfort for the president was that Hillary Clinton chose the start of the week to make herself equally ridiculous, if not more so.
    As she slipped behind Barrack Obama in the polls in Iowa, her campaign issued a press release on December 3 designed to paint Obama as a man consumed by ruthless, lifelong ambition: "In kindergarten, Senator Obama wrote an essay titled 'I Want to Become President'." In kindergarten!
    FIRST POSTED DECEMBER 7, 2007
    http://www.thefirst post.co.uk/ index.php? storyID=9740
    Israel no nuclear threat to neighbours, says Gates
    By Kristin Roberts Reuters - Saturday, December 8 10:10 amMANAMA (Reuters) - U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates defended Israel's nuclear programme on Saturday, saying the Jewish state did not seek to destroy its neighbours or support terrorism, unlike Iran.
    Asked at the Manama Dialogue conference whether Israel's nuclear programme posed a threat to the region, Gates replied: "No, I do not."
    The statement was greeted by laughter from a room filled with government officials from Middle Eastern countries.
    Israel is widely assumed to have the region's only atomic arsenal, but declines to confirm or deny it. Washington has long avoided pressing Israel to go public with its capabilities.
    Gates did not specifically mention Israel's nuclear weapons or arsenal, but responded to questions about its "nuclear programme" -- giving the Pentagon chief room to dismiss any suggestion that he implicitly confirmed the weapons' existence in Israel.
    He dismissed the allegation that the United States applied a double standard on the nuclear issue by supporting Israel while calling for Iran to abandon its enrichment activities, which Tehran says are for peaceful purposes.
    "Israel is not training terrorists to subvert its neighbours. It has not shipped weapons into a place like Iraq to kill thousands of innocent civilians covertly," Gates said.
    "It has not threatened to destroy any of its neighbours. It is not trying to destabilise the government of Lebanon.
    "So I think there are significant differences in terms of both the history and the behaviour of the Iranian and Israeli governments. I understand there is a difference of view on that," he said.
    Iran denies U.S. allegations that it has armed, trained and funded Shi'ite militias in Iraq, blaming the violence in Iraq on the U.S.-led invasion to topple Saddam Hussein in 2003.
    A year ago, Gates first angered Israelis during testimony to the U.S. Congress by including Israel in a list of nuclear-armed countries that surround Iran to explain why Tehran might have sought the means to build an atomic bomb. He has not publicly discussed it since.
    Israel admits to having two atomic reactors, describing them officially as research facilities. Its refusal to discuss any nuclear weapons capabilities or accept international inspections at the facilities is a major irritant for Arabs and Iran, which see it as a contradiction in U.S. policy in the region.
    (Editing by Andrew Dobbie)

  • Nandigram, Godhra incidents unfortunate: PM

    Nandigram, Godhra incidents unfortunate: PM
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
    The West Bengal assembly which today discussed an adjournment motion on Nandigram, witnessed noisy scenes and walkouts by Trinamool Congress and the Congress, with Chief Minister Buddhadev Bhattacharjee saying the area was slowly returning to normal.
    The chief minister, speaking on the motion, said that peace was slowly returning to Nandigram, people had returned home and the administrating was trying to distribute relief to all.
    The house witnessed uproar when Bhattacharjee spoke about maoist activities in Nandigram and alleged TC MLAs Sisir Adhikari and Subhendu Adhikari knew about their presence there. Three maoists were arrested from Sagar Island, he said.
    Bhattacharjee urged the Congress to introspect on the direction the party was moving. The Congress had joined hands with the TC, BJP and the maoists in Nandigram, he alleged.
    Reiterating it would have been better if the March 14 police firing in Nandigram did not take place, he said the state's investment prospect has not been hindered due to happenings in Nandigram.
    Bhattacharjee told the house that the state in the past one year received investment proposals of Rs 1.50 lakh crore and this year it would increase.
    Earlier, Speaker H A Halim admitted an adjournment motion on Nandigram jointly moved by TC and Congress.
    Stating that they were not satisfied with the reply of the chief minister, both the opposition parties walked out of the House
    Nandigram, Godhra incidents unfortunate: PM
    Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today condemned the Nandigram and Godhra incidents and said they were 'unfortunate' and should not be repeated.
    Incidents like Godhra and Nandigram in West Bengal are unfortunate and it should not be repeated, Singh said while interacting with the media at Rajkot on Friday.
    Reacting to the issue of Afzal Guru issue awaiting death penalty after being convicted in Parliament attack case, Singh said it was a legal matter and the process is on and steps will be taken at appropriate time, he added.
    Replying to a querry on the fake encounter on Sheikh Sohrabuddin, he said ''I would not like to comment on the issue as the matter was sub-judice and it was improper to react on it''.

    Mamata meets Sonia, Advani on Nandigram issue
    New Delhi : Stepping up her offensive against CPI(M) on Nandigram issue, Mamta Bannerjee on Friday held separate meetings with Congress President Sonia Gandhi and leader of the opposition L K Advani.
    During the nearly thirty-minute meeting with Gandhi, Banerjee requested her to visit Nandigram to see for herself the situation there in the wake of long-drawn violence there.
    Banerjee, who was accompanied by party MPs Dinesh Trivedi and Mukul Roy, told Gandhi that it was time Congress views its ties with CPI-M as the marxist party "has crossed the Laxman Rekha in politics".
    She also wanted Gandhi to send a UPA team to Nandigram.
    Banerjee had yesterday met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Home Minister Shivraj Patil on the issue.
    Banerjee's flurry of meetings came
    Politics on track over dead bodies in Khejuri, Nandigram
    By NI Wire Views:18
    New Delhi Comments:0

    Dec 08: The West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee ordered the CID to probe into the matter of recovered five half charred dead bodies buried five mounds below the earth found at Khejuri village near Nandigram.
    Besides the Bengal government has filed a fresh petition in the Apex Court challenging the CBI investigation into Nandigram.
    The graves were dug up in the presence of CBI and CRPF officials and under the supervision of a judicial magistrate following allegations that dead bodies of the victims of recent Nandigram violence were buried there.
    For the identification of deceased DNA tests would be conducted, said the Home Secretary Prasad Ranjan Ray on Friday.
    Mr Ray after a meeting with Chief Minister further said that the bones of the deceased would be sent to Central Forensic Laboratory for the examination.
    The curtain rose, with the recovery of half-burnt skull bones and ashes from graves by the CBI in Nandigram, over the incident. The piece of skull and hair have been sent to a forensic laboratory for DNA matching as the CBI wants to be clear that whether the bones match with the people who are alleged to have been killed either in police firing on March 14 or by anti-social elements.
    Instead of saying something concrete the Superintendent of Police of East Midnapur, Satyeswar Panda Expressed complex views saying that the dead bodies could be related to March 14 police firing or November 8 Nandigram violence or it could be of those five people, died owing to blasts while manufacturing bombs on October 28.
    Local Trinamool Congress leader Subhendu Adhikari alleged that almost 27 people are missing from the area after March 14 open police firing on the innocent villagers. He said that those five bodies could be of those villagers.
    But on the other hand CPM claims that those five people are its own members, who died in an accidental blast while manufacturing bombs on October 28.
    While the Bhoomi Uchchhed Pratirodh committee, a group who has been fighting for the villagers, farmers against the acquisition of land allegedly claims that the dead persons were the workers and members belong to its group, who were dragged by the CPM cadres into Khejuri from a procession in Maheshpur and exterminated them.
    Khejuri has been a CPM stronghold even at the height of the violence erupted in Nandigram, which is across the Talpatti canal.
    Politics has been started with the recovering of charred bodies among all the major political parties. Trinamool Congress is playing its own cards when its members staged a noisy walkout from the West Bengal Assembly on Friday protesting the speaker’s refusal to allow a discussion on the unearthed bones from Khejuri Meanwhile the ruling government of CPM is trying to defend its position in West Bengal.

    Maoists attempting to entrench themselves in WB evicted: CPI-M
    New Delhi: Apparently seeking to justify the recapture of Nandigram, the CPI(M) today claimed West Bengal was the only state from where Maoists, who were trying to entrench themselves there, have been evicted.
    The party, heading the Left Front, also utilised Governor Gopal Krishna Gandhi's visit to Nandigram to project that all was well in the area.
    "There are so many states like Chhattisgarh, Bihar, Jharkhand and Andhra Pradesh, where vast areas have come under the control of the Maoists. No administration functions in these 'liberated zones'. West Bengal is the only state from where they have been evicted," Politburo member Sitaram Yechury told reporters here.
    Replying to questions on the Nandigram issue, Yechury said the party Politburo was taking stock of the situation there on the basis of a report submitted by the party's West Bengal Committee on the matter.
    "The question is to restore peace and normalcy there. People are returning to their hearths and homes after 11 months. They are being provided money by the state government to buy utensils and even seeds to help them start a new life." To a question about Governor Gopal Krishna Gandhi's visit yesterday to Nandigram, he said it was good that the Governor had first-hand experience of the situation there.
    "The fact that he played cricket there shows normalcy has returned. Where is the fear psychosis being reported by the media," he asked.
    Asked in a lighter vein about the Governor getting bowled out on the first ball, Yechury remarked "those who do not know (how to play), should not try it."
    A Few Desperate and Concerned Questions
    By Ashok Mitra. Translated by Debarshi Das, Sanhati
    http://sanhati.com/front-page/542/
    This article appeared on 18th April, 2007 in the Anandabazar Patrika
    Thousands and thousands of faceless, ordinary people; crossing thousands and touching lakhs even. The heart of the Left movement in West Bengal lies in these ordinary folks. They have been witness to several episodes of history. Slowly and gradually, over the span of last half century they have welcomed and embraced the communist party, “Come to my abode mother, and stay here forever.” Mother-like communist party has provided them with fearlessness and courage, has assured them in the darkest hours, “Unite. Speak up against atrocities and injustice with a united vow. The society will change, you yourselves will change it. Your united strength is the strength of the party, which makes our movement all conquering.”
    This particular history has its origin in the beginning of the decade of forties of last century. Before the raw wounds of great famine could be healed, came partition. Countless refugees who had lost everything flocked to West Bengal. There was unprecedented price rise of commodities. Valiant tales of Tebhaga movement were coming from villages. In village after village share croppers, farm labourers, their womenfolk who laboured till the last drop of sweat and could not get bellyful of food, were fired up with the heroic sacrifice of Ahalya Ma . In Kolkata and its suburbs, the middle and lower middle class, battle-weary in life’s struggle, were uniting fast. In the factories workers were fighting to protect their jobs. Students were on the streets demanding extension of right to education. The teachers demanded living with dignity, they joined the march too. Neither were the governmental, non-governmental workers left behind, their protest language was getting sharper by the day. Joining all of them were the recently arrived batches of refugees from East Bengal, uprooted and desperate.
    An avalanche commenced from that time on among the rural and urban populace. A large section of the state’s people’s embraced the communist party. Their conviction did not know any doubt. The communist party taught them, social injustice can be resisted through love. Get together, be prepared, change is bound to come – political change, and social change with it. But this change of tide will not happen automatically. It is not easy to unite and achieve one’s goal. Political, economic and social problems will have to be understood with ample patience. Those who are not with us at present will have to be convinced – with due humility, with a peaceful temperament. Then we shall overcome someday.
    Gradually, decade by decade, the appeal reached every house of West Bengal. People’s support for the communist party saw a high tide. Many of the participants of this mass, who feel proud to call themselves the sons and daughters of the communist party, are not members of the party. Many a time they are not even directly connected with the mass organisations of the party. And yet they are the real pillars of the party. The communist party (whatever be its formal name) is enjoying the administrative power of the state because of their intense loyalty. Communist movement cannot move a single step in this state by solely depending on the organisational talent, and ignoring this vast and wide communist surrounding. Even Marx had acknowledged with high regard the historical role of the communist surrounding in a society. Ignoring this surrounding is tantamount to losing one’s compass and blundering along in blind alleys. While entering the Writers’ Building in 1977 the chief captain of the Left Front had announced that, not by sitting in this red building, but by being one with the people and abiding by its directions every administrative policy and programme of the Left Front government would be decided. His gesture was towards this communist surrounding: please rest assured, the Front government would not take a step without your counsel and advice.
    The incidents of the last few months have put the proud with tradition communist surrounding to greatest danger. People in the surrounding are not able to relate their dreams with the cruel reality. Those who used to spread newspaper sheets on the Maidan grass and get mesmerised by exhorting speeches of Bankim Mukhopadhyay, Jyoti Basu, Harekrishan Konar are troubled, restless and flabbergasted. There were promises made by the Left Front government to provide succour to the poorest, even while keeping within the constitution of India. In spite of the administrative, legal, economic hurdles – there was a strong promise that these measures were to be presented to the rest of India as a pattern of an alternative programme. And this was to move the spellbound and inspired millions under shadow of the red flag. Why this promise was withdrawn, since when was it withdrawn: the leaders of the party did not feel the need to explain to the sons and daughters of the party. Why they did not explain: this question is internally troubling the communist surrounding. Since they are not able to understand, they not able to explain it to others. Their soul is wounded with thousands of questions. And yet it seems that the responsibility to answer the questions is being evaded. As if, the leadership does not deem it fit to waste time in answering these insignificant, worthless questions.
    End of Agricultural Potential?
    But the rustic and ignorant peasants are really at a loss. The land they had captured under the bold leadership of the party, the land over which the middle tenant farmers had achieved due rights after implementation of land reforms act, the land which had met their food needs – why should the government hand over that land to the capitalists under a dictatorial British act? Have all the potentials for improving agricultural productivity been exhausted? Why were no efforts made to improve agricultural productivity through co-operatives? Why were the least attempts not made to encourage co-operative initiatives even in buying of tilling implements and sale of farm products? Could not experiments of joint-farming be done as they have been done in Kerala? Twenty five years ago a committee appointed by the Reserve Bank of India recommended some steps to overhaul the irrigation system of East India. If they had been implemented agricultural production rate in Bengal would have increased many more times. Why didn’t the Left Front government show any interest in them? Who would unveil that mystery?
    The biggest question of all: is taking refugee behind the capitalists the only way to achieve industrialisation? If for a second, if for the sake of argument we agree (clearly a large section of the farmers would not concur), the questions will remain relentless. Why wouldn’t the government itself take the initiative in setting up industries? The party has kept up its fight against privatisation of nationalised industries at the Centre. Why wouldn’t the government, loyal to that party in every sense of the term, come forward to set up industries? There is no dearth of talents in the state. Most modern and adequate technology can be purchased from the market. Getting finance for investment is not a stumbling block. Different financial institutions under the Centre are lording over billions of rupees. The same money is used for gambling in the stock markets, the same money is utilised by private masters to extend their empire. The Central Government which owes its existence to the Left support could have been pressurised into allocating fifteen to twenty thousand crores of rupees each year for West Bengal. The Centre could be unabashedly supplicated for additional forces in order to counter the poor cow smuggler of Bangladesh. Why so much hesitation in demanding money for setting up industries? The communist surrounding would continue posing such questions to party leaders. “We have won 235 seats in the state assembly, we are not bound to answer these questions:” such logic is disastrous.
    Therefore, beyond everything, there is the question of culture, of humanity. Muzaffar Ahmed, Ganesh Ghosh, Binay Choudhury, Modammad Abdullah Rasul have repeated this point in numerous nuances – and have constantly tried to establish through examples of their own lives – the gist is the following: the communist leaders and workers must be gentle, they must be humble, they must remain tolerant in extremely adverse circumstances. Here is where the problem lies. The Left Front is in the government for the last thirty years. Naturally, plenty of opportunists and sycophants have made themselves intimate to the main ruling party. If the tide turns, or if there is an indication that it will, they would have a change of heart and would vanish from the scene. But those who are in the communist surrounding, have been there through thick and thin. They would remain so in the time of deepest trouble of the party. The party may turn its face from them; their loyalty to the party would not diminish a bit. When the party falters, it is they who have to answer for it. In markets and streets it is they who confront the critics. Why so much arrogance even in admitting that much intolerance and immodesty has seeped into the party and party’s running of the government? When the leadership with an unrepentant, brazen gesture takes the entire responsibility of the mistake on its shoulders, it reminds one of that line from a Bengali poem, “When peace roars like a lion, we fear it.”
    There is no alternative but to accept the framework of competitive democracy. It is being said that there is no alternative but to bribe a particular industrial group of thousands of crores of rupees to set up a car manufacturing factory in the state. Otherwise they would take their business to the poorer state of Uttarakhand. Trouble is, competitive democracy cuts both ways. All the follies of the ruling party would be capitalised by the opposition, as they are doing so in Singur and Nandigram. Those who are so vocal against the ruling party do not exactly have halos around their heads. But in this pandemonium who cares for such niceties! The onus therefore falls on those who are in the surrounding of the ruling party and are trying their best to protect the image of the party. Responsibilities of rigidity of the leaders, use of unclean language, don’t-give-a-damn-to-anyone attitude are borne by them.
    We Know It Very Well
    They will never alienate themselves from the party. Unflinchingly they would keep on ignoring the welcoming gesture from the enemy camp. They would only hope that the party and the government would not avoid a few very important questions. We know the history of the last fifteen years very well. National output had had a tremendous rise, capitalists have built mountains out of profits, but employment has not risen. The little rise there was, was in the public sector. In private sector employment has in fact gone down. On what basis therefore is the party leadership claiming that unemployment problems would be mitigated if West Bengal is handed over to domestic and foreign capitalists? Undoubtedly, about eight decades ago, in Soviet Russia farmers were evicted from vast fields in the interest of industrialisation. But those who were evicted were big landlords and the rich kulaks. The land that was captured from them was used to build large nationalised farms, which raised agricultural production by huge amounts thus supplying raw materials to industries and providing food to workers employed in industries. And in West Bengal today the initiative that is on has the target to cleanse small peasants, share croppers and agricultural labourers and give away the land to giant industrialists.
    If anyone declines to answer these questions, they would not evaporate into thin air. I fear one day they may, all of a sudden, catch fire.
    * Ahalya Ma, was a martyr of the Tebhaga movement in South Bengal

  • Chengara, Kerala - land grab, Adivasis, and peasant struggle - A citizens’ report

    Chengara, Kerala - land grab, Adivasis, and peasant struggle - A citizens’ report
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
    Chengara, Kerala - land grab, Adivasis, and peasant struggle - A citizens’ report
    http://sanhati.com/articles/535/
    This is a report from a Solidarity Team which went to Chengara, Pathnamtitta district, Kerala, to investigate the struggle of Adivasis and Dalits, going on for the last four months (August - December, 2007). One more among the many struggles peasants all over India are engaged in to rightfully claim land or to defend their meagre land-holdings aginst the encrochment of big national or multinational capital. It is happening in states governed by “left” parties, as well as those ruled currently by the Congress or by BJP. The fundamental issue is the same, everywhere. Contact informaton for some of the members of the Solidarity Team could be provided, if requested.
    Click here for a compilation of mainstream media news items on Chengara [PDF, English, 400KB] »
    Hari Sharma for SANSAD. News items compiled by Greenyouth
    A Report on Chengara Land Struggle in Kerala - Peoples’ Movements Solidarity Team
    08 November 2007 to 11 November 2007
    Chengara speaks to India through the Chengara Pledge. It is the pledge of thousands of people, struggling for the last 120 days in Chengara Harrison Malayalam Estate, (also called as Laha Estate) seeking ownership of cultivable land to all 5,000 families there.
    Chengara Pledge: As Recited by Soumya Babu, an 11 Year old Girl who said she will go to school only after she gets land
    I love my country. I will try to learn about the Constitution and laws of my country. I will work for fulfilling the pristine objective of the Constitution. I will take part in the nation building process in my own way. I will not discriminate against any Indian on the basis of religion or caste. I understand us as owners of a great tradition as well as protectors of a great democracy.
    Country for the people (/Janangalkku Vendi Raashtram)/ People for the country /(Raashtrathuinuven di Janangal)/
    Land struggle in Chengara, Pathnamtitta district, Kerala by landless Dalits and Adviasis (as well as scores of families from OBC communities, Muslims etc) from all parts of Kerala, started on 4 August 2007. The movement is a fight to re-claim ownership of land that has been part of a long standing promise of the Government. At present nearly 5000 families, more than 20,000 people, have entered the Harrison Malayalam Private Ltd Estate, living in makeshift arrangements. The Chengara Land struggle demands permanent ownership of agricultural land through transfer of ownership from the Harrison Company to the Dalits and Adivasis. The Sadhu Jana Vimochana Samyuktha Vedi (SJVSV), the collective that leads the struggle, has opted for the land take-over as strategy remembering the tradition of the great leader Ayyankali, the militant dalit leader whose mission was to ensure liberation of dalits from various forms of slavery, right to agricultural land, as well as right to education in Kerala.
    The movement salutes Ayyankali and Ambedkar whose role in rights movements in Kerala is disproportionately highlighted in the modern social literature on Kerala. Raising the names of Ayyankali and Ambedkar as sources of inspiration is a political challenge to the mainstream political left parties. There is a widespread popular belief in Kerala that the official left were the sole forces which ensured rights to Dalits, including land rights. Such misrepresentations are now globalised through some academic works as well.
    The movement has till now survived attacks, threats, epidemics and hunger.
    The families have been staying there; facing threats from local communist party (Marxist) members as well as workers of the estate. The rubber trees in the estate have become too old for tapping. However the allegation is that the land struggle affects plantation activities. Harrison’s continued possession of land even after the land lease exhausted in 1996 itself is illegal. So is the case of immediate take over of land held in excess to the 1048 acres of land originally earmarked for Harrison Company. (According to laha Gopalan, President of the SJVSJ, the company got the land for lease for 99 years from a family to whom the local landlord had given for 34 years of lease for banana cultivation. This agreement was said to have been breeched when this family gave the land to the Harissons Company for 99 years.) The excess land occupied is expected to the tune of 6000 hectares
    The Sadhujana Vimochana Samyuktha Vedi (SJVSV) is a radical departure in people’s initiative to attain land rights. It exposes the socio-cultural reasons for landlessness among dalits and adivasis in Kerala. It says that 85% of the landless in Kerala are the Dalits, and Adviasis, who were also traditionally excluded from attaining wealth, power, titles and assets. Various governments set up by different coalitions failed to address this social reality and avoided to eradicate it as priority. The SJVSV says that dalits and adivasis live in extremely uninhabitable slum like situations in Kerala. According to SJVSV there are 12,500 dalit colonies and 4083 adivasi colonies where tens of thousands of families live with extreme lack of basic amenities - facing civil, political, economic and cultural rights violations.
    This condition - together with that of families living in temporary hutments, pavements, and the homeless - was excluded from Kerala’s social reality by the high tide of recent discussions on Kerala’s world renowned achievements in the field of social development. Landlessness continues after a poorly formulated land reform Act (implemented after fifteen years after its creation) was implemented in 1972. Public sphere in Kerala is abuzz with a misinformation that land question has been solved in Kerala, addressing the needs of the landless communities. The SJVSV says that dalits and adivasis could not benefit from the land reform of 1970s since its major focus was on conferring land to the tenants. In Kerala’s context the caste and cultural hierarchy, with strong oppressive segregation of these communities, did not allow them to be tenants; which is why many of them could not avail the benefits. Also, the lower rates of social membership, founding institutions etc. were essential factors which contributed to the concentration of distributed land (under the Land Reform Act) to some caste group which had developed these `abilities’. There was also the lack of a strong land rights movement from among the ranks of the dalits and adivasis.
    In the present day context, common resources including land are monopolized by corporate agencies in flagrant violation of principles like ‘public trust’. Policies and laws in the past decade enabled monopolies to own land while the previous mode of relationship was in possession of land for long lease with abysmally low royalties. This was done at a time when the state had a constitutional obligation of ensuring social justice to all marginalised communities through the principle of positive discrimination, while dalits and adivasis remained landless and oppressed. To explain the situation in Kerala’s context, it is important to see that in 1972 the State government had issued a government order allotting 1,43,000 acres of land to Tatas. In comparison with this the total land distributed to thousands of families as part of land reforms was only between 3 and 4 lakh acres (as per official figures in 1966, around 10 lakh acres of land was available for distribution) . Such facts clearly indicate where the state stands when it comes to identifying the nature of land question and link it with the principle of right to live with dignity for the the dalits and adivasis. The demand for meaningful and dignified survival with sufficient area of agricultural land for dalit, adivasi communities is to be understood in this context. Together with this there is a need to examine the official understanding on the area of land required for dalit and adivasis. The earlier land rights movements in the 1990s have described how the dalit adivasi families were forced to bury their beloved inside their houses in many places. Even such families are considered as landed in official records. It was also observed that many dalit, adivasi families live in plots of a cent (one cent is one-hundredth of an acre) which is much less than the U.N..Habitat estimates for healthy life in * Urban *environments. Considering that contiguity of homestead and agricultural land is an essential condition for agrarian communities in Kerala, seeking refuge under technical definition is equal to avoiding responsibilities. So the acute landlessness among dalits and adivasis becomes an immediate human rights concern in Kerala. Kerala’s land reform tells us how a state policy for land reforms overruled the objective of the Article 14 of the Indian Constitution through formulating eligibility stipulations disregarding the long standing socio-cultural segregations faced by the dalits and adivasis.
    Kerala was a land of unknown land struggles till the historic land agreement in 2001 October was signed between the protesting
    Dalits and Adivasis of Kerala and the State government. Since then dalit and adivasi land struggles in Kerala attained a new order of practice. First ever, large scale mass reclamation of land happened in Muthanga, which also proved that the state response to militant struggles for land rights leads to extreme forms of state violence in Kerala like in other states in India. While we write this we are still unable to decide what would be the state response to such struggles in Sonbhadra ( U.P.), Rewa (M.P.) Khammam (A.P.) Kodaikanal (T.N) and many other known and unknown places where the people who for generations have tilled the lands have fallen to the ire of the state. Coming back to the Chengara Land struggle since 4 August 2007, one of the core factors that influenced the making of the struggle was the unjustifiable delay in responding to the rights of these communities by the state, in honoring the understanding between the state and the dalit-adivasi combine on distribution of fertile land as an immediate measure. Dalits and Adivasis in India are united in their experience of high forms of land alienation as well as the permanent forceful displacement from their natural habitats. Chengara explains to the world a not-so-much discussed reality in Kerala. On the other side the land struggle that has passed over one hundred days and could face an eviction through an order from the Kerala High court.
    The people are facing continuous threat from the ruling left front activists - including one which is said to have appeared in the print media that the CITU proposed to evict the people engaged in the land struggle, if the police fail to do so. (Note: CITU is a trade union organization, affiliated to CPI-M.) Another critical question is how the present state government will approach the land struggle in the context of an response to the Kerala High Court which the Government needs to submit on the modalities of vacating people from Chengara estate. So the question become more of what a peoples government could do in such situations where rights movements of historically alienated and oppressed communities are in an organic struggle united to defend their human rights. Also, how the law of the land could adopt a new turn to defend the peoples demand rather than branding the struggles as mere illegal, violent and anti-state militancy.
    Another important factor is that how Chengara land struggle is understood in the Kerala society, considering the fact that the origin of this is connected to the historical struggle which Ayyankali had led in 1907 demanding cultivable land to landless dalits and adivasis, and also to the dalit land rights movement of 1990s. While encoding these historical influences as major factors, it is also clear that Chengara movement has espoused a new politics of defining rights and achieving them through direct action.
    *Why solidarity visit.*
    Chengara connects Kerala to the larger reality of land struggles across the world where landless oppressed have successfully mobilized to assert land rights. While the official, state version on these movements remained as anti-state consolidation for vested interests, such movements have realized land for people, whose generations never hand chance to own and cultivate land. Land rights movements in Brazil, many African countries and Australia have made such historic land marks. In India, as we see the right to own and preserve land as well as protect land from corporate and state-sponsored land acquisition led to death of hundreds of people, many who were killed still remain unknown. It is in this context, we see that state responses to peoples democratic rights to land become more aggressive.
    The Solidarity Team had following objectives:
    1. To assess the ground situation through exchanges with struggling people.
    2. To discuss the politics of land movements in other parts of the country.
    3. To facilitate solidarity for the Chengara movement outside Kerala.
    4. To present a report concerning the demands of the struggle, factors that led to the struggle, as well as responses towards it.
    The SJVSVS politics is based on few important interpretations of the national and local political and social processes in the last few decades. These processes, which the SJVSV believes have sustained the coercive and non coercive forms of exclusion faced by the dalits and adivasis in India. One of the prominent landmarks in this connection is the historic Pune Pact between Gandhi and Ambedkar, which the SJVSV believes, was coerced upon the dalit leadership in order to facilitate a fictious national trans-caste unity.
    *Background*
    The Chengara struggle got a lot of inspiration from the land struggles of 2001, led by a Dalit Adivasi combine. By 2001 land struggles in Kerala attained a new order of practice. First ever, large scale mass reclamation of land was marked in the history of peoples struggles. Muthanga firing in 2002 was an eye opener to the supporters of struggle movements in Kerala when it was shown that the state response to militant struggle for right to land could face extreme forms of state violence in Kerala. The chronology of events concerning the implementation of agreements reached between state and the land rights movement indicates:
    Chengara explains a land question spanned in colonial and post colonial era. The welfare-ist democratic state has failed to address the illegality involved in the transfer of the land to the Harrison’s or the illegal possession of land (raised by the descendant of the original owner of the land) as cited in the Kerala High Court Judgement on 24 September 2007 . Such situations indicate the need for immediate positive obligations from the state to provide fertile agricultural land in sufficient quantities, which the families in struggle could use as asset as well as means of survival.
    For any one who believes that the true function of social engagement is to expose realities and opening avenues for natural justice and Human Rights of oppressed sections, Chengara has many things to offer. At a time when the state Chief Minister has come out with an idea of second land reforms, it is important to see how the people of Kerala, the opinion makers and leaders perceive the demands raised by the Chengara movement.
    The following are the observations of the Solidarity Team on what a government, with intention to defend Human Rights of oppressed communities, could do in the context of Chengara Struggle.
    * No bloodshed is the first demand from all those who support the movement. This demand is very important since we have seen what land rights movements in various parts in Kerala have faced with state and non-state violence where people were killed and injured.
    * Withdraw all cases against activists of the SJVSJ. The police and district administration should examine the matters regarding atrocities against the dalits and adivasis considering the interpretations of atrocity as laid down in the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act.
    * Stop official as well as media projections of the movement as extremist and illegal. Rather the state and civil society of Kerala should declare solidarity and support to the movement so that Dalits and adivasis are freed of the historical injustice faced through generations. This is important and possible though meaningful dialogues between the communities in struggle and the state.
    * Accepting the movement as a peoples movement is key to this. Such being the case there must be a halt to the efforts by the police, in the main, to portray the movement as a law and order problem. From experiences around India, such branding of peoples resistance for right to reclaim and protect land have been used as alibis for indiscriminate use of force to suppress movements.
    * Since 4 August 2007, the arrests or illegal detentions are common in the area near the estate. Such acts indicate gross human rights violations including freedom of movement and freedom of assembly. Such acts of illegal detention are also alleged to be done by aggressive local cadre of the ruling party (CPI-M) misusing state power to suppress peoples movement. Subtle social boycott and denying freedom of movement result in loss of work and access to essential services for the already impoverished
    families, who are thus are facing great threat. All forms of violence result to threat to life and livelihoods and so this has to be stopped at the earliest.
    * In the past, due to absence of strong articulations of landless and marrginalised people about their right to own land, the state was adopting a go slow attitude to the needs. Considering that land ownership is key for all communities in Kerala to attain versatile economic and social potentials, such opportunity should be provided to the dalits and adivasis in a way they wish to materialise it.
    * Considering that the movement has come up in the context of repeated indifference from various governments; the solutions should be urgent, and must consider that the right to land is a human right to marginalised communities.
    * Land rights movements like Chengara are suggesting methods for meaningful elimination of landlessness. Chengara movement, quoting from the authentic data from the state as well as reputed agencies, says that there is enough land to be distributed to the landless. Such scientific options should be at the core when deciding on solutions, rather which adopting a charity or welfare approach.
    * Dalits and adivasis are the people living in harmony with the land, instead of an exploitative relationship. So it becomes the natural right of these communities to have possession of the lands since they were the people who always oriented their lives in a symbiotic relationship with the land.
    * Landlessness among dalits and tribals is the highest among all social groups in Kerala according to a study by the Kerala Shastra Sahitya Parishad (KSSP). Average land possession by Dalit families’ is 0.43 acres as against the state average of 0.86 acres. Reading this in the backdrop of social and cultural segregations, it is the duty of a democratic government to accept land rights by these communities as inalienable rights.
    * Delay in ensuring fertile land in sufficient quantity must be looked upon as a practice of segregation and discrimination against these historically suppressed communities.
    Solidarity Team Members
    Bijulal M.V., Human Rights and Law Unit, Indian Social Institute. Co-Convener, Delhi Support Group for people’s movements.
    Ashok Chaudhury, National Federation of Forest People and Forest workers. Forest Rights Campaigner and Organiser, Uttar Pradesh.
    Prakash Louis, Director, Bihar Social Institute, works on Peasant Question in Bihar and Dalit Rights
    Roma, Kaimur Kisan Mazdoor Mahila Sangharsh Samiti Activist. Working with people’s movement for land rights in Uttar Pradesh & Madhya Pradesh.
    Shanta Bhattacharya, Kaimur Kisan Mazdoor Mahila Sangharsh Samiti Activist. Working with people’s movement for land rights in Uttar Pradesh & Madhya Pradesh.
    Vijayan MJ, Coordinator, Delhi Forum, New Delhi,

  • Priyanka Todi breaks her silence!

    Priyanka Todi breaks her silence!

    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com
    Poised and calm, life at standstill
    Life for Priyanka Todi has come to a standstill, as she herself told The Telegraph at the end of the interview.
    Confined to her CG-235 home in Salt Lake, the 23-year-old now spends every day dreading the next time her family’s name will figure prominently in the probe into the mysterious death of Rizwanur Rahman.
    Normality remains a distant dream for this girl-next-door. But she is poised and calm, with a quiet strength that has helped her face the crisis.
    She displays a natural clarity of thought, but there are times when she appears lonely and lost.
    The young Aquarian has gone through more in the past three months than most do in a lifetime.
    All she wants now is the truth about her husband’s death to come out.
    I really regret involving Rukbanur and Pappu
    - Priyanka Todi breaks her silence
    SUMIT DAS GUPTA AND DEVADEEP PUROHIT
    The Telegraph Interview
    http://www.telegraphindia.com/1071208/asp/frontpage/story_8644420.asp
    Priyanka Todi breaks her silence in an interview to The Telegraph. She speaks about Rizwanur, the two persons whom she regrets having involved in the matter, and her wait for the truth.
    Q: Why did you marry Rizwanur?
    A: Because I loved him.
    Q: Were you aware of the step you were taking?
    A: Yes, I was aware. We knew what we had to face but I was sure we could convince my family to accept our marriage.
    Q: How were you so sure?
    A: Because I knew my family loved me and wanted me to be happy. I was convinced that once they realised that we loved each other, they would accept it.
    Q: Why did you leave home like that instead of trying to explain to your parents?
    A: Looking back, that is one of the things I regret — I made a mistake by not getting my family to meet Rizwanur and get to know him better before marriage. Because of all that happened after August 31 (the day Priyanka left home), my family judged Rizwanur by some of the people who surrounded him. But Rizwanur was very different from them all. But who would have thought that things would take such a turn….
    Q: Were you under any threat from anyone?
    A: No, we weren’t under any threat.
    Q: Then why did you sign those letters (mentioning her father Ashok Todi) about a potential threat?
    A: My mind was a blank… I was just signing whatever letters Rizwan was telling me to sign. I once told him we shouldn’t mention my father, but he said Pappu and Rukbanur had insisted that we frame the letters like that and they knew best. It was only when Rukbanur and Pappu tried to get us to sign a third letter that both Rizwan and I refused, saying we would not sign any more letters.
    Q: What was Pappu’s role?
    A: He was a kind of godfather to Rukbanur, a friend and an adviser. Rukbanur first took Rizwan and then Rizwan and me to Pappu’s office. Pappu said he had very good contacts with senior police officials and he knew exactly how to handle the matter. He said: “Just do what I say and you will be fine. Only make sure my name must never be revealed.” We followed Pappu’s instructions, conveyed through Rukbanur.
    Q: Was the relationship between Rizwan and Rukbanur strained?
    A: Rizwan was not close to his brother. They had some fundamental differences, which I don’t want to go into. But after the marriage, Rukbanur was always with us and so we trusted him blindly. From August 31, he moved into 7B Tiljala Lane with his family (Rukbanur and family live in a flat on CIT Road).
    Q: Was he constantly in touch with Pappu?
    A: He was our link with Pappu. He would go and meet Pappu and when he came back home, he would either be confident and relaxed or tense and agitated.
    Q: We have learnt that Rizwanur and Rukbanur had a showdown on the night of September 19….
    A: Much later I learnt that on September 19, Pappu had demanded and taken money from my uncle to make Rizwan sign divorce papers. And that on the night of September 19, Rukbanur had turned against Rizwanur and tried to force him to sign the divorce papers….
    Q: Have you been following Rukbanur’s statements after September 21?
    After Rizwan’s death, some of the false statements that Rukbanur has made about me and in my name have really shocked and saddened me. The manner in which my personal belongings were displayed to the media also hurt me deeply.
    Q: Looking back…
    A: The one thing I really regret now is involving Rukbanur and Pappu in the matter. Rizwan and I should have resolved the differences with my family by ourselves. If Pappu and Rukbanur had not been involved, things would not have come to such a pass, things would not have ended in such tragedy.
    Q: What happened on September 8?
    A: Two things happened that day that struck Rizwan and me as odd. First, Rukbanur’s wife and children left Tiljala Lane for their CIT Road home. I tried to persuade them to stay back but Rukbanur said space was becoming a problem at the Tiljala Lane house. Then, Pappu refused to accompany us to Lalbazar that day. We both asked him to come with us, but he said he was busy.
    I was determined to go and see my father, who was not well, and I told Rizwan that. We were joined by Rukbanur, who made a few calls, and then said that a bond should be signed to ensure my return within seven days. I left for home.
    Q: What did your father tell you on your return?
    A: He said we should give the matter some time. That would enable my sister and a cousin brother to get married. That would also enable my family to run a check on Rizwanur, like any family would run before getting their daughter married. And the wait would prove to my family whether Rizwan was really in love with me. I agreed.
    Q: What did you tell Rizwanur when you spoke to him from Tiruppur on September 11?
    A: I told him everything would be all right but he would have to wait for me. “Will you wait for me? How long?” I asked him. “A lifetime,” he said.
    Q: Why did you not speak to him after that?
    A: I was waiting for things to settle down and things were settling down. I felt that matters had been resolved during the conversation I had with Rizwan — I told him I needed time and he told me he was willing to wait.
    Also, I was a little confused after speaking to Rizwan’s ex-girlfriend (I do not want to name her because no one knows more than me now how negative publicity can ruin lives and families) as she told me “you should think again”….
    Q: Do you have any insight into what happened on September 21?
    A: I have no idea how Rizwan died. I don’t even want to think what might have happened on that dreadful day… But circumstances leading to his death seem to suggest that he must have been deeply disturbed by some things that had happened between September 19 and 21.
    Q: Why?
    A: Rizwan himself has stated, in the letter he wrote to the APDR (Association for Protection of Democratic Rights), that no harm had been done to him, either physically or through threats, till September 19. What happened between 19 and 21 that drove him to such despair?
    There are a few questions about September 21 that also haunt me — why did he not call or SMS Rukbanur or any of his family members on September 21, when he was calling and messaging so many other people? Why is it that only Sujato Bhadra of APDR is saying that Rizwan had fixed an appointment with him that afternoon?
    Q: What do you want from the investigations?
    A: I just want to know the truth. The truth must come out.
    Q: What will you do next?
    A: I cannot think of anything. Life has come to a standstill.

  • [issuesonline_worldwide] Punjab holds the key to peace

    [issuesonline_worldwide] Punjab holds the key to peace
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Apolitical bodies rake up Nandigram issue in Punjab
    Chandigarh : Several representatives owing allegiance to various apolitical organisations are touring Punjab to highlight the plight and repression of West Bengal Government against the residents of Nandigram.
    Addressing a joint press conference here, the representatives said that they would be holding meetings at various places of Punjab, including Patiala, Sangrur, Mansa and Moga till December 11 to "expose" the alleged pro-liberal, pro-imperialist and anti-people nature of the CPI(M) government in West Bengal.
    Terming the West Bengal Government's propaganda against them as "incorrect", they sought support from all sections of people of Punjab, including radical organisations like Dal Khalsa.
    They said that the alliance of Trinamool with the Maoists is "obnoxious" as Bhumi Uchhed Pratirodh Committee (BUPC) comprised of several political forces including parts of the CPI(M).
    "The government has named people as Maoists who are actually either Trinamool leaders or ordinary villagers or students who came to help people in Nandigram," they said. The representatives included Deboleena (Matangini Mahila Samiti,West Bengal), Gauranga Mondal (Bhumi Uchhed Pratorodh Committee, Nandigram), Jharna Giri (Matangini Mahila Samiti, Nandigram), Krishna Mondal (Matangini Mahila Samiti), Raja Sarkhel (Peoples Democratic Front of India) and Darshan Pal (Peoples Democratic Front of India).
    Punjab holds the key to peace
    (http://www.apnaorg. com/articles/ news-18/
    ------------
    http://www.apnaorg. com
    is a wonderful, a real punjabi website where you will
    find both Punjabs are breathing together; B.S.Goraya
    Moderator)
    ------------ ----
    Ishtiaq Ahmed
    Daily News: Saturday, February 10, 2007
    The year 2007 marks the 60th anniversary of the bloody
    partition of the two key provinces of Bengal and
    Punjab as well as of India. In a series of forthcoming
    articles I shall from time to time review different
    aspects of that cataclysmal event. My special focus
    will be on the Punjab.
    Some people suggest that the Cabinet Mission Plan of
    May 16, 1946, was the best solution to the communal
    tangle of the subcontinent. Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali
    Jinnah accepted it but it was rejected by the
    Congress. Therefore the Congress Party bears the main
    responsibility for the division of India.
    From the Indian side, one hears that the Cabinet
    Mission Plan would have resulted in the balkanisation
    of India, and probably brought the India-Pakistan
    border nearer Ambala or Delhi than where it is now. By
    entering into treaties with princes and other
    supporters of the Raj the British would never have
    left. Therefore a partitioned India was better than a
    balkanised India.
    It is my firm belief that even if India was to be
    partitioned, had it happened in an orderly manner the
    politics of this region would not have so easily
    become hostage to chauvinism and jingoism externally,
    and religious and sectarian terrorism internally. What
    happened subsequently in the two Punjabs is
    particularly instructive.
    In the Pakistani Punjab, Muslim religious identity
    proved brittle. The idea of a Muslim, rather than a
    Pakistani nation, began to dominate the debate on
    national identity soon after Jinnah died. It
    inevitably resulted in the rather intractable
    controversy over who is a proper Muslim. The year 1953
    brought the first manifestation of the
    sectarianisation of Muslim identity as riots were
    directed by the religious parties and sections of the
    Muslim League against the heterodox Ahmadiyya
    community. Later, during the 1980s, Sunni and Shia
    militias began to fight each other. Recently Sunni
    sub-sects have been involved in vicious attacks upon
    each other.
    In the Indian Punjab Sikh and Hindu leaders, who had
    closed ranks against the Muslims in 1947 now clashed
    over domination in the province. Although in 1956 the
    former princely states of Patiala, Faridkot,
    Kapurthala, Nabha, Jind and other minor ones were
    amalgamated into East Punjab, it did not satisfy the
    Sikh leaders of the Akali Dal who began to campaign
    for a compact Punjabi-speaking province in which
    Punjabi written in the Gurmukhi script would be the
    official language and the medium of instruction in
    schools and higher seats of learning.
    In reaction, Punjabi Hindus, under the influence of
    various communal parties as well as the Congress
    Party, declared Hindi and not Punjabi as their mother
    tongue. This resulted in the Punjabi Suba agitation
    launched by Master Tara Singh and later Sardar Fateh
    Singh. In 1966 Prime Minister Indira Gandhi conceded
    the demand of the Sikhs. Accordingly only
    Punjabi-speaking areas remained in East Punjab while
    those areas in which Hindi was the main language were
    awarded to Haryana or to Himachal Pradesh.
    Such redrawing of borders did not, however, satisfy
    some Sikh nationalists who launched the Khalistan
    movement in the hope of establishing an independent
    Sikh state. The Indian state reacted with all the
    might at its disposal and between June 1984 and the
    early 1990s the Khalistanis and the Indian police and
    security forces were embroiled in terrorism against
    each other which resulted in the deaths of more than
    60,000 people and led directly to Indira Gandhi's
    assassination.
    Notwithstanding all this the ordinary people in both
    Punjabs have all along managed to live peacefully with
    one another. In fact things have improved very much in
    East Punjab and in Pakistan's Punjab too sectarian
    terrorism seems to have lessened; the recent peaceful
    passing off of the Muharram Ashura event is a good
    sign.
    It is my firm belief that extremists and terrorists
    cannot survive for long if the government is
    determined to eliminate them. Therefore, without the
    connivance and protection of state functionaries
    extremism and terrorism have no future. This is an
    iron law of large-scale ethnic, religious and
    sectarian conflicts and we should always bare that in
    mind.
    Each time the Punjabis have had an opportunity to meet
    they have shown keen interest in the fellows from the
    other side. Already in 1948 the citizens of Lahore and
    Amritsar sent peace delegations to each other and the
    reception was warm and friendly despite the very
    recent bloodshed that took place in those two cities.
    In 1955 the Pakistan High Commissioner to India, Raja
    Ghazanfar Ali Khan, allowed East Punjabis to visit
    West Punjab during an India-Pakistan cricket match at
    Lahore. On that occasion West Punjabis e showed the
    visitors such warm hospitality that the bloody riots
    of only a few years earlier seemed a nightmare. From
    my various interviews with refugees who have visited
    the other side of the border, it comes out very
    clearly that they have been received with great warmth
    and affection.
    The moral which I draw from these varied behaviour
    patterns is the following: there is no fixed or
    permanent identity nor love or hatred among human
    beings: it all depends on the circumstances and the
    role of politicians.
    Tridivesh Singh Maini is a young Sikh academic who
    lives in Delhi. I know his parents and even
    grandparents. His maternal grandfather, Brigadier
    Chaudhry, was a member of the Punjab Boundary Force.
    He saw to it that the Muslim Meo population of 11
    villages from East Punjab safely reached Pakistan. I
    will soon have evidence from a Pakistani Lt-General
    who also served on the Punjab Boundary Force. He too
    did his duty with honour when he helped Hindus and
    Sikhs cross the border safely into India.
    Tridivesh wants us to look forward. He has produced a
    most timely book, South Asian Cooperation and the Role
    of the Two Punjabs (New Delhi: Siddharth Publications,
    2007) in which he develops a very persuasive argument,
    backed by solid economic and social data and cultural
    arguments, to show that peace and prosperity in the
    South Asian subcontinent is an imperative that we
    cannot anymore ignore with impunity.
    He asserts correctly that reconciliation between
    Indian and Pakistani Punjab is the key to enduring
    peace in South Asia. He has spoken to leading scholars
    of India-Pakistan relations, politicians, journalists,
    writers, poets and the result is a very representative
    presentation of well-informed expert and public
    opinion. More such books are needed.
    The writer is an associate professor at the Department
    of Political Science at Stockholm University in
    Sweden. Email: ishtiaq.ahmed@ statsvet. su.se

  • EU and NATO to keep pressure on Iran despite US report

    EU and NATO to keep pressure on Iran despite US report
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
    Bolton says U.S. intel report on Iran was political
    Reuters - 17 minutes ago
    BERLIN (Reuters) - U.S. intelligence services were seeking to influence political policy-making with their assessment Iran had halted its nuclear arms programme in 2003, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton said.
    Iran drops dollar from oil deals: report
    TEHRAN (AFP) - Major crude producer Iran has completely stopped carrying out its oil transactions in dollars, Oil Minister Gholam Hossein Nozari said on Saturday, labelling the greenback an "unreliable" currency.
    "At the moment, selling oil in dollars has been completely halted, in line with the policy of selling crude in non-dollar currencies," Nozari was quoted as saying by the ISNA news agency.
    "The dollar is an unreliable currency, considering its devaluation and the oil exporters' losses," he added.
    The world's fourth largest oil exporter, Iran has massively reduced its dependence on the dollar over the past year in the face of US pressures on its financial system and the fall in the dollar.
    Nozari did not specify in which currencies Iran was now being paid. In the past, officials have said most oil income was in euros, with a significant percentage in yen.
    Japan, which purchases 20 percent of Iran's crude oil, has recently agreed to pay for the crude oil in yen, officials have said. The UAE dirham has also been mooted as a possible payment currency.
    Iran has in the past months been whittling down the proportion of dollars in its oil revenue income. Officials in October said that dollars accounted for only 15 percent of payments and predicted the amount would fall to zero.
    However, the oil income is still being booked in dollars.
    The United States has in recent months successfully encouraged major European and Asian banks to cut their dealings with Iran in a bid to make the Islamic republic give way on its controversial nuclear programme.
    Washington has also blacklisted major Iranian banks for alleged support of terrorism and seeking nuclear weapons, charges denied by Tehran.
    Iran has also reduced its dollar assets held in foreign banks and urged OPEC to take collective action to price oil in other currencies such as the euro, instead of the US currency which is used across the world at present.
    The fall of the dollar, which has weakened considerably against the euro and other currencies in the past 12 months, has affected the revenues of OPEC members because most of them price and sell their oil exports in the US currency.

    EU and Africa open summit
    By Ingrid Melander Reuters - 11 minutes agoLISBON (Reuters) - Leaders from the European Union and Africa met on Saturday to forge a new strategic partnership at their first summit in seven years, marred by unease over the presence of Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe.
    Pressured by China's growing investment and influence in Africa, the Europeans aim to agree an ambitious action plan with the world's poorest continent to revitalise trade -- but also to improve cooperation in areas like immigration and peacekeeping.
    Portuguese Prime Minister Jose Socrates said history had "thrown down the gauntlet and challenged us to work together to write together a completely new page in the relationship between Europe and Africa."
    Even before the summit started, differences over getting new trade deals in place and over the attendance of Mugabe -- accused by the West of ruling like a dictator and wrecking his country's economy -- clouded the atmosphere in Lisbon.
    Prime Minister Gordon Brown is boycotting the summit because of Mugabe's presence, depriving the weekend meeting of high-level representation from a major former colonial power in Africa. Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek also stayed away.
    The issue of Mugabe, seen by many in Africa as an independence hero, has underlined the difficult relationship between Africa and the former colonial powers, some of whom gave up control only a few decades ago.
    "The real significance of this summit must be to lay the foundations of a new partnership based on mutual respect," said John Kufuor, president of Ghana and current chairman of the African Union.
    He said meetings like this would help to break and move away from a painful past relationship that included slavery, colonial rule and apartheid. "Europe needs Africa as much as Africa needs Europe."
    The call for a fresh start comes at a time when many African countries' economies are growing more rapidly than in several decades, thanks to a commodities-fuelled boom.
    CHINESE INVESTMENT
    Massive investment by China in Africa in recent years, as Beijing secures raw materials to feed its own booming economy, has added to confidence on the continent and prompted concerns in Europe that it is losing out on opportunities.
    Some African states welcome Chinese economic involvement partly because it comes without the calls for recognition of human rights that accompany European trade and aid deals.
    "We don't want any paternalism," Moroccan President El Fassi Abbas told reporters as he entered the summit.
    The last time leaders convened at this high level was in 2000 in Egypt and host Portugal, which holds the rotating EU presidency, has said it was a historic mistake not to have had a high-level dialogue between the EU and Africa since then.
    "The very fact it's the first summit in seven years between a re-organised African Union and an enlarged Europe -- that's 90 percent of the achievement," one European diplomat said.
    Human rights and aid groups are pressing leaders to talk less and do more to help end festering conflicts like the one in Sudan's western Darfur region, and reduce poverty across Africa.
    The UK charity Save the Children said that almost all the two continents' states were failing on past commitments to dedicate a certain level of spending to aid and healthcare.
    "Almost five million children under the age of five die each year in sub-Saharan Africa," said Martin Kirk, Save the Children's Head of Campaigns and Advocacy.
    "The only way for millions more children to grow up healthy is for all governments to fulfil their promises to increase health funding, so that essential basic healthcare reaches the poorest children in the poorest communities," he added.
    African and European leaders are at odds over the EU's insistence that African states sign new Economic Partnership Agreements by December 31 before the expiry of a World Trade Organization waiver of current preferential treatment.
    Some African nations have complained they will face too much competition and are being strong-armed into signing new deals.
    "We can't be forced into a straitjacket, it doesn't work like that," Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade said in an interview with French television.
    (Additional reporting by Ruben Bicho, Pascal Fletcher, Angelika Stricker, Henrique Almeida; writing by Axel Bugge, editing by Tim Pearce)

    By Francois Murphy Reuters - Thursday, December 6 11:39 pmPARIS (Reuters) - Germany and France said on Thursday Iran's nuclear programme was still a threat and the search for more U.N. sanctions should go on despite a U.S. intelligence report that Tehran was no longer trying to build an atomic bomb.
    (Advertisement)
    EU and NATO foreign ministers, meeting for separate talks in Brussels, agreed there was no reason to change their position of threatening sanctions against Iran over its nuclear programme, Belgian Foreign Affairs Minister Karel de Gucht said.
    Speaking at a joint news conference with French President Nicolas Sarkozy in Paris, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said the existing dual track policy of preparing sanctions against Tehran while leaving the door open to negotiations should go on.
    "I think that we are in a process and that Iran still poses a threat," Merkel said, adding that talks between EU mediator Javier Solana and Iran's top nuclear negotiator should continue.
    Sarkozy said he fully agreed with Merkel, adding: "What has made Iran move until now is sanctions and firmness."
    The U.S. National Intelligence Estimate published on Monday said Iran had stopped its nuclear weapons programme four years ago. It said Iran was continuing to develop the technical means that could be applied to producing weapons.
    The report appears likely to increase resistance from Russia and China to U.S. demands for a third round of United Nations sanctions against Iran over its atomic programme.
    Russia has said the report is a factor that will be taken into account in negotiations over sanctions, and the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, Mohamed ElBaradei, said the NIE report "somewhat vindicated" Iran.
    U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, in Brussels for meetings with NATO ministers, urged Russia to help maintain pressure on Iran.
    EU, NATO CONSENSUS
    Belgium's De Gucht said there was consensus among EU and NATO foreign ministers to keep the two-pronged approach in place.
    He said Iran's work on uranium enrichment made no sense unless it was part of a plan to produce nuclear weapons. De Gucht said it did not mean Iran had decided to make nuclear arms, but once it had fissile material, it could be done in a reasonable amount of time.
    Because of international concerns that Iran is secretly pursuing nuclear weapons, the U.N. Security Council has imposed two rounds of sanctions against Tehran and demanded that it halt uranium enrichment, a process that can produce fuel for power plants or, potentially, atom bombs.
    Iran says it only wants to generate electricity and has a national right to uranium enrichment.
    Washington has said it would keep pushing for a third round of sanctions.
    U.S. deputy director of National Intelligence, Donald Kerr, told Congress on Thursday that Iran retained capabilities despite having frozen weapons development in 2003, and there was reason to believe Iran still wanted an ability to make nuclear weapons.
    (Additional reporting by Elizabeth Pineau in Paris, David Brunnstrom and Sue Pleming in Brussels and Randall Mikkelsen in Washington; Editing by Caroline Drees)
    US Defence Secretary sees Iran as threat to US and MideastBy Daphne Benoit AFP - 1 hour 27 minutes agoMANAMA (AFP) - US Defence Secretary Robert Gates on Saturday said Iran's foreign policy was a threat to the United States, the Middle East and all countries within range of missiles which he said Tehran was developing.
    (Advertisement)
    "There can be little doubt that their destabilising foreign policies are a threat to the interests of the United States, to the interests of every country in the Middle East, and to the interests of all countries within the range of the ballistic missiles Iran is developing," Gates told delegates at a conference on regional security in the Bahraini capital, Manama.
    He claimed that Iran was also "funding and training" militias in Iraq and supporting what he called "terrorist organisations" such as Lebanon's Shiite movement Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas.
    Iran has consistently denied funding and training militias in Iraq.
    Gates charged that Tehran was developing "medium-range ballistic missiles that are not particularly cost-effective unless equipped with warheads carrying weapons of mass destruction."
    His accusations came five days after the publication of the US National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), which said that Iran halted a secret nuclear weapons programme four years ago -- a conclusion at odds with Washington's accusations of recent years.
    Gates conceded the timing of the report was not ideal. "The estimate fairly has come at a wrong time, it has annoyed a number of our good friends and confused a number of people," he told delegates.
    Suspicions about Iran's nuclear activities, which have particularly alarmed America's key regional ally Israel, have been a key driver behind the tough US approach towards Tehran and its determined pursuit of sanctions against the Islamic republic.
    "The United States and the international community must continue -- and intensify -- our economic, financial and diplomatic pressures in Iran," Gates maintained, adding that the US was seeking other ways of applying pressure on Tehran.
    "In the past, bilateral arragements with the United States have helped maintain a balance of power in the Gulf region. While such partnerships are important, the United States seeks to encourage more multilateral ties and cooperation with and among our friends in the region," he said.
    Gates rejected suggestions the US applied a double-standards policy towards Iran and Israel, which has never confirmed it has a nuclear arsenal but is widely believed to be the only state in the Middle East with such weapons, estimated to number 200.
    "Israel is not training terrorists to subvert its neighbours, it has not shipped weapons to a place like Iraq to kill thousands of civilians, it has not threatened to destroy any of its neighbours, it is not trying to destabilise the government of Lebanon, so I think there are significant differences in terms of both the history and the behaviour of the Israeli and Iranian governments," he said.
    The leader of Israel's arch-foe, Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has called for it to be "wiped off the map." But Tehran has consistently denied sending weapons to neighbouring Iraq.
    Washington has vowed to press ahead with its own measures against what it sees as potential threats from Tehran, especially a missile shield with planned installations in Europe, which has angered Russia.
    "Whether or not Iran has suspended its nuclear weapon programme, its conventional missiles remain a threat to Europe, and we should continue to pursue missile defence together," Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said on Friday in Bahrain.
    The Pentagon said on Friday it had notified Congress of possible arms sales worth more than 10 billion dollars to oil-rich Gulf states including Kuwait and Saudi Arabia to bolster their missile and air defences against Iran.
    In a wide-ranging speech Gates also urged delegates to the conference to support efforts to stabilise Iraq where the United States has thousands of troops fighting an insurgency since toppling Saddam Hussein in March 2003.
    "I urge you to exercise your influence with the Iraqis and encourage them to meet their own goals and expectations," he said.
    Gates said fallout from failure in Iraq would be felt first in the cities and communities of the Middle East before those of the United States.
    The conference in the Gulf archipelago -- home to the US Fifth Fleet -- brings together more than 200 ministers, security officials and anti-terrorism experts from around 50 countries.
    Iran was due to send a delegation headed by Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki, but organisers said Tehran cancelled at the last minute.
    In Tehran IRNA news agency quoted foreign ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini as saying the trip "was on Mr Mottaki's agenda but was not finalised. Due to his hectic and intense plans it was not possible for it to take place."

  • Amnesty asks China to free anti-Olympic activists

    Amnesty asks China to free anti-Olympic activists

    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com
    China bird flu cluster sparks fear of human-to-human transmission
    GENEVA (AFP) - The World Health Organisation said Friday that two members of the same Chinese family had contracted bird flu, sparking fears of a possible human-to-human transmission of the deadly H5N1 virus.The father of a 24-year old man who died on December 2 in the eastern province of Jiangsu tested positive for bird flu after displaying symptoms of the disease, the WHO said.
    The global health body said there were three possible explanations for both men contracting the virus: either they were infected by the same animal, there was transmission between them, or they were exposed to two different infected animals.
    WHO spokesman John Rainford said cases of human-to-human transmission are very rare, citing only three previous cases in Vietnam, Cambodia and in Indonesia.
    BEIJING (Reuters) - Amnesty International has called for China to free activists in custody for staging anti-Olympic protests over land grabs and forced evictions.
    The London-based international human rights watchdog urged China to immediately and unconditionally release Yang Chunlin, who was detained in July for his involvement in a petition "We Want Human Rights, not the Olympics" signed by farmers protesting against land seizures.
    Yang reportedly on numerous occasions had his arms and legs stretched and chained to the four corners of an iron bed, Amnesty said, adding that he was then left to eat, drink and defecate in that position.
    Ahead of the December 10-12 International Olympic Committee executive board meeting in Lausanne, Amnesty also asked China to free housing activist Ye Guozhou, who is serving a four-year prison sentence for organising protests against forced evictions ahead of the 2008 Beijing Olympics.
    Ye's brother Ye Guoqiang was detained in September on suspicion of "inciting subversion". Ye Guozhu's son Ye Mingjun has been released on bail and awaits trial on a similar charge.
    Amnesty also took up the cudgels for Wang Ling who was sent to a labour camp last month to undergo 15 months of re-education for signing petitions and preparing banners in protest against the demolition of her property for Olympic construction projects. It said she was beaten on numerous occasions.
    The cases "underscore the urgent need for action on the human rights situation in China in the lead up to the Games", Amnesty said in an e-mailed statement seen on Saturday.
    "The reports of torture must be investigated and measures taken against anyone found responsible. Those abused must receive reparation," it added.
    The Chinese government could not immediately be reached for comment. China routinely defends its human rights record saying its citizens enjoy greater freedoms compared with three decades ago and that feeding and clothing 1.3 billion people takes precedence over human rights.
    The Olympics is the coming-out-party of the government and a huge source of pride for an overwhelming majority of the world's most populous nation.
    The Communist Party, which has ruled unchallenged since 1949, is obsessed with stability and anything going wrong.
    With 21,600 journalists accredited for next year's Games and up to half that number expected to turn up to report from the city without IOC credentials, the Beijing Games promise to be the most intensely scrutinised Olympics in history.
    (Reporting by Benjamin Kang Lim; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani)
    Bush and China's Hu talk by telephone on Iran
    BEIJING (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush told China he was willing to solve the Iranian nuclear issue through dialogue, state media reported on Friday, an approach long promoted by Beijing.Bush also hopes the United Nations keeps taking "necessary action" to stop Iran's uranium enrichment programme, the official Xinhua news agency said in a report carried on the front page of Communist Party mouthpiece the People's Daily.
    "The Chinese side has all along upheld peacefully resolving the Iran nuclear question through diplomatic negotiations, so as to protect regional peace and stability, which will meet the interests of all the parties concerned," it quoted Chinese President Hu Jintao as telling Bush.
    "China is willing to continue to play a constructive role to help solve the issue," Hu added.
    China has so far resisted calls to support sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme, wary of impeding growing Chinese energy and economic interests in the country.
    After a U.S. intelligence assessment released Monday said Iran had likely stopped a nuclear weapons programme four years ago, China's stance has been ambiguous.
    Beijing's ambassador to the United Nations said that after the report "things have changed", suggesting his country may not back fresh sanctions on Iran.
    Since then, however, Chinese diplomats have retreated to stock calls for negotiations, leaving unclear whether Beijing would wield its power as a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council to veto new sanctions demanding that Iran stop uranium enrichment, which Washington and its allies still want.
    But China and the United States have worked closely over North Korea's nuclear plans.
    Beijing has hosted many rounds of so-called "six-party talks" between the two Koreas, Japan, Russia as well as the United States to get North Korea to account for and give up its atomic programme.
    Bush told Hu that "the six-party talks are the best way to solve the nuclear issue on the Korean peninsula", Xinhua said.
    "The United States highly appreciates the important role China has played in this regard, and is willing to cooperate with other parties to push forward the six-party talks," it paraphrased Bush as saying.
    (Reporting by Ben Blanchard, editing by Nick Macfie)

  • Without Reservation In Private Sector,