Search blog.co.uk

Posts archive for: 24 October, 2007
  • Other faces of India Marginalised

    Other faces of India Marginalised
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
    Asserting that the Army was not against the peace process initiated with the ULFA, a senior Army officer on Tuesday welcomed "unconditional" talks with top leaders of the outfit. Meanwhile, "Jatinga", a film based on militancy in Assam, will be screened at the International Film Festival in Goa for its intense portrayal of youth who are trapped into terrorism. The maker of the film, an engineering lecturer Sanjib Sabhapandit, has carved a niche for himself by making films on social issues.
    According to Sanjib, militancy has become an easy and profitable business instead of epitomizing the revolutionary spirit it was meant to embody.
    "Jatinga" unmasks the reality behind militancy in the state, a situation people live in and realise, but do not speak of, said Sanjib.
    "This is high time that things are put into correct perspective. So, Jatinga was conceived in that backdrop," he said.
    Talking about the significance of the title of film, Sanjib says that Jatinga is a small place in Assam where birds are said to commit suicide. While this is not the case - birds do not actually commit suicide, they are lured to death. At night, people hold bamboo torches to attract these birds and when they fly close, they are clubbed to death. However the general folklore says that the birds come here to commit suicide.
    Drawing a similarity between the birds of Jatinga and the youth who are lured to militancy with false promises, he gave the film its name.
    "In the guise of a revolution the boys are lured into a death trap kind of situation," explained Sanjib.
    He says it is now up to the State and Central Government to find a solution for the persisting menace.
    "I thought that this is an issue which should be captured for posterity in the real perspective. I was not concerned more than that," added Sanjib.
    Sanjib's first film "Juye Poora Hoon" (The Gold That Has Been Burnt) that was based on environmental preservation received the best Indian National Film in 2004.

    Talking to reporters after the surrender of 33 ultras here, the operational head of the Unified Command structure and the Commander, four corps, Lt Gen B S Jaiswal said the Army was "not against the peace process".
    "Even the Army chief has gone on record saying that the peace process could go ahead if the top leaders came forward for talks unconditionally", Jaiswal said.
    The Army officer expressed surprise over a statement attributed to him in the media that he had warned the parents of ULFA to ensure that their wards shun violence or else be ready to receive their dead bodies.
    "My statement to the press had been distorted... What I said was that the parents of the ultras should persuade their wards to come to the national mainstream...I did not even use the word dead bodies," he said.
    The ULFA had criticised the reported statement of Jaiswal, who is the operational head of the Unified Command structure, formed in Assam to combat insurgency, alleging it showed the Army was not interested in the peace process.
    In what could turn out to be a major set back to the proscribed United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA), BS Jaswal, GOC of Army’s 4 Corps today said that some of the top leaders of the outfit are in touch with the Army and are considering to lay down their arms. This has once again added momentum on the speculations that were doing round pertaining to top ULFA leader Hira Sarania, who according to some reports is contemplating to lay down arms.
    “The Unified Command’s joint endeavour to bring back more and more ULFA cadres into the mainstream has yielded positive results, and the surrender of 33 militants at the Red Horns Division HQ at Tamulpur in Baksa district of lower Assam today has proved this,” the GOC said while addressing the media during the surrender ceremony of as many as 31 ULFA militants, besides two KLNLF cadres.
    This is the fourth surrender ceremony in past eight months at the Red Horns Division Headquarters. The last surrender ceremony was held on September 8 last.
    The 33 militants included 31 ULFA cadres including two women cadres of the outfit’s 109 battalion and two KLNLF militants. The militants have also laid down 19 assorted weapons including one AK 47, two AK 56, one Muzzle loaded gun, five revolver, one pistol, five grenades, five AK magazine, 195 rounds of AK ammunition, detonators, 6.5 kgs of explosives and one radio set.
    Jaswal while welcoming the move of the militants said, “ We are not against peace and we want the youths of Assam to prosper and militancy is certainly not the way to do so. We have repeatedly urged the parents of the cadres to ask their wards to come back to mainstream and work for the prosperity of the State.”
    “Relentless operations is our way to bring normalcy in the State and anyone who tries to hurt the sovereignty of our nation will have to face the heat,” the GOC asserted.
    “We are definitely not against the peace talks and for that matter it does not fall under our jurisdiction. But, I feel that before coming for peace talks, the militant group will have to shun violence and come for talks without any condition,” he pointed out.
    “We have been able to bring the situation under control and the credit for such success in fighting militancy goes to the effective unified command structure existing in Assam where the Army, paramilitary forces and State police operate hand in hand,” said Jaswal while adding that his philosophy is to fight insurgency and not insurgents.
    Director General of the Assam Police RN Mathur also echoed similar lines and said that there are indications that more cadres of the outfit wanted to join the national mainstream. “We welcome all whoever wants to shun violence and help bringing in peace,” said Mathur who was also present on the occasion.
    He further said that the surrendered cadres would be given vocational training on computers, carpentry, tailoring, driving, fishery, poultry, bee keeping and several other aspects of earning livelihood.
    Besides, the cadres would also be given a monthly stipend of Rs 2,000 each during the period.
    “We have organized for accommodation of these cadres in Red Horns division HQ itself and they could stay here for one year. Besides, a sum of Rs 1.5 lakh would also be deposited against each of them which they could withdraw after three years of continued good behaviour,” he said.
    Assam Police IGP (Special Branch) Khagen Sarma and GOC Red Horns Division Gyan Bhushan among other top ranking army officials were also present in the surrender ceremony.

    Amnesty International India urges Prime Minister to support UN resolution for a global moratorium on death penalty. A nationwide campaign secured over 42,000 signatures asking the PM to support UN resolution.
    Bihar is one of the first states to accept right to information applications on phone. The objective was to ensure transparency and to expand its reach to villages, where the literacy rate is low. But the real picture is different.
    Police detain 40 Muslim women protesters in Kashmir
    Srinagar : Police detained at least 40 Muslim women on Wednesday who clashed with police during an anti-U.N. protest, officials said.
    Pervez Ahmed, a police officer, said they were likely to be released later Wednesday.
    The women were protesting what they said was a failure by the United Nations to resolve the Kashmiri dispute. Police stopped them from approaching the U.N. Military Observer's office in Srinagar, the summer capital of India's Jammu-Kashmir state.
    ``The United Nations has failed the Kashmiris,'' said Yasmeen Raja, the head of the Muslim Khawateen Markaz, a women's separatist group, before she was taken away.
    On Wednesday, more than 200 black-veiled women protesters chanted ``Down with the United Nations,'' and ``We want freedom.''
    The protesters said the United Nations has failed to hold a plebiscite in Kashmir as agreed to by India after the creation of Pakistan in 1947. Kashmir is divided between India and Pakistan, which have fought two wars over its control.
    Nearly a dozen rebel groups have been fighting since 1989 for Kashmir's independence from India or its merger with Pakistan. At least 68,000 people, most of them civilians, have been killed in the conflict.
    As the muezzin called for prayers from the Kashmir mosque, Begum Rafiqa prayed in a dingy room of her old brick house for someone she has not seen for almost a decade -- her missing husband.
    "I am neither a widow nor divorced, I am married but without a husband," said 35-year-old Rafiqa.
    "God help me, I'm in limbo."
    Rafiqa, a mother of four, is one of Kashmir's hundreds of "half-widows" -- women whose husbands disappeared after their arrest by Indian security forces. Many of these disappeared men are presumed kidnapped, tortured and killed.
    Since a separatist revolt broke out in 1989, up to 10,000 people have gone missing following their arrest by security forces according to the Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP), an independent group in Kashmir.
    At least 2,000 of these disappeared people were married, and nearly all were male and young, the APDP says.
    Their wives now live a life of limbo, unable either to close an old chapter in their lives or to start a new one by remarrying, leaving them with the label of "half-widows".
    Indian troops, engaged in fighting over 17 years of insurgency, have been accused of murdering innocent civilians in staged gun battles and passing them off as separatist militants to earn rewards and promotions.
    You can forget the popcorn. At the only working movie theatre in Indian Kashmir, this is what a moviegoer endures: a frisking, a walk past sandbagged bunkers and a once-over by soldiers in body armour carrying assault rifles.
    But there are plenty of seats. Every day, Noor Mohammad, the manager of the Neelam Cinema, stares at the empty rows, a fruitless wait for customers in a land where the violence of everyday life is more dramatic than on-screen fiction.
    Mohammad has worked for the Neelam since 1966, when it first opened.
    "Those were times when cinema halls used to bustle with life," said Mohammad, smiling as he sold an occasional ticket for 40 Indian rupees, about $1. For this haggard 65-year-old, a crowd of 10 is enough to roll his movie projector. Fewer than that, and he doesn't bother.
    The theatre can seat 750, but it's a rare day when there are more than 40 people for all three shows. None are shown at night - few people venture outside here after nightfall.
    Srinagar, the main city in Indian-controlled Kashmir, is a tough town.
    After Kashmiri militants rose up against Indian rule in 1989, launching an insurgency that has left more than 68,000 people dead, this once-thriving city wilted. Protests shook the streets as Kashmiris demanded India allow the Muslim-majority region to become independent or join neighbouring Pakistan. Bombings became daily occurrences, and Indian soldiers flooded the Himalayan region.
    The Muslim militants ordered liquor stores, movie theatres and the handful of bars to close, saying they were vehicles of India's cultural invasion and anti-Islamic.
    Many of the city's eight movie theatres soon became something far more ominous. In the early 1990s, the Indian military converted most - including the Neelam - into makeshift army camps, detention centres or interrogation centres. Soon, places where audiences thrilled to Bollywood blockbusters became feared buildings, where witnesses say torture was commonplace.
    Two theatres - the Broadway and the Neelam - reopened in 1999 amid an official push to project the idea that life had returned to normal in Kashmir. But weary Kashmiris largely stayed away, and the Broadway locked its doors within a year.
    The Neelam stuck it out.
    It looks more like a military installation than a place for an evening out. Coils of barbed wire surround the building, and gun-wielding soldiers stand guard behind sandbag bunkers.
    The popcorn machine has been switched off. The snack bar serves only cookies, potato chips, tea and cold drinks.
    Few people come, fearing the possibility of a bombing or the wrath of the militants, who still oppose movie theatres.
    Employees, speaking on condition they not be identified, say the privately owned theatre gets a subsidy from the government, which still wants to make Srinagar appear normal. The theatre owner and government officials declined to comment.
    A generation has grown up in Kashmir without ever visiting a cinema hall - something incredibly rare in a country with the world's largest moviemaking industry and where passion for movies runs deep.
    On a recent day, 21-year-old Mohammad Abdullah Lone entered the Neelam to watch "Aag," or "Fire."
    He was awed.
    "It's my first experience watching a movie on the silver screen," Lone said. "But I wonder whether movie theatres are all like this."
    Most Kashmiris watch movies at home, on DVDs or satellite television. Some 2,000 new subscribers sign up every month for satellite TV, local operators say.
    That's more bad news for the Neelam.
    "I don't know how cinema will survive here in these conditions," Mohammad said.
    He counts one statistic as the most depressing: Since the theatre reopened eight years ago, not a single family has come together to see a movie.
    Elderly people in Indian-administered Kashmir have recently got together to set up a home for themselves - the first such accommodation for senior citizens in the area. BBC reports.
    The launch signifies a major change in a society where parents have traditionally been revered.
    Traditionally, aged parents have been looked after by their sons and daughters in the extended family.
    But, now some elderly people in the Kashmir valley have felt the need to fend for themselves.
    One of them, retired Professor SN Ganjoo, says his son rings him up from Delhi barely once a month.
    'Psychological satisfaction'
    "It's the age of hedonism," he says, "and the new generation is mad after riches. We have lost our values. Therefore, the elderly people who are past 70 or 80 need a place where they can chat freely among themselves and share hearty laughter.
    "That'll give them at least some psychological satisfaction, because the youngsters have no time for them."

    The home has been so popular it will soon become residential
    Seventy-eight-year-old Ghulam Mohammad Dar, a prominent businessman, recently took the initiative to set up a Council of Senior Citizens in Indian-administered Kashmir.
    He says that even those who still live within the nuclear family are feeling lonely, and that the attitude of young people towards the old has been changing.
    This he attributes to the fast pace of life as well as growing materialism.
    "My sons, who are in business, come home late in the evening. Whatever time they have is spent with their own children, with hardly a moment spared for their parents."
    Among the elderly, such views appear very much to represent a consensus.
    Former Indian Administrative Service officer, Syed Ahmed Sayed Qadri, was a big name in Kashmir's bureaucracy until his retirement 20 years ago.
    Now he says that he would be the first to move into a home for the elderly.
    At 80 years old, Mr Qadri is quite healthy.
    He's always meticulously dressed and looks as if he is quite happy with life.
    Loneliness
    But he is lonely too.
    "My health is normal. I have got enough money to hire the most expensive servant. But I am not getting the support I need.
    "Having my meals on time or having things of my choice is not possible any longer - it's rather a luxury."
    He says the establishment of a home for the elderly is a noble initiative.

    Many elderly Kashmiris have to cope alone
    Mr Dar says the home will, for now, have room for elderly people to sit, chat and play games.
    Later, it will be expanded so people can actually live in it.
    But loneliness is not the only problem facing elderly people in Kashmir. Many are also short of money.
    Ali Mohammad, a carpenter, stopped working four years ago. He still lives with family.
    But as a result of what he says is corruption and red tape in the administration, he has not received an old age pension and other benefits offered by the government.
    "Often the official concerned is not available or asks for money which I don't have," he says.
    People like Ali Mohammad have now pinned their hopes on the Senior Citizens Council, which uses a combination of volunteers and paid staff to speak up on their behalf.
    'Materialistic values'
    But the younger generation is not convinced that homes for old age pensioners is necessarily a good thing.
    Tariq Andrabi, 29, runs a garment shop.
    "It is not a right step," he says.
    "Old people are themselves responsible for their predicament because they didn't give religious education to their children, and instead have inculcated them with materialistic values.
    I have come back to Kashmir for the sake of my parents who would have been living alone
    Bilal Malik,
    Software engineer
    "The parents told them to become engineers or doctors, and told them to go to the US to pursue their careers.
    "Now, understandably, they don't want to go back."
    Businessman Syed Mushtaq argues that young people must bear more responsibility for the plight of their parents.
    "At the same time parents should also be understanding," he says. "I am still unmarried. I leave for work early in the morning and come back home very late in the evening. It does not mean I am ignoring my parents."
    Social psychologist AR Rather believes that the elderly are losing out because of changing social values.
    "There's greater emphasis on individualism and competition today," he says.
    "The joint family has broken up and youngsters secede from their parents soon after marriage."
    But the old values have not been discarded completely.
    Bilal Malik lived in London for five years where he worked as a software engineer.
    "I have come back to Kashmir for the sake of my parents who would have been living alone," he says.
    IN A NATIONWIDE campaign, Amnesty International India (AI India) has urged the Indian government to support the resolution calling for a global moratorium on executions, at the ongoing 62nd session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA).

    In an open letter addressed to the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the global human rights organisation asked the Indian Government to take this opportunity and declare a moratorium on death penalty.

    A nationwide campaign by the human rights organisation secured over 42, 000 signatures.

    Amnesty International India campaign and communications coordinator Joe Athialy said that the signatures would be handed over to the Prime Minister in the coming days.

    He said that the resolution moved by the European Union is supported by countries from all regions of the world and would be an important milestone towards achieving the General Assembly’s stated aim: the world wide abolition of the death penalty.

    The open letter says, “A step towards abolishing death penalty would go well with the principles of Gautam Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi, of which the whole country is proud.”

    Those who signed on the memorandum include Justice Krishna Iyer, former Supreme Court judge; Justice Leila Seth, former Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh; Justice Rajinder Sachar, former Chief Justice, Delhi High Court; Justice SM Daud, former Judge, Mumbai High Court; Admiral Ramdas, former Chief of Navy; Mohini Giri, former Chairperson, National Commission for Women; Upendra Baxi, former Vice Chancellor, Delhi University; Shyam Benegal, filmmaker and Member of Parliament; Medha Patkar, social activist; Mahesweta Devi, Litterateur; Ashgar Ali Engineer, Muslim Scholar and Aruna Roy, social activist.

    They said that they oppose the death penalty believing it to be a violation of the right to life and the right not to be subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. They further added that the death penalty legitimises an irreversible act of violence by the state and will inevitably claim innocent victims, as has been demonstrated, time and again.

    AI India felt that it would be a great opportunity to realise the worldwide abolition of death penalty as already momentum is gathering to end capital punishment in all countries.

    According to Amnesty International 133 countries, from all regions of the world, have abolished the death penalty in law or in practice. Only 25 countries carried out executions in 2006.

    The words of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon shortly after assuming office on January 11, 2007 should be recalled: “I believe that life is precious and must be protected and respected, and that all human beings have the right to live in dignity. International law affirms these values. I recognise the growing trend in international law and in national practice towards a phasing out of the death penalty.”
    SHILLONG: Ruing that maximum trade between India and ASEAN has so far bypassed the North East, noted social worker and columnist Patricia Mukhim on Tuesday said the region should come up with a coherent framework to reconnect the North-East to the world economically.
    Giving a presentation at a seminar on the North East today, Mukhim said trade between India and the ASEAN has multiplied four fold since 1992 after the LEP was outlined.
    "However, the North East contributes only 12 per cent of the trade, as most of the trade is done through the sea routes, thus benefiting the eastern coastal places more," she said.
    She said the focus of the northeastern states should be on transit arrangements, proliferation of trade routes, setting up custom check post and easy visa regime facilities.
    "We should also look to harness the vast river networks and establish air links to foster the trade relations wit
    The South East Asia," Mukhim suggested, underlining the need o mobilize political, intellectual and material resources so t at the region can engage in the LEP.
    President of the Society for Informed, Conscious and Responsible Existence, Toki Blah said LEP was never Northeast centric.
    "But suddenly, the Centre realized that to secure the countries trade routes, the Northeast region should take centrestage in the LEP. The Bay of Bengal is no longer a private pool. Growing Chinese influence in Myanmar has posed a threat to India, making its sea routes vulnerable," he said.
    The same night after North East Support Centre and Helpline was officially launched at the Press Club of India with the main objective of taking up measures to prevent harassment and abuse meted out to students and young people from North East in the National capital, a tribal girl aged 21 years old from Manipur was sexually assaulted by a tenant at around 12.30 am on Oct 21.Instead of protecting the victim, the landlord forced the victim's cousin and other students from North East living in the rented house to vacate the rooms without giving any notice.
    The incident happened when she along with her cousin sister went to visit their cousin brother who lives in a rented room in Mahilpalpur.
    The victim's report to the North East Support Centre and Helpline said, 'When my cousin sister went to the bathroom outside the room, I was waiting outside for her, a tenant claimed to be police man started taking picture of me and molested me'.
    When she screamed, her cousin brother and other tenants came out to rescue her.
    But they were also abused by the man in front of other residents.
    Next day, the landlord, instead of protecting the victim forced three students from Manipur living in the rented rooms of the same building to vacate the house immediately without any prior notice.
    Students sought shelter with their friends living nearby after they were pushed out by the landlord.
    The Fact Finding Team consisting of Supreme Court Lawyer Langsinglu Rongmei, All India Christian Council's Regional secretary Rev Madhu Chandra, Journalist Lemyai Shimray, Peace Campaign Activist Dr Alana Golmei and Mandali Devi rushed to the sport and gave trauma counselling to the victim and lodged a complaint with Vasanj Kunj Police Station.
    At first the Duty Officer Nalka Ram refused to entertain the complaint, However, after waiting for two and half hours, the application was endorsed under the instruction of the Station House Officer of the Police Station Rajesh Kumar and First Information Report was registered under appropriate sections of IPC and SC/ST Atrocity Prevention Act, 1995.Girls from North East India have suffered sexual abuses at work places, colleges, rented houses, roads and market places in recent time.
    In 2005, a girl was raped in a moving car, Another girl was molested by a manager of a Mall in Gurgoan last year and in last September, two girls were assaulted in Delhi University campus of which duty officer of the Police Station refused to take their complaint.
    North East Support Centre and Helpline (nesupportcentre.blogspot.com) is a combined initiative of various human rights activists, social workers, students, journalists and lawyers seeking to prevent harassment and buses meted out to North East people and tribal communities of other States.
    When monks took to streets in Burma last month, the world's spotlight came on the decades-long ongoing pro-democracy movement within the country. We are witnessing that despite and in spite of all control-measures of Junta Government in Burma (State Peace and Development Council), it is impossible to freeze information flow of human rights excesses. We hope the Junta Government is aware of, that unlike the way it succeeded in crushing the pro-democracy movement in 1988, this time the 'world is watching'!
    Interestingly the ongoing struggles in Burma have given a strong beam of hope and vigour to similar pro-democracy movements going near its North-East border of India.
    Hundreds of people came in support of pro-democracy movement led by Irom Chanu Sharmila in Manipur – a North-Eastern Indian state. They were fasting in solidarity and hundreds of other people in many countries apart from those in other states of India, prominent amongst which are Bangladesh, Pakistan, UK, Thailand, Nepal, and US, also took part in the five-days fast and demonstrated solidarity to the pro-people movement in Manipur.
    Nava Thakuria, a senior Journalist in another North-East Indian state of Assam, who is also the General Secretary of Journalists' Forum in Assam, is part of an open public meeting at Guwahati Press Club on issues around Burma and its implications to North-East.
    "In the recent uprising in the military ruled country that is adjacent to northeast India, a number of people (including a Japanese photojournalist) were killed. To suppress the pro-democracy campaigners and also the media, the Burmese junta has already taken numerous unethical means, where the military continued massive crackdown on the unarmed monks and the common Burmese with strict restriction on the media" remarks Thakuria.
    "The junta government has already cut the telephone lines of working journalists based in Burma and also slows down the Internet connectivity, such that no legitimate information from the county could reach the outer world" furthers says Thakuria.
    No matter how hard the Junta government in Burma may try to snap communications and thwart efforts to get information out of the country, it is virtually impossible to stop the world from watching and feeling outraged. Also ongoing people's movements are also slowly aligning themselves with the pro-democracy struggles in Burma.
    The minimum pre-requisite of many people's movements around the world in recent past has been a singular demand –free Aung San Suu Kyi! She is imprisoned under the 1975 State Protection Act in Myanmar (Burma), which grants the government the power to imprison persons for up to five years without a trial. She has been intermittently under arrest of one kind or the other since 1990.
    By 1988, Burma was burgeoning with pro-democracy movement, fueled by the energy and idealism among the country's young people. There were demonstrations against the repressive, one-party socialist government. Aung San Suu Kyi was drawn into the pro-democracy movement, which was snuffed out by State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC), which seized power on September 18, 1988. Thousands of pro-democracy advocates were killed.
    Next came a general election in 1990, which political parties were allowed to contest. Aung San Suu Kyi, who was leading the National League for Democracy (NLD), won a landslide victory, with 80 percent support. SLORC leaders refused to accept the election results putting the elected pro-democracy leaders under house arrest, including Aung San Suu Kyi.
    Despite the restrictions of house arrest, Aung San Suu Kyi continues to campaign for democracy. She was awarded the Nobel Prize for peace in 1991.
    The solidarity fast by hundreds of people in Manipur last month wasn't only in support of Irom Sharmila, but also demanded freedom of Aung San Suu Kyi as a minimum step forward towards establishing a just social order.
    "It is with bated breath and great expectations the entire world is looking at current events in Myanmar and Pakistan. And the expectations are for change and democracy in these two countries, close neighbours of India" said Tiamerenla Monalisa Changkijathe, Editor of a tabloid 'Nagaland Page' in another North-East state of India – Nagaland.
    The alignment of people's voices not only within Burma but globally is a positive development.
    Only time can tell whether the voices of common people will be heard or the state will continue to trample over people's rights with anti-people laws and policies.
    After getting drunk on stolen liquor and vandalizing an electrical cable support, 6 thieves were killed by electrocution.Although you could be forgiven for assuming that the deceased were likely a group of the idiotic young yobs ever present in Britain and America, the crooks in question were in fact wild Asian elephants.The elephants were part of a group of 40 wild elephants in Chandan Nukat, North East India. The 6 elephants became drunk after consuming rice beer brewed by area tribesmen, and in their search for food ended up uprooting an electric pole. The massive shocks killed 6 of the creatures, including 3 calves.
    Local conservationist Dipu Mark praised the quick thinking villagers for limiting the carnage, saying “there would have been more casualties had the villagers not chased them away.”
    Believe it or not, this is not the first time elephants have electrocuted themselves after drinking. It seems to be an almost regular occurrence throughout North East India, home of the world’s largest concentration of wild Asian elephants. A similar scene has actually occurred in Chandan Nukat itself before. Four other elephants suffered the same fate after drinking 3 years ago.
    Dr. Kushal Konwar Sharma, elephant expert and instructor at Guwahati College of Veterinary Science in India, said: “There have been several incidents of elephants drinking country liquor and going berserk, at times plundering granaries and tearing apart huts, besides inflicting fatal attacks on human beings.”
    Over 600 people have been killed in elephant attacks in the North East state of Assam, a sign of both the huge numbers of elephants and their shrinking habitats as humans encroach.
    The problem of drunken elephants appears to be on the rise as the pachyderms and humans share space. Hopefully, the problem can be handled before it causes a massive hangover in the region.
    Are there crude oil deposits in the jungles of the northeastern state of Nagaland? That is what India’s Oil and Natural Gas Company (ONGC) and Canada-based Canoro Resources will soon scout for.
    The Nagaland government has signed agreements with Canoro Resources and ONGC to look for oil deposits in the jungles, the state Industry and Commerce Minister Khekhiho Zhimomi said.
    Nagaland has the potential to yield some 600 million tones of crude oil, according to preliminary government estimates.
    ”Nagaland is literally sitting on a multi-million dollar oil reserve. The state's economy would definitely witness a massive turnaround if oil is struck,” the minister pointed out.
    \

  • Zero-Tolerance,Pranab Style Diplomacy and Security Challanges in Asia

    Zero-Tolerance,Pranab Style Diplomacy and Security Challanges in Asia
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com
    Benazir barred from leaving Pak
    http://specials.rediff.com/news/2007/oct/24video.htm
    China Launches First Lunar Probe
    New York Times - 57 minutes ago
    By JIM YARDLEY BEIJING, Oct. 24 - With a regional space race heating up in Asia, China launched its first lunar probe into space today as the Communist Party moved a step closer to fulfilling its ambitions of one day reaching the moon.
    Russia and China today acknowledged India's growing status in the international affairs but stopped short of explicitly backing New Delhi's claim to a permanent seat in the revamped UN Security Council.
    "The Foreign Ministers of China and Russia reiterated that their countries attach importance to the status of India in international affairs and understand and support India's aspirations to play a greater role in the United Nations," a joint communique issued at the end of the third standalone meeting of the Foreign Ministers of India, China and Russia, said.
    India today asked the international community to show "zero-tolerance" towards terrorism while emphasising that the Taliban remnants in Afghanistan should not be allowed to take control of parts of the strife-torn nation.
    "Under no circumstances Taliban should be allowed to take control in any area," External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee told reporters at a joint press conference at the end of the third trilateral meeting of Foreign Ministers of India, China and Russia here in northeast China.He said the meeting dwelt on the Afghanistan issue and noted that the peace process in Afghanistan should be expedited and all stakeholders should be engaged.
    Mukherjee said they discussed and reached agreement that there should be a comprehensive mechanism to tackle the problem of terrorism.
    "Terrorism is a regular agenda item in our meetings," the minister said.He said the international community should exercise "zero-tolerance" towards any terrorist actions.
    The three Foreign Ministers reiterated their strong condemnation of terrorism in all its forms and manifestations.
    "No act of terrorism can be compartmentalised, and there can be no justification for terrorism on any ground," Mukherjee, Yang and Lavrov said in a joint communiqui.
    "It is imperative for the international community to come together to combat terrorism in a long-term, sustained and comprehensive manner," it said.
    India is seeking a full-fledged permanent membership in the revamped United Nations Security Council. While many countries have expressed support for India's bid, Beijing is yet to fully back New Delhi.Meanwhile, at the trilateral meeting between External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee, Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov here today, they underlined that the UN is the most representative and authoritative international organisation.
    "In order to deal with various problems and challenges facing the international community more effectively, it is important to strengthen the role of the United Nations, improve its efficiency and conduct a comprehensive reform of the United Nations," the communique adopted by the three ministers said.
    Amid rising international pressure on Myanmar’s junta, India said Tuesday it would play an active role in helping the country to move toward democracy.On the other hand,India on Wednesday ruled out being part of the controversial us-led missile defence system, opposed by countries like Russia and China.External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee met with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov in the northeast Chinese city of Harbin on Wednesday.The meeting took place at the initiative of the Russian side, sources said.Details of their talks were not available.The meeting took place on the sidelines of the third standalone meeting of the foreign ministers of India, China and Russia in Harbin, capital of northeast China's Heilongjiang Province.During his Russian visit earlier this month, Mukherjee could not meet Lavrov, and media reports claimed that the cold reception to the Indian minister was a rebuff.The Indian government, however, suggested that the meetings could not not take place because of schedule constraints of Russian leaders.
    The placement of U.S. missile defenses in Europe will not ease global security concerns but will undermine the global strategic balance, the Chinese foreign minister said Wednesday.
    Washington insists that the deployment of a radar in the Czech Republic and a missile interceptor base in Poland will protect the U.S. and its NATO allies from potential missile attacks coming from Iran or North Korea, despite Russia's objections.
    Speaking at a news conference after a meeting between foreign ministers of China, Russia and India, Yang Jiechi expressed hope that a new concept of global security, characterized by mutual trust and equal rights, could be established in the future.
    The Harbin meeting is the third stand-alone meeting of the foreign ministers from the three countries. New Delhi hosted the previous two meetings, which some experts and media said could be aimed at setting up a military-political alliance to counter the influence of the United States in the region.
    Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said at the news conference in Harbin that Russia has no plans to form a military union with India and China.
    He said Moscow is developing dialogue with the two Asian countries through bilateral as well as trilateral formats, within the framework of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and other structures.
    "We are striving to jointly resolve key issues of security through multilateral dialogue, primarily by political and diplomatic means," Lavrov said.
    "There is no alternative to a multi-polar and equal-rights cooperation in the world if we want to respond effectively to the existing threats," he said.

    In Islamabad, on the otherhand, unfolds a new drama as Former Pakistan premier Benazir Bhutto on Wednesday named four suspects, for the attack on her convoy on October 18, in her letter to the government, Geo TV said.The four persons named in the letter are Punjab Chief Minister Parvez Elahi, IB chief Ijaz Shah, former Inter Services Intelligence Head Hamid Gul and ex-deputy chairman of National Accountability Bureau Hassan Waseem Afzal, Geo TV reported.Pakistan People's Party chairperson Benazir Bhuttohas asserted that the October 18 terrorist attacks on her homecoming procession should not be made a pretext for cancelling or postponing the general elections.While,Saudi Arabia is pressing Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf [Images] to allow former prime minister Nawaz Sharif to return home before the upcoming general elections, media reports said.Daily Times quoted highly placed sources as saying that Saudi monarch King Abdullah issued an appeal to Gen Musharraf in this regard on October 15.However, in his response, Gen Musharraf conveyed to King Abdullah that though Sharif's wife Kulsoom, presently in London [Images], could return home immediately, the former prime minister and his brother Shahbaz Sharif would be allowed only after general elections.
    The senior detective leading the probe into the suicide attack on former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto has withdrawn from the case because she objected to his credentials, a senior official said on Wednesday.
    ``The investigation team will be formed anew after Manzur Mughal disassociated himself from the investigation in view of the objections raised by Benazir Bhutto on the chief investigator's credentials,'' said Ghulam Muhammad Mohtarem, the home secretary of Sindh province, of which Karachi is the capital.
    The United States has praised Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf for his role in the war on terror, but said that Islamabad had not been successful in closing down the terror network in restive tribal areas on the Afghan border.
    "Now, in those tribal areas, they made some efforts. Thus far, they have not been successful in closing down these terrorist networks and those who are supporting them," the US Assisstant Secretary of State Sean McCormack said.
    "That's going to require a concerted effort. And we're going to continue to work with the Pakistani Government to see that there is not a safe haven from where terrorist groups can operate," he said in a briefing.
    Lauding Islamabad for its efforts to combat terrorists, McCormack said: "They have worked closely with us to set Pakistan on a different course. President Musharraf has decided that himself and we have tried to be supportive of that." Pakistan had "launched numerous operations to try to disrupt terrorist attacks as well as break up terrorist cells", he said, adding "there was an issue of al-Qaeda and Taliban sympathisers operating in the tribal regions in its northwest.
    "The Prime Minister (Shaukat Aziz) and his government are very much aware that it's a problem. We've seen the kind of violence that potentially can emanate from those regions and it is directed at us, it's directed at the Afghan populations. It's directed at Pakistani populations. So they understand very well what the threat is", McCormack added.
    Shahbaz Sharif, also the president of Pakistan Muslim Leauge- Nawaz (PML-N) told Geo News yesterday that Gen Musharraf was pressing his brother to delay his return through his overseas friends. Nawaz Sharif was deported to Saudi Arabia on September 10 when he tried to stage a comeback.
    Significantly, media reports also said Saad Hariri, son of assassinated Lebanon prime minister Rafiq Hariri, and former Saudi ambassador to the US Prince Bandar Bin Sultan met Sharif in Jeddah on October 7, asking him to delay his return at least till November 17.
    Hariri is said to be very close to President Pervez Musharraf. They told him that his further stay in Saudi Arabia would be in the interest of his own country.
    However, Sharif got a promise form his guests that they would not press him again to change his plans.
    Meanwhile, Bhutto said that her party might join the caretaker set-up if it was convinced that it would be for holding free, fair and transparent elections.Bhutto questioned the composition of the Election Commission and claimed that its secretary was involved in the 2002 elections.The former prime minister reiterated her demand for associating foreign experts in the investigation of the bombings and said she had been appalled by government's insistence on not including them in the probe. She said she feared that evidence might be destroyed with the passage of time, the Dawn reported.She criticised Pakistan Muslim League president Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain's for alleging that the PPP itself was involved in the October 18 blasts.
    Meanwhile, officials confirmed that two suicide bombers were behind the bomb attacks.Also, the officer heading the probe into the blasts was expected to be replaced after Bhutto said she had no confidence in him, the paper quoted officials as saying.Sindh Home Adviser Wasim Akhtar also confirmed that the change was being considered, although he did not say if it was in response to Bhutto's claims.
    The Pakistan government has deployed 4,000 troops in the Swat valley of North West Frontier Province to counter the activities of a pro-Taliban cleric whose men have challenged the writ of the local administration.The move came hours after four security personnel were injured in a bomb attack on a military caravan in the Malakand area late on Tuesday. Seven persons were arrested in connection with the attack.Military spokesman Maj Gen Waheed Arshad on Wednesday said the paramilitary troops had been deployed to stop the illegal activities of Maulana Faizullah, a radical cleric who is popularly known as the "FM Maulana" for his fiery sermons and edicts broadcast on an illegal FM radio station.Faizullah is the leader of the band Tanzim Nifaz-e-Shariat Muhammadi and has thousands of followers.Reports from Swat, located 50 km from the provincial capital of Peshawar, said the troops were advancing towards Faizullah's madrassa. Many people were fleeing the region as they were apprehensive about the outbreak of violent clashes.

    Closer cooperation between China, India and Russia is "conducive" for the creation of a multi-polar world and democratisation of international relations, Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi said in Harbin on Wednesday.
    "Through this trilateral meeting, we have been able to cooperate closely to create a better international environment and a better environment in our own neighbourhood," Yang said while hosting a luncheon in honour of his Indian and Russian counterparts in Harbin.
    "This format is also conducive for the creation of multipolarisation and democratisation of international relations," Yang, also host of the third stand-alone trilateral meeting of three foreign ministers, said even as senior officials of the three sides stress that their cooperation was not targeted at a third party.
    "The three major countries, Russia, India and my own country are all developing very rapidly. We are all contributing in our own way to peace, stability and development," he said.
    The three foreign ministers are expected to discuss regional and international issues and expansion of trilateral cooperation, official sources said.
    "We are all looking forward to this afternoon's trilateral of the three foreign ministers," Yang said.
    "I am sure that with our joint efforts this meeting will be crowned with success," Yang said while toasting with his Indian and Russian counterparts Pranab Mukherjee and Sergei Lavrov, stressing on the "ever-growing friendship and cooperation between China, Russia and India and for the good health and happiness of everyone."He noted that the foreign ministers have many topics to discuss during their meeting and thanked New Delhi and Moscow [Images] for their close cooperation and support during the process of the preparatory work.
    Though the visit by the Indian and Russian foreign ministers to Harbin is short, Yang hoped that the two ministers will get a glimpse of the northeast Chinese city, which the Chinese foreign minister described as one of the most beautiful in China.
    Earlier, Mukherjee, accompanied by senior officials arrived in Harbin by a special plane.
    Wednesday's three-way meeting will be the third standalone trilateral foreign ministers' meeting after the last one in New Delhi on February 14, 2007, and the first one in Vladivostok on June 2, 2005.The three foreign ministers have also met on the sidelines of multilateral forums in September 2002, September 2003, October 2004 and September 2005.
    Former Russian prime minister Yevgeny Primakov first mooted the trilateral relationship between India, China and Russia during a visit to New Delhi in 1998.
    The first summit meeting among the leaders of India, Russia and China took place on July 17, 2006, in St Petersburg on the sidelines of the meetings among G-8 and outreach countries.
    Oct 24, 2007
    A GUIDE FOR THE PERPLEXED
    Intellectual fallacies of the 'war on terror'
    By Chalmers Johnson
    http://www.atimes. com/atimes/ Middle_East/ IJ24Ak01. html
    (This essay reviews The Matador's Cape: America's Reckless Response
    to Terror by Stephen Holmes.)
    There are many books entitled A Guide for the Perplexed, including
    Moses Maimonides' 12th century treatise on Jewish law and E F
    Schumacher's 1977 book on how to think about science. Book titles
    cannot be copyrighted. A Guide for the Perplexed might therefore be
    a better title for Stephen Holmes' new book than the one he chose,
    The Matador's Cape: America's Reckless Response to Terror. In his
    perhaps overly clever conception, the matador is the terrorist
    leadership of al-Qaeda, taunting a maddened United States into an
    ultimately fatal reaction. But do not let the title stop you from
    reading the book. Holmes has written a powerful and philosophically
    erudite survey of what we t hink we understand about the 9/11
    attacks - and how and why the United States has magnified many times
    over the initial damage caused by the terrorists.
    Stephen Holmes is a law professor at New York University. In The
    Matador's Cape, he sets out to forge an understanding - in an
    intellectual and historical sense, not as a matter of journalism or
    of partisan politics - of the Iraq war, which he calls "one of the
    worst (and least comprehensible) blunders in the history of American
    foreign policy" (p 230). His modus operandi is to survey in depth
    approximately a dozen influential books on post-Cold War
    international politics to see what light they shed on America's
    missteps. I will touch briefly on the books he chooses for
    dissection, highlighting his essential thoughts on each of them.
    Holmes' choice of books is interesting. Many of the authors he
    focuses on are American conservatives or neoconservatives, which is
    reasonable since they are the ones who caused the debacle. He avoids
    progressive or left-wing writers, and none of his choices are from
    Metropolitan Books' American Empire Project. (Disclosure: This
    review was written before I read Holmes' review of my own book,
    Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic, in the October 29
    issue of The Nation.)
    He concludes: "Despite a slew of carefully researched and insightful
    books on the subject, the reason why the United States responded to
    the al-Qaeda attack by invading Iraq remains to some extent an
    enigma" (p 3). Nonetheless, his critiques of the books he has chosen
    are so well done and fair that they constitute one of the best
    introductions to the subject. They also have the advantage in
    several cases of making it unnecessary to read the original.
    Holmes interrogates his subjects cleverly. His main questions and
    the key books he dissects for each of them are:
    Did Islamic religious extremism cause 9/11? Here he supplies his own
    independent analysis and conclusion (to which I turn below).
    Why did American military preeminence breed delusions of
    omnipotence, as exemplified in Robert Kagan's Of Paradise and Power:
    America and Europe in the New World Order (Knopf, 2003)? While not
    persuaded by Kagan's portrayal of the United States as "Mars" and
    Europe as "Venus", Holmes takes Kagan's book as illustrative of
    neoconservative thought on the use of force in international
    politics: "Far from guaranteeing an unbiased and clear-eyed view of
    the terrorist threat, as Kagan contends, American military
    superiority has irredeemably skewed the country's view of the enemy
    on the horizon, drawing the United States, with appalling
    consequences, into a gratuitous, cruel, and unwinnable conflict in
    the Middle East." (p 72)
    How was the war lost, as analyzed in Cobra II: The Inside Story of
    the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq by Michael Gordon and Bernard
    Trainor (Pantheon, 2006)? Holmes regards this book by Gordon, the
    military correspondent of the New York Times, and Trainor, a retired
    Marine Corps lieutenant general, as the best treatment of the
    military aspects of the disaster, down to and including US envoy L
    Paul Bremer's disbanding of the Iraqi military. I would argue that
    Fiasco (Penguin 2006) by the Washington Post's Thomas Ricks is more
    comprehensive, clearer-eyed, and more critical.
    How did a tiny group of individuals, with eccentric theories and
    reflexes, recklessly compound the country's post-9/11 security
    nightmare? Here Holmes considers James Mann's Rise of the Vulcans:
    The History of Bush's War Cabinet (Viking, 2004). One of Mann's more
    original insights is that the neocons in the Bush administration
    were so bewitched by Cold War thinking that they were simply
    incapable of grasping the new realities of the post-Cold War
    world. "In Iraq, alas, the lack of a major military rival excited
    some aging hardliners into toppling a regime that they did not have
    the slightest clue how to replace ... We have only begun to witness
    the long-term consequences of their ghastly misuse of unaccountable
    power". (p 106).
    What roles did Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense
    Donald Rumsfeld play in the Bush administration, as captured in
    Michael Mann's Incoherent Empire (Verso, 2003)? According to Holmes,
    Mann's work "repays close study, even by readers who will not find
    its perspective altogether congenial or convincing". He argues that
    perhaps Mann's most important contribution, even if somewhat
    mechanically put, is to stress the element of bureaucratic politics
    in Cheney's and Rumsfeld's manipulation of the neophyte Bush: "The
    outcome of inter- and intra-agency battles in Washington, DC,
    allotted disproportionate influence to the fatally blurred
    understanding of the terrorist threat shared by a few highly placed
    and shrewd bureaucratic infighters. Rumsfeld and Cheney controlled
    the military; and when they were given the opportunity to rank the
    country's priorities in the war on terror, they assigned paramount
    importance to those specific threats that could be countered
    effectively only by the government agency over which they happened
    to preside" (p 107).
    Why did the US decide to search for a new enemy after the Cold War,
    as argued by an old cold warrior, Samuel Huntington, in The Clash of
    Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (Simon and Schuster,
    1996)? It is not clear why Holmes included Huntington's 11-year-old
    treatise on "Allah made them do it" in his collection of books on
    post-Cold War international politics except as an act of obeisance
    to establishmentarian - and especially Council-on-Foreign- Relations -
    thinking. Holmes regards Huntington's work as a "false template"
    and calls it misleading. Well before 9/11, many critics of
    Huntington's concept of "civilization" had pointed out that there is
    insufficient homogeneity in Christianity, Islam, or the other great
    religions for any of them to replace the position vacated by the
    Soviet Union. As Holmes remarks, Huntington "finds homogeneity
    because he is looking for homogeneity" (p 136).
    What role did left-wing ideology play in legitimizing the war on
    terror, as seen by Samantha Power in A Problem from Hell: America
    and the Age of Genocide (Basic, 2002). As Holmes acknowledges, "The
    humanitarian interventionists rose to a superficial prominence in
    the 1990s largely because of a vacuum in US foreign-policy thinking
    after the end of the Cold War ... Their influence was small,
    however, and after 9/11, that influence vanished altogether." He
    nonetheless takes up the anti-genocide activists because he suspects
    that, by making a rhetorically powerful case for casting aside
    existing decision-making rules and protocols, they may have
    emboldened the Bush administration to follow suit and fight
    the "evil" of terrorism outside the constitution and the law. The
    idea that Power was an influence on Cheney and Rumsfeld may seem a
    stretch - they were, after all, doing what they had always wanted to
    do - but Holmes' argument that "a savvy pro-war party may
    successfully employ humanitarian talk both to gull the wider public
    and to silence potential critics on the liberal side" (p 157) is
    worth considering.
    How did pro-war liberals help stifle national debate on the wisdom
    of the Iraq war, as illustrated by Paul Berman in Power and the
    Idealists (Soft Skull Press, 2005)? Wildly overstating his
    influence, Holmes writes, Berman, a regular columnist for The New
    Republic, "first tried to convince us that the Israeli-Palestinian
    conflict, far from being a tribal war over scarce land and water, is
    part of the wider spiritual war between liberalism and apocalyptic
    irrationalism, not worth distinguishing too sharply from the
    conflict between America and al-Qaeda. He then attempted to show
    that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden represented two 'branches'
    of an essentially homogeneous extremism." (p 181) Berman, Holmes
    points out, conflated anti-terrorism with anti-fascism in order to
    provide a foundation for the neologism "Islamo-fascism. " His chief
    reason for including Berman is that Holmes wants to address the
    views of religious fundamentalists in their support of the war on
    terrorism.
    How did democratization at the point of an assault rifle become
    America's mission in the world, as seen by the apostate
    neoconservative Francis Fukuyama in America at the Crossroads:
    Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy (Yale University
    Press, 2006)? Holmes is interested in Fukuyama, the
    neoconservatives' perennial sophomore, because he offers an
    insider's insights into the chimerical neocon "democratization"
    project for the Middle East.
    Fukuyama argues that democracy is the most effective antidote to the
    kind of Islamic radicalism that hit the United States on September
    11, 2001. He contends that the root of Islamic rebellion is to be
    found in the savage and effective repression of protestors - many of
    whom have been driven into exile - in places like Egypt, Saudi
    Arabia, and Pakistan. Terrorism is not the enemy, merely a tactic
    Islamic radicals have found exceptionally effective. Holmes writes
    of Fukuyama's argument, "[T]o recognize that America's fundamental
    problem is Islamic radicalism, and that terrorism is only a symptom,
    is to invite a political solution. Promoting democracy is just such
    a political solution." (p 209)
    The problem, of course, is that not even the neocons are united on
    promoting democracy; and, even if they were, they do not know how to
    go about it. Fukuyama himself pleads for "a dramatic
    demilitarization of American foreign policy and a re-emphasis on
    other types of policy instruments. " The Pentagon, in addition to its
    other deficiencies, is poorly positioned and incorrectly staffed to
    foster democratic transitions.
    Why is the contemporary American antiwar movement so anemic, as seen
    through the lens of history by Geoffrey Stone in Perilous Times:
    Free Speech in Wartime from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on
    Terrorism (W W Norton, 2004)? Holmes has nothing but praise for
    Stone's history of expanded executive discretion in wartime. A key
    question raised by Stone is why the American public has not been
    more concerned with what happened in Iraq at Abu Ghraib prison and
    in the wholesale destruction of the Sunni city of Fallujah. As
    Holmes sees it, the Bush administration, at least in this one area,
    was adept at subverting public protest. Among the more important
    lessons George W Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, and
    others learned from the Vietnam conflict, he writes, was that if you
    want to suppress domestic questioning of foreign military
    adventures, then eliminate the draft, create an all-volunteer force,
    reduce domestic taxes, and maintain a false prosperity based on
    foreign borrowing.
    How did the embracing of American unilateralism elevate the Office
    of the Secretary of Defense over the Department of State, as put
    into perspective by John Ikenberry in After Victory: Institutions,
    Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars
    (Princeton University Press, 2001)? This book is Holmes' oddest
    choice - a dated history from an establishmentarian point of view of
    the international institutions created by the United States after
    World War II, including the World Bank, the International Monetary
    Fund, and NATO, all of which Ikenberry, a prominent academic
    specialist in international relations, applauds. Holmes agrees that,
    during the Cold War, the United States ruled largely through
    indirection, using seemingly impartial international institutions,
    and eliciting the cooperation of other nations. He laments the
    failure to follow this proven formula in the post-9/11 era, which
    led to the eclipse of the State Department by the Defense
    Department, an institution hopelessly ill-suited for diplomatic and
    nation-building missions.
    Why do we battle lawlessness with lawlessness (for example, by
    torturing prisoners) and concentrate extra-constitutiona l authority
    in the hands of the president, as expounded by John Yoo in The
    Powers of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After
    9/11 (University of Chicago Press, 2005)? In this final section,
    Holmes puts on his hat as the law professor he is and takes on
    George W Bush's and Alberto Gonzales' in-house legal counsel, the
    University of California, Berkeley law professor John Yoo, who
    authored the "torture memos" for them, denied the legality of the
    Geneva Conventions, and elaborated a grandiose view of the
    president's war-making power. Holmes wonders, "Why would an aspiring
    legal scholar labor for years to develop and defend a historical
    thesis that is manifestly untrue? What is the point and what is the
    payoff? That is the principal mystery of Yoo's singular book.
    Characteristic of The Powers of War and Peace is the anemic
    relations between the evidence adduced and the inferences drawn."
    (p. 291)
    Holmes then points out that Yoo is a prominent member of the
    Federalist Society, an association of conservative Republican
    lawyers who claim to be committed to recovering the original
    understanding of the constitution and which includes several
    Republican appointees to the current Supreme Court. His conclusion
    on Yoo and his fellow neocons is devastating: "[I]f the misbegotten
    Iraq war proves anything, it is the foolhardiness of allowing an
    autistic clique that reads its own newspapers and watches its own
    cable news channel to decide, without outsider input, where to
    expend American blood and treasure - that is, to decide which
    looming threats to stress and which to downplay or ignore." (p. 301)
    Is Islam the culprit or merely a distraction?
    In addition to these broad themes, Holmes investigates hidden
    agendas and their distorting effects on rational policy-making. Some
    of these are: Cheney's desire to expand executive power and weaken
    congressional oversight; Rumsfeld's schemes to field-test his theory
    that in modern warfare speed is more important than mass; the plans
    by some of Cheney's and Rumsfeld's advisers to improve the security
    situation of Israel; the administration' s desire to create a new set
    of permanent US military bases in the Middle East to protect the US
    oil supply in case of a collapse of the Saudi monarchy; and the
    desire to invade Iraq and thereby avoid putting all the blame for
    9/11 on al-Qaeda - because to do so would have involved admitting
    administration negligence and incompetence during the first nine
    months of 2001 and, even worse, that Clinton was right in warning
    Bush and his top officials that the main security threat to the
    United States was a potential al-Qaeda attack or attacks.
    This is not the place to attempt a comprehensive review of Holmes'
    detailed critiques. For that, one should buy and read his book. Let
    me instead dwell on three themes that I think illustrate his insight
    and originality.
    Holmes rejects any direct connection between Islamic religious
    extremism and the 9/11 attacks, although he recognizes that Islamic
    vilification of the United States and other Western powers is often
    expressed in apocalyptically religious language. "Emphasizing
    religious extremism as the motivation for the [9/11] plot, whatever
    it reveals," he argues, "… terminates inquiry prematurely,
    encouraging us to view the attack ahistorically as an expression
    of 'radical Salafism', a fundamentalist movement within Islam that
    allegedly drives its adherents to homicidal violence against
    infidels." (p 2) This approach, he points out, is distinctly
    tautological: "Appeals to social norms or a culture of martyrdom are
    not very helpful ... They are tantamount to saying that suicidal
    terrorism is caused by a proclivity to suicidal terrorism." (p 20)
    Instead, he suggests, "The mobilizing ideology behind 9/11 was not
    Islam, or even Islamic fundamentalism, but rather a specific
    narrative of blame" (p 63). He insists on putting the focus on the
    actual perpetrators, the 19 men who executed the attacks in New York
    and Washington - 15 Saudi Arabians, two citizens of the United Arab
    Emirates, one Egyptian, and one Lebanese. None of them was
    particularly religious. Three were living together in Hamburg,
    Germany, where they did appear to have become more interested in
    Islam than they had been in their home countries. Mohamed Atta, the
    leader of the group, age 33 on 9/11, had Egyptian and German degrees
    in architecture and city plan.

  • Priyanka Defends family and Riz remains a Lost Memory

    Priyanka Defends family and Riz remains a Lost Memory
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com
    Priayanka Tody defends her family ,quite understandably as riz remains a lost memory inspite pof being an Icon of Popular resistance!
    Chiranjeevi's daughter granted protection
    NDTV.com - 10 hours ago
    The Delhi High Court has granted police protection to Chiranjeevi's daughter Srija, who had moved the court saying her life was in danger.
    Srija wants reel marriage now Hindustan Times
    Love story of megastar's daughter in court Times of India
    Kolkata Love Tragedy seems to meet the same destiny as faced by Nitish katara in New delhi. As Priyanka , the lady protagonist surviving in the case, is captured as had been Bharati Yadav, who later turned hostile. Priyanka now defends her family as expected and Suicide theory gets momentum as CBI still investigating the murder case likely to be hushed up as another suicide story. The case turns to be a deathtarp for the opposition as CPIM is successful to defend its Vote Bank and turminates beautifully whatsoever opposition subverting all vital issues.
    Did Rizwanur Rehman commit suicide? Did he die accidentally? Or was he murdered?
    As the CBI tries to unravel the mystery surrounding Rizwanur's death in Kolkata on September 21, NDTV has access to the call list of Rizwanur's cell phone number.The SMSs suggest that Rizwanur did actually commit suicide. NDTV is clear that these SMSs are printouts apparently from Rizwanur's phone but they still need to be checked for any tampering or falsification.The question remains is why didn't the Calcutta police release these SMSs earlier.Five senior police officers have been punished because of the Rizwanur case. The name of a former girlfriend of Rizwan-ur-Rahman, the computer graphics teacher who was found dead on railway tracks just a month after his marriage to a Hindu girl, surfaced on Wednesday during investigations by CBI.
    Newly-appointed city police commissioner Mr Goutam Mohan Chakraborty announced today his decision to set up a public grievance cell at the Kolkata Police headquarters in Lalbazar. The cell will accept complaints against police officers accused of refusing to register the grievances of people at police stations. The CP’s announcement comes days after Rizwanur Rehman lost his life following sustained pressure from senior city police officers to break his marriage to the daughter of businessman Mr Ashok Todi. Rizwanur had to move unsuccessfully from pillar to post to make the powers-that-be take note of the harassment meted out to him by policemen. Mr Chakraborty, who took over as the new CP on 17 October, made the announcement at a Press conference held at Lalbazar this evening. He said that an officer of the rank of assistant commissioner would head the cell, which would start functioning within a month. Asked what had prompted him to set up the cell, Mr Chakraborty said: “The decision was taken to help people exercise their right to lodge complaints against errant policemen. Police personnel shouldn’t stray beyond their brief.”
    The Left Front allies have raised questions about the rationale of continuing with the judicial probe, particularly after CBI began its investigation following a directive of the Calcutta High Court. While RSP described the judicial commission as “useless”, the CPI said that in case the two reports were contradictory, it would generate needless controversy for the state government. The state home secretary, Mr Prasadranjan Ray said there is no legal hurdle for the two inquiries to continue simultaneously but a decision to withdraw the judicial commission would be a “political” one.
    Mr Nandagopal Bhattacharjee, the minister from CPI said they would definitely raise the issue of withdrawing the judicial commission in the Left Front. “ Two inquiries should not run simultaneously. The judicial commission should be withdrawn, particularly because the findings of both inquiries can be contradictory. The state government has already faced flak on the Rizwanur issue and I don't see any need to drag in any more controversy.”
    The minister said the nature of two investigations are different, while CBI would examine witnesses behind close doors in case of judicial commission, witnesses will be called on to give evidence publicly which might hamper the CBI investigation.
    Meanwhile,THE CBI today questioned Rizwanur Rehman’s former girl friend, Priyanka’s uncle, Pardip Todi for the second time and two of the graphic designer’s uncles. The investigating agency also cracked the password of Rizwanur’s e-mail Id. His mails and the server have been checked.
    The former girl friend Pompi Roy was questioned by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) earlier but Priyanka and her mother have contradicted her statements. Meanwhile Pradip Todi has told the CBI that there was illegal transaction of a large amount of money. Rizwanur’s uncles are being grilled repeatedly to find out whether there was any pressure on the graphic designer from his family. He had not been staying at his home after Priyanka went back to her family.

    The sleuths also came across another eyewitness to his death.

    It took CBI officials five hours to home in on the password. Two officials went to Arena Multimedia center again today and spoke to his colleagues. The team loaded documents from his mailbox in a compact disc for examination.

    Arun Kumar, CBI joint director leading the team said they had been trying to get his password, which might provide positive leads to the case. Earlier, the CBI team took away the hard disks from Priyanka’s personal computer and laptop for forensic examination in Hyderabad.

    "We are carefully examining all the documents but at present, in the interest of the case, we cannot divulge anything," CBI DIG Satish Golcha told the Kolkata media.

    Interestingly, the CBI came across another eyewitness. The man is local in the area where the body was found and for the sake his security the CBI refrained from divulging his name.

    The guard and engine driver of the down Burdwan local, which had passed the spot where Rizwanur’s body was found, were grilled again.

    Some officers visited a private bank where Rizwanur had his salary account

    In New Delhi, Kumar is overseeing the constitution of a medical board that is being set up to examine the post-mortem report on Rizwanur.

    The CBI is in no hurry to interrogate Asohok Todi.

    The state’s home secretary said during the day that the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) had handed over all its findings, including vide recordings to the CBI. There was some tension between the investigating agencies. The CID not parting with the documents related to questing over 80 people and the call history of Rizwan’s mobile. The designer had bought a new mobile and kept his old one in his office drawer.

    Meanwhile, yesterday Priyanka Todi told the CBI that there was tremendous opposition to her marriage from her family but she did not believe they could have killed Rizwanur.Interestingly, Priyanka also said she also believed that Rizwanur could not have committed suicide because the couple were looking forward to a life together. Rizwanur was willing to wait for her family to come around. She claimed she had come close to convincing her father. She said she left his home because of pressure from her family. She told the CBI that Rizwanur was a very sentimental person. The CBI team interrogated her at a third place at the request of the Todi family. She was not questioned at her house or at the CBI office, CBI joint director, Arun Kumar said. And added that it was too early to say anything and that the team was monitoring the case.

    Priyanka was said to have cooperated with the officials and given details of what had transpired and answered all the questions. “We are very pleased with way of Priyanka cooperated and she has helped a lot in the investigation,” Kumar told the Kolkata media. While Kumar refused to divulge details of the interrogation, she is learnt to have spoken about the role of her family. Women CBI officers, part of the team, were present during the questioning. She may be questioned again.

    The CBI team which questioned Priyanka visited the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) office to match her statements with the ones she made earlier to CID officials.
    It was for the first time that Ms Priyanka Todi, widow of Rizwanur Rehman, voiced her resentment against her parents while she being questioned by officers of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) today in connection with the mysterious death of her husband.
    A senior CBI officer said: “Priyanka didn't make any adverse statement against any police officer. But she was critical of her parents." Ms Todi was questioned by the sleuths at an “undisclosed and neutral” place in Salt Lake this morning.
    Later, CBI officers went to the CID headquarters at Bhabani Bhavan to verify Ms Todi’s statement. She had earlier issued a statement to the CID ~ which was handling the probe into Rizwanur's death before the CBI stepped in ~ and it had been video recorded. The officers also collected some documents as well as three mobile phones and SIM cards which the CID had earlier seized.
    Newly-appointed AC-ARS, Mr BK Saha, and another officers of the city police's detective department, Mr Boudhayan Mukherjee, travelled to Nizam Palace this afternoon to submit some documents which the CBI had requisitioned. Meanwhile, CBI joint-director (special crime branch) Mr Arun Kumar, who is heading the investigation returned to Delhi this afternoon. He is likely to submit a preliminary report to the CBI special director Mr ML Sharma.
    CBI officers questioned three of Rizwanur's uncles ~ Mr Sahidur Rehman, Mr Motiur Rehman and Mr Wahidur Rehman today. Yesterday, Rizwanur's two other uncles and brother Rukbanur had been questioned. Rizwanur's uncles had alleged that they had received threats from some promoters before Rizwanur had died.
    “Those persons (the promoters) have been identified and we are looking into all aspects,” a senior officer said. Two locals, who had spotted the body of Rizwanur next to railway tracks in Patipukur were also examined today. Meanwhile, a Calcutta High Court lawyer today lodged a complaint with the CBI against five Kolkata Police officers, including its former commissioner, Mr Prasun Mukherjee, for disregarding a 2006 verdict of the Supreme Court which enjoins upon civil servants not to interfere with any intercaste and inter-religious marriages.
    “The five police officers are guilty under Section of the 166 of the Indian Penal Code. Mr Mukherjee and the former DC-HQ, Mr Gyanwant Singh, have also been charged with accepting gratification under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
    The two officers had accepted at least 800 T-shirts from Lux Cozi, a company owned by Mr Ashok Todi,” the lawyer said.

    In a new development, officers from the special branch of Kolkata Police told Rizwanur’s brother Rukbanur to inform the special branch before stepping out of the house. Ironically a police force, which had threatened the family, now feel they need security. While CBI has registered it as a murder case it is also said to be looking for a suicide note that Rizwanur might have left behind. They are looking for the note on the basis of information and have asked the family to help find it.
    The CBI has already registered a case against Priyanka's father Ashok Todi.

    The state government has handed over all documents collected by the CID to the CBI. Initially, the CID was acting churlish and had refused to hand over the call sheet from Rizwanur’s mobile and the statements of the 80-odd people it had questioned. The state’s home secretary had to step in get them to hand over all relevant documents.

    The joint director who flew back to New Delhi today evening is expected to discuss the probe with the CBI director. The autopsy report sent to forensic experts in the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi will be available to the CBI early tomorrow. Kumar will be back in Kolkata two days later.

    The CBI team which has grown from seven to 24 has been divided into groups. One group led by Arun Bhatnagar revisited the office of the Arena Multimedia in Chowringhee where Rizwanur worked and spoke to the authorities. They also scrutinized the computer used by the graphic designer for clues.

    The CBI has sent Rizwanur's mobile phone SIM card which it has got from the CID to the laboratory to find out whether anything has been deleted.

    The CBI questioned Pompi Roy, a former girl friend and batch mate of the graphic designer in St. Xavier's College, Kolkata. She told a section of the media today that he was a decent human being and was not after money. They last met in 2004. The CID was allegedly trying to project a love triangle but backed out when the media began exposing the truth.

    The CBI which has been questioning everyone even remotely connected with the case had a surprise visitor in a lawyer who claimed Rizwanur had contacted him. Anil Saraogi, a relative of the Todis was also questioned. Among others questioned over the last four days are Sujato Bhadra of the Association for Protection of Democratic Rights (APDR) who gave a detailed account from the day he met Rizwanur to the last telephone call he made to Bhadra before he died. Supriya Mondal, the owner of public call office on APC Road from where Rizwanur made calls just before his death was also questioned.

    Yesterday the CBI had sent notices to the immigration department to ensure that Ashok Todi and Priyanka did not leave the country without the investigative agency’s knowledge.

    The CBI team questioned a realtor whom the CID had ignored despite a complaint from Rizwanur’s family.

    Hassan Ali, a south Kolkata based realtor and Abdul Majid, his associate, were interrogated because Rizwanur’s family alleged that the two acted on behalf of Ashok Todi and mounted pressure on the family to send Priyanka back.

    Majid had turned up thrice on September 1 and tried to force the family to send Priyanka to her parents, according to Jalisur Rahman, one of Rizwanur’s uncles
    Unfolding of events
    The record of the SMSs that Rizwanur apparently made on the morning before he died, is as follows:
    September 21 9.10 am: ''Papa, there is five minutes before I kill myself. Talk to me last time.''
    This is the content of Rizwanur's SMS to his father-in-law Ashok Todi at 9.10 the morning of his death.
    Here is what followed. At 9.14 am, Rizwanur SMSed his mother-in-law Bimla Todi.
    At 9.15 am Rizwanur talked to Ashok Todi for 147 seconds. At 9.21 am Rizwanur sent a second SMS to Ashok Todi. At 10.11 am, Rizwanur called Sujato Bhadra of the Association for the Protection of Democratic Rights and spoke for 79 seconds.
    According to Sujato Bhadra, Rizwanur asked if Bhadra was going to the police headquarters as planned.
    When Bhadra said yes, Rizwanur said he would meet him at 2.30 and give him some documents so that he, Bhadra, could argue Rizwanur's case well with the police.
    At 10.12 am Rizwanur talked to Swapnil Sengupta, an office colleague, for 148 seconds.
    At 10.15 am Rizwanur talked to Madhavi Chandak for 241 seconds. She is someone who he tutored.
    At 10.21 am Madhavi sent an SMS saying, ''You are my guiding star. Don't do this to me please.''
    At 10.28 am the word ''my'' is typed and saved in the draft messages folder of his mobile.
    At 11.15 am, the phone received an sms from Debraj Banerjee. The SMS was sent three times and said, ''Please talk to us. Me and Swapnil are ready to come and help and don't take any wrong step.''
    At 11.20 am, the phone received an SMS from Jolly, one of Rizwanur's students. It said, ''We need you please.''
    At 12.21 pm Jolly sent another SMS saying, ''Call me please.''
    Rizwanur's body was found at Patipukur next to rail tracks at around 10.30 am.
    Loose ends
    There are several unanswered questions in the case.
    At 10.11 am the day he died, Rizwanur called up Sujato Bhadro of the Association for the Protection of Democratic Rights and according to Bhadro said he would meet him at 2.30 to hand over some documents.
    If he committed suicide, why did he fix the meeting?
    Why did Rizwanur go to Patipukur and what was he doing on the railway tracks where his body was found.
    CBI officials say some of the injuries mentioned in state forensic laboratory's report are not commonly seen when a person commits suicide by jumping in front of a train.
    Rizwan's head was smashed, neck severed and body bore several injury marks, but the post-mortem report doesn't provide explanation for each injury.

    Hush hunt for ‘suicide note’
    A STAFF REPORTER reports for The Telegraph , Kolkata
    Calcutta, Oct. 23: The CBI is looking for a “suicide note” that the agency feels Rizwanur Rahman might have left behind.
    “Although a murder case has been started we have got information that he left a note before his death. We are probing all angles,” a CBI officer said.
    One of the persons questioned by the agency hinted that Rizwanur had prepared a note detailing his “miserable condition” after Priyanka Todi returned to her parent’s house in Salt Lake on September 8.
    The purported note is different from the “first person account” Rizwanur had submitted to the Association for Protection of Democratic Rights.
    “The person told us that Rizwanur had described in the note how police harassed him to leave Priyanka. He had also written down how frustrated and depressed he was at not being able to talk to his wife and how lonely he was,” another CBI officer said.
    “We are trying to confirm whether he had left behind any such note.”
    A disclosure by a member of Rizwanur’s family today seemed to corroborate the officer’s statement. The family member said that while questioning Rizwanur’s relatives yesterday, the CBI officers had asked them to search their houses for the note.
    “They asked us several times to look for any suicide note he might have left behind. We told them that it was not true but they appeared very adamant,” the family member said. “We were told not to tell the media about it.”
    The CBI officers also asked Rizwanur’s family members yesterday why they thought it was a case of murder and not suicide.
    “This was the first question they asked me yesterday. I told them that if he had planned to commit suicide on railway tracks, he would have done so near his house. I told them my brother was mentally prepared to fight a legal battle to bring his wife back,” Rukbanur, Rizwanur’s brother, said.
    A CBI officer said the agency was also trying to find information on Rizwanur’s state of mind during the last few days before he died. “We got to know that he had spent several nights at an undisclosed location. This is very important to the case,” the officer said, suggesting that the case was still open.
    Pressure but not lethal: Priyanka
    Light shed on secluded life
    OUR BUREAU

    Calcutta/New Delhi, Oct. 23: A composed Priyanka Todi today told the CBI that there was “tremendous opposition” to her marriage from her family members but she did not believe they could have killed her husband.
    Priyanka, Rizwanur Rahman’s widow, did not tell the agency that officers of Calcutta police had misbehaved with her.
    “The opposition from my family was definitely there, but that does not mean that they will kill him,” a CBI source quoted her as telling the investigators.
    However, Priyanka said she was also convinced that Rizwanur could not have committed suicide as the couple were looking forward to their life together.
    According to her, Rizwanur was willing to wait for her parents to come around and eventually bless them.
    Priyanka was questioned early this morning to save her from media glare.
    “Her family had requested that she be questioned at a place other than her own house or the CBI office. So, she went to her uncle Pravin Todi’s house late last night and the CBI team went there early morning to talk to her,” an officer said.
    Admitting her family exerted a lot of pressure on her after her wedding, Priyanka said she had married Rizwanur on her own accord as she was in love with him.
    “I loved him then and love him even now,” she told the CBI team led by joint director Arun Kumar. Two women officers were present during the questioning.
    Asked why she left Rizwanur’s home, Priyanka said it was because of pressure from her family.
    “My family did not like my going out, socialising and meeting people. They did not approve of it then and they do not approve of it now,” Priyanka said. She ruled out any tension between her and Rizwanur over another woman.
    Priyanka told the officers that Rizwanur was a “very sentimental type”, adding he would feel restless during the days of courtship if they did not manage to meet for a day or two.
    Priyanka told the CBI how they got married and later, in the face of questioning, spelt out where she had spent the days between September 8 and 21. She said she spoke to Rizwanur’s former girlfriend between September 10 and 15.
    “Priyanka tried explaining to us how high-strung the 30-year-old youth was. She wanted time from Rizwanur to convince her father to accept the marriage. According to her, she had almost come close to convincing her father but before she could take any step, Rizwanur was dead,” an officer said.
    The CBI officials said Priyanka cooperated with them “completely”. Later, the CBI officials spoke to Priyanka’s mother Bimla.
    The CBI team took the hard disks from her personal computer and laptop for forensic examination in Hyderabad.
    Later in the day, the CBI team went to Rizwanur’s office on Chowringhee Road where experts cracked the password and collected details of mails sent from Rizwanur’s two accounts. Some officers visited a private bank where Rizwanur used to have his salary account.
    Kumar took possession of the disks as well as documents and left for New Delhi along with another officer, Seema Kapoor. “I am leaving for New Delhi to oversee the constitution of a medical board that needs to be set up to look into the post-mortem report on Rizwanur,” Kumar said.
    He added that the CBI was in no hurry to question Ashok Todi. “That is the last step and we will call him when required.”
    The CBI today interviewed two persons, Gajendra Saha and Dukhiram Halder, who had seen Rizwanur’s body at Patipukur. Three officers from the detective department were also quizzed during the day.
    Officers from the special branch of Calcutta police spoke to Rizwanur’s brother Rukbanur on the family’s security. The Rahmans were told to inform the special branch before stepping out of the house, saying there was a possibility of an attack on them.
    Parallel probe
    Political ripples refused to die down with some state cabinet ministers criticising the “parallel probe”. CPI minister Nandagopal Bhattacharya said the Rs 20 lakh being spent on the judicial inquiry was a waste of public money and would only confuse people.
    http://www.telegraphindia.com/1071024/asp/frontpage/story_8467562.asp

    A decision on whether or not to exhume the body of Rizwanur Rehman, the computer graphics teacher of Kolkata who had married the daughter of a Hindu industrialist, would be taken after a team of experts studies the post-mortem report, CBI sources said on wednesday. The agency, probing the death of Rehman, will approach the Director General of Health Services (DGHS) for constituting the team of experts that would examine the postmortem report. CBI sources said since AIIMS Doctor P D Dogra had been suspended by the Health Ministry, it was now going to approach the DGHS for constituting a team of doctors for examining the autopsy report. Meanwhile, in Kolkata, The West Bengal CID would hand over all its investigation reports in the mysterious death of computer graphics teacher Rizwanur Rehman after he married the daughter of an industrialist to the CBI.
    Dogra was preferred by the investigating agency because of his quick examination in Nithari (Noida) serial killings and identification of victims.
    But now the DGHS will have to provide the agency with a fresh panel of experts which would go into the report and advise whether a fresh postmortem was required, they said.
    Exhuming of Rizwanur's body would be beneficial right now as even the soft tissues within the body of the deceased would be intact, a CBI official, attahced with the probe into the death, said.
    "The CBI asked for some documents for the sake of investigation and we have written to them to collect them," Inspector General (Special), CID, P Neeraj Narayan told PTI on Wednesday.
    Initially, the CID had said that it would provide all documents but not their investigation details to the CBI.
    The turn around came a day after Director General of Police Anup Vohra held a close door meeting with senior police officers and requested them to co-operate with the premiere investigation agency.
    The investigation details include the verbatim record of all the people CID examined, videography of the place of death, CDs of the recorded statement of some key persons like Rizwanur's widow, Priyanka Todi, her father Ashoke Todi, the prime accused in the case and others.
    The CBI took over the charge of the investigation of the unnatural death of 27-year-old Rizwanur, at the directive of the Calcutta High Court on October 16.
    Rizwanur, who married Priyanka, the daughter of businessman Ashok Todi against his wishes, was found dead on September 21.
    The death had caused a national outcry leading to the removal of five police officers, including the Kolkata police commissioner, Prasun Mukherjee.
    Days after his removal as police chief in the Rizwanur Rehman death case, a defiant Prasun Mukherjee on Tuesday ruled out stepping down as Cricket Association of Bengal (CAB) president even as affiliated clubs are moving to seek his resignation.
    "There is no question of stepping down. Now, that I am not the Commissioner of Police I can concentrate more on cricket. Before, I had the pressure of handling an 80,000 strong crowd at a cricket match. Now, it will be cricket only. I can only do better," Mukherjee said.
    It has been learnt that three affiliated clubs of the CAB will seek his resignation following his removal as police commissioner in the Rizwanur Rahman case. The letter will be sent within a couple of days.
    "We will ask him to vacate the chair. The test against Pakistan is only a month away, but he hasn't been devoting time to the CAB," former assistant secretary Biswaroop Dey, who will be one of the signatories, said.
    The letter from 20 members that will force a 'requisite special general meeting' is also expected to be sent next week.
    "We will call the meeting once we get the letter to discuss the issue," Joint Secretary Samar Paul said.
    Reacting to the statements, Mukherjee said: "As you know, there are a few people who are against me. But they are not the majority. Besides, I think the opposition is nursing a grudge after having lost the elections. They have not been able to accept defeat gracefully."
    "When I lost to Jagmohan Dalmiya, I accepted the verdict and joined one of the sub-committees and continued to work. And, now also, it is my work that will speak for me," he said.
    Asked if the demands for removal were weighing on his mind, he said, "Not at all. Bouquets and brickbats are part of life. I know how to shut these things out of my mind and continue to work."
    Mukherjee also assured he would continue to work for the betterment of CAB and cricket in general and not pay heed to what a section of the dissidents had to say about his stepping down.
    "I have heard Sachin Tendulkar does not read papers when he plays. I will concentrate on my work and keep these external factors out of my mind," Mukherjee concluded.
    A number of CAB members led by its trustees Gautam Dasgupta and Shivkumar Kalyani, besides Dey, are gearing up to grill Mukherjee for decisions taken by him without informing the trustee board.
    Mukherjee and four other police officials were removed last Wednesday for their alleged involvement in harassing Rehman, who was found dead under mysterious circumstances on Sep 21. He had married Priyanka Todi, daughter of industrialist Ashok Todi, who was against the marriage.

  • California Fire Worries India

    California Fire Worries India
    States Set to Sue the U.S. Over Greenhouse Gases
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
    California's wildfires rage into fourth day | Video
    http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSHUN40455820071024
    Fire Chief Says Calif. Ill Prepared
    FOX News - 1 hour ago
    LOS ANGELES - Unable to slow, much less stop, many of the wildfires that have charred Southern California, some local officials lashed out Tuesday at what they described as state authorities who offered inadequate help and seemed unprepared for a ...
    San Diego's Inferno: Relief Ahead? TIME
    As Fires Rage for Fourth Day, Hopes Rest on Winds Easing New York Times
    Concerned about the safety of Indians residing in the wildfire-hit US state of California, Leader of the Opposition Lal Kishenchand Advani on Wednesday spoke to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to enquire about their wellbeing.
    Advani telephoned Dr Singh to find out whether the government had any information about Indians affected by the raging fire in southern California and any steps were being taken to ensure their safety.California has a sizeable Indian population, majority of them businessmen from Gujarat.
    The prime minister informed Advani that he did not have any information off-hand and would get back to him, sources said.
    All Indian nationals in wildfire-hit southern California are safe but many had to evacuate their properties, the government said here on Wednesday.
    Indian Consulate General in San Francisco has been in touch with members of the Indian community, many of whom had to evacuate their properties.
    India has expressed regret over the loss of life and damage to property in the fires in southern California that began on Sunday and have destroyed over 384 square miles of area.
    "It is hoped that the blaze will soon be contained and the affected people enabled to resume their normal life," an External Affairs Ministry statement said here.
    More than half a million people have been evacuated from their homes in California, about 500,000 in San Diego county alone, as massive fire, which broke out on Sunday, continued to wreak havoc.California is expected to file suit against the United States next week in a sad jurisprudential waste of time and taxpayer money brought to you by an environmentally delinquent Bush administration.
    No one disputes that California has the authority under the Clean Air Act to enact environmental regulations that are stricter than federal standards. To do so, though, it must get permission from the Environmental Protection Agency, a process that has been something of a formality in the past; the EPA has never turned down a waiver request, granting about 50 of them since 1970. Yet the agency has been dragging its feet for two years on California's effort to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles. Hence the lawsuit by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger intended to force the EPA's hand.
    The excuse offered by EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson for blowing off California's waiver request used to be that he didn't believe the agency had the authority to regulate greenhouse gases, because they weren't traditionally considered pollutants. The Supreme Court put an end to that tactic in April, when it ruled that there is abundant evidence that greenhouse gases, and the climate change they are accelerating, pose a threat to human health and welfare and thus fall under the EPA's purview. So the excuse du jour is that California submitted a lot of paperwork and it will take until the end of the year for the agency to vet all the data. This is bureaucratese for "we're trying to drag this out as long as humanly possible."
    The Supreme Court decision wasn't the only loss for those trying to stop California's new regulations, which require automakers to reduce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions by 30% between 2009 and 2016. Under the Clean Air Act, other states are empowered to adopt California's tougher environmental standards if they so choose, and so far about a dozen, including Vermont, are ready to duplicate this state's "clean cars" law if it gets an EPA waiver. The auto industry responded by filing federal lawsuits in Vermont and California, and although the latter hasn't been heard, the former was a conclusive defeat. A judge in Vermont ruled last month that California's rules weren't "sufficiently draconian" to interfere with the federal government's authority to set fuel-economy standards, as carmakers had argued.

    New York is one of more than a dozen states, led by California, preparing to sue the Bush administration for holding up efforts to regulate emissions from cars and trucks, several people involved in the lawsuit said on Tuesday. DANNY HAKIM reports in New York Times.The move comes as New York and other Northeastern states are stepping up their push for tougher regulation of greenhouse gases as part of their continuing opposition to President Bush?s policies.
    Meanwhile,California's attorney general said Tuesday he will postpone a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency because of the massive wildfires in Southern California. Attorney General Jerry Brown told The Associated Press that California would not sue the agency on Wednesday as he had planned. Instead, he will likely sue next week.
    "The governor would rather do this next week," Brown said. "He's totally focused on the fires."
    California intends to sue the EPA in federal court to force a decision on whether California and 11 other states, including Rhode Island, can impose stricter vehicle standards.
    The state has waited 22 months for a response from the agency to its petition to be allowed to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from cars, pickup trucks and sports utility vehicles.
    California regulators need an answer because they want to implement a 2002 state law requiring vehicles sold in California to emit fewer greenhouse gases starting with model year 2009.
    The proposed standard would cut emissions in California by about a quarter by the year 2030, according to the California Air Resources Board. But the law can take effect only if the EPA grants California a waiver under the federal Clean Air Act.
    The EPA held hearings in May on the state's request, and administrator Steven Johnson has said he would make a decision by the end of the year. Meanwhile, the agency is also crafting national standards that it plans to propose by the end of the year.
    California's lawsuit will allege there has been an "unreasonable delay" by the EPA in deciding on the waiver request, which the state first applied for in December 2005.
    Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Washington also plan to join California's lawsuit against the EPA, officials in those states said.
    While the federal government sets national air pollution rules, California has unique status under the Clean Air Act to enact its own regulations -- with permission from the EPA. Other states can then follow either the federal rules or California standards, if they are tougher.
    Eleven other states -- Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington -- are ready to implement California's emissions standards. The governors of Arizona, Florida and New Mexico also have said their states will adopt the standard.
    The Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, which represents Honda, Nissan, Toyota and 11 other foreign car companies, has sued to block the standards from taking effect.It argues the standards would raise the cost of cars and could force manufacturers to pull some sports utility vehicles and pickup trucks from showrooms. Their case is pending in federal court in Fresno.
    The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers has asked the EPA to deny the waiver, arguing there should be one federal standard.

    On Wednesday, Gov. Eliot Spitzer?s administration is to issue regulations requiring power plants to pay for their greenhouse gas emissions, part of a broader plan among 10 Northeastern states, known as the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, to move beyond federal regulators in Washington and regulate such emissions on their own.
    ?I believe that states have to step into a void created by a failure of federal action,? Mr. Spitzer said in an interview on Tuesday. ?The global warming issue is one where the current administration has first denied the scientific evidence and only recently begun to discuss the matter in a serious way.?
    Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo, in a statement on Tuesday, said, ?New York State is moving forward on all cylinders to take aggressive action to curb global warming from both power plants and cars.?
    ?I stand with the governor to support these policies, and I will take vigorous action both to defend these important initiatives from any challenge and to sue the Bush administration if the federal government tries to block us,? he added.
    The legal move by the states to sue the Environmental Protection Agency is aimed at prodding the Bush administration to remove obstacles to more than a dozen states seeking to regulate global warming emissions from cars and trucks. In 2005, California sought a waiver from the E.P.A. that would allow it to implement the first regulation in the United States requiring reductions of greenhouse gas emissions from cars. The E.P.A. has not yet granted the waiver, keeping the regulation from taking effect.
    New York, Massachusetts and a number of other states have since moved to adopt California?s measure. They cannot proceed until the E.P.A. moves on the waiver.
    If implemented, the measure would first affect 2009 models; automakers have said it would make it harder to sell the largest and least fuel-efficient sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks in states that adopt the rules.
    The lawsuit against the E.P.A. was expected to be filed on Wednesday, but will be delayed until next week as California continues to deal with wildfires, aides to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger of California said Tuesday.
    The states have won several key court challenges in recent months. In September, a federal court in Vermont rejected attempts by automakers to block the regulation. And in April, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to regulate heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide.
    After the April ruling, the agency?s administrator, Stephen L. Johnson, made a commitment to deciding on the waiver issue by the end of the year.
    ?We?re interested in a good decision, not a good headline,? said Jennifer Wood, a spokeswoman for the agency. ?The agency moved expeditiously after the Supreme Court decision.?
    States will argue in the forthcoming suit that the E.P.A. has violated legal requirements that federal agencies act on such requests within a reasonable time. But environmentalists said they were more concerned with what the decision would be.
    ?The administration has promised an answer by the end of the year,? said David Doniger, a top lawyer at the Natural Resources Defense Council. ?This is an insurance policy to keep them honest.?
    ?The real issue is, will he block the states or let the states go forward?? he added.
    By contrast, the move to regulate power plants in the Northeast is set to take effect next year.
    The regulations will seek to cut global warming emissions from power plants 16 percent by 2015, but that reduction is based on 1990 emissions levels. The regulations will favor alternative energy approaches, like wind power, and will not be favorable for coal producers. The plan will both cap the amount of emissions permitted and force producers to purchase allowances for their carbon emissions, encouraging them to lower their emissions.
    The multistate effort was begun during the Pataki administration and involves nine other states in principle, though Massachusetts is the only other state to have put forward a similar regulation.
    ?Of course, the renewable energy companies love this,? said Judith Enck, a top energy policy adviser to Governor Spitzer. ?If you?re wind, you don?t have to pay anything. If you?re natural gas, you don?t have to pay a whole lot.?
    ?Anyone who operates coal plants is going to hate it,? she added.
    National Grid, the largest investor-owned power generator in New York, supports the plan, and does not oper