Different Historical View and Different Resistance Wanted Unless the galaxy will be Ruled by Manusmriti Order!
Palash Biswas
Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
Galileo showed off his telescope nearly 400-years ago. And astronomy has come light-years since then. The latest gadget for the star-struck is Google sky. Now 200 million galaxies could just be a mouse click away.
And this galaxy is going to be ruled by Zionist Hindu Post Modern manusmriti Order. Since, the zionist and Brahmins establised dicrimination, caste and apartheid based socied before thousands of years, they are in a position to sustain the Hegemony and the Blacks, Minorities, Refugees and Dalits are destined to be enslaved infinitely with inherent inequality and continuous uprooting from life and livelihood. It would take more than some hundred years to create a mechanism of resistance against the rotten Old system. Awakening lacked as Indian Subcontinent could not rise against british Raj as a nation ,as a people before the fall of east India Company and here too, the industrialisation and renaissance in Europe contributed much. The blacks worldwide could finish apartheid with continuous struggle since spartcus` days. French and US revolutions only were logical results. We could not finish caste in India as we never fought syatematically against it as systematically the system was created by the Brahmins!
Brahminism dragging down India
This long message sent by an old member of the DV family in England was read out by the Editor himself at the Dalit Voice silver jubilee function in London on July 24, 2007. The message is published in full because of its eminent author’s several qualifications to comment with full authority on Brahminism that is dragging down India: she is an eminent anthropologist, (age 71), a White British citizen, deep study of India where she lived for several years with her daughter married to a Brahmin in Madhya Pradesh. She was away in Canada during our London meeting.
U.S. WAR ON TERROR”
West defeated in “clash of ideas” with Islam
V.T. RAJSHEKAR
[Paper on “US War on Terror” presented at the London Institute of South Asia (LISA) seminar in London on July 24 2007 at the Imperial College of Science, South Kensington, Central London. ]
The subject, “US War on Terror” has been the hottest international controversy for the past several years that any opinion you express is bound to be criticised. I am very well aware of the risks.
But we the Dalits (Untouchables of India), treated as slaves by its Hindu rulers, belong to no party to this longest war of the century waged by the American-led West against “terrorism.” We are neither Hindu, Muslim, Christian or Jew. India’s Hindu rulers led by their 3% Brahmins are the most enthusiastic supporters of America and its war on terror. India has the world’s largest Muslim population (next to Indonesia) which the Hindu rulers have declared as the enemy of Hindus and subjected to daily war and violence. So I am, with the permission of the chair, amending the subject to include India in my paper. Being neither Hindu nor Muslim our opinion on this war on terror can be taken as impartial, rank outsiders.
As the Editor of Dalit Voice, India’s largest circulated journal of the Untouchables, we have been writing on this “US war on Terror” ever since George W. Bush father launched the “clash of civilisations” and we are glad to tell you our readers have fully supported our stand on this subject. We have also gathered enough evidences from authentic American sources itself about the “terrorist attack” on the World Trade Centre. Hundreds of lies have been manufactured to hide the real perpetrators of the WTC holocaust.
Subsequent developments have revealed that Saddam Hussain had neither the weapons of mass destruction nor did he have any connection with Al-Qaida.
American people would have realised long back that this war on terror is built on a mountain of lies, totally hidden from their eyes by the mass media, controlled by its Jewish owners and journalists. The American voters themselves rejected President Bush’s party of Republicans after disbelieving his lies on the war. Bush himself has become the most hated President of America. His tail, Tony Blair, had a shameful exit. The Bush poodle died even before its master. The world opinion is not only against Bush and Blair and the war they started but the peoples of the world have started disbelieving all the lies manufactured to launch this war.
So it is now clear, even to a child, that all these cock and bull stories were manufactured and sold to protect the zionist Israel, which is the cause of the entire Middle East violence.
INDIA’S WAR ON MUSLIMS
In India too, we are witnessing the same scene daily. What we call as the “Jews of India” have made full use of this “US war on terror” and launched a bloody war on Indias’ Muslims. Not a single day passes without a war and violence on India’s innocent Muslims.
So it is now clear that this “US War on Terror” is nothing but a war on Muslims and Islam.
We very often hear from government leaders and the media that the “terrorists are killing innocents.” If Bush and Blair can kill millions and millions of innocent Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine etc, what is wrong in Muslims getting angry and retaliating? The Muslim terrorism is a rightful reaction to the Western action. Muslims say:” You stop the war on Muslims and Muslims will stop terrorism.” Why there was no Muslim terrorism before the Bush-Blair war on Muslims? For this Bush and Blair may point out the grave Al –Qaida provocation of 9/11 but we have our own doubts about the American version of 9/11. If the hate-Muslim campaign in the West is a recent development, in India the Muslim hatred was the very basis of the country’s partition in 1947. The Hindu rulers waged three wars against Pakistan on the issue of Kashmir, the world’s second longest lasting international dispute after Palestine, disregarding the UN call for plebiscite on the disputed territory.
So on this anti-Muslim hatred demonizing Muslims and attributing all types of cruelty to Muslims, India’s Hindu rulers excel American and Western rulers.
Nay. On one side they hate the Muslims (15% of India), on the other side they are doing everything to keep our people, Dalits (20%) enslaved. Why they hate both because most of the Indian Muslims are converts from our community and conversion brought liberation. I have to give this brief background of India because though India is far, far away from the West both suffer from the same hate-Muslim insomnia and the consequent pain, suffering, war and violence.
After observing this unending “war on terror” in the West and in India, our conclusion is that this “war on terror” is nothing but a war on Islam. Any amount of hiding this war on Islam by giving it all sorts of respectable names cannot hide the real intentions behind it.
Bush/Blair/ Brown argument that their intention is to “promote democracy” will not impress the Muslims, or outsiders like us.
WESTERN CONCEPT OF DEMOCRACY
Because the word “democracy” itself makes the Muslims suspect the sellers of democracy. Please note “democracy” and “secularism” are zionist inventions to subvert and destroy nation-states and the ethnic identities which are the special features of Asian and African societies. This statement may come as a shock to you, but those doubting us may verify this from the book, Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the secret book of the zionists (for copies write to Dalit Voice office, Rs. 50). The failure of Western model of democracy in India is because it did not take into consideration India’s caste-based society and its varieties of ethnic identities. Even in China, “democracy” is not accepted for the very same reason. Western-style democracy and secularism can work only in countries where the society is homogenous.
If the West goes on lecturing Muslims on “strengthening democracy” not only Muslims, but also Asians and Africans will suspect such people more and more.
The West only talks of democracy and says Muslims must promote democracy. But always supports the worst tyrants like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan etc.
British rulers have also started using some deceptive language. The new PM, Gordon Brown, wants to change the choice of language. The media is also calling for a new vocabulary. But we can tell you that such a change is no use because by now the whole world knows what is meant by this “war on terror.” It is nothing but a war on Islam.
HOW TO DESTROY AN IDEA?
After making a deep study of the problem, I want to impress both the Western as well as India’s Hindu warmongers that they can never, ever win this “war on terror”- meaning Islam.
Why? Because Islam is an idea or ideology. An idea cannot be defeated or killed by any weapon, any army or bomb. An idea can be fought and defeated by a more superior idea.
An overwhelming majority of Western Christians are innocent and good people. But the Western ruling class is guided by zionist money bags, media and its stink (not think) tank. This is the real problem.
Do the people conducting this war on Muslims have any superior idea or ideology to defeat the Islamic ideology?
SUICIDE BOMBER
Both the Western rulers and India’s Hindu rulers have launched a bloody war on Muslims and Islam. They have killed millions and millions of Muslims. But to this day they have not claimed any victory. Nor have they made even a dent on Islam.
Muslims are simply fighting and dying. They are ready to die. Even young, unarmed boys are fighting the armed Israeli soldiers and dying. But it is the Western people and India’s Brahminical rulers who say they are afraid of dying. The Muslims have invented a new revolutionary magic weapon unknown to the West – the suicide bomber (Japanese and Lankan precedents are there).
Neither the Western nor Hindu rulers could prepare a single suicide bomber to this day. They have no courage. How can those who are afraid of dying win a war?
But Muslims have produced hundreds of such soldiers. Even young Muslim girls are not afraid of dying. Suicide bombers are dying daily. They call it Jihad.
So at this stage we can confidently predict who is going to win this war of ideas. Having failed so far to win this war, the sinking American rulers are now under zionist pressure to attack Iran. That means a sure world war because that will force China, Russia and many other countries to intervene. And the UN, the world’s only hope, will break into pieces.
SALMAN RUSHDIE HONOUR
Such a bankruptcy of ideas and ideology is forcing the Western rulers to take desperate steps even at the cost of a third world war — all because of their misplaced love for a tiny Israel and defend its illegal occupation of the Palestinian land.
Having failed in this war, they are already giving expression to their desperation resorting to heinous tactics of corrupting and co-opting their Muslim enemies. We have the standing example of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and its American stooge appointed Prime Minister. Not only that. Tony Blair, hated by the Palestinians and the Muslims as a whole, is appointed Middle East envoy on whom the Muslims have no trust. Such a habit of corrupting and co-opting enemies of Muslims and honouring hated authors like Salman Rushdie is like pouring petrol on the burning fire.
Such actions of the West are forcing the Muslim revolutionaries to fight two enemies – internal and external – at the same time. This is what Hamas is called upon to do in Palestine and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Unless the internal enemies are eliminated first, the external enemies cannot be fought.
So to put the matter straight it is a no-holds-barred war against Islam not by the masses of Christians in the West and India but by a tiny Western ruling class led by its zionist masters and by a mere micro-minority of 3% “Jews of India”.
LESSONS OF HISTORY
While dealing with this most important burning topic of the day, I will be failing in my duty if I don’t refer to the lessons of history. I have to refer to history because history has taught us that those who forget the past cannot build the future. What does history say? Among the three Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam), the conflict has been mostly between Christianity and Judaism. Jews who lived in Islamic empires faced no persecution.
“The Muslims of Spain had given Jews the best home they had ever had in the diaspora, so the annihilation of Spanish Jewry was mourned by Jews throughout the world as the greatest disaster to have befallen their people since the destruction of the Temple in CE 70.” (P. 304, Karen Armstrong, A History of God, 1993, Vintage Books, London)
The author, a British Roman Catholic nun and a distinguished religious historian, says it was Christianity that was most violent against Jews during the15th century. Thousands of Jews were expelled from different countries. The German nazis accused of Jewish Holocaust were also Christians. She refers to many clashes between Christians and Jews but hardly any between Muslims and Jews.
The Tehran correspondent of The Guardian (July 13, 2007) reports that 25,000 Jews living in Iran rejected the Israeli offer of cash if they migrated to Israel, the arch enemy of Iran. Jews have lived in Iran since 700 BC. Jews rejected the zionist offer and said that they were Iranians first and Jews second.
NO MUSLIM-CHRISTIAN CONFLICT
The zionist – Muslim conflict began only with the creation of the zionist state and imposing it on the Palestinians with the firm British Government blessings. Even Churchill was not happy with this arrangement. This is the beginning of the zionist-Muslim conflict if my reading of history is correct. Nor was there any major conflict between Muslims and Christians. Christ was given the highest place of a prophet in the Quran. Both the First and the Second World War were fought mainly between the Christians only.
The Muslims were forced to fight the zionists who were supported by the Christian ruling class of England only after the zionists illegally occupied the Arab land. Any number of UN resolutions are there on record.
We can understand the zionists hating Muslims because they are fighting the zionists who have occupied the Muslim land. Why should the Western Christians join this zionist war on Islam? Muslims have nothing against Christians.
This is where we get doubts that the Western Christian political leadership, particularly in America and England, is manipulated by Zionist money and media power. Total media blackout in America has kept its innocent people in total darkness. In fact, outsiders like us know more about the truth than those inside America.
Our fear is the American political leadership by becoming a puppet in the hands of zionists is not only endangering peace in the whole of West but causing the economic collapse of America itself. The peoples of India, China, Africa and peace loving peoples even in the West have their heart with the Muslim sufferers.
If the zionists want to impose Israel on the Arab land, let them do it. Why the Christian leadership should fight the zionist war?
Already the Christian religion is under too much confusion. A large number of churches in England, Germany and elsewhere are closed down. There are hardly and church-goers in the West. Many of them have become indifferent towards god and religion.
CHRISTIAN – MUSLIM RECONCILIATION
But the zionists who preached communism, atheism to Christians are keeping their synagogues active and their religion fighting fit. Even in America, mainstream churches are fading and the Jewish-controlled Evangelicals are running riot. The Christian religion itself is in deep trouble in the West. Christian values are under threat.
So it is time the Christian West and Christian religious leaders, the Pope, the World Council of Churches etc. deeply ponder over these serious issues which have endangered the very peace and happiness of the entire Western Christian world and make peace with Muslims and Islam and join Muslims to rebuild the world.
A noted American intellectual and professor of History at Columbia University, Dr. Richard W. Bulliet, has written a book itself on the subject,Islamo-Christian Civilisation (2004). There is an urgent need for Islam – Christian reconciliation to save the world from sure Armageddon (Dalit Voice editorial Sept. 16 2006). Unless the Western Christian laity correct, control and force their political leadership, they will not be able to avert a third world war which is knocking at our doors
According to the Guardian (July 17 2007) Al-Qaida has become stronger, better equipped and well placed to attack both America and Europe. This was the assessment of the American Government itself, according to the Guardian.
WHO IS REAL ENEMY OF JEWS?
There is yet another serious problem with the highly advanced Western Christian society and the Jews.
Muslims are enlightened enough to understand that despite all their educational backwardness they have identified their enemy. But it is the highly educated and scientifically advanced Christians and Jews who have failed to identify their enemy.
We congratulate our friend, the British journalist and historian, Alan Hart, for writing a scholarly book in two volumes on this subject, Zionism — The Real Enemy of the Jews.
The West should realise the fact that zionism is not only the enemy of Jews, but it is also the enemy of the Western Christian society. Similarly in India, the Brahmin is not our enemy. The real enemy of Brahmin and India is Brahminism.
But I am sorry to note Alan Hart’s scholarly work did not get the respect and recognition it deserved. As the Christians and Jews have failed to honour the writer, who made the world know the truth, it is now the duty of Muslims to honour Alan Hart.
CONCLUSION
The Western society today is the richest, technologically the most advanced and militarily the mightiest. In contrast the Muslim world is poor, backward and riddled with plenty of stooges who have placed their only wealth (oil) at the disposal of the West. In spite of all these advantages, why the West is not able to defeat the Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine or even Pakistan?
Every time the “Muslim Terrorism” explodes the Western rulers say they are caught unawares. What does it mean? If the gory picture of the Al-Qaida and the more-than-the-life picture given about Osama Bin Laden are true, we are not able to understand how a frail ageing man sitting atop a mountain or hiding in a cave without any standing army, deadly weapons or any latest communication network is able to terrorise the world’s sole superpower. Are we listening to a fairy tale?
What does all this mean? The answer to this question reveals the Great Truth. The Western thinkers and scholars know the Truth but they are unable to understand it. What is this Great Truth? The Truth is between the world of property and world of ideas which is more powerful?
The West says the world of property is all that matters. If you have the wealth you can command anything. It brings happiness, respect. And military might will assure peace.
MILITARY MIGHT
All this is now proved false. The zionist Israel, a nuclear power and controller of the whole Western world, is not even getting sound sleep in the night.
Bush and his Neo-cons, who built the myth of military power as the determining factor, have been rejected by the American people themselves.
The dollar is sinking and China is poised to replace USA in another 20 years. Where is the myth of military might? Where is the superpower arrogance? Where is the dollar domination? Bush and Blair, dancing to the tunes of their zionist controllers have been rejected by their own people and thrown into the dustbin of history.
What a slap on the face of Samuel Huntington who tried to confuse and mislead us by calling it a “Clash of Civilisations.” It is not a clash of civilisations. It is a clash of ideas. In other words, the world of property is defeated by the world of ideas. See how these zionist writers are misleading the civilised world.What is this world of ideas? The answer is Islam.
The Christian world must note that Islam has nothing against Christianity or Christians, nor is it against Jews. It is time the Christian world understands this supreme truth. But our fear is that the Bush – Blair pair, intoxicated by the overdose of zionist liquor, will not regain sanity until they completely ruin the hard-won Western Christian civilisation and bring to grief the entire Christian world.
FUTURE BELONGS TO ASIA
The future belongs to Asia, meaning China, India and Africa — the winners in this “Clash of Civilisations,” to put it in the words of Huntington.
Of course in India we have to tackle the 3% ruling “Jews of India” who too have made terrorism, meaning Muslim mayhem, as their staple diet.
What is worrying us in India is the desperate bid of the “Jews of India” to join hands with their counterparts in America. The “Jews of India” have urged the American Jews to shift their enormous capital to India so that together they could subjugate India’s Dalits, Muslim’s and other original inhabitants, finish their hated Pakistan and finally take on China.
But our information is that the American Jews have expressed some reservations on this offer. The Brahminical rulers are told that their 60 year-old rule of India has only made a mess of the whole country. They are first asked to show their “merit and efficiency” inside India before selling their global ambitions.
That means there is total confusion unless the Christian leadership takes the initiative to end this mindless war and violence. With this question mark I will end this paper.
http://www.dalitvoice.org/Templates/august_a2007/articles.htm
AS AUSTRALIA'S defence minister during the Vietnam War and its prime minister when a flood of boat people arrived, Malcolm Fraser has a much different historical view of that conflict than US President George Bush.Fraser says the Vietnam experience left him convinced that no Australian government should ever again commit troops to a major war as an ally of the United States unless it could place a senior minister in Washington to closely examine US policy and strategy.
In a major speech to US war veterans in Missouri this week, Bush described how the willingness of the US to persevere in wars against Japan, Germany and Korea produced economically strong democracies that were now valuable American allies.In contrast, the decision to pull out of Vietnam contributed to the collapse of the South, the flood of boat people, retribution against those who stayed and precipitated the horrors of Pol Pot's regime in neighbouring Cambodia.Bush argued that those historical events demonstrated why the US should stay the course in Iraq.
Fraser, army minister and then defence minister during Vietnam War, said yesterday he was far from impressed by Bush's sense of history.
Japan's bid for a strategic partnership with India aims to counter China's rising influence, with Tokyo omitting Beijing from its vision of an Asian 'arc of freedom', analysts said on Thursday. The highlight of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's three-day visit to India was the signing of a roadmap for strategic and global partnership between the two Asian giants.
Abe called for greater political, security, defence and trade relations. "They are keen to consolidate their relations with India, which they see as a balance of power in the east against China's growing influence," said Sushila Narsimhan, professor of Japanese history at Delhi University. Abe made no reference to China on Wednesday when he called for the creation of an "arc of freedom and prosperity" bringing together Australia, India, Japan and the United States, but Beijing loomed large in the background.
Analyst C Raja Mohan said the trip had highlighted Abe's key strategic aims - rebuilding a "foreign policy that is rooted in Japan's Asian identity and constructing a new Asia that is committed to democratic values and freer trade."
The Government on Thursday said Air India and Indian Airlines have been asked to increase flights to bring over two lakh Indians stranded in the UAE as members in both Houses sought its urgent intervention in the wake of the Gulf nation directing all those without work permits to leave by September 2.
"I have talked to Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel and the Air India Chairman for increasing the frequency of flights," Minister of State for Overseas Affairs Vyalar Ravi said in the Rajya Sabha.
Since most of the stranded people were Telugu speaking, the External Affairs Ministry had made arrangements to depute officials knowing that language, he said during Zero Hour.Raising the issue, Ravula Chandra Sekhar Reddy (TDP) charged the Congress government in Andhra Pradesh with not doing enough for the safe return of the stranded people, most of whom belonged to SCs and STs.In the Lok Sabha, S Sudhakar Reddy (CPI) said there were 3.5 lakh Indians in the Gulf country and of them 80,000 belonged to Andhra Pradesh alone.
On the other hand,After violent demonstrations in Bangladesh, the country's military-backed caretaker government has apparently decided to confront and possibly suppress various sections of the population growing more restless by the day. While, Former Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif vowed on Thursday to return from exile in the coming days and fight to end President Pervez Musharraf's rule.
The caretaker government appears to have come to the conclusion that the demonstrations represented a real challenge to its authority - if not its continued existence. In unprecedented scenes, soldiers in uniform were seen being chased out of the Dhaka university campus by students. In two days, the myth of the army's omnipotence was all but laid to rest.
Meanwhile,Nepal's multi-party transitional government has decided to nationalise major royal properties inherited by King Gyanendra. The properties include the Narayanhiti Royal Palace in the capital, Kathmandu, and six other historic palaces around the country. The government says that some of those listed are archeologically significant. It is the latest setback for the king, who has already been stripped of most of his powers and prerogatives. He is no longer head of state or army chief, following a historic peace pact with rebel Maoists and political parties earlier this year. The monarchy itself remains suspended under the present constitution.
Pakistan's 60 year struggle for democracy
by Rehan Rafay Jamil
24 August 2007 Print
Email
KARACHI - As Pakistanis celebrate sixty years of independence, the country finds itself embroiled in yet another seemingly intractable political crisis. The state, founded by one of the Indian subcontinent's most brilliant lawyers, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, has spent more than half of its life under military rule. Jinnah envisioned Pakistan as a secular and democratic state. Today Pakistan is ruled by the military, and President Pervez Musharraf seems determined to stay in power despite his inability to prevent the growing militancy and political unrest brewing in the country.
Musharraf has travelled down a well-trodden path. Starting with the first military coup in 1958, the country has experienced a continuous power struggle between elected and military rulers. The plot is quite predictable by now. A general overthrows a civilian government in a military coup, making lofty but inevitably elusive promises to hold elections and return the country to democratic rule.
Democracy may not be the panacea for all Pakistan's problems but it is a discourse deeply rooted in the Pakistani polity since the country's inception. Unlike many other Muslim countries, Pakistan has enjoyed brief periods of democratic rule. But elections are just one component of democracy and must be supported by strong institutions such as an independent judiciary, a free press and a robust civil society, elements that have ? until recently ? been absent in Pakistan.
In March, Musharraf made the mistake of suspending the most senior judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Ifitkhar Chaudhury. Few could have contemplated the overwhelming public support that followed. The demand for the restoration of the Chief Justice and the independence of the judiciary captured the imagination of the nation. In a historic verdict by the Supreme Court this month, the Chief Justice was reinstated.
This lawyers' movement was a rare and unprecedented display of people's power in Pakistan. The protests were brought to the homes of millions of people by Pakistan's electronic media. Musharraf's seven-year rule has seen the strengthening of Pakistani civil society and a free press; it is these two institutions that could play an important role in his downfall.
There is a well-known saying in Pakistan that there are three A's that keep the country intact: Allah, the Army and America. This saying may be indicative of some deeper truths about the powers that shape Pakistani political life. Pakistan was a crucial American ally in the final days of the Cold War, which saw the Soviet defeat in Afghanistan. Today Pakistan once again finds itself as an indispensable ally in the Bush administration's so-called "War on Terror". But the two countries have always had a difficult relationship with mutual suspicion entrenched on both sides. A stable and friendly Pakistani government is essential for American efforts to maintain the fledgling peace in Afghanistan and curb the militancy along the Pak-Afghan border.
The fear that Pakistan, a state armed with nuclear weapons, could be taken over by hostile religious extremists has been a source of concern for American policy makers. The recent standoff between the government and fundamentalist students in the Red Mosque in the heart of the capital Islamabad ostensibly strengthens that perception. However, the Pakistani military establishment has a dubious and well-documented history of covertly supporting religious political parties and militant groups to marginalize mainstream political parties and further its foreign policy objectives. While religious parties may enjoy strong social support in Pakistan, they have had limited electoral success, as has been proven time and again at the ballot box.
Today Musharraf finds himself at an important crossroads. His political opponents argue that it is unconstitutional for him to simultaneously remain President and Chief of Army. With parliamentary elections scheduled for October, the President is faced with a difficult dilemma: he can either attempt to stay in power in the hopes of continued support from his two principle allies ? the Pakistan Army and America ? or he can step down from his position as Chief of Army and allow a peaceful transition of power to a civilian government by holding transparent elections. Such a move could secure him a place in history and ensure that his considerable economic and social reforms in Pakistan are not overshadowed by a desperate attempt to stay in power at all costs.
There is evidence of recent clandestine talks of cooperation between Musharraf and Benazir Bhutto, the exiled leader of Pakistan's largest political party. If these talks bear fruit, there could be a return to civilian rule in the country. Unfortunately, this in itself will not guarantee a quick fix to Pakistan's myriad problems. The track records of the leaders of Pakistan's two major political parties, Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, hardly inspire confidence in democratic leadership of the country.
In order for a democratic political culture to take root in Pakistan, civilian governments must be allowed to complete their tenures in office. The people, along with democratic institutions, such as an independent judiciary and free press, should hold political leadership accountable.
In the long-term, perhaps the Turkish political model of an institutionalized role for the military in politics may be the only solution to maintain a balance of power between Pakistan's powerful military establishment and popularly elected governments.
###
*Rehan Rafay Jamil is a freelance journalist based in Pakistan. This article is distributed by the Common Ground News Service (CGNews) and can be accessed at www.commongroundnews.org.
http://www.mediaforfreedom.com/ReadArtic