ABP Brand Buddha Launches Campaign for Us Capital and Nuclear Energy!
Palash Biswas
Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
Sensex hits all-time high at 16K, records single biggest gain
In a span of just 53 days, Indian markets have scaled from 15,000 to 16,000. Following positive cues coming from the US markets, Indian markets opened on a strong note on Wednesday (September 19).
http://www.timesnow.tv/News.aspx?CatID=15
ABP Brand Buddha Launches Campaign for Us Capital and Nuclear Energy! While the Political Drama styaged by the Ruling Indian comradors presnt Classical Soap Opera full of Melodrama content.The Indo-US nuke deal has put the UPA government in the dock with the US showing urgency and the Left warning it to pause the deal for six months.The government and its communist allies said on Wednesday they had constructive talks to resolve their row over a nuclear deal with the United States but more negotiations were needed to try and find a solution.Their comments came after a second meeting of a panel formed to address concerns of the left parties, whose opposition to the historic deal has destabilised Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's coalition and triggered fears of early general elections.The Left wants the government to tell the nation whether it will stick to the US time frame or address the objections to the agreement raised by the majority in Parliament.The panel, consisting of senior government leaders and communist representatives, was formed last month after the left parties warned the government of "serious consequences" if it did not dump the pact.The pressure from the Left is immense and it was perhaps visible on Wednesday in Vienna where Atomic Energy Chairman Anil Kakodkar carefully avoided the words N-deal and safeguards.Earlier, the UPA-Left panel met twice to sort out the differences on the issue, but it is break point again for the government.
And see! how dares the Chief Minister of West Bengal Party Parliamentaryrepresentation, Left Front, Party Polit Bureau and central; committe! Supported by the Brahminical Media in Bengal, Buddha continues to run blind on the highway of Capitalist development!The WB Industry Minister Nirupam Sen is going USA to fetch US capaital while the state party unit has made it more than clear taht it won`t tolerate any attempt to dislodge the World Bank government. Pranab Mukherjee and Buddhadeb fotrm a superhit Duet directed by Loksabha speaker Somnath cahtterjee. The nonagerian CPIM patriarch Comrade Jyoti Basu is the best defence for US interests in Left. What a coincidence! CPIM polit Bureau and central committe pulled Basu back while the Left could rule India. The CPIM policymakers did not permit Somnath to be the President. But this ultra hyped cpim descipline could not stop a Chief Minister. Only recently Kerela chief Minister had been suspended from party polit bureau.
What does all this nonsence mean after all?
ANBP publishers owning major Bengali daily Anand bazar patrika, The Telegraph and a prominent literary fortnightly DESH and TV channel Star Anand go all out to promote Buddha as a Brand and Icon committed to the interests of Bengal.
Are the intersets of India and the interests of Bengal different?
Is West Bengal a sovereign free State like Bangladesh which has nothing to do with India? Bengali Brahminical Nationality sounds so much Anti India as it is anti Muslim, Anti tribal, Anti Dalit, anti OBC and anti refugee!
Once Nirupam returns , Buddha himself would go to his dremland America.
Desh published a news story in its latest issue: Vietnaam Paare, Lal Bangla Paare naa. Means what Vietnam does , Red Bengal can not do! Exactly on the same line the capitalist Marxist chief Minister exclaims,` US investment happens to be the most in Vietnam. Does Vietnam cease to be communist Country! thanks! He is not quoting Chinese line!
Buddha says,` I am not against America.I don`t believe in anti Americanism! We may have differences on Indo Us Nuclear Deal, but it doesn`t mean that we don`t want US cooperation in fioelds like Education, IT and other industries!’
Prakash Karat has warned Dr manmohan singh ,` Don`t operationalise the Deal for six months’.
President Bush is not ready to wait and here, Buddha is also not ready to wait!
buddha seems all set for a grand coup to save the intersts of West Bengal as dictated by AbP and the entire Bengali Brahminical media and Intellegentsia Kolkata! Thes interests are amusingly identical with those of United sates of america! So what ABP branded brahminical Bengali Nationality is well extended to USA.
Seeking to dispel perception of differences in the party over use of nuclear power in the wake of West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee's remarks about the need for nuclear energy, a senior CPI(M) leader today said what Bhattacharjee had meant was its use based on indigenous technology.
"There is need for nuclear energy for the country though it is highly expensive. We want it to be produced with indigenous technology and with the development of thorium of which there is a huge stock in the country. Bhattacherjee had meant this when he stressed the need for nuclear energy," CPI(M) central committee member Shyamal Chakraborty told reporters.
He denied there were differences on nuclear power between the Chief Minister and the party. Chakraborty, who is also state president of CPI(M)'s labour arm CITU, said "my party was not totally against the (Indo-US) nuclear deal but against certain provisions of it".
Asked whether it was not a contradiction to oppose the nuclear deal while the state government government here was wooing US investment, Chakraborty said "there is no harm in accepting the US capital or signing agreements on industries. The CPI(M) has objections to the nuclear deal because of the certain provisions." He said the UPA government was a 'minority' one and only existed with the support of Left parties. "So, it should not go ahead with the nuclear deal."
In New Delhi a different tune is played by entire left and Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee said the talks were constructive but senior Left leaders told NDTV that ''so far there has been no meeting ground between us.''The difference was clearly evident all through the day as a bitter public feud came out into the open.Reacting angrily to the US Ambassador David Mulford's timeframe that the deal should be completed in the life of this US Congress the CPM has demanded an explanation.Reacting to the developments at the IAEA, Left leader AB Bardhan says that America is pushing its own time table and the Congress is in a hurry. The Indo-US nuke deal has put the UPA government in the dock with the US showing urgency and the Left warning it to pause the deal for six months.The Left wants the government to tell the nation whether it will stick to the US time frame or address the objections to the agreement raised by the majority in Parliament.
The pressure from the Left is immense and it was perhaps visible on Wednesday in Vienna where Atomic Energy Chairman Anil Kakodkar carefully avoided the words N-deal and safeguards.Earlier, the UPA-Left panel met twice to sort out the differences on the issue, but it is break point again for the government.
The second meeting of the UPA-Left Committee on the Indo-US civil nuclear deal began here today even as the Left parties rejected the government's reply to concerns raised by them over the agreement.On the other hand,Top Left leaders on Wednesday rejected Government's response to their objections on the Indo-US nuclear deal, saying they were not convinced with even a ‘single contention of the government’ on the issue. The Left leaders met in New Delhi on Wednesday to chalk out their strategy ahead of the UPA-Left Committee meet. Meanwhile,There is growing pressure from the United States on the Indian Government to get on with closing the nuclear deal.
US Ambassador to India, David Mulford met India's Chief Nuclear Negotiator, Shyam Saran, on Wednesday and told him that the next steps — towards operationlising the deal — will have to be taken quickly.
Despite the Left's opposition to the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal, there seems to be a significant development at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) meet in Vienna.
In Kolkata, Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee is staying focused on business and America seems to be listening more to the chief minister than Prakash Karat.Two US real estate funds have formally launched their Indian operations by investing in a Bengal township project.Chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee has given his party a crash course in nuclear power by publicly stressing its indispensability.Many of his party colleagues have started finding virtues in the alternative source of energy that the CPM high command views with scepticism.On the other ahnd, Indian communists are not expected to soften their position over a nuclear deal with the United States at a meeting on Wednesday of a panel that aims to resolve their row with the government, left leaders said.The panel, consisting of senior government leaders and communist representatives, was formed last month after the left parties warned Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's coalition of "serious consequences" if it did not dump the historic pact.Opposition to the deal by the communists, whose support is key to the survival of Singh's coalition, has led to the worst political crisis since the government was formed in 2004 and sparked fears of a general election before it is due in 2009.
“You just cannot avoid nuclear power,” the chief minister had told business barons yesterday in reply to a question.The statement is the closest Bhattacharjee could have come to if his intention was to contest the leadership’s stand without breaking party discipline. The timing of the assertion — in the middle of a standoff in Delhi, where the CPM is insisting that nuclear power is unviable — also was too striking not to interpret it as an indirect reply to Prakash Karat.Scrambling to paper over differences that have spilled out in the open after the chief minister’s carefully worded reply, the CPM is putting the spin that he has “salvaged” the situation for the party.The party feels that Karat’s refrain on the nuclear deal had created an impression that the party is against nuclear energy as such, which is what Bhattacharjee has dispelled.
There seemed to be little headway over the Indo-US nuke deal impasse in the second round of UPA-Left talks held here on Wednesday. In a brief statement at the end of the meet, External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee said that the ?discussions were constructive? and that talks will continue.
“We are not against nuclear power per se like the Naxalites, but opposed to the Indo-US nuclear deal which will make India dependent on the US and entangle us in conditionalities dangerous for the country’s sovereignty. We want an independent nuclear power programme based on thorium which is available in India and not on imported uranium,’’ CPM central committee member Mohammed Salim said.
The MP said: “Far from going beyond the party line, the chief minister has rather salvaged the party’s position. There was some confusion over Karat’s statements on the nuke deal as if the party was opposed to nuclear power and not concerned about the energy crisis. But Buddhada’s stress on nuclear power as an alternative source of energy made a balanced reflection of our position. It sends a right signal to industry and people.’’
CPM veteran Benoy Konar described nuclear energy as “one of the major sources of alternative energy in future”.
“As a Marxist party, we cannot be opposed to science. So, we are not allergic to nuclear power but we are only opposing the Centre’s hasty and anti-national deal with America,’’ Konar said.
CPM state secretary Biman Bose confined himself to what the chief minister had added yesterday, saying: “Let the scientists decide whether nuclear power is needed or not.”
Starwood Capital Group Global and Walton Street Capital will partner the south-based Shriram Group to develop an integrated township at Uttarpara on Hind Motors’ excess land. The three will contribute equally to the Rs 5,000-crore project, which works out to over Rs 1,666 crore a partner.
This is the first time US private equity funds are investing in a real estate project in Bengal. Starwood Capital, part of the group that owns hotel chains like Sheraton and Le Meridien, has assets worth $30 billion. The Chicago-based Walton has assets of $14 billion.
“How does it matter if it’s a Left-ruled government? It is more important what is happening on the ground. We liked what we saw,” said Balaji Rao, the managing director of Starwood Capital India Advisors.
Rao said his US counterparts were not worried about the Left government in Bengal.
The project will come up on 314 acres. The 20-million-sqft developable area will have a residential project and infotech and auto ancillary parks. A hotel is also on the cards.
Sourav Goswami, the Walton Street Capital India managing director, said: “I feel the government is strongly business-oriented.”
The chief minister lived up to the assessment today, telling Left Front partners at a meeting that industrialisation would go ahead irrespective of the political uncertainty at the Centre. “The government cannot sit idle (waiting for the crisis to be over),” a front leader quoted Bhattacharjee as saying.
“The chief minister said industrialisation is going ahead as the general situation is favourable,” CPM state secretary and front chairman Biman Bose added.
Bose asked Bhattacharjee to submit a report on the investment scenario, instead of dwelling on the nuclear standoff, sending a signal that the Bengal unit is not in favour destabilising the current momentum. The chief minister listed investment proposals the state has received.
Bose said the meeting also endorsed the political “consensus” on Nayachar for a chemical hub. “We asked the government to proceed after taking into account all aspects,” he said, suggesting environment concerns were still an issue. The chief minister said they would be taken into account.
Soon after, the government announced that it would hold a meeting with “all stakeholders” on September 25 on industrialisation. Industries minister Nirupam Sen would preside over the discussion at a city hotel.
The meeting is expected to discuss land acquisition and rehabilitation with “the intelligentsia, business chambers and investors”.
The row over Indo-US Nuclear deal refuses to die down - in yet another warning from the Left to the Government, CPI(M) General Secretary Prakash Karat said today (September 18) that the Government should not push the Nuclear deal for the next 6 months.
In a stern warning to UPA and Congress, Karat, said the deal should be "put off" until the next six months and that the Goverment should address the concerns raised by experts and discuss the issues exhaustively in Parliament.
"Do not operationalise the deal for at least six months. The government should wait for the outcome of a discussion in Parliament before taking any decision in this matter," Karat said.
The Left parties have already submitted a note containing their apprehensions over the nuclear deal and the Hyde Act, to which the government has responded. These notes would come up for discussion at the third meeting of the Left-UPA panel in New Delhi tomorrow.
The US ambassador to India, David Mulford says time is of essence with reference to the Indo-US nuclear deal.
He has contended that we need to move on to the next stage of the Indo-Us nuclear deal from '123 to 456'.
Mulford exhorts stakeholders to take up the last steps to complete the deal.
He also assures us that we are working towards bringing a new law to address India's concerns.Mulford said the deal must be endorsed by the current US congress and that the Bush administration was working with the Congress to produce an Act that reflects the spirit and terms of what PM Manmohan Singh and Prez Bush agreed on.
The UPA and its main allies, the Left have been at loggerheads with regard to operationalising the Indo-US nuclear deal.
The Left parties have already submitted a note containing their apprehensions over the nuclear deal and the Hyde Act, to which the government has responded. These notes would come up for discussion at the third meeting of the Left-UPA panel in New Delhi tomorrow.
Mulford's statement has come at the same time that Karat warned the government, "Do not operationalise the deal for at least six months. The government should wait for the outcome of a discussion in Parliament before taking any decision in this matter,"
Atomic Energy Commission Chairman (AEC) Anil Kakodkar played safe today (September 19) as he addressed the plenary session of the International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA General Conference in Vienna.
Even though Kakodkar did not mention the Indo-US Nuclear deal, he did give an indication of the government's view point on the subject.
Kakodkar said that India was looking forward to the opening up of international civil nuclear cooperation. Kakodkar alos said that India expected cooperation from the United States to be sustainable and free from interruptions.
India's demand for exemption
India has to reach a safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the NSG has to change its guidelines to allow international nuclear trade with India to operationalise the Indo-US civil nuclear deal.
In this context, a special meeting of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) is expected to be held tomorrow. The meeting is likely to discuss India's demand for exemption. Exemption will allow India to operationlise the Nuclear deal.
With the crucial NSG meet scheduled to be held on Thursday, the question is whether Kakodkar be able to avoid discussing an exemption for India.
Kakodkar: Nuke community wants early talks with NSG, IAEA
Even as the Left's opposition to operationalisation mounted, Anil Kakodkar said on September 18 in Vienna that everyone in the nuclear community wanted early negotiations between India and IAEA and Nuclear Suppliers Group to help implement the deal.
The AEC chief said India expects the US to work out clean and unconditional exemption. Kakodkar said,
"India has made its position very clear that it expects clean, unconditional exemption after recognising it as a unique country. Everyone in the nuclear community wants this to be carried out -- the sooner the better."
Indian Ambassador to Austria, Sheel Kant Sharma and other officials had a meeting with the NSG's 'Troika' - South Africa, Brazil and Germany as a part of the outreach programme of the NSG.
NSG likely to give approval: Reuters
Reuters correspondent in Vienna Mark Heinriech told TIMES NOW,
"India has yet to approach the International Atomic Energy Agency about an inspection regime for India to support the United States-India nuclear cooperation agreement, and the reason for the delay in negotiations is the internal political crisis in India whereby the Communist coalition partner is threatening to leave the Government if the US-India nuclear cooperation agreement goes through.
"However once the IAEA and India start their talks on a inspection agreement, that is expected to be sowed up pretty quickly. The next step would be for the Nuclear Suppliers Group to approve the India-US nulcear treaty. There is probably some skepticism among some NSG members about the implications of this treaty for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty - however in the end they are expected also to approve the US-India agreement - in part because no one in the Suppliers Group would like to offend or anger both India and the United States in light of the fact that both are very large nuclear markets."
Kakodkar-El Baradei meeting
Meanwhile IAEA sources said Kakodkar is expected to meet IAEA Director General Mohammed El Baradei during the week. Kakodkar had meetings with his counterparts from the US, Russia, France, Vietnam, Bangladesh and South Africa on cooperation programmes.
Ahead of the much-discussed and debated meeting between Anil Kakodkar and El Baradei, the Indian Government has sought to defend the meeting which could lead to India negotiating a country-specific safeguards agreement with the IAEA.
Government sources have told TIMES NOW that, if Kakodkar meets El Baradei it will be a matter of governance and so Left parties could not call on Kakodkar to not meet with El Baradei.
"How can we help it if Baradei decides to bring up the issue? No one can prove what happened unofficially. India has time till the 6th of October to put the N-deal on the agenda at the IAEA," said the Government sources.
DIFFERENT TUNE
Communist parties have a history of being caught in the web of their own contradictions. But this is one consequence of his action that Prakash Karat could not have anticipated when he launched the Left’s crusade against the nuclear deal between India and the United States of America. His wisdom has now been questioned by none other than Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee, who has openly defended nuclear power. It is not that he has done so for the first time. He had not only pleaded earlier for a nuclear power plant in Bengal but also identified a site for it. But the context in which he has reiterated his preference for nuclear power makes his position politically significant. The chief minister has thus challenged the contention of his own party that nuclear power is not the answer to India’s growing energy problems. The arguments actually go beyond nuclear power and relate to the Indo-US nuclear agreement. The prime minister, Manmohan Singh, and the Congress have defended the agreement primarily for what it can do to augment India’s nuclear energy. Mr Karat and his colleagues in the Communist Party of India (Marxist), on the other hand, think that nuclear power can make only a small addition to the country’s total power production and that too at exorbitant costs. Mr Bhattacharjee has almost demolished the party line.
However, politics, and not nuclear power, is really the significant part of the chief minister’s remarks. What does one make of the fact that his comments have come in the thick of his party’s threat to pull down the United Progressive Alliance government on the issue of the nuclear agreement? Also, the politburo and the central committee of the CPI(M) are scheduled to debate the issue once again in Calcutta later this month. It is reasonable to assume that Mr Bhattacharjee wants Mr Karat to reconsider his position on the nuclear agreement and on the Left’s equations with the UPA government. That, of course, begs the other question as to why he should think so differently from Mr Karat. The obvious answer is that Mr Bhattacharjee’s primary concern is Bengal’s development, whereas Mr Karat busies himself only with ideological hair-splitting. Mr Bhattacharjee owes it to the people of Bengal to force his party to shun Mr Karat’s brand of politics. If he succeeds, that could be his historic contribution to both Bengal and his party.
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070919/asp/opinion/story_8331741.asp
123 to 456, US rubs salt into Karat cut
MANINI CHATTERJEE
New Delhi, Sept. 18: US ambassador David Mulford today underlined that “time is of the essence” and “we must take the last steps” to finalise the 123 Agreement and then go on to “456” — his new coinage to describe a “comprehensive relationship” between India and America.
The utterances could well jeopardise any chance of an entente between the UPA government and the Left parties on the nuclear deal.
Mulford’s “time is of the essence” remark at the Indo-US Economic Summit this evening came hours after CPM general secretary Prakash Karat told a party rally that the government should wait “for at least six months” and discuss the deal in Parliament before proceeding any further.
The Left has repeatedly made it clear that the government should not take the “next steps” on the deal till opponents of the agreement — including the “majority” in Parliament — give the green signal.
Mulford, on the other hand, stressed the need to take the “last steps” which are exactly the same as the Left’s “next steps”.
These, he explained, “involve completing the IAEA-India Safeguards Agreement, and securing the Nuclear Suppliers Group rule change which will permit this initiative to be global in scope. Finally, the US Congress must vote once more on the 123 Agreement, an action best accomplished by this administration in the life of this Congress”.
Although Mulford did not spell out the time frame, his insistence on “this administration” ties in nicely with the Manmohan Singh government’s eagerness to seal the deal before President George W. Bush becomes a “lameduck” President, starting early next year.
It equally serves as a red rag to the Left which has been accusing the Prime Minister of being in far too much of a hurry to complete the deal and making it contingent on the Bush presidency.
If the US ambassador’s remarks on the timetable for the deal are calculated to raise the hackles of the comrades, his subsequent elaboration on the “456” trajectory in Indo-US relations could embarrass the UPA which has been trying hard to dodge allegations that there is more to 123 than just nuclear energy.
In words that seemed to echo Karat’s charge that the nuclear deal was aimed at ushering in a new strategic partnership, Mulford said: “We are at a great moment in the history of our two democracies. We have overcome past differences and are charting a new course for the future.”
He went on to say: “This new course moves us from 123 to what I call 456. This is the ‘comprehensive relationship’ I have spoken of so often…: encompassing both our official bilateral relationship and the multitude of private contacts and relationships that exist between our peoples. This is the broader, longer term vision for US-India relations that touches all fields of human endeavour for which civil nuclear (cooperation) is important, but only one part of the larger whole.”
In a statement that is certain to reinforce the Left’s fears of closer defence ties, Mulford said that “456” would cover every front. “We are engaging with India on virtually every important front, from defence and space cooperation to critical transnational issues such as counter-terrorism, health, education and climate change.”
Mulford underscored that “one engine to advance macro-economic activity across India is further liberalisation in India’s banking and financial markets” — something the Left has been stoutly opposing.
Similarly, his praise of the Prime Minister’s call “for a paradigm shift in the economic and commercial use of water” or his advocacy of “organised retail, especially in rural areas”, is likely to add fuel to the Left’s fire.
Nuclear power inevitable"
9/19/2007 10:36:17 AM
Speaking at the General Conference of the IAEA, Atomic Energy Commission Chairman Anil Kakodkar (File shot) made it clear that nuclear power was an "inevitable option”
Atomic Energy Commission Chairman Anil Kakodkar has made a strong pitch for international nuclear energy cooperation with India. Speaking at the scientific forum, an integral part of the General Conference of the IAEA, Kakodkar made it clear that nuclear power was an "inevitable option”.
"The world has to move forward with nuclear power as an inevitable option based purely on partnership on objective, reliable and predictable basis with holistic mutual understanding and trust as a pre-requisite," Kakodkar said.
Kakodkar's carefully-worded comments come amidst a raging political debate on the Indo-US nuclear deal, with Left parties and the opposition closely watching his approach at the IAEA.
Kakodkar also emphasised that in order to meet the huge energy demands of the world community, it was important to have inclusive partnerships and make sure that those countries which are keen to develop nuclear power for the first time should have basic minimum infrastructure and human resource needed for it.
Crucial UPA-Left meet
Meanwhile, the Left-UPA Committee on the nuclear deal will meet for the third time on Wednesday (September 19) amid a fresh warning from the CPI(M) against implementing the pact and to keep it on hold for at least six months.
CPI(M) General Secretary Prakash Karat told the government not to operationalise the deal for six months and await the outcome of a discussion in Parliament. The Left parties have also warned that Atomic Energy Commission Chairman Anil Kakodkar, who is in Vienna for the IAEA meet, should not start negotiations on India-specific safeguards that would operationalise the agreement.
US pressure on nuke deal
A day after David Mulford, the US Ambassador to India, said that there had to be more movement on the nuclear agreement process between India and the US, there's renewed pressure on the issue.
The US has said that the nuclear accord should be moved as soon as possible keeping the political timelines in mind. This comes after the continuing crisis between allies Left & the Congress over the nuclear deal gains momentum.
The Assistant Secretary of State for South & Central Asia Richard Boucher said that the agreement is consistent with US laws, but at the same time fits all the requirements and parameters that was set down by Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and US President George W Bush.
The 123 agreement has to go through a series of steps for it to be fully operational, such as India coming to an arrangement with the IAEA, as well as meeting the democratic principles of both countries.
Govt defends Kakodkar's meet with IAEA chief El- Berdei
Ahead of the much talked about and debated meeting between Atomic Energy Commission Chief Anil Kakodkar and IAEA chairman El Baradei, the government has sought to defend the meeting which could lead to India negotiating a country specific safeguards agreement with the IAEA.Government sources have told TIMES NOW that India has time till October 6 to put the N-deal on the agenda at the IAEA.
West Bengal open to privatising water supply
The West Bengal government on Tuesday said it was open to privatising water and waste water services in industrial and commercial areas in the state.
"We are open to inviting private participation for water supply to industrial and commercial users, while municipal bodies will continue to carry out its services to domestic consumers," Urban Development Minister Asok Bhattacharya said on the sidelines of the Indo-UK seminar on water services.
The state government would sign an agreement within this month with JUSCO (Jamshedpur Utilities & Services Company Ltd) for water supply and sewerage management on BOT for the IT-hub, Sector-V in Salt Lake.
In domestic sector also, the government would consider privatising or outsourcing maintenance of water supply infrastructure.
Government specifies that Kakodkar meet with El-Baradei is a matter of governance.
US: Come clean on ties with Iran
9/19/2007 1:30:36 PM
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Now apart from the US stressing upon the constraint of time for the nuclear safeguards agreement to be finalised, it has also asked India to make clear its stand on the issue of Iran.
The Bush administration asked India to come clean on its military relationship with Iran. "The Indian government is aware of the concerns of India's military relationship with Iran. What we are trying to do is for everybody to understand the facts of the matter," said US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia Richard Boucher.
Soon after, India's Defence Minister AK Antony sought to play down American concerns by reiterating that India sought friendly relations with all countries. More significantly, he also stressed that India's relations with each country were independent of one another.
"India has very friendly relations with Iran. It will continue to do so. India's friendship will not come in the way of good relations with any other country,” said the Defence Minister.
Meanwhile reacting sharply to the US stand on Indo-Iran relations the Left said that the US has no business interfering in India's matters and urged the Government to follow an independent foreign policy.
CPI leader D Raja said, "It is none of his business to dictate what India should or should not do, either with Iran or some other country. The point here is t