Search blog.co.uk

Posts archive for: 7 October, 2007
  • CBI Calls for control on Cyber Network, New delhi Mute on Myanmar

    CBI Calls for control on Cyber Network, New delhi Mute on Myanmar
    Pranab Advocates East policy by strengthening bilateral and regional relations with Southeast Asian countries.
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com
    If India were to adopt a ‘bold’ approach on Myanmar the least that would be expected of New Delhi is to snap diplomatic and all other ties with its neighbour and then participate in covert or even overt operations against the junta. Anything short of that would remain classified as ‘muted’ response.On the other hand on the Myanmar line, in view of terrorists' growing usage of the cyber network for communication, security agencies, including CBI, has asked the government to amend Information Technology Act to enable investigating and intelligence agencies to monitor the Internet network and gateways. This was opined at the just-concluded Directors and Inspectors Generals Conference being organised in the capital by Intelligence Bureau. According to sources, monitoring of network was essential as this would help the probe and intelligence agencies in gathering real-time information and take necessary preventive measures. Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP), used to transmit voice signals as data packets through the Internet, was being misused by some people, posing a serious threat to national security, CBI said in its presentation at the Conference. The CBI’s stand was supported by representatives attending the conference.
    Twice in the past India had plunged headlong into the affairs of the beleaguered people in the neighbourhood. First in what is now Bangladesh where the Indian participation did prove to be very important in liberating the country from Pakistan. But where are we today? Relations with Bangladesh are anything but tension-free. To blame that state of affairs wholly on the faulty Indian policy would be somewhat misleading because it is Bangladesh that has in recent years chosen to jettison its secular character and encourage the rise of fundamentalism—acts that appeared to be part of a deliberate policy to distance Dhaka from New Delhi.The other unhappy experience was in Sri Lanka where the Indian army was sent with the intention of curbing militancy that appeared to be a serious threat to the island nation. The policy of sending Indian troops, which at the time had only received some muted criticism at home, ended in turning both the majority Sinhala (Buddhist) and the minority Tamil population against India. The after effects of that ‘disaster’ over two decades ago have still not been erased.

    External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee Sunday said India could emerge as one of the world`s fastest growing economies if it was able to boost its Look East policy by strengthening bilateral and regional relations with Southeast Asian countries.
    `The Look East policy is a strategic shift in India`s vision of the world and we genuinely believe the country could emerge as one of the fastest growing economies in the world if we can reach out to our civiliasational Asian neighbours,` the Minister said.
    It may well sound politically correct but the tendency in the country to magnify the negative impact of foreign policy issues that concern India sits ill with aspirations for great power status. There is some obsession about outside powers—almost always used as euphemism for the US—ever eager to ‘interfere’ in India’s domestic affairs much as they do when dealing with client states or potentates gone out of favour. Even with its potential still not fully realised, does anybody seriously think that India will become a vassal state?
    It is astonishing that the idea of today’s India being sill in ‘imminent danger of being swamped by the East India Company has so many takers in the country—among the class of politicians. Actually, the reason may be something very different. Raising slogans like someone ‘selling’ the country or ignoring national ‘interests’ are believed to be rewarding at the hustings. The baser the appeal the more politically profitable it is likely to be.
    Take the crisis in Myanmar. In comparison to the West, India’s response has been dubbed ‘muted’, mainly, it is said, because New Delhi cannot afford to annoy the Generals who are already in tight embrace of China. Besides, India needs Myanmar army’s help to fight insurgency in its troubled Northeast region. The rich energy sources of Myanmar are also responsible for bringing India closer to whoever rules the country.

    Mukherjee was speaking at a meet, titled `India`s Look East Policy - Challenges for Sub-Regional Cooperation`, in Assam`s main city of Guwahati. Organised by the Public Diplomacy division of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), the meeting was aimed at highlighting the Look East policy for developing closer relations with the economic tigers of Southeast Asia.
    `We need to cement connectivity with the Asian neighbours in the region who, by emerging as regional economic powerhouses, also presented us with a model worthy of emulation,` he said.
    Considering the proximity India`s Northeast has with Southeast Asia, the Minister said the region could become the gateway to the neighbouring countries.
    `India is aware of the geo-economic potential of the Northeastern region as a gateway to East and Southeast Asia. By gradually integrating this region through cross-border market access, the Northeastern region could become the bridge between the Indian economy and what is beyond doubt the fastest growing region in the world,` Mukherjee said.
    He said there were plans for direct air links between Southeast Asian cities with India`s Northeast, besides having telecommunication networking through optical fibre links.
    `Information and communication technology revolutions have virtually shrunk the globe, and geography is no longer a buffer,` he said.
    The meet was part of a exercise by the Public Diplomacy division to educate people across the country about foreign policy issues and seek their opinions on critical issues.
    Enunciated in the 1990s by then prime minister PV Narasimha Rao, the much-hyped Look East policy had its genesis in the end of the Cold War following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
    India made a shift in its foreign policy when it embarked on a programme of free market restructuring at home and sought new markets and economic partners abroad - primarily Southeast Asia - because of the geographical contiguity of the Northeast with the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries.

    Ancient India tribe marches against power project
    06 Oct 2007 11:47:18 GMT

    Background
    Northeast India clashes
    More (Corrects location in paragraph 1 from northwest to northeast)
    By Bappa Majumdar
    KOLKATA, India, Oct 6 (Reuters) - Thousands of Indian tribespeople protested on Saturday against the construction of hydro power projects on what they say is sacred land in the remote northeast, officials said.
    The ancient Buddhist Lepchas, who say they are already marginalised by the growing population of ethnic Hindu Nepalis in the region, strongly oppose the project in Dzongu mountain, which they regard as the abode of their guardian god of the mountains.
    "Dzongu is a reserved territory of the Lepchas and we will protect the land of our forefathers with the last drop of blood," said Tseten Lepcha of the Affected Citizens of Teesta.
    There are plans to construct at least six hydro power projects along the Teesta river in the tiny Himalayan state of Sikkim to generate more than 3,000 MW of power.
    The protest was seen spreading on Saturday after thousands of Lepchas were seen holding placards and shouting "Stop the project" and "Protect Dzongu", on the streets of Kalimpong, a tourist town in neighbouring West Bengal state, witnesses said.
    The ancient Lepchas traditionally revere the Teesta river, and fear its disappearance into a series of proposal tunnels will be accompanied by their own marginalisation.
    It will also cause widespread destruction of vegetation and kill thousands of rare fish, they say.
    Several rounds of talks with the government have failed to resolve the dispute.
    "The parleys have all failed and they want nothing less than scrapping of the Teesta project, which is impossible," B.B. Gooroong, chief adviser to the government, said on Saturday.
    The 100,000 Lepchas living in the two states are now coming together on the issue.
    "Dzongu is all that is left to us, how can we let them destroy it," added Dawa Lepcha.

    CBI favours monitoring of Internet gateways and networks

    "The calling person in a foreign country makes a call through calling cards. Once he or she calls any number to India using calling cards, the call is routed through VOIP gateway in the foreign country where the voice signals are converted into data packets.
    "The same are transmitted over Internet and are converted into voice signals by VOIP gateway in India. The calls are further routed through a local telephone network to the destination numbers as local calls," the CBI said in the presentation.
    The investigating agency said such illegal set-ups caused losses to the government in form of Access Deficit Charges (ADC), licence fees and other charges like income, service taxes.
    "Also, as the calls cannot be monitored by law enforcement agencies, they present a serious threat to the security of the nation," the CBI, which has registered many cases including that against Reliance InfoComm (before demerger), said in its presentation.
    The agency, while calling for strengthening of the IT Act, also favoured legal sanctions for pre-registration of evidence collection tools as e-surveillance and undercover operations besides providing testimonial immunity to undercover agents.
    In view of the paucity of staff, the CBI favoured delegating the powers of investigation to an Inspector as not many Deputy Superintendents of Police were available for investigating.

    CBI favours monitoring of Internet gateways and networks

    New Delhi, Oct 07: In view of terrorists' growing usage of the cyber network for communication, security agencies, including CBI, has asked the government to amend Information Technology Act to enable investigating and intelligence agencies to monitor the Internet network and gateways.
    This was opined at the just-concluded Directors and Inspectors Generals Conference being organised in the capital by Intelligence Bureau.
    According to sources, monitoring of network was essential as this would help the probe and intelligence agencies in gathering real-time information and take necessary preventive measures.
    Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP), used to transmit voice signals as data packets through the Internet, was being misused by some people, posing a serious threat to national security, CBI said in its presentation at the Conference.
    The CBI’s stand was supported by representatives attending the conference.
    "The calling person in a foreign country makes a call through calling cards. Once he or she calls any number to India using calling cards, the call is routed through VOIP gateway in the foreign country where the voice signals are converted into data packets.
    "The same are transmitted over Internet and are converted into voice signals by VOIP gateway in India. The calls are further routed through a local telephone network to the destination numbers as local calls," the CBI said in the presentation.
    The investigating agency said such illegal set-ups caused losses to the government in form of Access Deficit Charges (ADC), licence fees and other charges like income, service taxes.
    "Also, as the calls cannot be monitored by law enforcement agencies, they present a serious threat to the security of the nation," the CBI, which has registered many cases including that against Reliance InfoComm (before demerger), said in its presentation.
    The agency, while calling for strengthening of the IT Act, also favoured legal sanctions for pre-registration of evidence collection tools as e-surveillance and undercover operations besides providing testimonial immunity to undercover agents.
    In view of the paucity of staff, the CBI favoured delegating the powers of investigation to an Inspector as not many Deputy Superintendents of Police were available for investigating.

    Thai companies looking to invest in the subcontinent are being encouraged to look to India's Northeast.

    Attractive government incentives and nearly $50 billion in planned road and highway upgrades make this one of the region's most lucrative areas, says an Indian delegation.

    ''What we have done is try to give subsidies in various forms to companies that invest in the region, and they are part of the overall incentives to promote the region,'' Ashwani Kumar, minister of state for industries for the government of India told Thai investors in Bangkok during a seminar.

    Mr Kumar was accompanied this week by Mani Shankar Aiyar, the minister for the development of the northeast region of India and close to 400 delegates from the region. He said the salient points of the incentives on offer are:

    FA 10-year income tax holiday from the date of investment.

    FExemption from all forms of excise duty on products manufactured in the region.

    FA capital investment subsidy of 30% of capital expenditure on machinery and equipment to companies that set up plants in the region.

    FA 3% interest-rate subsidy for investors.

    FComprehensive insurance, whereby the government subsidises 100% of the insurance premium that the investors undertake.

    FA transport subsidy for 90% of total costs for transport of raw material from any part of India to the region's manufacturing base and for the shipment of finished goods from the region manufacturing plant to any part of India.

    Mr Kumar, who drafted the incentives, said that they made the region an investment haven for Thai entrepreneurs looking to capitalise on India's robust economic growth.

    These subsidies, he explained, were available to investors for the next 10 years and could be renewed if the requirements existed during that period.

    ''There is no set rule that these subsidies will not be renewed, but rest assured they are there until March 31, 2017 and if there was a need to renew it, we will renew it,'' he said.

    Besides the manufacturing sector, the benefits would also be available for service industries such as tourism, hospitality, health care, vocational training and IT.

    Among the biggest challenges Mr Kumar highlights are the vast distances from the Northeast to the now booming areas of India. Chiang Mai is closer to northeastern India than Kolkotta, New Delhi or Mumbai.

    ''Through the transport subsidy, we have taken that burden off the manufacturers, which opens the region to a whole lot of opportunities apart from the infrastructure investments that are needed,'' Mr Kumar said.

    Thailand Deputy Industry Minister Piyabutr Cholvijarn and Satit Chanjavanakul, the secretary-general of the Board of Investment, agreed that the region offers great potential for Thais to capitalise on the growing Indian market.

    ''The region is one that we all have to look at as it can open the avenue for us to enter the booming Indian market and beyond to the Middle East and the European markets,'' Mr Piyabutr said in his remarks during the four-day event in Bangkok to promote trade and investment with less developed region of Northeast India.

    India, whose economy is on track for 9%-plus annual growth, is looking to develop the Northeast region to propel the country's overall growth. .

    Mr Kumar said that the delegation was the largest of its kind to visit Thailand.

    Northeastern India comprises Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura and Sikkim. The resource-rich provinces have large deposits of oil, coal and metals. Literacy among the region's population of 400 million is among the country's highest and labour is inexpensive.

    The area is also rich in oil, natural gas, coal and limestone, while the Brahmaputra River and its tributaries could be tapped for energy, irrigation and transport. It has more than two-thirds of India's hydropower potential (84,000 megawatts). Fertile soil in the Brahmaputra valley makes it a storehouse of plantation crops, vegetables, spices and rare woods.

    ''This is the gateway to Southeast Asia and we can complement each other as India's 'look east' policy and Thailand's 'look west' policy can help form a partnership that will be there for ages to come,'' Mr Kumar said.

    Film on Mahasweta Devi's Nandigram activism
    Kajari Bhattacharya
    http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=23&theme=&usrsess=1&id=162395
    KOLKATA, July 10: After making two controversial films ~ One Day From a Hangman’s Life ~ a film based on Nata Mullick, who was given the responsibility of putting the noose around murderer Dhananjoy Chatterjee’s head (a film that was banned in the state by chief minister Mr Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee) ~ and Walking Dead, a film about people living in Uttar Pradesh’s Azamgarh district who have been declared dead in land records ~ filmmaker and a director with Films Division, Joshy Joseph is now making a film on Jnanpith Award winner Mahasweta Devi.
    The film, The Journey of an Indian Author is being produced by Drik India, and is not a documentation of the 82-year-old writer’s life. Instead it focuses on Devi and her activism in Nandigram and other parts of rural West Bengal.
    “The film stems from my obsession with journeys and Mahasweta Devi’s journey to from Kolkata to Purulia and from there to Nandigram. Within this frame I want to reflect her past and her commitment to causes as an activist,” said Joseph, sitting in his Films Division office on the sixth floor of Doordarshan Bhavan. The filmmaker has already shot about 52 hours for the film, and plans to shoot another 30 to 40 hours within another four months, although the film’s duration will only be about an hour. Joseph is also making a biographical docu-feature from Films Division on Mahasweta Devi, which would take another five or six months to script.
    The writer-activist, who has been vocal in her criticism of the state government’s attempts to grab the land and homes of villagers in various parts of the state, is now engaged in pooling together all possible resources to set up health centres in Nandigram.
    The author has been a harsh critic of the government’s use of force for acquisition of land in Nandigram, East Midnapore and has stood by activists such as Medha Patkar to oppose the state’s land grab move. “I’ve been to Haripur, Baruipur, Nandigram, Singur; wherever they (the state government) are taking away land,” said Mahasweta Devi. “I’ve put all my efforts now into setting up health centres in Nandigram. Even after all the violence that has happened in Nandigram, the West Bengal government has done nothing to help the villagers. In the 37 to 38 villages that make up what is called Nandigram, people need doctors and medical help.”
    The author alleged that from across a canal that borders Nandigram, bombs and bullets are being hurled towards the villagers on a regular basis. “Martyrs’ Hospital that is being proposed to be built in Nandigram will be about 17 to 18 kilometre away from villages such as Shonachura. So, we have set up a health centre on the terrace of a United Bank of India building in the village,” she added. Both men and women from the village are actively involved in helping the health centre to run. High school pass outs are being trained by doctors to become health workers in villages such as Maheshpur and Shonachura. The author said efforts were on to open another health centre in Gokulnagar village. About 75 to 80 patients are treated in the Shonachura health centre on a daily basis. Most of the patients suffer from dog and snake bites.
    Britain on Wednesday justified the award of a knighthood to controversial author Salman Rushdie and asserted that it would not allow terrorist groups to undermine the British way of life.
    Lebanon's army appeared Wednesday to be gearing up to launch a major assault on a Palestinian refugee camp where troops have been battling Islamic militants for weeks.
    Witnesses said the army was bringing in heavy reinforcements to the Nahr el-Bared camp area near the northern port of Tripoli, suggesting a fresh assault was imminent.Sniper from inside the camp killed a Lebanese soldier late Tuesday after the Fatah Islam fighters rejected repeated calls to surrender.
    .S. tempts Japan with new F-22 jets By ERIC TALMADGE, Associated Press Writer
    Thu Jul 12, 4:26 AM ET
    Nationhood redefined
    I am sending you a review article of Mr V.T.Rajshekar's , (Editor, Dalit Voice ) book Caste : a Nation with in nation : recipe for a bloodless revolution.

    regards,

    Vidya Bhushan Rawat

    Strong caste identities pose serious challenge to brahmanical supermacy
    By Vidya Bhushan Rawat
    Hindu Society is a myth but caste is a reality. And this reality has been widely accepted in Uttar-Pradesh and Bihar where caste assertion is growing and those without any political representations are living on the margins. It would look absolutely fanatical if you talk of caste as a nation but reading V.T.Rajshekar's book 'Caste, a Nation with in the Nation', recipe for a bloodless revolution, reveals the importance of the subject. He is not the only one who speaks on the issue but definitely perhaps among very few who are unapologetic about speaking it and quotes reasonably well from Anthropological survey of India report ' People of India' which was headed by an IAS officer Mr K.S.Singh. Singh maintained that there are 2800 castes in which 450 are scheduled castes, 461 scheduled tribes and 766 backward classes. The report, which says that ' Indian society continues to be a collection of castes and communities,' has been hidden in the dusty files of the ministry.
    It is a fact that people closely connect on the basis of their caste more than any other identity. A person lives in various identities including the individual one. There are identities, which are linguistic, regional, and ethnic yet the Indian sub continental reality is that it would be entirely baseless to say that the caste identity does not exist. If caste were not a reality, Bangladesh would not have come into being. The fact of the matter is the Punjabi Muslims had always treated the Bangla Muslims with utter contempt. A former general in Pakistan justified in his book for non-inclusion of the Bengalis in elite services of Pakistan for they 'lack' merit.
    Caste Identities will ultimately eliminate the brahmanical supremacy
    What Rajsekhar has tried to put in bravely is that caste system has to be opposed but castes are different identities. That is a fact because Dalit is not a one word or one world as it includes a variety of castes and each one has its own world. Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar, when drafted the constitution, mentioned it as Scheduled Castes. So he was aware of the fact of the diversity with in the Dalit Bahujan societies. Caste is a reality and not rhetoric and has been wonderfully explained by Mr V.T.Rajshekar. In fact, he was among the very few whom out rightly supported quota on the basis of the percentage of the community. The issue of Mala Madiga, Mahar-Mang, Chamars-Valmikis and others would get resolved easily if there were broader feeling of sharing the space with even the nondescript communities. It is also interesting that the author says the abolition of sub castes would not help the Dalit Bahujan but to the brahmanical Hinduism. If Hindus are so interested in caste elimination why the elite want to confine their marriage in their communities. If caste is a rural phenomena and not an urban one, why the hell it is not eliminated from our English newspapers and their matrimonial columns? The caste consciousness of the Dalit Bahujan would make the struggle stronger which the upper caste Hindus fear too much and therefore the 'saintly' advise of 'elimination' of castes without touching the caste system.
    Rajshekar is unique in theorizing and people like me have always taken those theories further. Like, the demand for elimination or annihilation of castes normally comes from the powerful groups. It is no secret that why this issue has rarely been raised by the poor. Why are Brahmins so interested in demolition of caste they so wonderfully created? The answer is provided by the author himself. Today, using caste identity is not beneficial for the Brahmins. It is beneficial for the Dalits and the bahujans for democracy is a number game and therefore assertion is important. Secondly, it is important whether denouncing caste has in fact resulted in demolition of the brahmanical structure. It is easier to say ' I do not believe in caste', but how many of them have excluded from their social rituals and practices based on caste system. The answer would be in negative.
    On December 16th, 1993 Rajshekar wrote a historic editorial in Dalit Voice: Strengthen every caste to annihilate Brahmanism'. This was an important departure from the so-called academic theories, which talks of 'elimination' of caste system without really intending to do so. In December 1992 Babari Masjid was demolished and Dalit Voice was the only journal, which wrote that myth of the Hindu tolerance was exposed. Some of us who developed our understanding though reading Dalit Voice and the material referred by its editor, realized that the aim of the Babri demolition was not really against the Muslims but subjugate the Dalit Bahujan masses further which were aggressively asserting their caste identities in the aftermath of the anti Mandal protests in north India. An analysis of the post Mandal situation in India reflect explains unambiguously that had it not been the assertion of Dalit-Bahujan, India would have turned into a fascist state. Is not it a reality that after the Babari mosque was demolished the Dalit Bahujan of Uttar-Pradesh joined hand and threw away the fascist government of the Bhartiya Janata Party which thought that they would come with thumping majority. Is not it true that both Uttar-Pradesh and Bihar, many of our educated elite might make us believe are the worst Indian states, have virtually decimated the Sangh parivar. And what are the reasons for the same? It is the growing assertion of the Dalit backward communities in these states, which has kept the Hindutva family thoroughly marginalized. In the latest round of bout, again the people of Uttar-Pradesh have brought back a government led by a Dalit woman and both the upper caste parties are at the margin. It is another factor that the fall of Mulayam Singh Yadav must be attributed to upper castes and hence Maywati has to be extra vigilant when she makes Brahmins her ally, as they have not come to Maywati leaving their feudal caste mindset but because of compulsions. And marriage of convenience breaks ones compulsions are over. It is important to understand that while the caste identities have challenged brahmanical supremacy, further degeneration of it would bring back the brahmanical elite. Uttar-Pradesh is a case example. While the main political struggle here is between the Dalits and backwards, it is the brahmanical elite, which has become the most sought after in the state. But if the Dalit Bahujan are understandable this question would also get resolved soon.
    Connect to History
    The best practice of the brahmanical manipulation was that they were non violently violent as Rajshekar has pointed out many times. They institutionalized violence and made everything that benefited them as sacrosanct. So, for the poor Dalit Bahujan, the Brahmins made them hate them, so most of these communities hated themselves and their communities. Abroad, people used to write their surname with the work they do like the Shoe maker put their sir name as Shoemaker, similarly other sir names originated as Smith, Goldsmith, Blacksmith, Butler, etc. But here the Brahmins asked to hate us. How can the people or a community progress if they do not know their own history and hate them. Every now and them the ruling elite talks of the contradictions among the Dalit and Bahujan classes but the fact is that contradictions are there in our lives as Mao Tse Tung said in his famous work ' On Contradictions'. Human history progressed with these contradictions. Is not there a contradiction between Brahmin and a Thakur or a Kayastha or a Bania. Differences are bound to happen in a diverse society and they will be there in the Dalit Bahujan also as they are among the upper castes also. However, contradictions would always be used to divide the Dalit Bahujan masses to fulfill the grand agenda of the brahmanical elites in India and therefore Baba Saheb Ambedkar said, ' As long as oppressed classes do not turn to ruling classes, internal contradictions would remain.
    Hinduism is a Political Theory
    Again, an important point expressed in the book is that Hinduism is not a religion but a political theory. Some people differentiate between Hindutva and Hinduism for they believe the idea of Hindutva was propagated by Vir Savarkar while Hinduism, they feel, is essentially a very tolerant religion. This is historically inaccurate and incorrect for various reasons. One, Hinduism as such is not a religion but essentially meant to address the people living in India, a name was given by the Mughal invaders. Originally, it was Varnashram dharma, a religion based on caste and colour. But in real terms it is a political theory as mentioned by V.R.Rajshekar quoting profusely to Baba Saheb's writings, as define our civil laws and is aimed at controlling our freedom, our social and cultural life. This institutionalization has made every working masses totally depended on Brahmins to get social legitimacy.
    How do you abolish caste system? Academics over simplify them in terms of education, urbanisation or industrialisation and inter-caste marriages. The author brilliantly exposes all the three. Education as he rightly points out is 'an instrument of oppression in the hands of ruling classes to retain its dominations over its subjects. Secondly, caste is not just confined to rural India but also to urban India and therefore caste clashes would only strengthen the Dalit-Bahujan's determination to understand and strengthen their caste identities. Inter caste marriages have not taken place yet. Most of the marriages are one like the Brahmins girl marrying elite Dalit mens who are either government servants or politicians. They is not really inter caste marriages as marriages at local levels and village levels have not been possible. So these cases may be termed as rarest of rare despite various interest factors involved in it.
    Urbanisation and industrialization has not really helped the Dalit Bahujans as it might have helped in other countries. The caste struggle would ultimately lead to revolution and rightfully the author suggests that Marxian dialectics of class has to be modified in Indian terms replacing it with caste. Another important point that the author mention is that urbanization in India has pushed the Dalit Bahujan to further brink unlike other countries where urbanization is considered to be a better option for replacing the old feudal system but in India urbanization is creating new slums. It is hitting the Dalit Bahujan rock hard.
    Qualities of a True Ambedkarite
    While speaking strongly for caste identities the author feel that an enlightened Ambedkarite must rise above the narrow caste interests. Dr Ambedkar always felt proud to be born in a Mahar community but his struggles and fight was for all the downtrodden communities. Can any one say that he fought for Mahars? The point that the author wanted to make is that every community is today seeking its space under the sun. The communities have to do that because otherwise they will be thoroughly marginalized. They go the other way because their aspirations are not fulfilled. Aim of strengthening caste identities is not to divide the Dalit Bahujan's movement but to strengthen it. Basically with in ourself, there has to be a proportionate representation. Every caste has a history and they are tracing that history and it is good they are doing it. As Baba Saheb, no community can move forward which remains isolated and unknown to its history. So author want caste identities to eliminate the brahm

  • USA has chosen the Super Highway of Self Destruction!

    USA has chosen the Super Highway of Self Destruction!
    USSR is not the Last to Break,USA Faces Disintegration Threat
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com
    USSR is not the Last to Break,USA Faces Disintegration Threat !
    If Impeachment was good enough for Clinton...
    Impeachment is good enough for Bush.
    Who could believe any forcast in seventies that USSR would brek one day. Now it is history. Imperialism never helps a Nation. History of the Human civilisation has watched the rise and fall of so many Imperialist powers. War destroys the attacked geopolitics, true. But it does not spare the Agressive power in any sense. Two World Wars led United Kingdom to lose its status as World leader. It could not hold the Empire and the Raj! The Crown became so wiegty at last. It could not hold on the colonies. We know well the fate of Nazis and Fascists led by no less than a personality of Hitler. Nepolean met his destiny in Waterloo. In ancient history, we read the episodes relating the Great Alexander and know well how he finished. Wars had been the singular cause for the fall of Roman and Greek Empires. We also know the history of Mesopotamia.
    Recent history tells us how the Wars finished USSR and changed the Geopolitics of Entire Europe.It is hightime that the Galaxy Super Power United States of America has to pay for the Wars it launched worldwide and the for the aggresive foreign policy it adopted. iI don`t see any escape route for the zionist hindu white supremacy out of Middle East. The Asian Nato is going to intensify the process of destruction of United States as a nation. In Near future there won`t be no United states which provoked all partitions, seccession, wars and civil wars worldwide.
    USA has chosen the Super Highway of Self Destruction! American leaders are very bad students of History and Humanities, Geopolitics and Civilisation. The Brute Super Power has to perish at last!

    California's Secession Letter to Bush
    California's Secession Letter to
    Bush
    Good
    luck without us and the other blue states
    (Author unkown. Found floating around the internet. Thanks to R.L. for
    sending it our way.)
    Dear President Bush:
    Congratulations on your victory over all us non-evangelicals.
    Actually, we're a bit ticked off here in California, so we're leaving.
    California will now be its own country. And we're taking all the Blue States
    with us. In case you are not aware, that includes Hawaii, Oregon,
    Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, and all of the North
    East.
    We spoke to God, and she agrees that this split will be beneficial to almost
    everybody, and especially to us in the new country of California. In fact,
    God is so excited about it, she's going to shift the whole country at 4:30
    pm EST this Friday. Therefore, please let everyone know they need to be back
    in their states by then.
    So you get Texas and all the former slave states. We get the Governator,
    stem cell research and the best beaches. We get Elliot Spitzer. You get Ken
    Lay. (Okay, we have to keep Martha Stewart, we can live with that.)
    We get the Statue of Liberty. You get OpryLand. We get Intel and Microsoft.
    You get WorldCom. We get Harvard. You get Old Miss.'
    We get 85% of America's venture capital and entrepreneurs. You get all the
    technological innovation in Alabama.
    We get about two-thirds of the tax revenue, and you get to make the red
    states pay their fair share. Since our divorce rate is 22% lower than the
    Christian coalition's, we get a bunch of happy families. You get a bunch of
    single moms to support, and we know how much you like that.
    Did I mention we produce about 70% of the nation's veggies? But heck the
    only greens the Bible-thumpers eat are the pickles on their Big Macs. Which
    means trouble for you because most of the medical innovation in the U.S.
    happens in blue states, too. Oh yeah, another thing, don't plan on serving
    California wine at your state dinners. From now on it's imported French wine
    for you. Ouch, bet that hurts.
    Just so we're clear, the country of California will be pro-choice and
    anti-war. Speaking of war, we're going to want all Blue States citizens back
    from Iraq. If you need people to fight, just ask your evangelicals.
    They have tons of kids they're willing to send to their deaths for
    absolutely no purpose. And they don't care if you don't show pictures of
    their kids' caskets coming home.
    Anyway, we wish you all the best in the next four years and we hope, really
    hope, you find those missing weapons of mass destruction. Seriously. Soon.
    Sincerely,
    California
    State of Vermont seeks secession from USA over Iraq, Bush
    The Statesman, India - 5 Oct 2007
    Because Vermont is now home to a growing movement agitating for outright secession from the USA. The modern independence movement campaigns with a mixture ...
    Anger over Iraq and Bush prompts calls for secession from the US ... Independent
    all 5 news articles »
    Over Century After Civil War, New Secession Movement
    LiveScience.com, NY - 3 Oct 2007
    Vermont, one of the US's most liberal states, has become a hotbed for liberal secessionists, a fringe movement that gained new traction because of the Iraq ...

    Several States Are Discussing Secession From The United States
    OpEdNews, PA - 4 Oct 2007
    The news came as a surprise to me, as I wasn’t aware there was a “Secessionist” movement in the United States, but there it is, right before your eyes. ...

    Vermont out of USA?
    Merinews, India - 2 Oct 2007
    Michigan, Idaho, and South Carolina are also into secessionist movement. Only time will tell what happens if the City State replaces the Nation State in ...

    The Secession Movement in America
    The Illustrated London News, vol. 38, no. 1070, pp. 47-48 .
    January 19, 1861
    THE SECESSION MOVEMENT IN AMERICA.
    When, immediately upon the announcement of the election of Mr. Lincoln to the Presidency of the United States, South Carolina raised a cry for secession from the Union, it was quietly assumed both by the free States and by the great majority of well-informed politicians in Europe that it had been resorted to only as a threat, and that no serious intention could be entertained of carrying the threat into execution. The advantages of the Union to the Slaveholding States had been so great, so palpable, and so uninterruptedly enjoyed for above half a century—the perils to be faced as the certain consequences of disruption seemed so numerous and obvious—and the occasion seized upon as the ground of justification for so extreme a course appeared to the rest of the world so utterly inadequate, that no sober-minded man could regard the avowed purpose of the Southern States with any other feeling than incredulity. Nevertheless, as we have seen, South Carolina has seceded. Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas, have either followed her example or are on the eve of doing so. The border States will probably be drawn into the vortex of the revolution; and before Mr. Lincoln takes his place in the Presidential chair the Republic seems likely to be rent in twain, and two or more powerful and rival Confederacies to be substituted for it.
    Even now political good sense finds it hard to believe in the reality of the astounding result. To say nothing of the glorious historic page which is thereby torn to atoms, and the international power and prestige which are at once surrendered, one cannot help surmising that when the heat of passion has had time to cool down, the mutual interests of the sundered parties will operate, like the curative force of nature, to close the wound and reunite the dissevered tissue. Possibly "the wish is father to the thought;" that the South is making use of disruption, not as an end to be rested in, but as a means to an end; but, assuredly, the thought underlies the speculations of most men with regard to the future of the Empire Republic. It is imagined that as soon as a Southern confederacy is constituted negotiations with the North will be opened through the mediation of the democratic Free States and the border Slave States; that terms of compromise will be found, and that a readjustment of the Union will be effected. That the current of feeling in America is gradually setting in towards this point, the direction in which the straws upon the surface are drifting seems to indicate. Appearances, however, which have been deceptive before, may again deceive; and the history of nations teams with proofs that when once they have overstepped the bounds of reason, albeit with the purpose of returning when their ends shall have been accomplished, the very events which their own passion has produced frequently raise a barrier against their retreat, and nulla vestigia retrorsum becomes their doom.
    We are not sure that the eager haste of South Carolina to slip from within the bonds of the Union is due exclusively to the wrongs she professes to have suffered. Doubtless, the "peculiar domestic institution" is sacred in her eyes, and perhaps she believes, and may have some reason for believing, that the late Presidential election has cast an ominous shadow on the perpetuity of slavery. But something more than fear and indignation are needed to account for the precipitancy with which she has detached herself from the Union. Mr. Lincoln's election was not more threatening to her than to other Slave States; nor, supposing his policy to be what has been ascribed to him by Southern demagogues, would she have been the first to feel the injury. But South Carolina is a seaboard State, possessing ports capable of being raised to first-rate importance. A Southern Confederacy, trading direct with England, and released from the restrictions of protective import duties, would export through Charleston the whole produce of the Cotton States, and would import all the foreign commodities they receive in exchange. Her ports would become the centre of commerce between America and Europe, and, in course of time, she would acquire for herself in the South a supremacy similar to that which is now enjoyed by New York in the North. Mingled with the indignation of South Carolina, therefore, there may also be some ambitious aspirations. There are other causes of difference between the North and South than that of slavery. The protective fiscal policy which the North has succeeded in forcing
    http://beck.library.emory.edu/iln/browse.php?id=iln38.1070.011
    Bye, Bye, Miss American Empire
    Or, the sweet smell of secession
    by Bill Kauffman
    Published in the July/August 2007 issue of Orion magazine

    Illustrated by Linda Zacks

    In the wake of George W. Bush’s re-election in 2004, frustrated liberals talked secession back to within hailing distance of the margins of national debate—a place it had not occupied since 1861. With their praise of self-rule and the devolution of power, they sounded not unlike many conservatives had in the days before Bush & Cheney & Limbaugh wedded the American Right to the American Empire. While certain proponents of the renascent secessionism were motivated by spite or pixilated by whimsy or driven by the simple-minded belief that the United States can be divided into blue and red—as though our lovely land can be painted in only two hues!—others argued with cogency and passion for a disunionist position that bordered on the, well, seditious. Emphasizing both culture ("Now that slavery is taken care of, I’m for letting the South form its own nation,” said Democratic operative Bob Beckel) and economics (Democratic pundit Lawrence O’Donnell noted that “ninety percent of the red states are welfare clients of the federal government"), writing in forums of neoliberalism (Slate) and paleoliberalism (The Nation), liberals helped to disinter a body of thought that had been buried at Appomattox. And—surprise!—three years later, the corpse has legs.
    Secession is the next radical idea poised to enter mainstream discourse—or at least the realm of the conceivable. You can’t bloat a modest republic into a crapulent empire without sparking one hell of a centrifugal reaction. And the prospect of breaking away from a union once consecrated to liberty and justice but now degenerating into imperial putrefaction will only grow in appeal as we go marching with our Patriot Acts and National Security Strategies through Iraq, Iran, and all the frightful signposts on our road to nowhere.
    Some of the contemporary secessionists are puckish and playful; others are dead serious. Some seek to separate from the main body of a state and add a fifty-first star to the American flag while others wish to leave the United States altogether. Some proposals are so sensible (the division of California into two or three states) that in a just world they would be inevitable; others are so radical (the independent republic of Vermont) as to seem risibly implausible—until you meet the activists and theoreticians preparing these new declarations of independence.
    For these movements are, in the main, hopeful and creative (if utopian) responses to the Current Mess engulfing our land. They are the political antidote to the disease of giantism. We are a nation born in secession, after all, and of rebellion against faraway rulers. Ruptures, crackups, and the splintering of overlarge states into polities of more manageable size, closer to the human scale, are as American as runaway slaves and draft resisters.
    “SECESSION,” SAYS ROB WILLIAMS—Vermont filmmaker, radio host, Champlain College professor, and singer-songwriter of the ought-to-be classic “Kill Your Television”—“is every American’s birthright.”
    It’s been almost a century and a half since any significant number of Americans believed that, but last November Williams’s verdantly democratic state hosted the first-ever nationwide conference of those who wish to make the nation a little less wide.
    Yeah, sure, I know: breaking away is impossible. Quixotic. Hopeless. So was dancing on the Berlin Wall.
    The Vermont gathering was convened by Kirkpatrick Sale, founder of the Middlebury Institute, a secessionist clearinghouse whose “ultimate task” is “the peaceful dissolution of the American empire.” Sale is the author of the decentralist compendium Human Scale and books on the Luddites and Students for a Democratic Society. So that agents of the Department of Homeland Security won’t have to pore over his works, he offers this description of his political vision: “I am an anarchist who wants to see society organized on a small, human scale, based on self-determining communities.”
    Sale scheduled the confab just three days before the 2006 election, not for any symbolic reason but because it was “the first cheap weekend after the fall foliage season.” So upon Burlington converged the divergent. Forty-three delegates from eighteen states met around a long table in the Lake Champlain Salon of the Wyndham Burlington. I saw ponytails and suits, turtlenecks and sneakers, an Alaskan gold miner and one delegate from the neo-Confederate League of the South who wore a grey greatcoat, as if sitting for a daguerreotype just before the battle.
    http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/311
    FROM LITTLE ACORNS: The American Secession Movement Today
    Kirkpatrick Sale, May 2007
    http://middleburyinstitute.org/fromlittleacorns.html
    Here’s a simple truth. For those who can’t stand the increasingly ugly and corrupt American empire but don’t want to leave the home and place they love, the only possible solution, we have to face it, is secession—and that’s just what more and more people are thinking about these days.
    The latest evidence for the appeal of the secessionist alternative comes from a just-released poll taken by the University of Vermont in February of this year that found that 13 per cent of the state’s residents came right out and said “it would be a good idea for Vermont to secede from the United States and become once again an independent republic as it was from 1777 to 1791.” Thirteen per cent—that may not seem a lot at first, but it translates to 64,400 people of voting age in the population at large, and that’s enough to make the politicians in the state house pay attention.
    Vermont has had a secession movement for the last four years, made up of what is now a think-tank called the Second Vermont Republic, a periodic newspaper called Vermont Commons, and various groups, most recently FreeVermont.Net, hoping to put the question of secession on the agenda of the state’s 230 town meetings by the year 2010. But only recently has it begun to get media notice, with articles in the Burlington Free Press, Los Angeles Times, and Philadelphia Enquirer, among others, and interviews on Vermont and New Hampshire public radio. Last year only 8 per cent of Vermonters favored secession, so an increase of 60 per cent suggests that the movement is on a roll.
    And another question from the UVM poll indicates that there is more fertile ground for it. When asked, “Has the United States government lost its moral authority,” a surprising 74.3 per cent said yes, an indication that attachment to the government is clearly eroding. It was the loss of moral authority that played a large part in the downfall of the apartheid government in South Africa and eventually led to the end of the communist regimes in Eastern Europe and the breakup of the Soviet Union itself. When the center cannot hold—allegiance, loyalty, moral authority—things fall apart.
    Some other indications that the idea of secession now is being taken seriously:
    The Washington Post in early April carried an op-ed article by Ian Baldwin, publisher of the Vermont Commons, and Frank Bryan, a UVM professor who has been a secessionist activist since the early 1990s, entitled “The Once and Future Republic of Vermont” (a reference to the period from 1777 to 1791 when it was independent). According to an editor there, it was the second-most read piece in the entire Sunday paper (12,000 hits on-line) and garnered more than 200 emails, considered a high rate of response by the paper. It was syndicated cross-country and exploded with 21,000 entries on the internet.
    A Daily Kos poll on April 2 asked, “Should states be allowed to secede from the union peaceably?” and 65 per cent answered affirmatively—which is interesting especially because it is conventional liberals, of the kind that this blog mostly attracts, who usually believe in working within the system and are not often fans of secession. A previous poll in 2005 showed only 53 per cent in favor of “I like secession as an option.”
    A secessionist convention—the first ever for North America—was held at a downtown hotel in Burlington, Vermont, last November and attracted more than 40 representatives from 16 secessionist organizations in 18 states (including particularly strong showing from Hawai’i, Alaska, Cascadia, Texas, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Vermont, and New Hampshire). The sponsor was the Middlebury Institute, the first American think-tank devoted to “the study of separatism, secession, and self-determination,” begun in November 2003. That such an event was held at all is pretty remarkable, and the fact that it drew serious people from across the land indicates that there is something that can fairly be called a secessionist movement. A second convention is planned for this summer.
    An online petition recently posted on its website by the League of the South, one of the oldest secessionist groups, asks support for “the South’s right to secede from the current regime and form its own government.” It had been signed by 2,259 people as of April 18.
    There are a number of other active secessionist organizations in North America.
    The Alaska Independence Party has swung in electoral support from 5 per cent when it began in 1986, up to 38.8 per cent in 1990 (when Walter Hickel was on the ticket and won the governorship), down to 13 per cent in 1994, and it has hovered around 1-2 per cent in elections since then. (Still, 2 per cent is nearly 10,000 voting-age people, a real constituency.) It recently installed new leadership and a strong effort is being made to field serious candidates statewide next year.
    The Puerto Rico Independence Party has varied from 1 per cent in referendums for statehood vs. independence in 1967, to 4.4 per cent in 1993, but down to 2.5 per cent in 1998 and 2.4 per cent in 2004. (But even that represents a 648,000 voting-age population.) It recently got a boost from an endorsement by a “Panama Proclamation” passed unanimously at the Latin American and Caribbean Congress meeting last November urging that Puerto Rico “become a free and independent nation.”
    Hawai’i is a special case. The movement there is for sovereignty, of course, not secession per se, and several votes and polls have shown wide support for it. An election in 1996 had 73 per cent (22,294 voters) on a line in favor of Hawai’ian sovereignty; a Honolulu Advertiser poll in July 2006 showed 63 per cent wanted that “a Hawai’ian entity be formally recognized,” though it did not specify the entity. (Percentages like these amount to roughly 900,000 people.) The trouble with the campaign there is that it is divided into a half-dozen different groups with different agendas and tactics, and it hasn’t yet been able to translate what is obviously popular support into a coherent movement.
    One other interesting area is the South, where some advocates of secession claim that 20 per cent of the citizens favor an independent nation but the professional polls seem to suggest support, as one leading pollster put it, only “in the high single or low double digits.” A poll said to be fairly typical, by the University of North Carolina in 1992, found that 8.4 per cent agreed that “if it could be done without war, the South would be better off as a separate country today” (5.2 per cent “not sure”), and 16.8 per cent said that “the South would be a lot better off it had won the War Between the States” (17.5 per cent “not sure”). The League of the South, the strongest secession group in the South, boasts chapters in 16 states and a dues-paying membership said to be close to 4,000; a new secessionist organization, the Southern National Congress, was started last year and plans an inaugural convention for later this year.
    The other strong secession movement in North America is the Parti Quebecois in Montreal, which has come within a hair (in 1995) of winning a referendum on separation from Canada. Its latest showing in this spring’s election was third, but only 11 seats behind the leading Liberals, and much support was withdrawn from the party because it is widely felt that its current leadership under Andre Boisclair is not serious about secession. The PQ won 28 per cent of the vote this year, which represents something like 2.2 million people, so it still plays an important role in Quebec politics and there is a strong constituency in it that thinks itcould rebound in coming years to the majority status it once enjoyed.
    Putting the Vermont vote in perspective, it appears to have one of the largest percentage in favor of secession of all the states that have been measured. As such, it is in a position to lead New England in recapturing its role as the home of American secession—just as it was in the first secession, of 1776, of the colonies from Great Britain; as it was in its republic that refused to join the Confederation of 1777 and the United States of 1788; as it was in the movement in 1804 to oppose the Louisiana Purchase and establish “a new confederacy” uncontaminated by the agrarian South and West; as it was in 1814-15 in the Hartford Convention that opposed conscription for the War of 1812 and advocated “some new form of confederacy” among the New England states.
    It is the wording of the report of the Hartford Convention that resonates in Vermont even today: “Whenever it shall appear that these causes [the monopoly of power by Washington and the neglect of the commercial interests of New England] are radical and permanent, a separation, by equitable arrangement, will be preferable to an alliance by constraint.” Vermont secessionists would like to start to do to the American Empire what Lexington and Concord started to do to the British—a process leading to “separation, by equitable arrangement.” As SVR chair Thomas Naylor has put it in a new “Green Mountain Manifesto,” “Tiny Vermont might help save America from itself by seceding from the union.”
    It is not fanciful to think that, 64,000 strong, they just might have a good go at it.

    --
    "the republican party..supporting life right up until birth!" - Mark Binder
    THERE IS SOMETHING CALLED "JUSTICE" AND IT DAMANDS IMPEACHMENT
    It is no longer a question of 'winning' or 'loosing'

    It is no longer a question of what is a sure thing and what is difficult.

    We are bound by the Rule of Justice and our own National Integrity to IMPEACH GEORGE BUSH AND DICK CHENEY.

    It does not matter the outcome. What matters is that we do what is just. We MUST allow ourselves this opportunity to make some kind of amends to the world and American future generations.

    To pass this by is to bow down to the criminals in Government who have wrought so much evil on this world and our great nation. It will be to accept corruption on a gigantic level from the highest levels of our government. It will cost us our National Pride, the respect of the entire world and every future generation it's trust and faith in our government.

    It will take all the blood sweat and tears of our past generations and bury it is filth.

    What happens during and after the Impeachment is irrelevant. What WE DO is what matters. Americans need to send the message that we ARE a nation of laws, dignity and ethics to every other American, to the world and to all future Americans yet unborn.

    We are at a crossroads. We can either seize back control of our nation and redeem our Constitution and regain our PRIDE

    Or we can bow down and become a nation of serfs.

    I SAY WE STAND TALL.

    JUSTICE DEMANDS IMPEACHMENT NOW!!! THE CHOICE IS OURS!!!
    --
    If Impeachment was good enough for Clinton...
    Impeachment is good enough for Bush.
    Amend the Constitution.
    Power to WE The People To Impeach By National Referendum.
    US Is Top Arms Seller to Developing World
    US Is Top Arms Seller to Developing

    posted Saturday, 6 October 2007

    *US Is Top Arms Seller to Developing World*
    By Thom Shanker
    The New York Times
    Monday 01 October 2007
    Washington - The United States maintained its role as the leading
    supplier of weapons to the developing world in 2006, followed by Russia and
    Britain, according to a Congressional study to be released Monday. Pakistan,
    India and Saudi Arabia were the top buyers.
    The global arms market is highly competitive, with manufacturing nations
    seeking both to increase profits and to expand political influence through
    weapons sales to developing nations, which reached nearly $28.8 billion in
    2006.
    That sales total was a slight drop from the 2005 figure of $31.8
    billion, a trend explained by the strain of rising fuel prices that prompted
    many developing states - except those that produce oil - to choose upgrading
    current arsenals over buying new weapons.
    The report, "Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations," was
    produced by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, a division of
    the Library of Congress, and presents a number of interesting observations
    linking arms sales and global politics. For example, Russia has been a major
    supplier of weapons to Iran in past years, including a $700 million deal for
    surface-to-air missiles in 2005.
    But anxieties over Iran's nuclear program can be seen as having deterred
    Moscow from concluding significant new conventional arms deals with Iran in
    2006, deals that could be viewed as overly provocative while the Security
    Council debates new sanctions on Iran.
    At the same time, though, Russia continues to nurture an arms-trade
    relationship that is deeply disturbing to the Bush administration, by
    signing weapons deals with oil-rich Venezuela and its anti-American leader,
    Hugo Chavez. (- Why is that statement made so flippantly - why is Chavez
    defined as ANTI-American; the U.S. has acted anti-Venezuelans, certainly,
    and Chavez may be justified in being less than trustful but what has he DONE
    specifically? - kb)
    The Russian agreements with Venezuela in 2006 included the sale of two
    dozen Su-30 fighter jets valued at more than $1 billion, along with attack
    and transport helicopters valued at more than $700 million.
    Russia also sold Venezuela a large number of AK-series assault rifles in
    a deal that included a pledge to build a factory in Venezuela to produce
    those rifles and ammunition, together valued at more than $500 million.
    "Venezuela's populist president, Hugo Chavez, has taken a hostile
    approach to relations with the United States in recent years," wrote Richard
    F. Grimmett, a specialist in national defense at the Congressional Research
    Service.
    "Thus his decision to seek advanced military equipment from Russia is a
    matter of U.S. concern," Mr. Grimmett wrote in the report. "Chavez appears
    embarked on an effort to make Venezuela an important military force in Latin
    America."
    The study makes clear also that the United States has signed
    weapons-sales agreements with nations whose records on democracy and human
    rights are subject to official criticism.

    This is about my ancestral home.

    The bit about Ispahan is where my father was born.

    We Iranians have many problems and are not a perfect people. However we are NOT terrorists nor have we ever invaded a neighboring nation in the past 300 years.

    We have never sponsored terrorism - despite all the egregious lies put out by the Israeli Controlled Media.

    The Israelis wish to demonize Iranians and to dehumanize us Iranians so when they pour bombs on us and pump Iran with DU, Depleted Uranium, the Public feels as if their tax dollars have been spent on War On Terror.

    Don't buy these lies. Remember that Iranians are poetic, romantic, and minding their own lives. We only wish to be left alone. The Hostage Taking of American Diplomats was a black spot on my Iranian National Honor. And I shall not excuse it. However, there was a backlash for the support of Americans to a Shah's Military which excelled in killing its own people!

    USA has a History of supporting Military to kill their own population! Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Turkey, Azerbaijan Republic, and Egypt are all but a few examples.

    Please rebut the rising hysteria to demonize Iranians. We Iranians are an ancient people who love poetry and wish to progress and better our lives. We are hospitable and love humanity. We are integrated within the world.

    I love you all,

    Nader Rastegar

  • USA has chosen the Super Highway of Self Destruction!

    USA has chosen the Super Highway of Self Destruction!
    USSR is not the Last to Break,USA Faces Disintegration Threat
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com
    USSR is not the Last to Break,USA Faces Disintegration Threat !
    If Impeachment was good enough for Clinton...
    Impeachment is good enough for Bush.
    Who could believe any forcast in seventies that USSR would brek one day. Now it is history. Imperialism never helps a Nation. History of the Human civilisation has watched the rise and fall of so many Imperialist powers. War destroys the attacked geopolitics, true. But it does not spare the Agressive power in any sense. Two World Wars led United Kingdom to lose its status as World leader. It could not hold the Empire and the Raj! The Crown became so wiegty at last. It could not hold on the colonies. We know well the fate of Nazis and Fascists led by no less than a personality of Hitler. Nepolean met his destiny in Waterloo. In ancient history, we read the episodes relating the Great Alexander and know well how he finished. Wars had been the singular cause for the fall of Roman and Greek Empires. We also know the history of Mesopotamia.
    Recent history tells us how the Wars finished USSR and changed the Geopolitics of Entire Europe.It is hightime that the Galaxy Super Power United States of America has to pay for the Wars it launched worldwide and the for the aggresive foreign policy it adopted. iI don`t see any escape route for the zionist hindu white supremacy out of Middle East. The Asian Nato is going to intensify the process of destruction of United States as a nation. In Near future there won`t be no United states which provoked all partitions, seccession, wars and civil wars worldwide.
    USA has chosen the Super Highway of Self Destruction! American leaders are very bad students of History and Humanities, Geopolitics and Civilisation. The Brute Super Power has to perish at last!

    California's Secession Letter to Bush
    Posted by: "Kathy Leonard-Bushman"
    Sat Oct 6, 2007 7:55 pm (PST)
    California's Secession Letter to
    Good
    luck without us and the other blue states
    (Author unkown. Found floating around the internet. Thanks to R.L. for
    sending it our way.)
    Dear President Bush:
    Congratulations on your victory over all us non-evangelicals.
    Actually, we're a bit ticked off here in California, so we're leaving.
    California will now be its own country. And we're taking all the Blue States
    with us. In case you are not aware, that includes Hawaii, Oregon,
    Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, and all of the North
    East.
    We spoke to God, and she agrees that this split will be beneficial to almost
    everybody, and especially to us in the new country of California. In fact,
    God is so excited about it, she's going to shift the whole country at 4:30
    pm EST this Friday. Therefore, please let everyone know they need to be back
    in their states by then.
    So you get Texas and all the former slave states. We get the Governator,
    stem cell research and the best beaches. We get Elliot Spitzer. You get Ken
    Lay. (Okay, we have to keep Martha Stewart, we can live with that.)
    We get the Statue of Liberty. You get OpryLand. We get Intel and Microsoft.
    You get WorldCom. We get Harvard. You get Old Miss.'
    We get 85% of America's venture capital and entrepreneurs. You get all the
    technological innovation in Alabama.
    We get about two-thirds of the tax revenue, and you get to make the red
    states pay their fair share. Since our divorce rate is 22% lower than the
    Christian coalition's, we get a bunch of happy families. You get a bunch of
    single moms to support, and we know how much you like that.
    Did I mention we produce about 70% of the nation's veggies? But heck the
    only greens the Bible-thumpers eat are the pickles on their Big Macs. Which
    means trouble for you because most of the medical innovation in the U.S.
    happens in blue states, too. Oh yeah, another thing, don't plan on serving
    California wine at your state dinners. From now on it's imported French wine
    for you. Ouch, bet that hurts.
    Just so we're clear, the country of California will be pro-choice and
    anti-war. Speaking of war, we're going to want all Blue States citizens back
    from Iraq. If you need people to fight, just ask your evangelicals.
    They have tons of kids they're willing to send to their deaths for
    absolutely no purpose. And they don't care if you don't show pictures of
    their kids' caskets coming home.
    Anyway, we wish you all the best in the next four years and we hope, really
    hope, you find those missing weapons of mass destruction. Seriously. Soon.
    Sincerely,
    California
    State of Vermont seeks secession from USA over Iraq, Bush
    The Statesman, India - 5 Oct 2007
    Because Vermont is now home to a growing movement agitating for outright secession from the USA. The modern independence movement campaigns with a mixture ...
    Anger over Iraq and Bush prompts calls for secession from the US ... Independent
    all 5 news articles »
    Over Century After Civil War, New Secession Movement
    LiveScience.com, NY - 3 Oct 2007
    Vermont, one of the US's most liberal states, has become a hotbed for liberal secessionists, a fringe movement that gained new traction because of the Iraq ...

    Several States Are Discussing Secession From The United States
    OpEdNews, PA - 4 Oct 2007
    The news came as a surprise to me, as I wasn’t aware there was a “Secessionist” movement in the United States, but there it is, right before your eyes. ...

    Vermont out of USA?
    Merinews, India - 2 Oct 2007
    Michigan, Idaho, and South Carolina are also into secessionist movement. Only time will tell what happens if the City State replaces the Nation State in ...

    The Secession Movement in America
    The Illustrated London News, vol. 38, no. 1070, pp. 47-48 .
    January 19, 1861
    THE SECESSION MOVEMENT IN AMERICA.
    When, immediately upon the announcement of the election of Mr. Lincoln to the Presidency of the United States, South Carolina raised a cry for secession from the Union, it was quietly assumed both by the free States and by the great majority of well-informed politicians in Europe that it had been resorted to only as a threat, and that no serious intention could be entertained of carrying the threat into execution. The advantages of the Union to the Slaveholding States had been so great, so palpable, and so uninterruptedly enjoyed for above half a century—the perils to be faced as the certain consequences of disruption seemed so numerous and obvious—and the occasion seized upon as the ground of justification for so extreme a course appeared to the rest of the world so utterly inadequate, that no sober-minded man could regard the avowed purpose of the Southern States with any other feeling than incredulity. Nevertheless, as we have seen, South Carolina has seceded. Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas, have either followed her example or are on the eve of doing so. The border States will probably be drawn into the vortex of the revolution; and before Mr. Lincoln takes his place in the Presidential chair the Republic seems likely to be rent in twain, and two or more powerful and rival Confederacies to be substituted for it.
    Even now political good sense finds it hard to believe in the reality of the astounding result. To say nothing of the glorious historic page which is thereby torn to atoms, and the international power and prestige which are at once surrendered, one cannot help surmising that when the heat of passion has had time to cool down, the mutual interests of the sundered parties will operate, like the curative force of nature, to close the wound and reunite the dissevered tissue. Possibly "the wish is father to the thought;" that the South is making use of disruption, not as an end to be rested in, but as a means to an end; but, assuredly, the thought underlies the speculations of most men with regard to the future of the Empire Republic. It is imagined that as soon as a Southern confederacy is constituted negotiations with the North will be opened through the mediation of the democratic Free States and the border Slave States; that terms of compromise will be found, and that a readjustment of the Union will be effected. That the current of feeling in America is gradually setting in towards this point, the direction in which the straws upon the surface are drifting seems to indicate. Appearances, however, which have been deceptive before, may again deceive; and the history of nations teams with proofs that when once they have overstepped the bounds of reason, albeit with the purpose of returning when their ends shall have been accomplished, the very events which their own passion has produced frequently raise a barrier against their retreat, and nulla vestigia retrorsum becomes their doom.
    We are not sure that the eager haste of South Carolina to slip from within the bonds of the Union is due exclusively to the wrongs she professes to have suffered. Doubtless, the "peculiar domestic institution" is sacred in her eyes, and perhaps she believes, and may have some reason for believing, that the late Presidential election has cast an ominous shadow on the perpetuity of slavery. But something more than fear and indignation are needed to account for the precipitancy with which she has detached herself from the Union. Mr. Lincoln's election was not more threatening to her than to other Slave States; nor, supposing his policy to be what has been ascribed to him by Southern demagogues, would she have been the first to feel the injury. But South Carolina is a seaboard State, possessing ports capable of being raised to first-rate importance. A Southern Confederacy, trading direct with England, and released from the restrictions of protective import duties, would export through Charleston the whole produce of the Cotton States, and would import all the foreign commodities they receive in exchange. Her ports would become the centre of commerce between America and Europe, and, in course of time, she would acquire for herself in the South a supremacy similar to that which is now enjoyed by New York in the North. Mingled with the indignation of South Carolina, therefore, there may also be some ambitious aspirations. There are other causes of difference between the North and South than that of slavery. The protective fiscal policy which the North has succeeded in forcing
    http://beck.library.emory.edu/iln/browse.php?id=iln38.1070.011
    Bye, Bye, Miss American Empire
    Or, the sweet smell of secession
    by Bill Kauffman
    Published in the July/August 2007 issue of Orion magazine

    Illustrated by Linda Zacks

    In the wake of George W. Bush’s re-election in 2004, frustrated liberals talked secession back to within hailing distance of the margins of national debate—a place it had not occupied since 1861. With their praise of self-rule and the devolution of power, they sounded not unlike many conservatives had in the days before Bush & Cheney & Limbaugh wedded the American Right to the American Empire. While certain proponents of the renascent secessionism were motivated by spite or pixilated by whimsy or driven by the simple-minded belief that the United States can be divided into blue and red—as though our lovely land can be painted in only two hues!—others argued with cogency and passion for a disunionist position that bordered on the, well, seditious. Emphasizing both culture ("Now that slavery is taken care of, I’m for letting the South form its own nation,” said Democratic operative Bob Beckel) and economics (Democratic pundit Lawrence O’Donnell noted that “ninety percent of the red states are welfare clients of the federal government"), writing in forums of neoliberalism (Slate) and paleoliberalism (The Nation), liberals helped to disinter a body of thought that had been buried at Appomattox. And—surprise!—three years later, the corpse has legs.
    Secession is the next radical idea poised to enter mainstream discourse—or at least the realm of the conceivable. You can’t bloat a modest republic into a crapulent empire without sparking one hell of a centrifugal reaction. And the prospect of breaking away from a union once consecrated to liberty and justice but now degenerating into imperial putrefaction will only grow in appeal as we go marching with our Patriot Acts and National Security Strategies through Iraq, Iran, and all the frightful signposts on our road to nowhere.
    Some of the contemporary secessionists are puckish and playful; others are dead serious. Some seek to separate from the main body of a state and add a fifty-first star to the American flag while others wish to leave the United States altogether. Some proposals are so sensible (the division of California into two or three states) that in a just world they would be inevitable; others are so radical (the independent republic of Vermont) as to seem risibly implausible—until you meet the activists and theoreticians preparing these new declarations of independence.
    For these movements are, in the main, hopeful and creative (if utopian) responses to the Current Mess engulfing our land. They are the political antidote to the disease of giantism. We are a nation born in secession, after all, and of rebellion against faraway rulers. Ruptures, crackups, and the splintering of overlarge states into polities of more manageable size, closer to the human scale, are as American as runaway slaves and draft resisters.
    “SECESSION,” SAYS ROB WILLIAMS—Vermont filmmaker, radio host, Champlain College professor, and singer-songwriter of the ought-to-be classic “Kill Your Television”—“is every American’s birthright.”
    It’s been almost a century and a half since any significant number of Americans believed that, but last November Williams’s verdantly democratic state hosted the first-ever nationwide conference of those who wish to make the nation a little less wide.
    Yeah, sure, I know: breaking away is impossible. Quixotic. Hopeless. So was dancing on the Berlin Wall.
    The Vermont gathering was convened by Kirkpatrick Sale, founder of the Middlebury Institute, a secessionist clearinghouse whose “ultimate task” is “the peaceful dissolution of the American empire.” Sale is the author of the decentralist compendium Human Scale and books on the Luddites and Students for a Democratic Society. So that agents of the Department of Homeland Security won’t have to pore over his works, he offers this description of his political vision: “I am an anarchist who wants to see society organized on a small, human scale, based on self-determining communities.”
    Sale scheduled the confab just three days before the 2006 election, not for any symbolic reason but because it was “the first cheap weekend after the fall foliage season.” So upon Burlington converged the divergent. Forty-three delegates from eighteen states met around a long table in the Lake Champlain Salon of the Wyndham Burlington. I saw ponytails and suits, turtlenecks and sneakers, an Alaskan gold miner and one delegate from the neo-Confederate League of the South who wore a grey greatcoat, as if sitting for a daguerreotype just before the battle.
    http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/311
    FROM LITTLE ACORNS: The American Secession Movement Today
    Kirkpatrick Sale, May 2007
    http://middleburyinstitute.org/fromlittleacorns.html
    Here’s a simple truth. For those who can’t stand the increasingly ugly and corrupt American empire but don’t want to leave the home and place they love, the only possible solution, we have to face it, is secession—and that’s just what more and more people are thinking about these days.
    The latest evidence for the appeal of the secessionist alternative comes from a just-released poll taken by the University of Vermont in February of this year that found that 13 per cent of the state’s residents came right out and said “it would be a good idea for Vermont to secede from the United States and become once again an independent republic as it was from 1777 to 1791.” Thirteen per cent—that may not seem a lot at first, but it translates to 64,400 people of voting age in the population at large, and that’s enough to make the politicians in the state house pay attention.
    Vermont has had a secession movement for the last four years, made up of what is now a think-tank called the Second Vermont Republic, a periodic newspaper called Vermont Commons, and various groups, most recently FreeVermont.Net, hoping to put the question of secession on the agenda of the state’s 230 town meetings by the year 2010. But only recently has it begun to get media notice, with articles in the Burlington Free Press, Los Angeles Times, and Philadelphia Enquirer, among others, and interviews on Vermont and New Hampshire public radio. Last year only 8 per cent of Vermonters favored secession, so an increase of 60 per cent suggests that the movement is on a roll.
    And another question from the UVM poll indicates that there is more fertile ground for it. When asked, “Has the United States government lost its moral authority,” a surprising 74.3 per cent said yes, an indication that attachment to the government is clearly eroding. It was the loss of moral authority that played a large part in the downfall of the apartheid government in South Africa and eventually led to the end of the communist regimes in Eastern Europe and the breakup of the Soviet Union itself. When the center cannot hold—allegiance, loyalty, moral authority—things fall apart.
    Some other indications that the idea of secession now is being taken seriously:
    The Washington Post in early April carried an op-ed article by Ian Baldwin, publisher of the Vermont Commons, and Frank Bryan, a UVM professor who has been a secessionist activist since the early 1990s, entitled “The Once and Future Republic of Vermont” (a reference to the period from 1777 to 1791 when it was independent). According to an editor there, it was the second-most read piece in the entire Sunday paper (12,000 hits on-line) and garnered more than 200 emails, considered a high rate of response by the paper. It was syndicated cross-country and exploded with 21,000 entries on the internet.
    A Daily Kos poll on April 2 asked, “Should states be allowed to secede from the union peaceably?” and 65 per cent answered affirmatively—which is interesting especially because it is conventional liberals, of the kind that this blog mostly attracts, who usually believe in working within the system and are not often fans of secession. A previous poll in 2005 showed only 53 per cent in favor of “I like secession as an option.”
    A secessionist convention—the first ever for North America—was held at a downtown hotel in Burlington, Vermont, last November and attracted more than 40 representatives from 16 secessionist organizations in 18 states (including particularly strong showing from Hawai’i, Alaska, Cascadia, Texas, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Vermont, and New Hampshire). The sponsor was the Middlebury Institute, the first American think-tank devoted to “the study of separatism, secession, and self-determination,” begun in November 2003. That such an event was held at all is pretty remarkable, and the fact that it drew serious people from across the land indicates that there is something that can fairly be called a secessionist movement. A second convention is planned for this summer.
    An online petition recently posted on its website by the League of the South, one of the oldest secessionist groups, asks support for “the South’s right to secede from the current regime and form its own government.” It had been signed by 2,259 people as of April 18.
    There are a number of other active secessionist organizations in North America.
    The Alaska Independence Party has swung in electoral support from 5 per cent when it began in 1986, up to 38.8 per cent in 1990 (when Walter Hickel was on the ticket and won the governorship), down to 13 per cent in 1994, and it has hovered around 1-2 per cent in elections since then. (Still, 2 per cent is nearly 10,000 voting-age people, a real constituency.) It recently installed new leadership and a strong effort is being made to field serious candidates statewide next year.
    The Puerto Rico Independence Party has varied from 1 per cent in referendums for statehood vs. independence in 1967, to 4.4 per cent in 1993, but down to 2.5 per cent in 1998 and 2.4 per cent in 2004. (But even that represents a 648,000 voting-age population.) It recently got a boost from an endorsement by a “Panama Proclamation” passed unanimously at the Latin American and Caribbean Congress meeting last November urging that Puerto Rico “become a free and independent nation.”
    Hawai’i is a special case. The movement there is for sovereignty, of course, not secession per se, and several votes and polls have shown wide support for it. An election in 1996 had 73 per cent (22,294 voters) on a line in favor of Hawai’ian sovereignty; a Honolulu Advertiser poll in July 2006 showed 63 per cent wanted that “a Hawai’ian entity be formally recognized,” though it did not specify the entity. (Percentages like these amount to roughly 900,000 people.) The trouble with the campaign there is that it is divided into a half-dozen different groups with different agendas and tactics, and it hasn’t yet been able to translate what is obviously popular support into a coherent movement.
    One other interesting area is the South, where some advocates of secession claim that 20 per cent of the citizens favor an independent nation but the professional polls seem to suggest support, as one leading pollster put it, only “in the high single or low double digits.” A poll said to be fairly typical, by the University of North Carolina in 1992, found that 8.4 per cent agreed that “if it could be done without war, the South would be better off as a separate country today” (5.2 per cent “not sure”), and 16.8 per cent said that “the South would be a lot better off it had won the War Between the States” (17.5 per cent “not sure”). The League of the South, the strongest secession group in the South, boasts chapters in 16 states and a dues-paying membership said to be close to 4,000; a new secessionist organization, the Southern National Congress, was started last year and plans an inaugural convention for later this year.
    The other strong secession movement in North America is the Parti Quebecois in Montreal, which has come within a hair (in 1995) of winning a referendum on separation from Canada. Its latest showing in this spring’s election was third, but only 11 seats behind the leading Liberals, and much support was withdrawn from the party because it is widely felt that its current leadership under Andre Boisclair is not serious about secession. The PQ won 28 per cent of the vote this year, which represents something like 2.2 million people, so it still plays an important role in Quebec politics and there is a strong constituency in it that thinks itcould rebound in coming years to the majority status it once enjoyed.
    Putting the Vermont vote in perspective, it appears to have one of the largest percentage in favor of secession of all the states that have been measured. As such, it is in a position to lead New England in recapturing its role as the home of American secession—just as it was in the first secession, of 1776, of the colonies from Great Britain; as it was in its republic that refused to join the Confederation of 1777 and the United States of 1788; as it was in the movement in 1804 to oppose the Louisiana Purchase and establish “a new confederacy” uncontaminated by the agrarian South and West; as it was in 1814-15 in the Hartford Convention that opposed conscription for the War of 1812 and advocated “some new form of confederacy” among the New England states.
    It is the wording of the report of the Hartford Convention that resonates in Vermont even today: “Whenever it shall appear that these causes [the monopoly of power by Washington and the neglect of the commercial interests of New England] are radical and permanent, a separation, by equitable arrangement, will be preferable to an alliance by constraint.” Vermont secessionists would like to start to do to the American Empire what Lexington and Concord started to do to the British—a process leading to “separation, by equitable arrangement.” As SVR chair Thomas Naylor has put it in a new “Green Mountain Manifesto,” “Tiny Vermont might help save America from itself by seceding from the union.”
    It is not fanciful to think that, 64,000 strong, they just might have a good go at it.

    --
    "the republican party..supporting life right up until birth!" - Mark Binder
    THERE IS SOMETHING CALLED "JUSTICE" AND IT DAMANDS IMPEACHMENT
    It is no longer a question of 'winning' or 'loosing'

    It is no longer a question of what is a sure thing and what is difficult.

    We are bound by the Rule of Justice and our own National Integrity to IMPEACH GEORGE BUSH AND DICK CHENEY.

    It does not matter the outcome. What matters is that we do what is just. We MUST allow ourselves this opportunity to make some kind of amends to the world and American future generations.

    To pass this by is to bow down to the criminals in Government who have wrought so much evil on this world and our great nation. It will be to accept corruption on a gigantic level from the highest levels of our government. It will cost us our National Pride, the respect of the entire world and every future generation it's trust and faith in our government.

    It will take all the blood sweat and tears of our past generations and bury it is filth.

    What happens during and after the Impeachment is irrelevant. What WE DO is what matters. Americans need to send the message that we ARE a nation of laws, dignity and ethics to every other American, to the world and to all future Americans yet unborn.

    We are at a crossroads. We can either seize back control of our nation and redeem our Constitution and regain our PRIDE

    Or we can bow down and become a nation of serfs.

    I SAY WE STAND TALL.

    JUSTICE DEMANDS IMPEACHMENT NOW!!! THE CHOICE IS OURS!!!
    --
    If Impeachment was good enough for Clinton...
    Impeachment is good enough for Bush.
    Amend the Constitution.
    Power to WE The People To Impeach By National Referendum.
    US Is Top Arms Seller to Developing World
    Posted by: "Kathy Leonard-Bushman" sassykathy464@gmail.com sassykathy46
    Sat Oct 6, 2007 10:20 am (PST)
    US Is Top Arms Seller to Developing
    *US Is Top Arms Seller to Developing World*
    By Thom Shanker
    The New York Times
    Monday 01 October 2007
    Washington - The United States maintained its role as the leading
    supplier of weapons to the developing world in 2006, followed by Russia and
    Britain, according to a Congressional study to be released Monday. Pakistan,
    India and Saudi Arabia were the top buyers.
    The global arms market is highly competitive, with manufacturing nations
    seeking both to increase profits and to expand political influence through
    weapons sales to developing nations, which reached nearly $28.8 billion in
    2006.
    That sales total was a slight drop from the 2005 figure of $31.8
    billion, a trend explained by the strain of rising fuel prices that prompted
    many developing states - except those that produce oil - to choose upgrading
    current arsenals over buying new weapons.
    The report, "Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations," was
    produced by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, a division of
    the Library of Congress, and presents a number of interesting observations
    linking arms sales and global politics. For example, Russia has been a major
    supplier of weapons to Iran in past years, including a $700 million deal for
    surface-to-air missiles in 2005.
    But anxieties over Iran's nuclear program can be seen as having deterred
    Moscow from concluding significant new conventional arms deals with Iran in
    2006, deals that could be viewed as overly provocative while the Security
    Council debates new sanctions on Iran.
    At the same time, though, Russia continues to nurture an arms-trade
    relationship that is deeply disturbing to the Bush administration, by
    signing weapons deals with oil-rich Venezuela and its anti-American leader,
    Hugo Chavez. (- Why is that statement made so flippantly - why is Chavez
    defined as ANTI-American; the U.S. has acted anti-Venezuelans, certainly,
    and Chavez may be justified in being less than trustful but what has he DONE
    specifically? - kb)
    The Russian agreements with Venezuela in 2006 included the sale of two
    dozen Su-30 fighter jets valued at more than $1 billion, along with attack
    and transport helicopters valued at more than $700 million.
    Russia also sold Venezuela a large number of AK-series assault rifles in
    a deal that included a pledge to build a factory in Venezuela to produce
    those rifles and ammunition, together valued at more than $500 million.
    "Venezuela's populist president, Hugo Chavez, has taken a hostile
    approach to relations with the United States in recent years," wrote Richard
    F. Grimmett, a specialist in national defense at the Congressional Research
    Service.
    "Thus his decision to seek advanced military equipment from Russia is a
    matter of U.S. concern," Mr. Grimmett wrote in the report. "Chavez appears
    embarked on an effort to make Venezuela an important military force in Latin
    America."
    The study makes clear also that the United States has signed
    weapons-sales agreements with nations whose records on democracy and human
    rights are subject to official criticism.

    This is about my ancestral home.

    The bit about Ispahan is where my father was born.

    We Iranians have many problems and are not a perfect people. However we are NOT terrorists nor have we ever invaded a neighboring nation in the past 300 years.

    We have never sponsored terrorism - despite all the egregious lies put out by the Israeli Controlled Media.

    The Israelis wish to demonize Iranians and to dehumanize us Iranians so when they pour bombs on us and pump Iran with DU, Depleted Uranium, the Public feels as if their tax dollars have been spent on War On Terror.

    Don't buy these lies. Remember that Iranians are poetic, romantic, and minding their own lives. We only wish to be left alone. The Hostage Taking of American Diplomats was a black spot on my Iranian National Honor. And I shall not excuse it. However, there was a backlash for the support of Americans to a Shah's Military which excelled in killing its own people!

    USA has a History of supporting Military to kill their own population! Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Turkey, Azerbaijan Republic, and Egypt are all but a few examples.

    Please rebut the rising hysteria to demonize Iranians. We Iranians are an ancient people who love poetry and wish to progress and better our lives. We are hospitable and love humanity. We are integrated within the world.

    I love you all,

    Nader Rastegar
    --
    "the republican party..supporting life right up until birth!" - Mark Binder

    Where the world stands on Burma
    An overview of the major diplomatic players and where they stand on Burma.
    news.bbc.co.uk
    Burmese struggle goes underground
    Burma's ruling generals may not yet have broken the spirit of dissent, writes the BBC's Andrew Harding.
    Burmese exiles in desperate conditions
    Mark Dummett visits the Tal camp in Bangladesh, home to some 8,000 Burmese refugees.
    <http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/2/hi/asia-pacific/7019882.stm >

    Burmese play tense waiting game
    Tension and defiance are palpable in Rangoon as the Burmese fear more violence - and protests.
    <http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/2/hi/asia-pacific/7024825.stm >

    Sanctions' limited effect on Burma
    The international community is considering what action to take against Burma, but previous sanctions have had only a limited effect.

  • USA has chosen the Super Highway of Self Destruction!

    USA has chosen the Super Highway of Self Destruction!
    USSR is not the Last to Break,USA Faces Disintegration Threat
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com
    USSR is not the Last to Break,USA Faces Disintegration Threat !
    If Impeachment was good enough for Clinton...
    Impeachment is good enough for Bush.
    Who could believe any forcast in seventies that USSR would brek one day. Now it is history. Imperialism never helps a Nation. History of the Human civilisation has watched the rise and fall of so many Imperialist powers. War destroys the attacked geopolitics, true. But it does not spare the Agressive power in any sense. Two World Wars led United Kingdom to lose its status as World leader. It could not hold the Empire and the Raj! The Crown became so wiegty at last. It could not hold on the colonies. We know well the fate of Nazis and Fascists led by no less than a personality of Hitler. Nepolean met his destiny in Waterloo. In ancient history, we read the episodes relating the Great Alexander and know well how he finished. Wars had been the singular cause for the fall of Roman and Greek Empires. We also know the history of Mesopotamia.
    Recent history tells us how the Wars finished USSR and changed the Geopolitics of Entire Europe.It is hightime that the Galaxy Super Power United States of America has to pay for the Wars it launched worldwide and the for the aggresive foreign policy it adopted. iI don`t see any escape route for the zionist hindu white supremacy out of Middle East. The Asian Nato is going to intensify the process of destruction of United States as a nation. In Near future there won`t be no United states which provoked all partitions, seccession, wars and civil wars worldwide.
    USA has chosen the Super Highway of Self Destruction! American leaders are very bad students of History and Humanities, Geopolitics and Civilisation. The Brute Super Power has to perish at last!

    California's Secession Letter to Bush
    Posted by: "Kathy Leonard-Bushman"
    Sat Oct 6, 2007 7:55 pm (PST)
    California's Secession Letter to
    Good
    luck without us and the other blue states
    (Author unkown. Found floating around the internet. Thanks to R.L. for
    sending it our way.)
    Dear President Bush:
    Congratulations on your victory over all us non-evangelicals.
    Actually, we're a bit ticked off here in California, so we're leaving.
    California will now be its own country. And we're taking all the Blue States
    with us. In case you are not aware, that includes Hawaii, Oregon,
    Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, and all of the North
    East.
    We spoke to God, and she agrees that this split will be beneficial to almost
    everybody, and especially to us in the new country of California. In fact,
    God is so excited about it, she's going to shift the whole country at 4:30
    pm EST this Friday. Therefore, please let everyone know they need to be back
    in their states by then.
    So you get Texas and all the former slave states. We get the Governator,
    stem cell research and the best beaches. We get Elliot Spitzer. You get Ken
    Lay. (Okay, we have to keep Martha Stewart, we can live with that.)
    We get the Statue of Liberty. You get OpryLand. We get Intel and Microsoft.
    You get WorldCom. We get Harvard. You get Old Miss.'
    We get 85% of America's venture capital and entrepreneurs. You get all the
    technological innovation in Alabama.
    We get about two-thirds of the tax revenue, and you get to make the red
    states pay their fair share. Since our divorce rate is 22% lower than the
    Christian coalition's, we get a bunch of happy families. You get a bunch of
    single moms to support, and we know how much you like that.
    Did I mention we produce about 70% of the nation's veggies? But heck the
    only greens the Bible-thumpers eat are the pickles on their Big Macs. Which
    means trouble for you because most of the medical innovation in the U.S.
    happens in blue states, too. Oh yeah, another thing, don't plan on serving
    California wine at your state dinners. From now on it's imported French wine
    for you. Ouch, bet that hurts.
    Just so we're clear, the country of California will be pro-choice and
    anti-war. Speaking of war, we're going to want all Blue States citizens back
    from Iraq. If you need people to fight, just ask your evangelicals.
    They have tons of kids they're willing to send to their deaths for
    absolutely no purpose. And they don't care if you don't show pictures of
    their kids' caskets coming home.
    Anyway, we wish you all the best in the next four years and we hope, really
    hope, you find those missing weapons of mass destruction. Seriously. Soon.
    Sincerely,
    California
    State of Vermont seeks secession from USA over Iraq, Bush
    The Statesman, India - 5 Oct 2007
    Because Vermont is now home to a growing movement agitating for outright secession from the USA. The modern independence movement campaigns with a mixture ...
    Anger over Iraq and Bush prompts calls for secession from the US ... Independent
    all 5 news articles »
    Over Century After Civil War, New Secession Movement
    LiveScience.com, NY - 3 Oct 2007
    Vermont, one of the US's most liberal states, has become a hotbed for liberal secessionists, a fringe movement that gained new traction because of the Iraq ...

    Several States Are Discussing Secession From The United States
    OpEdNews, PA - 4 Oct 2007
    The news came as a surprise to me, as I wasn’t aware there was a “Secessionist” movement in the United States, but there it is, right before your eyes. ...

    Vermont out of USA?
    Merinews, India - 2 Oct 2007
    Michigan, Idaho, and South Carolina are also into secessionist movement. Only time will tell what happens if the City State replaces the Nation State in ...

    The Secession Movement in America
    The Illustrated London News, vol. 38, no. 1070, pp. 47-48 .
    January 19, 1861
    THE SECESSION MOVEMENT IN AMERICA.
    When, immediately upon the announcement of the election of Mr. Lincoln to the Presidency of the United States, South Carolina raised a cry for secession from the Union, it was quietly assumed both by the free States and by the great majority of well-informed politicians in Europe that it had been resorted to only as a threat, and that no serious intention could be entertained of carrying the threat into execution. The advantages of the Union to the Slaveholding States had been so great, so palpable, and so uninterruptedly enjoyed for above half a century—the perils to be faced as the certain consequences of disruption seemed so numerous and obvious—and the occasion seized upon as the ground of justification for so extreme a course appeared to the rest of the world so utterly inadequate, that no sober-minded man could regard the avowed purpose of the Southern States with any other feeling than incredulity. Nevertheless, as we have seen, South Carolina has seceded. Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas, have either followed her example or are on the eve of doing so. The border States will probably be drawn into the vortex of the revolution; and before Mr. Lincoln takes his place in the Presidential chair the Republic seems likely to be rent in twain, and two or more powerful and rival Confederacies to be substituted for it.
    Even now political good sense finds it hard to believe in the reality of the astounding result. To say nothing of the glorious historic page which is thereby torn to atoms, and the international power and prestige which are at once surrendered, one cannot help surmising that when the heat of passion has had time to cool down, the mutual interests of the sundered parties will operate, like the curative force of nature, to close the wound and reunite the dissevered tissue. Possibly "the wish is father to the thought;" that the South is making use of disruption, not as an end to be rested in, but as a means to an end; but, assuredly, the thought underlies the speculations of most men with regard to the future of the Empire Republic. It is imagined that as soon as a Southern confederacy is constituted negotiations with the North will be opened through the mediation of the democratic Free States and the border Slave States; that terms of compromise will be found, and that a readjustment of the Union will be effected. That the current of feeling in America is gradually setting in towards this point, the direction in which the straws upon the surface are drifting seems to indicate. Appearances, however, which have been deceptive before, may again deceive; and the history of nations teams with proofs that when once they have overstepped the bounds of reason, albeit with the purpose of returning when their ends shall have been accomplished, the very events which their own passion has produced frequently raise a barrier against their retreat, and nulla vestigia retrorsum becomes their doom.
    We are not sure that the eager haste of South Carolina to slip from within the bonds of the Union is due exclusively to the wrongs she professes to have suffered. Doubtless, the "peculiar domestic institution" is sacred in her eyes, and perhaps she believes, and may have some reason for believing, that the late Presidential election has cast an ominous shadow on the perpetuity of slavery. But something more than fear and indignation are needed to account for the precipitancy with which she has detached herself from the Union. Mr. Lincoln's election was not more threatening to her than to other Slave States; nor, supposing his policy to be what has been ascribed to him by Southern demagogues, would she have been the first to feel the injury. But South Carolina is a seaboard State, possessing ports capable of being raised to first-rate importance. A Southern Confederacy, trading direct with England, and released from the restrictions of protective import duties, would export through Charleston the whole produce of the Cotton States, and would import all the foreign commodities they receive in exchange. Her ports would become the centre of commerce between America and Europe, and, in course of time, she would acquire for herself in the South a supremacy similar to that which is now enjoyed by New York in the North. Mingled with the indignation of South Carolina, therefore, there may also be some ambitious aspirations. There are other causes of difference between the North and South than that of slavery. The protective fiscal po