Search blog.co.uk

Posts archive for: 14 November, 2007
  • Nawaz ready to reconcile with Benazir while Musharraf 'considered' stepping down from office

    Nawaz ready to reconcile with Benazir while Musharraf 'considered' stepping down from office
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com

    Pakistan's exiled former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said on Wednesday he was ready to work with another former prime minister, Benazir Bhutto, against the military rule of President Pervez Musharraf. Bhutto has been trying to forge an opposition alliance after she called on Musharraf to give up up power and has spoken to leaders from Sharif's party about a coalition.
    "We are ready to set aside our differences with the People's Party and work for the return of democratic rule," Sharif said on telephone from Saudi Arabia, referring to Bhutto's party.
    Urging the Bush Administration to facilitate an "exit strategy" for President Pervez Musharraf, former Pakistan Premier Benazir Bhutto has warned that if the General remained in power that would mean the takeover of her country by the al-Qaeda and Taliban.
    "... I can tell you that if General Musharraf stays, al- Qaeda or Taliban people taking over the country will become a reality," Bhutto said in an interview to CNN.
    "It's under his watch that the Taliban have reorganised themselves and taken over the tribal areas of Pakistan. They are now expanding into the settled areas of the (North West) Frontier Province. They have their eye on our capital city of Islamabad. Al-Qaeda has regrouped, too. So these forces are now launching attacks in nearby Afghanistan and Pakistan."
    Bhutto warned that "dictatorship" in her country was a threat to both Pakistan and Afghanistan.
    On the other hand, Militants are holding sway in the restive Swat valley of Pakistan and are destroying the heritage of Gandhara Civilisation there. While,Coming out strongly against severe national and international criticism against his decision to impose Emergency in Pakistan, President Pervez Musharraf slammed advocates of democracy on Wednesday, saying nation came first and that his decision was a necessity. Musharraf has rejected US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's appeal to lift Emergency in Pakistan, saying that his decision was the best way to ensure peaceful elections in the country.

    “I totally disagree with her,” General Musharraf said in an interview to The New York Times in Islamabad. “The emergency is to ensure elections go in an undisturbed manner.”
    “If a country is sliding towards becoming a failed state, is it more important to arrest that slide or have so called democracy,” he quipped.
    Defying calls by the US and the international community to revoke his decision, the General said in a television interview that Emergency would not be lifted until elections are held.
    Musharraf rejected the view that he was not in tune with the aspirations of the people and said that he was cued into the mood of the nation. “I know that the people support the Emergency. In fact, they are questioning as to why I did not take the decision earlier.”
    Commenting on the house arrest of Benazir Bhutto, Musharraf said, “You cannot come back on a supposedly conciliatory note and then suddenly turn hostile.”
    On being questioned about allegations about his being power hungry, Musharraf revealed that he had considered resigning in the face of turmoil in Pakistan, but decided against it in the interest of his country.
    The Pakistani President further said in the interview that he was not a dictator.
    “If a country is sliding towards becoming a failed state, is it more important to arrest that slide or have so called democracy,” he quipped.
    Defying calls by the US and the international community to revoke his decision, the General said in a television interview that Emergency would not be lifted until elections are held.
    Musharraf rejected the view that he was not in tune with the aspirations of the people and said that he was cued into the mood of the nation. “I know that the people support the Emergency. In fact, they are questioning as to why I did not take the decision earlier.”
    Commenting on the house arrest of Benazir Bhutto, Musharraf said, “You cannot come back on a supposedly conciliatory note and then suddenly turn hostile.”
    On being questioned about allegations about his being power hungry, Musharraf revealed that he had considered resigning in the face of turmoil in Pakistan, but decided against it in the interest of his country.
    The Pakistani President further said in the interview that he was not a dictator.
    Pakistani police detained cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan on Wednesday, shortly after he left Punjab University campus in Lahore where religious students had briefly held him during a rally, police said. Imran, who was earlier in hiding, told CNN-IBN that he would march along with students and workers from his Tehreek-e-Insaaf party and other opposition parties.
    He said he was willing to be arrested and hoped the students’ rally would be the biggest in Pakistan's history. Imran is demanding that the Pakistani constitution be restored and the Supreme Court reinstated. He has already announced his party's boycott of the upcoming elections and criticised former prime minister Benazir Bhutto for what he calls her mock fight with General Pervez Musharraf.
    The US on Tuesday said Pakistan's move towards democracy has been "seriously set back" by the Emergency, which could also hit the investor confidence in the country.
    "The US is urging your government not to throw away in weeks what it has taken years to achieve," American Ambassador Anne W Patterson said.
    Noting that "Pakistan's move towards democracy has been seriously set back" by the emergency, she said: "Our embassy and our consulates have tried to make sure that American business representatives know that Pakistan is a good place to do business and I have always highlighted the enormous economic opportunities which your country offers."
    Speaking at the National Defense University here, Patterson said Pakistan's economic progress, particularly the 7% annual economic growth, has been one of the greatest accomplishments of President Pervez Musharraf's administration.
    Patterson's comments came ahead of a visit by US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte to Pakistan this week to urge Musharraf to end the Emergency before the holding of polls in January.
    "The November 3 imposition of state of Emergency put this economic growth of Pakistan and upward mobility at risk. This is an ominous development," she said.

    Meanwhile,Pakistan People's Party leader Shah Mehmood Qureshi, who was leading the party's "long march" against emergency after former premier Benazir Bhutto was put under house arrest, was arrested today in Faisalabad. As he was driven away in a police van from the house where he had addressed a press conference on the PPP's campaign to pressure President Pervez Musharraf to quit and revive the constitution, Qureshi said he had been illegally detained along with three PPP members of the Punjab provincial assembly.
    "The long march will continue. I have asked other PPP leaders of Punjab who have not been arrested to carry the torch of democracy and move forward," Qureshi told Dawn News channel on phone.
    "I have asked PPP leaders who have not been apprehended to ensure they are not put under house arrest and to come out in the streets and fight for democracy."
    Qureshi had set off yesterday for Islamabad with about 100 vehicles after authorities served a seven-day detention order on Bhutto and barred her from leaving the home of PPP leader Latif Khosa, where she is staying in Lahore.
    By last evening, Qureshi reached Okara where the march halted for the night but the number of the cars had dwindled to about 30, as many PPP workers were scattered by police who set up numerous blockades along the route of the march.
    Qureshi went to Faisalabad from Okara this morning. "I was able to reach Faisalabad and the house where I was holding a press conference was surrounded by thousands of policemen. I am being taken to some unknown destination," he said.
    Qureshi said his arrest was "illegal" as he had not been served any notice or detention order by police. The PPP would continue to keep the "flag of democracy flying" so that Musharraf was pressured to restore the constitution and fundamental rights which he had suspended with the imposition of emergency on November 3, he said.
    "We have to fight against dictatorship," he said.
    Bhutto has urged Musharraf to quit as president and army chief and ruled out serving with him in any future government.
    She has also stepped up efforts to forge a united front with other opposition parties to oppose the military ruler

    Musharraf 'considered' stepping down from office
    CNN-IBN
    Islamabad: Pakistani President Musharraf did give a thought to quitting, he says, but is now convinced that he is the man to lead the country to democracy.

    Creating quite a frenzy in political circles and the stock market, Musharraf spoke his mind ahead of a senior american diplomat's Pakistan tour.

    "If there is a way that my going will bring balance and stability in Pakistan. That will be the best time to go. I seeing and looking for it," he said.

    General Musharraf made the remarks in an interview to British TV channel Sky News, which was also carried by some Pakistani channels and on the Internet.

    Soon after, stocks plummeted in the Karachi Stock Exchange. The benchmark KSE 100 index was down by 305.51 points to close at 13,315.58 points, which analysts attributed to political uncertainty.

    The President also accepted that he cannot be a President in uniform.

    "We must have elections. I cannot be a President in uniform. Now the choice after that is whether I should stay at all. That option is available to me. Or should it be given up now? And we have a better Pakistan, a stabler Pakistan," he said.

    He was asked "have you thought of it?"

    Q: Have you thought of it before now?
    A: Well I think of everything when I sit.
    Q: So you have actually considered it recently? You have actually thought of the possibility?

    A: Well, I think of every option. I think of every option and I discuss every option.
    Buddha not laughing in Swat, terror shadow on heritage
    Dawn News
    Swat: Militants are holding sway in the restive Swat valley of Pakistan and are destroying the heritage of Gandhara Civilisation there.

    In the absence of proper security arrangements, a historic rock-carved image of Buddha has already been destroyed partially.

    Situated on the banks of River Swat, anciently known as Svastu, the scenic Valley of Swat was the centre of Buddhist civilisation.

    In ancient scripts Swat is known as Udhyana meaning garden or park. Historians say Ashoka introduced Buddhism to Swat spreading it to Peshawar, Taxila, and beyond into Afghanistan.

    However, by seventh and eighth centuries AD, Buddhist Civilisation was losing its influence in this area.

    Rock carvings and historical sites preserve this part of history in the mountains and plains of Swat. Images and statues of Buddha carved in different forms are permanent record of the material remains of mankind.

    “We reconstruct the history of Buddhism with their help. Now these carvings which you see hundreds of them in Swat,” says Director Archeology Departmen, NWFP, Professor Fidaullah Sehrai.

    Growing militancy during the last one year has emerged as a major threat to these rare sites in the restive valley.

    Some sites have already been damaged. Jehanabad Buddha is one such complete and inspiring symbol of Gandhara Art.

    Preserved by nature due to difficult location, this seven meter tall meditating Buddha carved some 20 feet high from the land, survived many attacks since 1994. However, the last one proved destructive.

    Body of the Jehanabad Buddha still carries holes filled with explosives which show that the militants can come back any time for the final round to completely destroy the unique image.

    “We have complained to the DOc and the ministry, and they will take some action,” says official of Swat Museum, Nasir Khan.

    Unlike the past, the sites offer bleak look as no foreign tourists are visiting these sites for fear of growing militancy. This has badly damaged economy of the area that largely depended on tourism industry.

    Due to growing insecurity and lack of well-preserved strategy, some of these sites are fast losing its attraction for the tourists coming from different countries of the world.

    China says Myanmar should not be "another Iraq"

    Beijing: China does not want Myanmar to become "another Iraq", a senior Chinese diplomat said on Wednesday, stressing his country's opposition to sanctions as a way of seeking reform in the troubled Southeast Asian nation. Assistant Foreign Minister He Yafei said Myanmar was now headed in the right direction in the aftermath of mass protests demanding democracy and then a harsh wave of arrests. Noting recent visits to Myanmar by U.N. special envoy Ibrahim Gambari and contacts between the imprisoned opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi and the ruling generals, He said now was the time for "encouragement", not sanctions.
    "We should be patient," the Chinese diplomat told a news conference about a summit of Asian leaders in Singapore next week. "We especially disapprove of sanctions. Sanctions cannot solve the problem, and will only make matters worse."
    China believed stability was paramount for Myanmar to achieve "democracy and economic development", the senior official said.
    "We cannot permit Myanmar to fall into chaos, we cannot permit Myanmar to become another Iraq. No matter what ideas other countries have, China's stance on this is staunch."
    The diplomat's strong rhetoric, apparently suggesting that Myanmar should not be the target of excessive foreign pressure, came a day after Gambari said Myanmar's junta appeared to be making some concessions following their September crackdown on the protests led by Buddhist monks.
    China's He said leaders from ASEAN, China, Japan and South Korea were likely to discuss Myanmar at their Singapore summit, but it would not be a focus of discussions, with the agenda taken up by regional cooperation, energy and the environment.
    Western powers have been much more guarded about the hints of relaxation in Myanmar, and have previously imposed economic restrictions in a bid to force the government to release Suu Kyi from house arrest and open the way to democratic reform.
    Traditionally hostile to the use of economic sanctions, China shares a long border with Myanmar, and also has big stakes in developing its neighbour's raw materials and energy reserves.

  • What is happening in WB is a shame to all of us

     What is happening in WB is a shame to all of us

    Palash Biswas

    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com

    I am just forwrdig some relevant correspondence on nandigram! I am not sending my writeups by mail anymore as some friends have refused to bear with this `Bombardment’. If the alternative information is an information it is going to continue. if you are interested at all please look for my writeups Googling. Henceforth it is your choice. I am just posting in my blogs. You have to browse yourself. I am sorry for the inconvenience I created for my learned friends. I am helpless as thing happens around me and I have to react. I felt that some of the adressees may be interested. I am wrong. Thus, henceforth, I am not targeting individuals anymore. My experience and network happens at the disposal of General readership.
    Palash

    Dear all,
      What is happening in WB is a shame to all of us. Irrespective of our party affiliation, we must all agree that the democratic right of the people has been compromised- slaughtered.

     In www.vinnomot. com, we have taken initiative to register your protest if you feel that such undemocratic and irresponsible behavior from the WB Govt. is not acceptable-- even opposing view is also welcome.

     Please send your protest/ or counter protest or what ever you feel is right

    1) In writing-- Bengali or English article --send it to rahul.guha@gmail. com,biplabpal200 0@yahoo.com

    2) Send your voice: Please capture your voice of protest in mp3 or WMA format. You can use window media encoder 9 to capture your voice [use start and end button carefully-135kbps streaming format will be fine] http://www.microsof t.com/downloads/ details.aspx? FamilyID= 5691ba02- e496-465a- bba9-b2f1182cdf2 4&displaylang= en

    You can also send us mp3 file or upload the file in rediff ishare music area and send us the link. Keep the file size within 10MB.

    3) You can also send recorded video of the protest--use window movie maker and a simple webcam to register your video.
    Use window movie maker to capture webcam video. It will be a wmv file. Keep it shorter than 10 minute and then upload the wmv file to www.youtube. com or www.vimeo.com  or rediff ishare video : Then send us the link.

    Please contact: rahul.guha@gmail. com,biplabpal200 0@yahoo.com

    You must send your response by 15th night-Thursday- --we will publish the issue by Friday night

    Instead of pointing finger, let participate in a solid protest --let the world , WB Govt. know that Bengalis are not sleeping ---

    Thanks
    Biplab

    Every action has a reaction." - Narendra "Killer"
    Modi

    "They have been paid back in their own coins." -
    Buddhadeb "Thug" Bhattacharya

    BTW, the RSP State Secretary while commenting on this
    has publicly said, in a TV interview, that a person
    occupying the post of the Chief Minister should know
    what to say. He has also decried the politics of
    retaliation explicitly endorsed by "Thug"
    Bhattacharya.

    The analysis offered here suggests that the attack
    started after receipt of the letter from the Centre as
    regards non-availability of the CRPF. That is
    evidently
    wrong.

    The whole game of delaying the CRPF, with the benefit
    of hindsight, appears to be stage-managed.

    In any case, it was on Nov. 4, Brinda Karat in a
    public meet, announced the need to administer to
    Dumdum Dawai to the people of Nandigram with the Chief
    Minister, Buddhadeb "Thug" Bhattacharya by her side.
    On Nov. 5 morning, the Operation Recapture commenced.

    It is rather inconceivable that the state government
    got to to know the content of the letter only after
    formally receiving it.

    The bogey of Maoists, by all accounts, is just that.
    Shamelss Prakash Karat quoted the NSA to substantiate
    the claim of the Maoist role in Nandigram, while the
    CPIM government has utterly failed to provide any
    evidence. In fact, the Home Secretary has said as much
    and informed that he has no information about Maoists
    in Nandigram.

    Sukla

    http://www.merinews .com/catFull. jsp?articleID= 127726

    Opposition paid back in their own coin: Buddhadeb
    Bhattacharjee

    Kumar Sarkar

    13 November 2007, Tuesday

    WEST BENGAL chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee
    rather bluntly justified on Tuesday the action of
    marauding CPI (M) supporters violently recapturing
    their land and home when he said, “I can simply say
    they were paid back in their own coin. Armed workers
    of the opposition evicted our people.”

    The chief minister said, “For 11 months our people who
    were evicted and could not return home despite several
    efforts at initiating peace talks with the
    opposition.”

    Asked whether the action was justified, he smiled and
    asked “legally or morally” and went on to say, “I
    wanted to avoid the situation and therefore asked for
    Central forces on October 27.” He complained that the
    Centre delayed despatch of the CRPF. Bhattacharjee
    said that on November 5, the Centre told him that it
    could not send central forces immediately. “Had the
    central forces arrived soon after I asked for it, what
    happened would not have happened,” he added.

    Ironically the CPI (M)’s operation to regain turf
    began precisely on November 5 when the Centre informed
    that it could not send central forces immediately. The
    operation to reclaim areas was completed in a week
    just before the CRPF arrived.

    Asked why the state police could not help evicted
    people return home, the chief minister said, “The
    police could not enter the vast area where the two
    sides clashed persistently. When the police did try to
    enter the zone, an unfortunate incident like the March
    14 police firing occurred where 14 people died. I did
    not want a repetition.”

    The chief minister said he had wanted to send 600 CRPF
    and 400 EFR personnel and had asked the opposition to
    cooperate because they too felt ‘enough was enough’.

    Asked whether it was not a matter of shame that what
    the state police could not do was done by armed cadres
    of the CPI (M), the chief minister said, “Yes, in a
    way it is.”

    On the death toll in the recent violence, he said he
    did not have the exact figures but four had died and
    11 others were injured. He would provide the exact
    figures in a day or two.

    Bhattacharjee in keeping with CPI (M) general
    secretary, Prakash Karat’s observation maintained that
    three months ago a strong group of Maoists had
    infiltrated from Jharkhand led by a man name Ranjit
    Paul, armed with rifles and land mines and set up camp
    in Sonachura. They imparted training to some locals.
    Some rifles and landmines have been found in the area.

    He alleged that the Maoists trained some members of
    the Bhumi Uchched Pratirodh Committee. The combine was
    a dangerous threat. “Where the Maoists have now gone
    cannot be fathomed,” he added lamely. But they were
    there, “We have proof of it. In fact both the state
    and Central agencies were aware of it.”

    To questions that people were demanding his
    resignation and he was being compared to former West
    Bengal Chief Minister Siddharta Shankar Ray of the
    Emergency era in Bengal, Bhattacharjee said, “it is
    unfortunate and I am surprised at the comparison. It
    seems they don’t know about Siddharta.”

    To repeated media description that the peace of the
    graveyard prevails in Nandigram, the chief minister
    asked tartly, “Was the peace of heavens prevailing all
    this time.” He appealed to everyone cutting across
    party lines to work for peace. He felt that peace
    would return if people let bygones be bygones and
    embrace each other in friendship.

    “People and journalists can go to Nandigram now. In
    fact, the Leader of the Opposition in Parliament L K
    Adani has gone there today. Thank God he went in a car
    and not on a rath (charriot),” he quipped.

    Rights group seeks Bengal peace 
     
    There have been widespread protests against the violence  India's top human rights group has asked the federal government to help restore peace in a troubled cluster of villages in eastern West Bengal state. The National Human Rights Commission has asked the government to report on the measures taken in Nandigram area. BBC reports.

    Federal policemen have entered the area, where at least eight people have died in clashes since last week.

    There have been skirmishes in the area between armed supporters of the ruling communist and opposition parties.

    The rights group has also asked the West Bengal government to submit a report on the conditions prevailing in the area within two weeks.

    Bengal's opposition parties, led by the Trinamul Congress party, held a general strike on Monday in protest against last week's violence in Nandigram, a cluster of villages south-west of Calcutta.

    'War zone'

    One thousand federal policemen have entered Nandigram, where more than 10,000 people have been left homeless by the political violence.

    Officials say hundreds of armed supporters of Bengal's ruling communist party have fought their way back into the area.

    They had been forced out in March amid protests against the state government's plan to acquire land to set up a special economic zone.

    More than 10,000 people had become homeless in Nandigram

    Some of Bengal's leading filmmakers, artists and writers have condemned the violence. The filmmakers have withdrawn their films and boycotted an ongoing state-run film festival in Calcutta.

    State Governor Gopal Krishna Gandhi has condemned the violence and accused the state government of failing to protect the people of the area from attacks by communist supporters.

    Amid protests over the land-reform plans, 14 farmers were shot dead by police in the Nandigram area on 14 March, and the government said it would move the project elsewhere.

    Hundreds of Marxist supporters fled the area with their families.

    The latest violence is linked to their efforts to return home.
     
    COUNTERPOINT
    Many Clothes Of The Emperor 
    Nandigram, Salwa Judum and Post-Godhra: One shouldn't be carried away by the mock opposition to the nuke deal by the CPI (M) and the so-called Congress protest bandh call opposing the massacre at Nandigram..  
     
     
    Revolutionary Democratic Front of India
     
     
    http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20071112&fname=nandigram&sid=2
     
    When this is being written, six days have passed since the unprecedented brutal attack on the people of Nandigram began. The present phase of massacre, fascistic by all means, has made the brutal assault on 14 th March this year pale to oblivion. The brutal massacre of the people and the manner in which the CPM government, Central government and all other parliamentary parties are playing their politics of deception and lies in connivance with the media is going to have far reaching implications on the way the discourse and practice of politics will unfold in the days to come in the state of West Bengal in particular and the country in general. One shudders to think that the happiest man today would be Narendra Modi of Gujarat who could see how things were being replayed, albeit under a different script, of 'development'. Another proud brother who would also be ready to pat Budhha and Narendra Modi would be Mahendra Karma who had foreseen the clinical execution of salwa judum on the tribals of Chhattisgarh again under the grand slogan of 'development'.

    On Sunday the attack has intensified to such levels that the Governor of West Bengal Gopalkrishna Gandhi described it as 'recapture' of Nandigram by the CPI (M) cadres. In the meantime, the National Security Advisor M K Narayanan has on board the flight to Moscow with Manmohan has expressed his grave fear of violence in Nandigram due to the presence of Maoists! As if had the Maoists been not there everything would have been peaceful!

    As the journalists, intellectuals and social activists have not been allowed entry inside Nandigram, the actual picture is not coming out to the full public view. The telephonic conversations with the leaders and activists of Bhumi Ucched Pratirodh Committee (BUPC) and the people of Nandigram are the sources for real information.

    Trinamul Congress member and an activist of Nishikant Mandal, informs from ground zero to Prof. Amit Bhattacharya, head of the Department of Jadavpur University that most of the activists of BUPC will be killed by the day and he himself will not be spared. Mahasweta Devi taking cue of this information talked to the Governor by noon in the day. The Governor promised to save the lives of the activists as the relentless hunt goes unabated in the burning villages of Nandigram.

    Planned Massacre

    From reports of the people through telephonic conversations so far, in the last six days 150 people have been killed and 2000 people are missing. About 550 people are kidnapped by the CPI (M) goons and taken to Khejuri village where they are tortured and used as human shield to prevent any possible counter-attack from the people of Nandigram. It is in Khejuri that CPI (M) gathered more than 1500 goons (who are also their party members) from all over West Bengal and Bihar and trained for the brutal massacre to be carried out on 14 th March and at present.

    About 100 people who are badly injured have been admitted in various hospitals whereas thousands of injured people have fled the area without any medical care. Those 550 people who were kidnapped in the process of 'recapture' of Nandigram by the marauders of CPM were tied with ropes.

    Active involvement of known criminal elements of the CPI (M)

    Eye-witness reports pouring in for several prominent people in Kolkata and Delhi corroborate the fact that activists and people of Nandigram in hundreds caught red-handed Tapan Ghosh and Sukur Ali, two CPI (M) leaders from Gorbeta, who were forcefully taking away four injured women. Several reports also point to the fact that dead bodies were being made to disappear under the leadership and supervision of these two known criminals.

    The Killing Fields Of Nandigram 
    The administration, especially the police, was asked to step aside and remain mute spectators to hundreds of well-armed CPI(M) cadres running riot in Nandigram for six days.  
     
     
    Jaideep Mazumdar
     
     http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20071112&fname=nandigram&sid=1
     
     
    NANDIGRAM

    The red flags are fluttering merrily in the early winter breeze at Nandigram after a gap of 11 months. On the ground, "victorious" CPI(M) cadres, drunk on their victory--the "recapture" of more than a hundred villages that had remained beyond their control for so long--are taking out processions and bike rallies, bursting countrymade-bombs like Diwali firecrackers and ensuring that the lakhs who had supported the anti-land acquisition brigade--the Bhumi Uchched Pratirodh Committee (BUPC)--submit meekly to the CPI(M). But tension is palpable, as is the intense loathing for the CPI(M) that had deployed its armed cadres, many from outside this East Midnapore district, to kill, rape, loot and "recapture" the villages that had remained under the BUPC's control for so long.

    The operation to liberate Nandigram and re-establish the CPI(M)'s grip there started in the middle of last week and was, by all accounts, a well-planned affair that had the blessings of the party's top leadership. The administration, especially the police, was asked to step aside and remain mute spectators to hundreds of well-armed CPI(M) cadres running riot in Nandigram for six days till Sunday.

    Even a stinging rebuke from Governor Gopalkrishna Gandhi asking the state government to act failed to move the powers that be at Writers' Building. The CRPF, which was sent following a request from the state government, arrived on Saturday, but is yet to deployed in the trouble-torn and traumatized villages, as I write this piece at 8:50 PM.

    In fact, five companies of the para-military force, led by its IG Subhas Goswami and DIG Alok Raj, had to face barricades put up by the 'red cadres' at two places in the 30 km journey from Tamluk to Nandigram town. They'll remain stationed at Nandigram police station on Monday evening and will fan out to the villages only from Tuesday morning.

    The whole area remained out of bounds for media persons ever since the CPI(M)'s operation began and it was only on Monday, after the party had been successful in re-establishing its total control in the area, that scribes were allowed in. But not before we witnessed a fair bit of "red terror", perhaps to serve as an ominous reminder about the CPI(M)'s "power" to us. The Outlook team, one of the first to enter Nandigram after its "re-capture", was caught in many CPI(M) processions and in one along Debipur village, cadres burst countrymade bombs in front of us to demonstrate their "power". The party's local committee secretary, Tilak Roy, however told us that the bombs were "firecrackers left over from Diwali" and asked us not to write about such "celebrations" by his "enthusiastic party workers". Perhaps it was this "enthusiasm" which was responsible for a TV camera person having her camera and mobile phone snatched when she went to cover the ransacking of the Trinamool Congress office by the CPI(M) cadre on Sunday.

    By Monday afternoon, red flags were up in every nook and corner of Nandigram, including the Tekhali bridge that had served as the no-man's land between the warring CPI(M) and BUPC activists. CPI(M) activists and supporters who had been displaced from their villages were still returning home. They, too, had suffered at the hands of the BUPC: driven out of their homes, they have had to spend months in relief camps funded almost entirely by the CPI(M). Their houses had been looted and often torched and some have had to suffer serious injuries in exchange of fire with BUPC activists. Their children had to stop going to schools and have lost a full academic year.

     STATEMENT
    'A Violent And Undemocratic Offensive' 
    'The gang up of political forces against the CPI(M) and the Left operating in the guise of BUPS virtually set up a parallel raj in the area. A dangerous phenomenon was their utilising the assistance of Maoist armed squads who came into the area from outside'  
     
     
    The Polit Bureau of the Communist Party of India (Marxist)
     
    http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20071112&fname=nandigram&sid=3
     
    The Polit Bureau of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) met in New Delhi on November 11 & 12, 2007. It has issued the following statement: (relevant extract on Nandigram follows):

    The Polit Bureau heard a report on the developments in Nandigram in the recent period. Since January 2007, an abnormal situation had developed with an alliance of forces led by the Trinamul Congress driving out workers and supporters of the Left Front including elected panchayat members. Since then the police and the administration have not been allowed to function in the area.

    Even after the state government announced that there is no question of land acquisition for a chemical hub, for the past nine months the people evicted from the area were not able to go back to their homes or cultivate their fields.

    The Polit Bureau firmly rebuffs all the mischievous attempts to portray the developments in Nandigram as an outcome of “red terror”. There has been no issue of land acquisition whatsoever in Nandigram since February 2007, yet the whole area was under siege on the spurious pretext of protection of land. The reality in Nandigram was a violent and undemocratic offensive to displace those who were the legitimate representatives of the people.

    The gang up of political forces against the CPI(M) and the Left operating in the guise of a Bhumi Ucchhed Pratirodh Samity virtually set up a parallel raj in the area. A dangerous phenomenon was their utilising the assistance of Maoist armed squads who came into the area from outside. The situation of utter lawlessness prevailed and bunkers were built and landmines laid. In this entire period 27 CPI(M) workers and supporters were killed. Such a situation cannot be tolerated by any state government or administration. After the March 14 police firing, repeated efforts were made for political negotiations and peace talks for the restoration of normalcy and the return of all the affected people.

    After a prolonged struggle, the determined efforts made by the people to return to their homes have succeeded and this should pave the way for normalcy to return. The CPI(M) and the Left Front have declared that they want peace to be restored and all sections of the people irrespective of political affiliations to be allowed to return to their family life in pursuit of their livelihood.

    With the deployment of central para military forces, the Left Front government should make all efforts for rehabilitation and resumption of development work in the area.

  • Deal has been struck for Consensus on N-deal: Nandigram Fallout

    Deal has been struck for Consensus on N-deal: Nandigram Fallout
    Palash Biswas

    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com

    I am not sending my writeups by mail anymore as some friends have refused to bear with this `Bombardment’. If the alternative information is an information it is going to continue. if you are interested at all please look for my writeups Googling. Henceforth it is your choice. I am just posting in my blogs. You have to browse yourself. I am sorry for the inconvenience I created for my learned friends. I am helpless as thing happens around me and I have to react. I felt that some of the adressees may be interested. I am wrong. Thus, henceforth, I am not targeting individuals anymore. My experience and network happens at the disposal of General readership.
    Palash

    The indefinitely postponed meet between the UPA and the Left on the deal has been reconvened on 16th instant as originally scheduled.
    This strongly suggests that a deal over the 'deal' has been struck between the UPA and the Left. The government thenceforth would be allowed to negotiate with the IAEA but not clinch the agreement.

    In fact the Left cannot afford to give an one-shot approval. They must keep the UPA constantly on the tenterhooks to keep extracting their pounds of flesh as regards Nandigram, Rizwanur, and who knows what.

    But this is obviously a bad news.

    Sukla

    Sources in the CPI-M have told CNN-IBN the party has allowed the Government to discuss the Indo-US nuclear with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)—a reversal of its stand that the deal must not be ‘operationalised’.BJP claims CPI(M) compromised with the govt to save its face after Nandigram.Sources said the Government will need the Left's approval before signing India-specific safeguards in the nuclear deal—a much softer demand, as before the parties had threatened to bring down the government if it talked with the IAEA.CNN-IBN Correspondent Smitha Nair reports the Government has been working hard to convince the Left parties that the nuclear deal was important for India’s energy security and it would not compromise India’s sovereignty. The Left’s permission comes at a time when the CPI-M is cornered over the violence in Nandigram and the murder of graphics designer Rizwanur Rehman in Kolkata. The Central Government has not reacted strongly on the violence in Nandigram, and the permission to speak to the IAEA may be part of a give-and-take arrangement with the CPI-M, says Nair.

    The Communist parties will give their permission formally when the Left-UPA committee on the deal meets November 16.

    Ahead of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA)-Left meeting on Friday, External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee on Wednesday said the government was engaged in building a consensus with its partners on the stalled India-US nuclear deal. NDTV reports.

    ''We are engaged in building a consensus with the UPA partners (on the nuclear deal). All the partners in the UPA government will be consulted,'' Mukherjee told reporters on the sidelines of a function to inaugurate the new building housing the Foreign Service Institute.

    ''We have reconvened a meeting of the UPA-Left committee Friday. We have held five meetings of the committee so far. Parliament is opening on Thursday.

    Let's wait and see what happens,'' he replied when asked if he expected a breakthrough in the nuclear committee's meeting over approaching the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on the negotiations.

    Although Mukherjee sounded positive about the outcome of Friday's meeting, he didn't say it in so many words. ''We hope a way out will be found at the meeting. But I am hopeful that something positive would come out,'' he had said Tuesday.

    The minister did not say when the debate on the nuclear deal would take place in parliament.

    In a breakthrough of sorts for the government over the stalled nuclear deal, the Left parties that fiercely oppose the deal have indicated they may allow the government to go ahead with negotiations with the IAEA provided the government gets their concurrence before signing any final agreement.

    Besides the nuclear deal, the issue of violence in Left-ruled West Bengal's Nandigram area will figure prominently in the discussions in the winter session of parliament that begins on Thursday.

    After months of haggling over the Indo-US nuclear deal, there appears to be a sign of reconcilation between the UPA government at the Centre and its Left allies as both sides have agreed to sit down and thrash the vexed issue on Friday next.

    According to sources, the crucial talks to be presided over by the External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherkjee, is likely to come out with a statement permitting the Centre to participate in the talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on the issue.

    Incidentally, a few days earlier, CPI(M) general secretary Prakash Karat had hinted that a solution to the problem was expected from the UPA-Left meeting soon and taking a cue from this, the Centre has taken this as a softening of stand by its Left allies on operationalising the 123 Agreement with the US.

    Hence, it is expected that the Left parties, who are sternly against the Indo-US nuclear deal on the pretext of harming national security, are now likely to allow the UPA government to take part in the Vienna talks with the IAEA on negotiations with the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the endorsement of the bilateral 123 Agreement by the US Congress, provided the government does not give anything in writing.

    Even A B Bardhan, the Communist Party of India general secretary, had also given indication that the Left might mull over allowing the UPA government to go for talks with the IAEA on the India-specific safeguards pact required for operationalising the nuclear deal, but without initialing it.

    Sources said that the Left parties have mooted a solution whereby the government would be permitted to introduce the India-specific safeguards draft for consideration before the UPA-Left committee. And if the committee approves it, things would be fine, otherwise the draft would stands rejected.

    However, there appears to be disagreement among the Left parties itself, as the All-India Forward Bloc general secretary Debabrata Biswas has said that Parliament itself could discuss the 123 agreement with the US. He was of the opinion that a move in this direction would be appropriate as it is in keeping with spirit of the Constitution. Incidentally, both the UPA and its Left allies are keen to resolve the issue before the ensuing Gujarat Assembly polls to avoid any political onslaught from their main rival BJP.

    Centre bartered Nandigram for N-deal: Mamata

    Last updated : Tuesday, 13 November , 2007, 21:17

    Kolkata: Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee on Tuesday claimed that the Centre's 'silence' on the recapture of Nandigram was intended as a 'gift' to Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPM) for softening its stand on the Indo-US nuclear deal.

    "I know the Centre has its compulsions. Why did the Centre not react and kept silent for 12 days in spite of repeated requests for intervention when a massacre was taking place?" Banerjee told a press conference.

    "Why did the CRPF arrive only after the operation by CPM at Nandigram was over?" she said.

    "Was it the UPA government's gift to CPM for accepting the Indo-US nuclear deal?" Banerjee said.

    Even the media, she said, was not allowed to enter Nandigram. "(Even) the Narendra Modi government did not prevent media during the Gujarat riots."

    Denying as 'baseless' CPM General Secretary Prakash Karat's charge on Monday that Trinamool Congress had taken the help of Maoists to consolidate their hold on Nandigram, Banerjee said "Karat was fed with a pack of lies and must control his Chief Minister."

    Claiming that violence in Nandigram was pre-planned Banerjee said seven police camps were withdrawn on October 24, 2007. "The administration and CPM ganged up to conquer Nandigram. Now, all traces of the massacre have been removed."

    She alleged Karat was also part of the conspiracy hatched by the Chief Minister to malign Trinamool Congress.

    Pointing out that she and social activist Medha Patkar were prevented from going to Nandigram, she said "Leader of the Opposition L K Advani was allowed entry. This shows that BJP is not untouchable. I welcome Advaniji's visit."

    On West Bengal Pradesh Congress' call to her to float a 'Save Democracy' front comprising Congress, Trinamool and other secular parties to counter CPM, she said she welcomed the idea "but will Pranab Mukherjee allow it?"

    Nuke deal gets letter of support
    The Indo-US nuclear deal got a boost on Wednesday when former service chiefs, bureaucrats and top scientists wrote an open letter to the Members of Parliament.

    Backing the deal, the letter read that the deal with US would open access to technologies denied to India till now.

    The letter goes on to say that denial of technologies had prevented India from becoming a principal power and that India can't get Russian rectors without the Indo-US agreement.

    ''India is more vulnerable to foreign pressures without this deal. We are as free under the N-deal as we are without it, to produce nuclear weapons,'' the letter read.

    The nuke deal became a bone of contention between the Left and the UPA Government.

    The Left parties do not want deal in its present form, while Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who has invested substantial political capital in this deal, has openly aired his displeasure over the Left's opposition to the deal.

    India upping antennae in Bay of Bengal to counter China

    Zeenews reports from Kolkata: India will strengthen its naval fleet on the eastern front, the regional commander said on Wednesday, adding destroyers and frigates among other ships, in an apparent move to counter Chinese interest in the region. Over the next five years or so, India's plans include stationing an aircraft carrier in the Bay of Bengal along with at least half of the 32 new warships and six submarines India plans to add to its fleet, Vice Admiral Raman Suthan said in Kolkata. The announcement comes a few months after India's Air Force said it would strengthen its presence in the east, adding new fighter jets and moving two squadrons of 36 state-of-the-art Russian-built Sukhoi-30 aircraft to the area.
    They are also adding advanced helicopters, strengthening runways and upgrading other air force facilities - an apparent move to counter China's might.

    "China has fuel interests of its own as fuel lines from Africa and the Gulf run through these waters, and so they are also building up their Navy," Suthan said on board INS Sukanya, a naval warship at the Kolkata dockyard. India has air and naval bases and listening posts across the eastern region. It considers the eastern sea routes vital to its security. Many Indian defence experts believe that China has military or intelligence facilities on Myanmar's Coco Islands, a few miles away from India's Diglipur, 185 km north of Port Blair, capital of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

    "We keep hearing about China's interest in Coco Island and are wary of its growing interest in the region, and we are keeping a close watch," Suthan said. Although Suthan said he believed China had no facilities on Coco, he said the navy could not let its guard down.

    "The naval fleet in east India has long legs and, with the government's emphasis on the look east policy, we are strengthening east now," Suthan added.

    PM, Putin had secret, strategic discussions

    Nikhil Lakshman, recently in Moscow
    http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/nov/14putin.htm

    Something is clearly cooking on the India-Russian front.

    The two governments signed four agreements on Monday and did not sign a much-awaited intergovernmental treaty on setting up four Russian nuclear reactors in India, but much of the discussion between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh [Images] and Russian President Vladmir Putin was off-limits to discussion or media scrutiny.

    Indian government sources would only categorise the issues the two leaders discussed at their 130-minute one-on-one meeting -- perhaps the longest such meeting Dr Singh has held with any world leader -- at the Grand Palace at the Kremlin November 12, in broad, bland terms. "Defence cooperation." "Space." "Atomic energy." "Issues of common concern." "The situation in the neighbourhood." "How to take the relationship forward in the future." "The economic relationship." "How to take India-Russia trade to $10 billion by 2010."

    Yes, sensitive, strategic issues were discussed, the sources said, but insisted that no information on these subjects could be shared as they are "out of the public realm."

    So sensitive are these issues that only National Security Adviser M K Narayanan was present at the 'strategic' discussions between Singh and Putin -- Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon, the other Indian official consulted at the one-on-one encounter, did not join in.

    So secret were the discussions that the foreign office was kept out of it, one official, privy to the events, said.

    Dr Singh and Putin's strategic exchange may have formalised what Narayanan discussed on his hush-hush visit to Moscow [Images] in late August and what Defence Minister A K Antony debated with his Russian counterpart Anatoly Serydukov in October.

    India's strategic involvement with Russia [Images]," one senior government official said early on Tuesday morning, "is infinitely greater" than with any other country.

    Russia, of course, continues to be India's largest supplier for defence material. Though the volume of Russian defence imports may have fallen marginally from the 80% and more from Soviet times, it still hovers around the 70% mark even after India's defence ministry expanded its suppliers to include Israel, France [Images], Great Britain and the United States after the collapse of the USSR in the early 1990s.

    The India-Russian defence relationship has also changed from the traditional buyer-supplier relationship to a buyer-supplier and co-producer of equipment equation. India now manufactures several Russian defence products locally, including the Brahmos supersonic missile, the T-90 tank and Sukhoi fighter aircraft.

    The Russians have given India military expertise, which they have not given any other country, including its closest allies. The Russians feel most comfortable with India, a senior Indian diplomat told rediff.com in Moscow, on condition that he would not be identified by name for this report.

    "They know we will never be a threat to them. We are a time-tested friend. And even though they are a big supplier of defence equipment to China," he said, "they are careful not to sell the Chinese any weapons that could be used against them in the future. The Russians have long memories and have not forgotten how the Chinese used Soviet weapons in the 1969 skirmishes near the Ussuri river."

    In addition to the absence of a threat perception from the Indian side, the Russian armament supercomplex, the diplomat added, is also grateful for the infusion of much-needed funds after the Soviet Union collapsed.

    "The Russian defence industry," he added, "has not forgotten how Indian money kept it alive in the early 1990s when they were starved for cash."

    Russia no longer needs cash -- its monthly oil revenues are $6 billion; it has foreign exchange reserves of $148 billion, thanks to oil -- but it still pursues an aggressive India-Russia defence relationship, which has been further strengthened in the Putin era.

    One of the most exciting India-Russia defence projects on the anvil is the joint development of a fifth generation fighter aircraft. The Russians have offered India the option to collaborate on the $10 billion project, both economically and technologically.

    When fully developed and flown, this plane will be the most lethal and sophisticated aircraft in the skies, reportedly superior to the only fifth generation aircraft in operation, the American F/A 22 Raptor. Interestingly, perhaps as a reaction to the Russian offer, the Americans in June offered India another fifth generation fighter plane, the F-35, which, like the Russian aircraft, is also in development.

    Though no communique was issued on the fifth generation aircraft after Monday's encounter, it is understood it is on course, as is the Russian proposal to lease India a nuclear submarine.

    Both Foreign Secretary Menon and National Security Adviser Narayanan refused to answer rediff.com's question if the submarine had, in fact, been deployed in the Indian Navy. "Neither the Indians nor Russians will talk about it," a senior Russian journalist told this reporter at the Kremlin on Monday, "the submarine will quietly be absorbed in the Indian fleet" before the information is made public.

    The Nerpa class nuclear submarine, developed at the Amur shipyard and incorporated into Russia's Pacific fleet earlier this year, is the most advanced Russian nuclear attack submarine. It can be equipped with 28 nuclear-tipped Cruise missiles. The lease, which may cost India about $650 million, will add a lethal edge to the Indian Navy's fighting abilities; there is speculation that Indian naval officers and sailors are already in Russia in training for this assignment.

    It is not as if the India-Russia defence relationship is trouble-free. Indian defence ministry officials have frothed at the long delay in delivering the Admiral Gorshkov, the aircraft carrier India bought from Russia in 2004 for $1.5 billion.

    With the nation's sole aircraft carrier, the INS Viraat near retirement, the Indian Navy is anxious that the INS Vikramaditya, as the Gorshkov will be known, is quickly deployed. But that is not to be. The Russians have kept shifting the dates for delivery.

    Since the aircraft carrier has virtually to be rebuilt to suit Indian requirements, the Russians reportedly felt the price tag was insufficient to cover the redevelopment costs. As Eduard Borisov, director of the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk, northern Russia, which is working on the ship, said in an interview in August, 'We are practically rebuilding a new ship using an old hull and changing everything else.'

    The cost may only be one part of the story; it could just be that the Russians lost track of the assignment. Vladmir Pastuknov lost his job as director of the Sevmash shipyard this year over the delay.

    The Russians also held out for a cost-escalation clause in other defence agreements, asking for an 18% annual increase in the price of all equipment before it was delivered. Like all buyers -- and perhaps in the national bargaining spirit -- the Indians held out for an annual 2.8% cost escalation fee.

    When in May the issue of Russian supplies became a serious issue for the services, defence ministry officials hastened twice to Moscow to sort out the issue. India will now pay an annual 5% cost escalation fee, which could cost the nation over an estimated $50 million every year.

    Since the cost escalation agreement was reached, the vexed issue of defence supplies has been sorted out to some extent, but there is still no word on when the navy can expect the INS Vikramaditya. The navy would like the ship delivered in 2009, but given the extent of work, the Russian newspaper Izvestia said it could be as late as 2011.

    There is also some speculation whether India and Russia are involved in a new strategic collaboration over Afghanistan. After the Taliban captured power in Kabul, India, Iran and Russia actively supported the anti-Taliban resistance, especially Ahmed Shah Masoud's Northern Alliance, with weapons, medical and other supplies.

    In recent years, all three former allies find themselves in different corners in Afghanistan. As a reaction to American hostility, the Iranians are said to have opened up lines of support to the Taliban.

    The Indians, who are building a lot of infrastructure in Afghanistan, are more aligned with the Americans, provoking one Indian commentator to call India 'America's poodle' in Afghanistan.

    The Russians, the afore-quoted Indian diplomat said, are seriously worried about the recent Taliban-inspired turbulence in Afghanistan, apprehensive that some of it could easily migrate across porous borders to important allies like Uzbekistan, which is the likeliest candidate for an Islamic revolution.

    "The Russians only lost two wars in the 20th century," the diplomat added, "with Japan [Images] in 1904 and in Afghanistan. They are wary of any direct involvement (to curb the Taliban, which is making inroads even in northern Afghanistan, not its traditional base), but now find themselves with little influence in that country."

    On Thursday, November 8, the Cabinet Committee on Security met in New Delhi to okay the deals that would be signed in Moscow. It is likely that one of them could have been the intergovernmental agreement for Russia to build four nuclear reactors in India, a proposal which the Indian side is said to have abandoned on the eve of the Singh-Putin encounter, fearing a new nuclear complexity to an issue that has virtually paralysed the Union government since late August. Or did the CCS grant the prime minister the sanction to go ahead with strategic proposals that the Indian public will only learn about some time from now? Or maybe, never at all.

    http://www.hindusta ntimes.com/ StoryPage/ Print.aspx? Id=3a522c74- 3ace-4772- b9f6-459cfc8c0a2 b

    Left turn on going to IAEA
    Is there a thaw in the Left parties' attitude on the nuclear question?
    The CPI on Monday said it will consider allowing the Centre to go to the IAEA for a safeguards agreement on the nuclear deal as long as no agreement is signed before clearing it with the Left.

    Karat clarified he was not talking about the possibility of a consensus on the nuclear question. "If there is no possibility, I will not say we are going to meet again. I am hopeful something will come out," he said.CPM General Secretary Prakash Karat also struck a conciliatory note by saying that neither side (Congress or the Left) was adamant on the issue, while expressing the hope that “something would come out” of ongoing talks on the subject between the two sides. He, however, maintained there was no change in his party’s position that the deal should not be operationalised before the UPA-Left panel comes out with its findings.
    Responding to a question on whether the Left will allow the government to go to the IAEA without signing anything, CPI leader AB Bardhan was quoted as saying: “Yes, it can be allowed, provided that they come back before initialing it before sending it to the Board of Governors. They (the government) should come and if at that time also we say no, nothing doing, then they should stop”.
    Speaking to reporters at the end of the two-day meeting of the CPM politburo, Karat clarified he was not talking about the possibility of a consensus on the nuclear question. "If there is no possibility, I will not say we are going to meet again. I am hopeful something will come out," he said.

    Pointing out that the government did not go the IAEA in September or October, Karat said the government was "not adamant" on the issue, while the Left was also trying not to be adamant. He reiterated the party demand for a discussion in Parliament on the deal.

    The apparent softening of stand comes two days after a crucial luncheon meeting attended by PM Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi, Pranab Mukherjee, Karat and Bardhan to break the stalemate on the issue before it is debated in the winter session of Parliament starting November 15.

    India to be one of the three major world powers: Ken

    London : India would be one of the three major economic powerhouses in the world in the next two decades, London Mayor Ken Livingstone has said.

    "I envisage that within the next 20 years, the three most important persons in the world will be the President of China, the President of America and the Prime Minister of India," Livingstone, who is embarking on a six-day visit to India from next Sunday, told newsmen on Tuesday night.

    He said he would be leading a delegation of high-powered 80-member London "ambassadors" including Lord Sebastian Coe and Paul Deighton, Chairman and Chief Executive of London Olympics 2012 Organising Committee.

    During his visit, the Mayor will open the London India Office in Delhi and the London India Office in Mumbai to promote business, trade, culture and tourism between the city and India and sign at least three agreements including a city- to-city partnership agreement with Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit, a tourism agreement in Delhi and an agreement between Film London and the Film and Television Guild of India.

    The Mayor, who will visit the Film City in Mumbai, said last year Indian film producers produced 40 movies in London and there was a vast scope to increase it.

    He will host a showcase of London and Indian creative industries in Mumbai with special guest Amitabh Bachchan, the Bollywood superstar.

  • Anti-reforms strike cripples Paris

    Anti-reforms strike cripples Paris
    Palash Biswas

    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
    Sorry!

    I am not sending my writeups by mail anymore as some friends have refused to bear with this `Bombardment’. If the alternative information is an information it is going to continue. if you are interested at all please look for my writeups Googling. Henceforth it is your choice. I am just posting in my blogs. You have to browse yourself. I am sorry for the inconvenience I created for my learned friends. I am helpless as thing happens around me and I have to react. I felt that some of the adressees may be interested. I am wrong. Thus, henceforth, I am not targeting individuals anymore. My experience and network happens at the disposal of General readership.
    Palash

    Anti-reforms strike cripples Paris
    Paris came to a halt on Tuesday after seven labour unions went on strike, protesting President Nicolas Sarkozy's plans to reform labour laws.

    Media reports said one in 15 subway trains and about 15 percent of buses were operating on Wednesday, but the strike halted commuter trains around Paris, stranding suburban commuters.

    Protestors are angry at Sarkozy, who promised early this year to revive France's economy and open up the job market by stripping away enshrined labour protections.

    The nationwide strike led to traffic jams, as more and more people turned to their cars instead of public transport.
    "I'm fed up of this," said one woman at Saint Lazare train station, where electronic boards warned passengers of disruptions to service.

    The proposed reforms focus on special pension plans, which allow some workers -- mostly train drivers -- to retire as early as 50.

    The strikes coincide with the commercial launch of a new Eurostar service, connecting Paris Gare du Nord with the new St. Pancras terminal in Waterloo.

    Under the French law, the strike won't lead to complete shutdown of the transit systems. As a result, 90 of 700 high-speed trains will run, as well as one in every 10 commuter trains.

    Does French 'people power' rule OK?
    By Henri Astier
    BBC News

    Protests defeated pension reform in 1995 - will history repeat itself?
    The French trade unions staging a series of strikes and protests against a pension-reform plan are following a well-established procedure.

    The government calls for urgent change and draws up a proposal; those affected paralyse much of the country; the plan is shelved.

    This may not be the way the constitution says laws should be made, but France has a time-honoured tradition of legislating from the street.

    French-style people power has even acquired a force that trumps representative rule.

    Last year students and unions - who are at the forefront of the current revolt - objected to a move that made it easier to hire and fire young people.

    The law was abandoned, although it had been overwhelmingly approved by the national assembly.

    The climbdown was widely seen as a wise move: protesters in France often have more legitimacy than mere MPs.

    Precedent

    The mother of all showdowns between parliamentary and street power took place in the winter of 1995.

    PEOPLE POWER IN FRANCE
    2006: Job youth plan shelved
    2005: School reform dropped
    2000: Protests force concessions on fuel taxes
    1996: pension reform ditched
    1994: Youth wave plan scrapped
    1993: Air France reorganisation dumped

    History of protests

    There are several parallels with the current revolt. Then, as now, the unions took on a right-of-centre reformist president who had been elected only half-a-year earlier.

    And then, as now, the battle was also fought over the special pension rights enjoyed by some public sector workers - such as train drivers who can retire on a full pension as early as 50.

    The law, which had been duly debated and approved by parliament, was shelved to universal relief.

    Thereafter, no French politician dared to touch special pension privileges - until President Nicolas Sarkozy.

    Will history repeat itself? Can Mr Sarkozy stand up to protesters who have so often been the arbiters of power in France?

    On the bright side

    The president can take comfort from two facts.

    The first is that despite France's long history of revolts - its national day, indeed, celebrates a bloody riot - the practice of legislating from the street is relatively new.

    Nicolas Sarkozy insists he will not back down

    May 1968 is often cited as an example of student power. But its upshot was a victory for representative rule, when a June snap election resoundingly won by the conservatives put an end to the demonstrations and strikes.

    As recently as 1992, when lorry drivers set up blockades to express their anger at a new point-based driving permit, the Socialist government refused to budge and sent tanks to clear the roads.

    The memory of representative rule is still fresh in French minds. Mr Sarkozy's contention that he, unlike the protesters, has a popular mandate does not sound incongruous to many of his countrymen.

    This leads to the second point in Mr Sarkozy's favour - most voters regard the special pension regimes as privileges that should be scrapped.

    An opinion poll published on Wednesday suggests that 58% of French people feel the government should stand firm. Only 34% want it to back down.

    Mr Sarkozy himself remains popular, with 55% of those surveyed voicing support - more than his score in May's presidential election.

    Lonely at the top

    All this explains why unions are not solely banking on street power to prevail.

    They are also trying to influence policy in the way it is done in most democracies - through negotiations with the government.

    The opposition Socialists, for their part, are careful not to oppose pension reform in principle - just the confrontational way the government is going about it.

    None of this was true in 1995, when demonstrators, riding a wave of support, were intent on giving the government a bloody nose.

    But Mr Sarkozy's strong showing in the polls is no guarantee that he will win the current battle. Popular support is a fickle thing, and if the protest movement spreads in the coming weeks, as it very well might, Mr Sarkozy's poll ratings could slip.

    Furthermore, the main characteristic of the French political system remains - weak parliamentary rule.

    Mr Sarkozy has promised constitutional changes aimed at strengthening the power of the assembly. But this will not happen until next year.

    In the meantime, he will have to face down the unions pretty much by himself, and stop the street being the main locus of political debate.

    Sebi board approves new derivatives products
    The Sebi board met in Chennai and has approved new derivatives products. It has approved the introduction of volatility index and F&O contracts, as well as options on futures, reports CNBC-TV18.

    Apart from that, the board approved mini contracts on equity indices. Options with longer tenor, bond indices and F&O contracts have also been approved. It has approved exchange-traded currency (forex) F&O.

    The Sebi Chairman has been speaking about the expansion of the derivative market. We trade normally between USD 15-20 billion on a daily basis in the market. Analysts said that it was time that we expand the market to various derivative products. That is what the Ram Mohan Rao Committee on derivatives has done. It has suggested a lot of derivative products to the Sebi Board and the Board has accepted the interim recommendation.

    Now, the Committee was set up on March 30 this year. Within a span of 6-7 months, they have come out with interim recommendations. Analysts added that these are just interim recommendations that have been approved by the Sebi board and it requires a lot of regulatory work to be done, before these products can come into the market.

    Among the products that have been approved are the mini contract on equity indices. Currently, the minimum value of equity indices or any futures contract has to be Rs 2 lakh. It is understood that mini contracts would mean less than Rs 2 lakh. That could require some regulatory permission, because the Rs 2 lakh figure was approved by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, and it has to go through that Committee which has to approve it.

    That is the reason why none of the contracts were brought down below Rs 2 lakh, in terms of contract value. There were options with longer life and longer tenor, which basically means that we are looking at LEAS or Long-term Equity Anticipation Securities, which is the expanded version of the current options in the market.

    The options market has also grown big, but it is not as big as the futures market. But there is very little interest coming in the second and third month contracts. According to analysts, we need to see how the long-term options contract will work out, because eventually it would mean that the long-term options contract would be much cheaper, as compared to the current options contract. So, it is a move in the right direction. But it will require a lot of regulatory framework and a lot of risk framework before it can come out in the open.
    I
    ndices up 4%: Banks soar
    14 Nov, 2007, 1455 hrs IST, INDIATIMES NEWS NETWORK
    MUMBAI: Equities gained further momentum driving the Sensex nearer to the 20,000 mark. At 2:45 pm, BSE's Sensex was up 835 points or 4.39 per cent at 19,870.25.

    Banking and oil led the advances. HDFC Bank (up 10.24%), ICICI Bank (7.48%), HDFC (6.86%), Reliance Industries (6.33%) and Infosys (5.38%) were the biggest gainers.

    Hindustan Unilever, down 0.62 per cent and Bajaj Auto, down 0.14 per cent, were the only Sensex losers.

    The Nifty was up 222 points or 3.9 per cent at 5917.4.

    Market breadth showed 965 advances and 222 declines on NSE, while 2034 shares advanced and 726 declined on BSE.

    Global markets continued to send green signals with a strong opening in Europe. FTSE was up 1.25 per cent, CAC added 1.17 per cent and DAX gained 0.74 per cent.

    In full: Brown anti-terror speech
    Here is the full text of prime minister Gordon Brown's Commons statement on anti-terrorism measures.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7094620.stm

    Mr Speaker, in advance of the National Security Strategy which will be published in the next few weeks - and following the statement by the head of MIS about the potential threat from UK-based terrorists - I want to update the House, as I promised in July, on the measures we are taking at home - following the incidents on June 29th and June 30th - both to root out terrorism and to strengthen the resilience of communities to resist extreme influence measures that to succeed will require not just military and security resources but more policing, more intelligence, and an enhanced effort to win hearts and minds.

    Let me first of all thank the police, the security services and the armed forces for their vigilance, their service and their courage in facing up to terrorist threats.

    Mr Speaker, the terrorist attacks in June revolved around an attempted bomb attack on a London venue where hundreds congregated and a vehicle bomb attack on Glasgow airport.

    The conclusions today of the review by the Noble Lord West on the protection of strategic infrastructure, stations, ports and airports - and of other crowded places - identifies a need to step up physical protection against possible vehicle bomb attacks.

    This will include, where judged necessary, improved security at railway stations - focusing first on those of our 250 busiest stations most at risk - and at airport terminals, ports and at over one hundred sensitive installations.

    The report proposes the installation of robust physical barriers as protection against vehicle bomb attacks, the nomination of vehicle exclusion zones to keep all but authorised vehicles at a safe distance, and making buildings blast resistant.

    While no major failures in our protective security have been identified, companies that are responsible for crowded places will now be given detailed and updated advice on how they can improve their resilience against attack, both by better physical protection and greater vigilance in identifying suspicious behaviour.

    New guidance will be sent to thousands of cinemas, theatres, restaurants, hotels, sporting venues and commercial centres, and all hospitals, schools and places of worship - and this will include advice on training staff to be more vigilant.

    Up to 160 counter-terrorism advisers will train civilian staff to identify suspect activity and to ensure premises have secure emergency exits, CCTV footage used to best effect, and regular searches and evacuation drills.

    From now on, local authorities will be required as part of their performance framework to assess the measures they have taken to protect against terrorism.

    We will now work with architects and planners to encourage them to "design-in" protective security measures into new buildings, including safe areas, traffic control measures and the use of blast resistant materials - and for this I am grateful for the recommendations of the Hon Member for Newark, whom I thank for his work.

    Following further work we will report back soon on what more we need to do to strengthen security to protect against the use of hazardous substances for terrorist purposes.

    Mr Speaker, just as we are constantly vigilant to the ways in which we can tighten our security, so too we must ensure that the travelling public are able to go about their business in the normal way.

    In the most sensitive locations, for example some large rail stations - and whilst doing everything to avoid inconvenience to passengers - we are planning additional screening of baggage and passenger searches.

    But in the last few months at key airports there has already been additional investment in new screening capacity. We have been able to review the one-bag per passenger rule and the Transport Secretary is announcing today that as soon as we are confident that airports are able to handle additional baggage safely, these restrictions on hand baggage will be progressively lifted.

    Starting with several airports in the new year, we will work with airport operators to ensure all UK airports are in a position to allow passengers to fly with more than one item of hand luggage.

    Mr Speaker the security budget - which is two and a half billion pounds this year - will rise to three and a half billions in 2011.

    Because of the terrorist threat, the size of the security service - which was under 2,000 in 2001 and is 3,300 now - will rise beyond 4,000, twice the size of 2001.

    I can report that we have now constituted dedicated regional counter terrorism units - with in total more than 2000 police and support staff and these are responsible for overseeing investigations into those who recruit terrorists and promote hate.

    From the Home Office budget, from now until 2011, an additional £240 million will finance counter terrorism policing - focused as much on preventing the next generation of terrorists as pursuing current targets.

    And this will include additional funding for further training of our 3,500 neighbourhood police teams to deal with radicalisation in their local communities.

    The scale of our international effort is such that around £400 million over the next three years will be invested through the Foreign Office, DfID and the British Council to tackle radicalisation and promote understanding overseas.

    And the Government will report back on action overseas with other countries to counter extremism when we launch the National Security Strategy.

    I can confirm £70 million is being invested in community projects devoted to countering violent extremism.

    So in total we are now investing three times as much in security now compared with six years ago.

    Mr Speaker, in line with the measured way we responded to the terrorist incidents in June, we will only seek new powers that are essential to the fight against terrorism.

    In the forthcoming Counter Terrorism Bill - that will be introduced shortly - there will be stronger sentences for terrorist-related offences and, where terrorists have served sentences, new powers for the police to continue to monitor their activities.

    Asset freezing is an important tool in the fight against terrorists buying weapons or using money for terrorist purposes.

    Sophisticated evidence gathering of financial transactions can both deny terrorists finance and locate the sources of terrorists plots.

    Current legislation, however, makes it difficult for us to take preventative action, so the new Bill will give us new powers to ensure we can use all available information to pursue those who finance terrorist attacks.

    In addition to measures to process terrorist cases more efficiently and reduce the time between arrest and trial - including 14 new specially protected courtrooms - a single senior Judge has been nominated to manage all terrorism cases.

    There will also be a single senior lead prosecutor in the Crown Prosecution Service responsible for cases relating to inciting violent extremism.

    Mr Speaker, to ensure we protect our borders and detect possible terrorist suspects, members of the new UK Border Agency will have the power, from January next year, to detain people not just on suspicion of immigration offences or for customs crime but also for other criminal activities including terrorism.

    Powers are also being given to airline liaison officers to cancel visas where justified.

    In line with the statement I made in July, there will be one single primary checkpoint for both passport control and customs. The UK Border Agency - which will have 25,000 staff - will now apply controls at points of entry and exit on people and goods, into and out of the United Kingdom, as well as working throughout the world.

    And the new Agency will enable us to transfer intelligence from UK operations overseas to those making visa decisions, and to check biometrics taken from visa applicants against criminal and counter-terrorism records.

    Further details of the new Border Agency - which has been welcomed by the Association of Police Officers - are published in the Cabinet Office report issued today.

    This will go hand in hand with what is increasingly necessary - biometric visas for all applicants from March next year, biometric ID cards for foreign nationals introduced from the end of 2008, and a strengthening of the E-borders programme, with the contract to incorporate all passenger information awarded today.

    Having agreed repatriation arrangements for foreign terrorist suspects with Jordan, Lebanon and Algeria, work is underway with a number of additional countries with a view to signing new agreements.

    In addition to the nine foreign nationals recently deported under immigration powers on grounds of national security, a further 24 foreign nationals are currently subject to deportation proceedings on national security grounds. And 4000 foreign prisoners are likely to be deported this year.

    Mr Speaker, all faith communities in the UK make a huge contribution to all spheres of our national life. They are integral to our success as a society.

    And as we found - listening to all communities in June - the vast majority of people, of all faiths and backgrounds, condemn terrorists and the actions of terrorists.

    But the objective of Al Qaeda and related groups is to manipulate political and humanitarian issues in order to gain support for their agenda of murder and violence - and to deliberately maim and kill fellow human beings, including innocent women and children, irrespective of their religion. We must not allow anyone to use terrorist activities as a means to divide us or isolate those belonging to a particular faith or community.

    So to deal with the challenge posed by this terrorist threat we have to do more, working with communities in our countries:

    First to challenge extremist propaganda and support alternative voices

    Second, to disrupt the promoters of violent extremism by strengthening our institutions and supporting individuals who may be targeted

    Third, to increase the capacity of communities to resist and reject violent extremism

    And fourth, to address issues of concern exploited by ideologues and where by emphasising our shared values across communities we can both celebrate and act upon what unites us
    This will be achieved not by one single programme or initiative and it won't be achieved overnight.

    It is a generational challenge which requires sustained work over the long term and by a range of actions in schools, colleges, universities, faith groups and youth clubs; by engaging particular young people through the media, culture, sport and arts; and by acting against extremist influences operating on the internet and in institutions from prisons to universities and some places of worship.

    As part of intensifying measures to isolate extremism, a new unit bringing together police and security intelligence and research will identify, analyse and assess not just the inner circle of extremist groups but those at risk of falling under their influence - and share their advice and insights.

    Building on initial roadshows of mainstream Islamic scholarship around the country, which have already attracted over 70,000 young people, and an internet site which has reached far more, we will sponsor at home and then abroad, including for the first time in Pakistan, a series of national and local events to counter extremist propaganda.

    And the next stage will draw on the work commissioned by the Economic and Social Research Council, Kings College and the Royal Society for Arts on how best to deal with radicalisation at home and abroad.

    One central issue is how to balance extremist views supporting terrorism which appear on the internet and media.

    The Home Secretary is inviting the largest global technology and internet companies to work together to ensure that our best technical expertise is galvanised to counter online incitement to hatred.

    I also welcome the decision by the Royal Television Society and Society of Newspaper Editors to hold a conference on how to ensure accurate and balanced reporting of issues related to terrorism in the media.

    To ensure charities are not exploited by extremists, a new unit in the Charity Commission will strengthen governance and accountability.

    A specialist unit in the Prisons Service will be tasked with stopping extremists using prison networks to plot future activities.

    And because young people in the criminal justice system are especially vulnerable to extremist influences, we are making further funding available through the Youth Justice Board, the National Offenders Management Service and the many voluntary agencies that work with young people in trouble to support young people who may be targeted for recruitment by extremist groups.

    Following evidence that some of those involved in promoting violent extremism have made use of outdoor activity sports centres and facilities, we are working with Sport England to provide guidance for the sector to ensure that these facilities are not abused.

    And backed up by a new website to share best practice, a new board of experts will advise local authorities, local councillors and local communities on tackling those promoting hate.

    We have had mosques in the UK for more than a hundred years, serving local communities well.

    These communities tell me that mosques have a much wider role beyond their core spiritual purpose in providing services, educating young people and building cohesion - and the majority already work very hard to reject violent extremism.

    As the newly constituted Mosques and Imams National Advisory Body recognises however, the governance of mosques could be strengthened to help serve communities better and to challenge those who feed hate.

    Our consultations with Muslim communities emphasise the importance of the training of imams, including English language requirements - and the Secretary for Communities will be announcing an independent review to examine, with the communities, how to build the capacity of Islamic seminaries, learning from other faith communities as well as experience overseas.

    In addition to updated advice for universities on how to deal with extremism on the campus, the Secretary for Skills and the Higher Education Minister will invite universities to lead a debate on how we maintain academic freedom whilst ensuring that extremists can never stifle debate or impose their views.

    And we will now consult also on how we can support further education colleges as well as universities.

    And the Secretary of State for Culture is working with the museums, libraries and archives council to agree a common approach to deal with inflammatory and extremist material that some now seek to distribute through public libraries, whilst also protecting freedom of speech.

    We know that young people of school age can be exposed to extremist messages.

    The Secretary of State for Children will be convening a new forum of headteachers to advise on what more we can do to protect young people and build bridges across communities.

    And to ensure young people have the opportunity to learn about diversity and faith in modern Britain, we will work in partnership with religious education teachers to promote the national framework for teaching religious education in schools including making sure children learn about all faiths.

    An advisory group will work with local communities to support citizenship education classes run by mosque schools in Bradford and elsewhere.

    And I can announce that one essential part of this will be to twin schools of different faiths with our £2 million pound school linking programme, supported by a new national website and School Linking Network.

    I am also announcing today a youth panel to advise the Government - learning from youth projects in different parts of the country, which all enable young people to debate and discuss issues of concern - as does the work of the Youth Parliament, which has been running debates about the impact of terrorism on young people.

    And we are sponsoring and encouraging a series of national and local mentoring programmes for young people:

    A Business In The Community Muslim mentoring programme
    New leadership training and local youth leadership schemes in Blackburn, Waltham Forest, Leeds and in partnership with Tottenham in Haringey
    After discussion with Muslim women, a new advisory group has been set up by the Secretary for Communities.

    And this will advise on the access of women to mosques and their management committees.

    Mr Speaker, it is by seeking to build on shared interests and shared values that we will isolate extremists and foster understanding across faiths.

    Following the recent remarkable letter by 138 Muslim scholars - from a diversity of traditions within Islam - which paid tribute to the common roots of Islam, Christianity and Judaism and called for deeper dialogue, we stand ready to support in Britain new facilities for multi-faith scholarship, research and dialogue.

    A green paper will be published to encourage interfaith groups to come together in all constituencies of our country.

    I am also inviting the Higher Education Funding Council to investigate the idea of setting up in Britain a European Centre of Excellence for Islamic studies.

    We will have joint work with the French and German governments on building an appreciation of Islamic and Muslim heritage across Europe, the Arts Council England, Tate Gallery, the Victoria and Albert Museum and British Library will all be taking forward projects to promote greater understanding of the contribution of Islam to European history and culture.

    And just as the British Council is connecting young people across the world through school twinning and volunteering exchanges, I am announcing that we will finance a rising number of young people from all faith communities to volunteer overseas.

    Mr Speaker, the intercept review will report in January, we believe a consensus now exists on post-charge questioning. The Home Secretary is beginning a new round of consultations with parties and communities on detailed proposals on pre-charge detention where we believe we can establish a cross-party consensus.

    Mr Speaker, there is no greater priority than the safety and security of our people and building the strongest possible relationships across all faiths and communities - and I believe it possible, with the actions we are proposing, to build a stronger consensus that will both root out terrorist extremism and build more vibrant and cohesive communities.

    India sees revival in industrial output
    NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Sluggish growth in industrial output in September was due to a weaker dollar and a comparison with strong expansion a year ago, and should revive in coming months, the trade minister said on Wednesday.

    Analysts, however, warn that high interest rates, a firm rupee, high oil prices and a possible slowdown in exports to the United States may weigh on Asia's third-largest economy.

    "I am hopeful manufacturing will revive," Kamal Nath told reporters on the sidelines of a conference, when asked about the outlook for industrial growth.

    "There has been a decline (as compared to September last year) because of two reasons. One is a weak dollar and second the growth in September has been on a higher base," Nath said.

    Industrial production in September rose 6.4 percent from a year earlier, sharply lower than annual growth of 10.7 percent in August and below estimates of 9.9 percent.

    Manufacturing, which contributes 79 percent to industrial output, grew by 6.6 percent in September.

    The rupee has risen 12.5 percent against the dollar this year and squeezed margins of exporters, especially in textiles, auto and software sectors.

    Some firms have cut output and jobs.

    Nath said the government would review the export target for 2007/08 sometime this month. At present, the target is $160 billion for the year to March 2008.

  • CPM issues veiled threat to media, Subhash Chakraborty Supports Buddha

    CPM issues veiled threat to media, Subhash Chakraborty Supports Buddha

    Palash Biswas

    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com

    I am not sending my writeups by mail anymore as some friends have refused to bear with this `Bombardment’. If the alternative information is an information it is going to continue. if you are interested at all please look for my writeups Googling. Henceforth it is your choice. I am just posting in my blogs. You have to browse yourself. I am sorry for the inconvenience I created for my learned friends. I am helpless as thing happens around me and I have to react. I felt that some of the adressees may be interested. I am wrong. Thus, henceforth, I am not targeting individuals anymore. My experience and network happens at the disposal of General readership.
    Palash

    Kolkata: West Bengal Transport Minister and senior Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) leader Subhash Chakraborty issued a veiled threat to the media Wednesday, saying scribes could face public outrage for providing "wrong information" about the Nandigram violence to the people.

    "Our battle is against media organisations which are instigating the opposition to carry on their anti-Left movement in West Bengal. We have been seeing that a number of media channels and newspaper organisations are continuously providing wrong information to the people," Chakraborty told a local television channel in an interview.

    If you think you are the representative of the common people, you are wrong. I am the actual representative of the people. I have been a legislator for the past 35 years and I have some responsibility," he said.

    "The media can face serious public ire. These media reports on Nandigram have no connection with the truth," said Chakraborty, a CPI-M legislator from the Belgachia (East) constituency.

    "I have seen many media organisations come and go. Many media persons will go into oblivion. But the Left Front will remain in its own position in the future," he said.

    Since January, violence in Nandigram, 150 km from here, has claimed at least 34 lives as the region flared up over proposed land acquisition for a special economic zone (SEZ), which was scrapped by the state government later in the face of stiff resistance by local villagers.

    Amnesty condemns attack on farmers in Nandigram
    Amnesty International is concerned at reports of an upsurge in political violence since November 6 in Nandigram, eastern Midnapore (West Bengal), which has led to at least nine deaths, more than 15 persons injured and the displacement of hundreds of local inhabitants.

    Amnesty International is particularly concerned at reports that state officials may have been complicit in attacks on farmers belonging to the Bhumi Uchched Pratirodh Committee (BUPC, Anti Displacement Committee), an organization formed in late 2006 to protest against their possible displacement due to planned construction of a industrial project in the area.

    Human rights organizations have reported that violence erupted on November 6 as armed supporters of the ruling Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) fired several rounds at local farmers belonging to the BUPC.

    The state police reportedly failed to take action against the armed men, and also to fulfil their duty to protect the local population. The firing was followed by retaliatory attacks by armed supporters of the BUPC.

    Over the last year, as violence has escalated between CPI-M which leads the ruling Left Front coalition in West Bengal and farmers linked to the BUPC, at least 25 persons have been killed and more than 100 injured. At least 20 women have reportedly been sexually assaulted during the violence, with at least 2,000 people displaced from their homes.

    The majority of the displaced are living in makeshift camps, unable to return to their homes for fear of being caught up in the violence.

    Violence was sparked in January 2007 after sustained protests from local farming communities because they feared that the industrial project would lead to their mass displacement.

    In March 2007, 14 persons, mostly local residents were killed when police and armed men, widely believed to be affiliated with the CPI-M, opened fire on demonstrators. After the incident, the state government has said it would relocate the project, but outbreaks of political violence have continued.

    Amnesty International remains concerned that, following the deaths of several persons in Nandigram in January and in March 2007, the Government of West Bengal failed to order impartial inquiries in to the killings.

    Additionally, the organization is further concerned that the state government successfully petitioned the Kolkata High Court to stay the investigation, ordered earlier by the court, to be carried out by India's Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), into the March violence.

    Amnesty International believes that the continuing unrest in Nandigram has been aggravated by the failure to effectively investigate and to prosecute those individuals believed responsible for violence incidents that have resulted in the death of at least 25 persons over the last year.

    Amnesty International calls on the Government of West Bengal to:

    pave the way for an impartial and independent inquiry into the Nandigram violence during the past year;
    promptly make the findings public and to bring to justice those believed to be responsible for the violence in proceedings that meet international standards of fair trial and do not impose the death penalty;
    ensure that all state officials, including police personnel, who are suspected of being responsible for human rights violations, including excessive use of force, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment are brought to justice in proceedings that meet international standards of fair trial and do not impose the death penalty;
    ensure the safe return of all displaced communities to Nandigram and neighbouring areas.

    Background

    The Nandigram industrial project, requiring at least 4,000 hectares of land to establish a Special Economic Zone (SEZ), was to be jointly developed as a chemical hub by the state-owned Industrial Development Corporation and the Indonesia-based Salem group of companies.

    The Government of West Bengal is to announce an alternate location for the project.

    The West Bengal state government plans to set up at least six other major industrial projects, including SEZs, in the state, necessitating the acquiring of at least 10,000 hectares of land.

    In a bid to boost national economic growth, India has been promoting SEZs across the country. The policy of acquiring and for such industrial projects continues to spark protests from local communities fearing land displacement and threats to their sustainable livelihood.

    Source: Amnesty International

    Buddhadeb meets Governor
    West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee on Tuesday called on Governor Gopalkrishna Gandhi and discussed the Nandigram developments.

    Mr. Bhattacharjee also apprised the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh of the situation in Nandigram after Dr. Singh’s arrival from Moscow, it was learnt.

    Earlier in the day, the government submitted a report to the Governor on the violence and the steps taken for restoring normality in Nandigram.

    Before visiting Raj Bhavan, Mr. Bhattacharjee said the violence could have been avoided if the Union government had promptly sent the CRPF (Central Reserve Police Force) soon after his request.

    “I wrote to Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil on October 27 but the CRPF came on November 12. The arrival followed only after a letter of regret sent to him on November 5, a telephonic conversation with him and a request to External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee to help facilitate matters,” the Chief Minister said.

    “The deployment of Central forces was sought only after a political solution, through talks with the Opposition that was initiated in September-October, turned elusive,” he said.

    Though he felt that the strength of the CRPF deployed in Nandigram was inadequate, he was confident that “within the next two to three days peace will be restored in the area.”

    Nandigram victims recount tales of horror

    Tomluk: Cowering in fear, victims of violence in West Bengal's Nandigram region on Wednesday recounted tales of torture at the hands of Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) cadres.

    "My wife was beaten up by CPI-M attackers when I was not at home. They broke her legs with a rifle butt and dragged her to a paddy field at gunpoint and raped her till she lost consciousness," Mir Akbar Ali told IANS at a government hospital in Tomluk, about 130 km from Kolkata.

    Nandigram standoff

    CRPF begins clean-up operation

    Images: Uneasy calm in Nandigram

    Mamata criticises Centre

    Full coverage: Farmers vs SEZ

    "Both my daughters, 16-year-old Ansura Khatun and 14-year-old Mansura Khatun, were abducted by CPI-M cadres and are missing," he said.

    Ali said the CPI-M cadres started their operation of recapturing Nandigram in East Midnapore district on November 5 and worked gradually through the area.

    "If you go to Nandigram you will find red flags fluttering on top of every house. The entire district has turned into a ghost town," he said, recounting how people were killed when CPI-M men fired upon a rally taken out by the Bhumi Uchched Pratirodh Committee (BUPC) activists on November 10.

    The rally was moving from Maheshpur to Sonachura within the Nandigram area when CPI-M supporters surr