Search blog.co.uk

Posts archive for: 20 August, 2007
  • Casteology Nationwide

    Mayawati Shatters SEZ Dreams!
    Elephant Set to launch Casteology Nationwide
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
    "prakash ray" writes:
    WILL YOU SHUT UP>>> YOU FASCIST>>>>

    On 8/19/07, palashc biswas wrote:
    Buddha, Pranab Broker Indo US Nuclear Deal
    CPIM Diversion Gimmick continues, Focus shifts in New
    delhi from Kolkata
    Pl Read:
    http://www.dalitvoice.org/Templates/august_a2007/articles.htm
    Mayawati Shatters SEZ Dreams while THE UP government on Saturday amended the Special Economic Zone policy framed by the previous government. According to the new document, land owned by the farmers will not be acquired forcibly to set up SEZ. Meanwhile, Mayawati tries her best to escalate
    her experiment of Casteology and social eingineering in UP countrywide. Now, Maya's man talks social engineering in Rajasthan.Mayawati's elephant seems all set to do an Uttar Pradesh in this desert state too. In an attempt to draw a bridge between the upper and lower castes, the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) on Sunday announced the formation of Brahmin-Dalit Bhaichara Committees in all 200 Assembly constituencies of the state.
    After three straight sessions of losses, the Sensex today zoomed up by 286.03 points on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) to settle in the green at 14427.55, following a rebound at Wall Street.While, in the backdrop of Nandigram SEZ issue, the government on Monday made it clear that farm land cannot be acquired without the consent of the owner but said dependence on agriculture sector for employment needs to be reduced.India's communists stepped up their opposition to a controversial nuclear deal with the United States on Monday, with one senior leader threatening to cut off vital support to the government if it pursued the pact. The four main left parties, who have 60 MPs in the Lok Sabha have urged Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's coalition not to pursue talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to clinch the deal.
    It is rather a worrying factor that Dalits have not achieved development even six decades after Independence and things need to be changed, said Usha Mehra, chairperson of Commission on Categorisation of Scheduled Castes in Andhra Pradesh.Usha Mehra along with members of the commission visited some SC colonies in Tirupati and surrounding areas on Sunday.Interacting with people of Gandhi Nagar, she urged them to keep their surroundings clean to prevent the outbreak of diseases.
    Later, the commission members visited Chaitanyapuram Dalit Colony and received representations from people on categorisation of Scheduled Castes.
    Usha Mehra said the commission would submit a report to Parliament after eliciting views of Dalits in the State on categorisation of SCs. She also visited Gandhipuram and Arundhati Colony in Tirupati rural mandal. MRPS leaders Raju Madiga, Gopi Madiga and Erraiah Madiga who met the commission, stressed the need for categorisation of SCs to provide social justice to all the castes.Mahajana Charmakarula Sangham president Muniratnam, Budaga Jangama Hakkula Porata Samithi leaders Kullayappa and Marranna and some research scholars from Tirupati also met the commission seeking categorisation of SCs.

    Responding to a question by Trinamool Congress leader Mamata Banerjee on the Nandigram issue in the Lok Sabha, Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar said the effort is to discourage acquiring of fertile land.
    No farm land can be acquired till there is consent of the owner, he said during Question Hour. Pawar said the government wanted the agricultural production to increase but at the same time, dependence of people for livelihood on the sector needs to be reduced.
    Noting that a big majority of country's population depends on agriculture for livelihood, Pawar said 82 per cent of them possess less than 2.5 acres of land.
    Most of them depend on rainfall, making their livelihood difficult, he said adding in view of this, it is better that they opt for alternative sources of employment.
    Citing examples of developed countries like the UK and Germany, he said they also had heavy dependence on agriculture earlier, but now not more than four per cent of their population is into farming.
    They diverted to other sectors and their problems were solved, Pawar said, adding the same example should apply to India if the situation is to change.

    Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister Shailesh Krishna said the state government has accepted the SEZ policy of the Central Government.The new SEZ policy approved by the state cabinet may affect the big industrial houses that were beneficiaries in the previous government, including the multi project one being set up by the Anil Ambani Group at Noida. Asked about the fate of projects approved by the previous government, Krishna replied that old proposals would be reviewed in the context of the new policy.
    The Lok Sangharsh Morcha on Sunday gave a call to tribals and other downtrodden in Gujarat and other parts of the country to look for a solution to their problems “outside the framework of law.” They should remain prepared to fight long arduous battles to get justice from the “lawless governments.”
    The Morcha, which organised a convention of the tribals and other downtrodden on the “People’s Rights and the Issues of Democracy in Gujarat” here adopted resolutions, including one condemning the alleged atrocities on the tribals by the Narendra Modi Government and his “false propaganda” on allotment of forest land to the tribals.
    It called for the immediate scrapping of all Special Economic Zones and condemned the police firings in Khammam (A.P.), Nandigram ( West Bengal), Orissa and other States.
    Communist Party of India general secretary A. B. Bardhan and veteran Gandhian Nirmala Deshpande were present. Briefly dealing with the alleged police atrocities on the tribals agitating for their rights on the forest lands in various states, Collin Gonsalves, a senior Supreme Court advocate, said that from his long experience in practising law he had realised that there was “no law, no court, no government” for the poor and downtrodden. Pointing out that he was contesting several cases in the Supreme Court on the tribals’ rights on the forestland, he said it was hardly leading to anywhere.
    “If you want to get your problems solved and re-establish your rights on the land you till, you must seek a solution outside the framework of law. He advised the tribals to join hands with the Dalits and Muslims to fight for the downtrodden.
    Mr. Bardhan, addressing the gathering, said he supported the contentions of Mr. Gonsalves and regretted that the subsequent governments in the post-independent era had belied the hopes and expectations of the poor and the downtrodden of a better deal by their own government.
    He said that even 60 years after Independence, nearly 80 per cent of the population in the country, largely constituted by the tribals, Dalits and Muslims, had to still survive on a paltry income of Rs.20 per family per day.
    The government had no land to give to the tribals for tilling, but could give thousands of acres of land to the industrialists to set up the Special Economic Zones. Criticising the government’s SEZ policy, he said he was not opposed to industrialisation, but questioned the need for giving such large chunks of land to the foreign and domestic investors to set up SEZs which could solve the problems of thousands of families of poor tribals and marginal farmers.
    Castigating the government for “its failure” to frame a proper land policy, Mr. Bardhan said the tribals were being driven out from the forests and the Dalits and other downtrodden from the land earmarked for the SEZs.
    Displaced when they settle down in the slums in the urban areas, their houses were being “bulldozed.” The compensation paid to the poor in lieu of their land given for SEZs, was too inadequate, he felt.
    Assuring that he and his party would be with the tribals and other downtrodden in their fight for justice and rights, Mr. Bardhan, however, advised them to wage a war under some political banner.

    Durgapur SEZ plan for infotech
    The Durgapur development authority has cleared a proposal by construction firm Shapoorji Pallonji & Co to set up an infotech special economic zone (SEZ).
    The SEZ will come up on 25 acres allotted by the Asansol Durgapur Development Authority (Adda), whose board okayed the proposal yesterday.
    Bansagopal Chowdhury, the Adda chairman, said the SEZ would be set up near the Software Technology Park in Durgapur’s Bidhannagar and will house a number of infotech companies.
    “Shapoorji Pallonji will develop infrastructure for the Rs 100-crore project on 25 acres in Durgapur’s Bidhannagar area. The company will have to follow the land utilisation pattern fixed by Adda,” Chowdhury told a media conference. He said 5 per cent of the turnover of the project would go to the authority.
    The project needs clearance from the approval board under the Union commerce ministry. If land acquisition is completed, approvals come through faster.The project, expected to be up and running by 2012, would generate around 4,000 jobs, Chowdhury said, adding that infotech SEZs have never been targeted by the Opposition.

    The Samajwadi Party government had given approval to the Anil Ambani Group and six other private companies to set up SEZs in the Noida region.The cabinet has also decided to do away with first-come-first served policy. Proposals to set up SEZs will now be invited through open tenders. "This will ensure transparency in the selection of companies", Krishna said.
    Krishna said under the new policy, SEZs will be developed through private-public partnership. Concessions to non-processing units will be withdrawn while processing units will continue to get the usual concessions.
    Even as Anil Ambani's proposal for a special economic zone in Noida was turned down by the Uttar Pradesh government on Saturday, Mukesh Ambani's Mumbai SEZ (formerly called the Maha Mumbai SEZ) has also run into problems.
    In an affidavit filed before the Bombay high court on Friday, the Maharashtra government's industrial and urban infrastructure development arm, CIDCO, has opposed the state government's decision to notify 4,000 hectares of land from Khopta and 21 nearby villages for acquisition for the Mumbai SEZ in Raigad district.
    The Mumbai SEZ is one of two being promoted by Reliance Industries [Get Quote] in the district, the other being the 4,000-hectare Navi Mumbai SEZ.
    An affidavit to this effect was filed by the CIDCO managing director in the Bombay high court, which is hearing a public interest litigation on the acquisition of land for the Reliance SEZ. The PIL was filed by Peasant and Workers Party leader Datta Patil and others. The petitioners had made CIDCO a respondent in the PIL.
    The affidavit states that the decision to notify the land from these villages was taken without consulting CIDCO, which is a planning body for the area. CIDCO had prepared plans to develop a township in this area, which was approved by the government, the statement said.
    Besides the township, the affidavit states that the land in these villages will be required to develop a container freight station, container depots - since these villages are near Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust - and other allied activities.
    The division Bench hearing the PIL, comprising high court Chief Justice Swatantra Kumar and Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud, has adjourned the hearing for four weeks and directed Reliance Industries to file an affidavit.
    Farmers in Dadar village of Raigad district whose land has been notified for acquisition for the Reliance Industries-promoted Mumbai special economic zone have formed a company to develop a multi-product SEZ on 2,500 acres, the minimum land required under current SEZ rules.
    A company called Kalbhairav Agro & Development Company has been floated for the purpose and 450 of the 1,000 farmers in the village have become shareholders. This marks the first time farmers have proposed an SEZ.
    Farmers have been allotted one share for every 1,000 square feet of land they own. Thus, a farmer owning 1 acre gets 40 shares.
    The company is chaired by A B Patil, a commerce graduate who owns six acres and two jeeps. He said he was confident of others joining once they saw some action on the ground.
    According to Patil, all registration formalities for the company are complete and the proposal has been sent to the registrar of companies. The formal proposal to set up the SEZ will be sent to the Centre and the Maharashtra government once the registration is received.
    "The government's attitude to this experiment will reveal if it is really interested in farmers' welfare," he said.
    The state government has notified nearly 10,000 hectares in 45 villages in the district for acquisition for the Mumbai SEZ, a move strongly resisted by farmers.
    Kalbhairav Agro has not yet drawn up firm fund-raising plans, however. Patil said the company was talking to the promoters of Magarpatta City on the outskirts of Pune for ideas. Farmers there joined hands and successfully developed a township and an infotech park.
    "We will learn from their experiences of becoming crorepatis," he said. Kalbhairva also intends to talk to financial institutions for assistance and is even planning an initial public offer.
    Patil admitted the task of setting up the SEZ was difficult because the farmers would have to face the might of Reliance Industries [Get Quote] and the state government. But he said the company would go ahead because the "fruits of development should be enjoyed by farmers themselves and not a few outsiders".
    Reliance Industries, he said, was offering farmers Rs 10 lakh an acre. But farmers can easily sell the land to other companies for no less than Rs 1 crore an acre.
    POSCO unit should open by end of 2011: Govt
    Zee News - 1 hour ago
    New Delhi, Aug 20: South Korean steelmaker POSCO is making progress on its troubled plans for a plant in eastern India and the unit should begin production by the end of 2011, India's steel secretary said on Monday.
    Posco plant to begin operations by 2011-end Business Standard
    Posco likely to start production at Indian steel plant by late 2011 MarketWatch
    Activists protest POSCO project in Orissa

    NDTV Correspondent
    Monday, August 20, 2007 (Cuttack)
    Using religion to express dissent, activists opposed to the Rs 52,000 crore POSCO steel project in Orissa marched from Cuttack to the Lingaraj temple in Bhubaneswar.The march was organised to pray to Lord Shiva for the withdrawal of the Korean steel company's project.
    Earlier, the POSCO India had announced it's plan to start construction work for its 12 million tonne steel plant in October this year.
    Udyam - a youth body - organised the Bol Bom March on Sunday to protest against the impending displacement of 20,000 people.
    They also protested the right accorded to POSCO to draw 15 to 18 crore litre of water per day from the river Mahanadi, which they said would endanger the livelihood of lakhs of farmers.

    “the Undercover Economist” & Underwear Technologies

    A new book “the undercover economist” unravels the mystery why rich are rich and coincidently I had explained over the years in much simpler way India is basically exporting raw materials or products that are low tech and have low value additions. I actually coined a term “Underwear Technology”- India promoted underwear technologies providing incentives worth $50b annually.

    I have attached it after the message again.

    India can be rich only when it firstly promote inventors and engineers who could found tech companies than displace commission agents, secondly promote development of globally competitive products with patent protection and serve the world market, thirdly minimize differential cost between producers and consumers and fourthly promote high technology industries and freeze investment on low technology products.
    India's Lower Castes Seek Social Progress In Global Job Market
    By Emily Wax
    Washington Post Foreign Service
    Monday, August 20, 2007; Page A01
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/19/AR2007081901724.html?hpid=moreheadlines
    PUNE, India -- As a Dalit, Pratibha Valmik Kamble is part of the poorest and most ostracized community in this subcontinent's ancient caste system, a group of people so shunned that they are still known as untouchables. Her mother is a maid, her father a day laborer.
    Yet here in this prospering city, Kamble, 24, was recently applying to an Indian firm called Temp Solutions to go to Philadelphia for a well-paid social service job there. During the interview, she twisted her hands nervously in her lap, knowing that if she landed the position, she would not only make more money than both of her parents combined, she would enhance their social status, and her own.
    Buy This Photo
    Michael Thevar, who recruits lower-caste workers for temporary jobs, speaks to Pratibha Valmik Kamble, right, and Vivek Kumar Katara in Pune, India. (By Emily Wax -- The Washington Post)
    Who's Blogging?
    Read what bloggers are saying about this article.
    Hindu Blog, Exploring Hinduism
    Thomas P.M. Barnett :: Weblog
    Hindu Blog, Exploring Hinduism

    Full List of Blogs (7 links) »

    Most Blogged About Articles
    On washingtonpost.com | On the web

    Save & Share Article What's This?
    DiggGoogle
    del.icio.usYahoo!
    RedditFacebook

    India has long had an affirmative action program for federal government jobs, setting aside 23 percent of positions for the most oppressed castes. Now activists are campaigning to open the private sector to them as well, whether the employer is Indian or multinational. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh recently said he favors that goal.
    So does Temp Solutions co-owner Michael Thevar, himself a member of a low-ranking caste. He gave Kamble the job. "I'm so proud of you," he told her after delivering the good news. "I know so well how much you struggled. That's why I am that much more impressed."
    Kamble's eyes went wet as she straightened her mustard-colored outfit and smiled, appearing to be almost embarrassed by his praise.
    Recruiting drives aimed at hiring members of India's unprivileged castes, who make up 70 percent of the population, remain rare in the subcontinent's booming service sector. But as India hurtles into world markets, such hiring has touched off a larger debate over the country's 3,000-year-old caste system.
    In much of India, the system organizes people into a rigid social order by accident of birth, determining everything from professions to marriage partners.
    While the caste system is outlawed by the constitution, low-caste Indians still experience severe discrimination. Dalits are regarded as so low that they are not even part of the system. To this day, they are not allowed to enter many Hindu temples or to drink water from sources used by higher castes.
    So far only two major companies -- Bharti Enterprises and Infosys -- have announced they would set aside jobs for Dalits and other oppressed castes.
    Ramesh Bajpai, executive director of the New Delhi-based American Chamber of Commerce in India, said the issue of affirmative action for oppressed castes has not been raised among his members -- an indication, some Indian workers contend, that many U.S. companies are not fully aware of the caste system and its complex legacy of discrimination.
    India-based executives for IBM and Microsoft, which are among the top foreign employers in this country, declined to comment for this article.
    "Things are changing in India and, I believe, changing for the good," said Bajpai. "As far as we know, our member companies try to hire across the spectrum of Indian society. But since the government has started talking about this issue, we in the industry will follow. It is a complex and interesting discussion."
    Airtel to connect Haryana Tech Park
    Signs MoU with Selecto Systems to provide data, fixed voice and mobile services to the Technology Park
    Monday, August 20, 2007

    NEW DELHI: Bharti Airtel has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Selecto Systems for providing telecom network infrastructure and services for its IT SEZ-Haryana Technology Park (HTP) on the Delhi – Agra National Highway in Haryana.
    Selecto Systems promotes the HTP and is technically assisted by Paharpur Business Centre and Software Technology Incubator Park.
    The MoU assigned Airtel the "Preferred Telecom Service Provider" status and will be given preferential rights to establish and provide telecom infrastructure and services at the HTP.
    Milan Rao, chief operating officer - North, Airtel Enterprise Services and Kamal Meattle, chief executive officer, Selecto Systems signed the MoU.
    The HTP is being built on 1.65 million square feet area and will be ready for
    occupation on January 1, 2010 and will service 30,000 users.
    The Park will be equipped and serviced facility suited for international IT, KPO and BPO firms.
    As a part of the MoU, Airtel will set up the telecom network infrastructure at the SEZ, ensuring all the SEZ clients have access to telecom services. Airtel will also establish a dedicated help center to address the telecom requirements of the SEZ clients.
    Airtel will provide data, fixed voice and mobile services to the HTP. Companies at the SEZ will also be able to safeguard themselves against any unforeseen disasters by
    having access to back up their critical business data and applications through the business resiliency and continuity services.

    There are several exclusive features of rich countries;

    1. People of rich countries are highly skilled.
    2. Rich countries have very high productivity per employee.
    3. Rich countries sell high value high technology products and buy low technology products; it is reverse for poor countries.
    4. Rich countries have very efficient legal system and law is enforced vigorously.
    5. There are ethical standards in every day life and every one is accountable to society.
    6. Rich countries have low level of corruption.

    All rich countries are efficiently governed.

    Ravinder Singh August20, 2007
    Progressindia2007@ yahoo.com

    http://www.slate. com/id/2171898/

    the undercover economist

    Milton Friedman, Meet Richard Feynman

    How physics can explain why some countries are rich and others are poor.

    By Tim Harford
    Posted Saturday, Aug. 18, 2007, at 7:07 AM ET

    If economics can tell us something useful about crime, marriage, or carpooling—as I believe it can—then other academic disciplines should have something to tell us about economies. Last month, Science published an example that may turn out to be important. Two physicists, Cesar Hidalgo and Albert-László Barabási, and two economists, Bailey Klinger and Ricardo Hausmann, have been drawing unusual pictures of economic "space" that promise a deeper understanding of the biggest question in economics: why poor countries are poor.

    There are many explanations, but some are easier to test than others. One very plausible account of why at least some poor countries are poor is that there is no smooth progression from where they are to where they would be when rich. For instance, to move from drilling oil to making silicon chips might require simultaneous investments in education, transport infrastructure, electricity, and many other things. The gap may be too far for private enterprise to bridge without some sort of coordinating effort from government—a "big push."

    That is an old and intuitive idea in economics, but as an informal argument it leaves a lot to be desired. For a start, while plausible, it might not be true. If it is true, it might be far more so for some kinds of economy than for others. And if there is to be a big push, in which direction should it go?

    Testing the idea took three steps. First, economists at the National Bureau of Economic Research broke down each country's exports into 775 distinct products. Next, Hausmann and Klinger used that data to measure how similar each product is to each other product. If every major apple exporter also exports pears, and every major pear exporter also exports apples, then the data are demonstrating apples and pears to be similar.

    Presumably, both economies would have fertile soil, agronomists, refrigerated packing plants, and ports. For the third step, Hausmann and Klinger called upon Hidalgo and Barabási, who specialize in mapping and analyzing networks. The result was a map of the relationships between different products in an abstract economic space. (And look at more maps here. Apples and pears are close together; oil production is a long way away from anything else.

    "The physicists' map shows each economy in this network of products, by highlighting the products each country exported. Over time, economies move across the product map as their export mix changes. Rich countries have larger, more diversified economies, and so produce lots of products—especially products close to the densely connected heart of the network. East Asian economies look very different, with a big cluster around textiles and another around electronics manufacturing, and—contrary to the hype—not much activity in the products produced by rich countries. African countries tend to produce a
    few products with no great similarity to any others."

    That could be a big problem. The network maps show that economies tend to develop through closely related products. A country such as Colombia makes products that are well connected on the network, and so there are plenty of opportunities for private firms to move in to, provided other parts of the business climate allow it. But many of South Africa's current exports—diamonds, for example—are not very similar to anything.

    If the country is to develop new products, it will mean making a big leap. The data show that such leaps are unusual.

    None of this is proof that other development prescriptions— provide financing, fight corruption, cut red tape, and lower trade barriers—are useless. Nor is it a green light for ham-fisted industrial policy. Klinger warns: "It's easy to take the policy implication too far and start trying to pick and choose where to settle in the product space." But it is a big step forward. Policy-makers should take note, and economists, too.

    Tim Harford is a columnist for the Financial Times. His latest book is The Undercover Economist.

    Aamdani Athanni Kharcha Rupia – Economic Profile Of India ©

    On one front India has corporate indulging in grabbing farmers land at 20 years old rates with GOI connivance who have not developed a single technology in 2-5 generations (Ambanis, Tatas & othrs), on another there are political agents specializing in converting slum properties in to super malls, on yet another there are moneylenders who charge 120% interest from farmers and small businesses, on yet another front there is run way imports of all kind of products at practically no duty and exports are generally raw materials or low value added products. In the following you can see June imports are 52.25% higher which was 46% in April.

    Non-oil imports during June, 2007 were estimated at US $ 13530.70 million which was 52.25 % higher than growth on non oil imports of US$ 8887.25 million in June, 2006. Non-oil imports during April-June, 2007 were valued at US$ 40078.64 million which was 50.36% higher than the level of such imports valued at US$ 26654.92 million in April-June, 2006.

    http://commerce. nic.in/pressrele ase/pressrelease _detail.asp? id=2112
    https://www. cia.gov/library/ publications/ the-world- factbook/ rankorder/ 2187rank. html

    Now Earnest & Young has also come out with prediction of India overtaking Developed countries in GDP like Goldman Sachs. I asked GS top executives in India, Can you give me the items India shall export in 2050? They couldn’t say a word. In the second link all other “Tigers” have substantial trade surplus. China has $179b surplus, Russia $105b that is one seventh in population, Brazil $13.5b, South Korea $2b, India is the only emerging economy that had rapidly growing trade deficit that was $41b in 2006.

    153rd Out Of 158 In Current Account Balance

    You see that in the list India ranks at the bottom.

    A common argument to counter trade deficit issue is India is getting NRI investments and remittances of Indian workers. But can they substitute for gross incompetence of Commission Agents kind of Indian corporate? Goods made in India could have created millions of jobs. By the way the commission agents corporate who claim most of India financial resources have neither created new jobs for 10-15 years nor any significant technology.

    I as an inventor put Man Mohan Singh in absolute idiot class firstly for promoting commission agents in the country and then diverting all the hard earned NRI deposits and remittances at their disposal. As a matter of fact India

    There was a popular song “Aamdani Athanni Kharcha Rupai”, Indian imports are growing at twice more rate than exports.

    India is either exporting low value addition goods or simply raw materials like iron ore, food items and raw cotton and low technology products.

    https://www. cia.gov/library/ publications/ the-world- factbook/ rankorder/ 2078rank. html

    Indian Exports Under 1% Of The World.

    Indian exports are less than 1% of the world at that too consists of mainly low value added products and raw material.

    But the problem is Man Mohan Singh can’t think of any one other than Ambanis or Tatas. You can see Tatas operating in areas marked in red failed to produce goods India imported worth $70b and figure for Ambanis could be $20b in expanding the full list. RIL exports of petroleum products have little value additions.

    Ravinder Singh August06, 2007
    Inventor
    Progressindia2007@ yahoo.com

    http://commerce. nic.in/ftpa/ default.asp

    Top 15 Commodities EXPORTS

    Rank Commodity Apr-Mar 2006 Apr-Mar 2007
    1 PETROLEUM (CRUDE & PRODUCTS) 11,639.65 18,551.91
    2 GEMS & JEWELLARY 15,529.06 15,585.69
    3 RMG COTTON INCL ACCESSORIES 6,553.69 6,752.39
    4 MACHINERY AND INSTRUMENTS 5,077.54 6,504.71
    5 DRUGS,PHRMCUTES & FINE CHEMLS 4,995.25 5,512.12
    6 OTHER COMMODITIES 2,510.73 5,413.68
    7 MANUFACTURES OF METALS 4,233.24 5,026.58
    8 TRANSPORT EQUIPMENTS 4,322.97 4,905.92
    9 PRMRY & SEMI-FNSHD IRON & STL 2,982.73 4,374.30
    10 COTTON YARN,FABRICS, MADEUPSETC 3,944.78 4,136.55
    11 IRON ORE 3,801.10 3,891.67
    12 NON-FERROUS METALS 1,340.29 3,486.58
    13 PLASTIC & LINOLEUM PRODUCTS 2,819.32 3,191.40
    14 ELECTRONIC GOODS 2,173.06 2,732.17
    15 DYES/INTMDTES & COAR TAR CHEML 1,649.39 2,253.59
    Total 103,090.53 126,331.10
    Exchange Rate: (1US$ = Rs. ) 44.2735 45.2495

    Top 15 Commodities of Import

    Rank Commodity Apr-Mar 2006 Apr-Mar 2007
    1 PETROLEUM, CRUDE & PRODUCTS 43,963.09 57,074.45
    2 ELECTRONIC GOODS 13,241.75 15,946.32
    3 TRANSPORT EQUIPMENTS 8,838.47 15,413.57
    4 GOLD 10,830.52 14,461.11
    5 MACHRY EXCPT ELEC & ELECTRONIC 10,009.81 13,848.87
    6 METALIFERS ORES & METAL SCRAP 3,881.80 8,333.77
    7 PERLS PRCUS SEMIPRCS STONES 9,134.42 7,487.40
    8 IRON & STEEL 4,385.74 6,043.47
    9 ORGANIC CHEMICALS 4,739.30 5,435.86
    10 COAL,COKE & BRIQUITTES ETC. 3,868.70 4,595.42
    11 OTHER COMMODITIES 5,896.25 4,534.21
    12 FERTILEZERS MANUFACTURED 1,673.26 2,673.43
    13 NON-FERROUS METALS 1,844.37 2,605.95
    14 ARTFCL RESNS,PLSTC MATRLS,ETC. 2,267.71 2,601.84
    15 INORGANIC CHEMICALS 2,244.82 2,375.44
    Total 149,165.73 190,565.97
    Exchange Rate: (1US$ = Rs. ) 44.2735 45.2495

    END NOTES
    i Appeal on Nandigram Violence
    The continuing violence in Nandigram, West Bengal resulting in needless death and injury to innocent
    villagers, has become a cause of great concern to people all over India.
    Whatever may have been the initial reasons for the start of the conflict it is clear from media reports and
    eyewitness accounts that the situation now is spinning out of control, resulting in a fratricidal war between
    different sections of the local population.
    It is also evident that over the past several months of agitation and turmoil thousands of ordinary people- of
    all political hues- are unable to make a livelihood, go about their daily work or even enjoy the basic right
    to sleep without fear. Women in particular have been severely affected while many children are unable to
    attend school normally.

  • Brahminical Left is Vertically Divided on Nuclear Renaissance,Stand Off Continues

    Brahminical Left is Vertically Divided on Nuclear Renaissance,Stand Off Continues
    Pranab Mukherjee Projected as the saviour of the Deal and Next Prime Minister, Manmohan Reluctant
    Sitaram Yechury says the Left parties want to keep the whole thing on hold till their objections are properly evaluated

    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashbiswaskl@gmail.com">palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
    Brahminical Left is vertically divided on Nuclear Renaissance. It is reminiscent of Sino-Indian War in 1962. With Hyde act stand off , the US ruling Lord World bank slave dared to expose the Marxists on its Chinese line! The stand-off on the nuclear deal appears to show no signs of resolution as the Left parties after holding a meet on Monday evening reiterated their earlier stand asking the government not to move any further on the nuclear deal.On the other hand, India's prime minister sought to step up pressure on opponents of a nuclear energy deal with the United States on Monday as his government faced its worst crisis since taking power three years ago.While,CPI-M patriarch Jyoti Basu on Friday ruled out withdrawal of Left support from the UPA government on the Indo-US nuclear deal issue despite CPI general secretary AB Bardhan saying that such a move appeared to be "inevitable".
    Speaking in New Delhi, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh made no direct reference to the much-touted - and increasingly maligned - deal. But his message in support of the pact was clear.
    "When we aim for a 10 percent (economic) growth rate, we must recognize the critical importance of energy security," Singh said, arguing that India must find cheaper alternatives to oil and gas imports, which are used to fuel two-thirds of the country's energy supply.
    "Our government is committed to the development of nuclear energy," he added in a speech.
    Both Singh and U.S. President George W. Bush have repeatedly sold the deal to skeptics in both countries as a way to help energy-starved India get the power needed to sustain its economic boom and wean itself from increasingly expensive oil and gas imports.

    Left Front patriarch Jyoti Basu on Monday ruled out the possibility of an interim election as a fallout of the discord with the Manmohan Singh government over the Indo-US nuclear agreement.
    "There is no possibility of an interim election. We would discuss the issue in parliament before the Lok Sabha speaker under a provision which does not entail voting," Basu said after attending a Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) state secretariat meeting in Kolkata.
    "The CPI-M politburo is unanimous about their stand against the Indo-US nuclear deal. A central committee meeting has been called on August 22-23 in New Delhi to discuss the issue inside the party," Basu said.
    "My party members who met at the recent Politburo meeting have unanimously taken a stance and I can't go away from that," he said, at the party's state headquarters at Alimuddin Street, adding the matter would be discussed in detail at the central committee meeting.
    The Left parties' opposition to the nuclear deal and its stance that the Congress-led government would have to pay a political price if it went ahead with it has presented the ruling United Progressive Alliance with its biggest crisis ever.
    Benagli TV channel Star Anand and the mother media group Ananda Bazar Patrika are trying to project the Kirnahar Brahmin Offspring, Pranab Mukherjee as the saviour of the controversial Nuke Deal. He is projected as the next Prime Minister replacing the former Reserve bank Governor as he is understood to be most capable to save the interests of Zionist Hindu Galaxy Manusmriti Order led by United States of America and fully supported by Global Hindu and Jew lobbies as well as the MNCs worldwide! Pranab Mukherjee leads the West Bengal Marxists including the Loksabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee, the shantiniketan Don, Buddhadev Bhattacharya , the capitalist Marxist Chief Minister of West Bengal Killing Fields and Biman Bose, the leader of the regimented Red Gestapo! Biman Bose and Jyoti Basu join the Brahmin Gang to save and broker the deal eyeing on Foreign investment and Corporate allaince to sustain Brahminical hegemony in West Bengal. JNU turn Polit Bureau member sitaram Yechuri leads the lobby from the front. But the real strength is vested in the nonagenerian patriarch Comrade Jyoti Basu! While the Keral lobby is led by Prakash Karat and Vrinda karat and is supported by Chief ministers of Kerala and Tripura! Despite the suspention of Keral CM Achutyanandan and rival Vijayan , Karat lobby enjoys the support of the majority in the eleven member Polit Bureau. But the Central Committee majoriti, perhaps falls in Bengal line. Bengali Marxist are actually enjoys the Honeymoon even now while the marriage is well over for Kerala and tripura!
    Meanwhile,China and its "all-weather" ally Pakistan are discussing an agreement similar to the one India has reached with the US on the civilian nuclear cooperation to maintain the regional security balance, sources said here today.
    Even as the two old allies discuss a nuclear deal, china's reservations over the indo-us deal and the boundary issue may be clouding Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's maiden visit to Beijing, which is likely to take place towards the end of the year, they said.
    Since Pakistan has pleaded with China at the highest level not to let it down in the nuclear balance with India, Beijing is apparently working out a nuclear deal with Islamabad, in case the Indo-US nuclear agreement is okayed by the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), sources said. While China was apparently taken aback by the finalisation of the 123 agreement, Beijing now hopes that the opposition within India itself will wreck the Indo-US nuclear deal, the sources said. At the same time, China is making active preparations for a counter-deal involving Pakistan, they said, while taking note of the recent spate of critical reports on the Indo-US nuclear agreement in the official Chinese media.
    The China-Pakistan defence ties and the implications of the Indo-US deal on Beijing and Islamabad came up for detailed discussions here this month when Chairman of Pakistan's Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, Gen Ehsan ul Haq, visited Beijing. During talks with Chinese Vice President Zeng Qinghong and Defence Minister Cao Gangchuan, the Pakistani side was assured that Beijing would further step-up its support to ensure the security of the country and maintain regional balance in South Asia, the sources said.

    Other Left minnows other than the CPIM with lesser strength, voices most agressive tune almost of no consequence!Talking to media persons CPI leader D Raja said that the Left appreciated the government?s move to form a committee for discussion but it would only be possible after the government declares in clear terms that it won?t proceed further on negotiations with the IAEA or the NSG.
    After a meeting with External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee, CPI(M) leader Sitaram Yechury made it clear that there was no change in the stand of the Left parties and the situation was as it is. He also poses as agressive as Prakash karat. But the fact remains that Yechuri is no less active to save the Deal as well as UPA and its zionist hindu Brahminical government with an agenda of Galaxy Manusmriti Order Ruled from Washington! De- industrialisation of indigeneous industries continues as ever since the defeat at Plassy. Exploitation of the masses and the Indian economy- trade, industry and finance continues. Rural India is quite devoid of the artisans and the Peasantry has to be ejected out as mass movements are supressed with Genocides like that happened in Nandigram!
    And see the hipocricy! The speaker violets the sovereignity of the People and the Parliament. The most vetern Marxist Basu says everything against pulling down the betrayer GOI while he dismisses any chances of midterm poll! While Sitaram sings in a different Tune!
    The CPI (M) on Monday stuck to its stand that the government should keep the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement on hold till its objections are "properly evaluated".
    After a meeting with External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee, CPI (M) leader Sitaram Yechury made it clear that there was no change in the stand of the Left parties and the situation was as it is.
    "The situation is where it is. We have not heard anything about the Committee (to go into the Hyde Act and its implications on the 123 agreement)", Yechury told reporters after meeting Mukherjee, who is playing the role of a trouble shooter.
    The CPI (M) leader said that the Left parties told the government to keep the whole thing on hold till their objections were "properly evaluated".
    Yechury's meeting with Mukherjee assumes significance as the Left parties are meeting this evening to study the response of the Government on their ultimatum regarding the nuclear deal. The CPI (M) leader's statement appears to show that there was no immediate end in sight to the stand-off between the Left parties and the government despite the UPA's declaration that it would address their "legitimate concerns".
    The Central Committee (CC) of the CPI-M will have the final say on the party's dispute with the UPA over the Indo-US nuclear deal.
    It seems likely that the CC, which is the party's highest decision-making body, will adopt the politburo resolution asking the government not to operationalise the deal. The CC comprises top party functionaries including state secretaries, important state-level functionaries, chief ministers, high office bearers, important ministers in states and leaders of mass organisations like trade unions.
    Just how much influence this panel of 80-odd party veterans — most of whom are above 70 and not in the best of health — wields can be gauged from the 1996 experience. At that time, they had ticked off the party's then general secretary Harkishan Singh Surjeet when he had sought to reverse the CC's decision disallowing Jyoti Basu to head the United Front coalition as PM.
    Basu later termed the decision a historic blunder. But the view that prevailed at the time was that the CPM shouldn't be part of any power-sharing arrangement where it cannot influence policy. This appears to be the line of thinking in the party's opposition to the nuclear deal and its objective of a programme-oriented third front as well.
    The dates of next week's CC meeting, which is held every three months, has been advanced on account of the controversy over the nuclear deal. The two-day meeting in which the politburo resolution will be put up for discussion is now slated for Wednesday.

    In an apparent reaction to reports that the UPA constituents rallied behind the Prime Minister and Congress President Sonia Gandhi in the current crisis, the Left parties appealed to all the parties in the UPA to see the "reasonableness" of the stand taken which is fully in the spirit of Parliamentary democracy and the Government`s commitment to the country`s welfare.
    However, launching a spirited defence of the deal Minister for Science and Technology Kapil Sibal said "misgivings" about the deal had arisen out of "preconceived notions" which could be addressed during a discussion in Parliament. He said the Indo-US civil nuclear deal would not be operationalised before December next year and exuded confidence that negotiations with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) would go on as scheduled in September.
    Sibal rubbished the contention that the 123 agreement bound India to the Hyde Act, the American law on the deal, and the pact did not allow transfer of reprocessing and heavy water technologies as "assured" by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to Parliament.
    He said the Prime Minister had given an assurance about uninterrupted supply of nuclear fuel, nuclear power reactors and reprocessing rights "which are granted in the 123 Agreement".
    "The 123 Agreement goes much further than the PM`s assurances to Parliament," Sibal told reporters here.
    united states india peaceful atomic energy cooperation act
    http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:h5682enr.txt.pdf
    see also:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/topics/Henry+Hyde
    Complete Coverage: The Indo-US nuclear tango
    http://in.rediff.com/news/nukedeal05.html
    Dear friends,
    A petition has been launched concerning the attacks on
    Taslima Nasreen, first in Hyderabad, and then as a
    follow up in Kolkata, where unlimited financial
    rewards were declared for anyone killing her. Please
    find below the URL of the petition. We appeal to you
    to sign the petition.
    Maitreyi Chatterjee and Mira Roy
    On behalf of Maitree
    http://www.Petition Online.com/ Taslima1/ petition. html
    Sino-Indian War
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to: navigation, search
    Sino-Indian War
    The Sino-Indian War occurred between the two Asian giants, China and India.
    Date October 10 — November 21, 1962[3]
    Location North-East Frontier Agency and Aksai Chin
    Casus
    belli Chinese: Indian military incursions north of the McMahon Line[1]
    Indian: People's Liberation Army invade into Indian territory in the North Eastern Frontier Agency[2]
    Result Chinese military victory. Subsequent Chinese withdrawal to pre-war positions.

    Combatants
    China India
    Commanders
    Zhang Guohua[4] Brij Mohan Kaul
    Strength
    80,000[5][6]
    Casualties
    Killed 1,460 (Chinese sources)[7]
    None captured[8][9][10][11]
    Wounded 1,697[7]
    Killed 3,128 (Indian sources)[12]
    Captured 3,968[2]
    Wounded 548[13]
    The Sino-Indian War (Simplified Chinese: ??????; Traditional Chinese: ??????; pinyin: Zhong-Yìn Bianjìng Zhànzheng; Hindi: ????-??? ????? Bharat-Chin Yuddh), also known as the Sino-Indian Border Conflict, was a war between China and the India. The initial cause of the conflict was a disputed region of the Himalayan border in Arunachal Pradesh, known in China as South Tibet.
    Fighting began on 10 October 1962 between the Chinese People's Liberation Army and Military of India. The first heavy engagement of the war was a Chinese attack on an Indian patrol north of the McMahon Line.[2] The conflict eventually widened to include the region of Aksai Chin which the PRC regarded as a strategic link, via the China National Highway route G219, between the Chinese-administered territories of Tibet and Xinjiang. The war ended when the Chinese captured both disputed areas and unilaterally declared a ceasefire on 20 November 1962, which went into effect at midnight.
    The Sino-Indian War is notable for the harsh conditions under which much of the fighting took place, entailling large-scale combat at altitudes of over 4267 metres (14,000 feet).[2] This presented numerous logistical problems for both sides.
    The aftermath of the war saw sweeping changes in the Indian military to prepare it for similar conflicts in the future, and placed pressure on Indian prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru, who was seen as responsible for failing to anticipate the Chinese invasion.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_War

    Despite statements to the contrary, ambiguity still remains on whether US can pull out of the Indo-US nuclear deal if India conducts a test. Many lawmakers in Washington are highly critical of the Bush administration for not demanding a no-test guarantee from India. Despite a crisis looming large over it in the wake of tough stand of the Left parties to the Indo-US nuclear deal, the government today dismissed opposition projections of a snap poll being round the corner.Fifteen suspected Al-Qaeda activists have been arrested from Moreh town in Chandel district of Manipur bordering Myanmar, official sources said on Monday.While 10 activists were Myanmarese, five were from Bangladesh, the sources said.Assam Rifles personnel, acting on a tip-off, nabbed them from a house at Moreh Ward number 3, about 120 km from Imphal on August 17, the sources said. All of them had entered India without valid documents, they said.They were proceeding to Bangladesh via Manipur and Silchar in Assam, the sources said.
    The stand-off on the nuclear deal appears to show no signs of resolution with the Left parties today likely to restate their opposition to implementation of the agreement on civil nuclear cooperation with the United States.
    It is very important that at this juncture Left members in the Lok Sabha protested government's ''failure'' to come out with an Action Taken Report (ATR) on the report of the Sachar Committee which went into the status of Muslims in the country.Raising the issue during Zero Hour, Rupchand Pal (CPI-M) said more than six months have passed since the presentation of the report, but no ATR has been tabled.He was supported by his party colleagues, Mohd Salim and Hannan Mollah.
    The four Left parties -- CPI(M), CPI, RSP and Forward Bloc -- are meeting here in the evening to consider the ruling UPA coalition's stand that the government was not in a position to put the deal on hold.

    Sources said the Left parties were unlikely to budge from their stand that the government should not go ahead with implementing the 123 agreement with the US and take the follow up steps on safeguards with the IAEA and the NSG.

    The evening meeting is likely to come out with a fresh statement telling the government that there was no question of reconsidering their stand on the opposition to the deal, the sources said.They said the parties were also unimpressed with the idea of a committee to go into the Left concerns as some sort of a mechanism to work out a compromise.
    Mid-term elections are possible next year after the Left parties on Monday evening again rejected the Indo-US nuclear deal and demanded that the government refrain from taking the “next step” in implementing the deal. Sources tell CNN-IBN the Left parties would regard the Government talking to the International Atomic Energy Agency as the ‘next step’.
    The Government and the Left parties continue their face-off on the Indo-US nuclear deal. Sources tell have told CNN-IBN the government would continue negotiations with the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) though the Left wants the nuclear agreement to be blocked till a parliamentary committee submits its report.

    Pressing pause on deal will deepen crisis at n-power plants: they are very low on fuel, production hit
    By IE
    Monday August 20, 02:34 AM
    As Left allies mount pressure on the UPA government to press pause on the Indo-US nuclear deal, time is also running out on another front: there's a crisis situation in the country's nuclear establishment with fuel for nuclear power plants running low and experts cautioning that if this continues for another year or two, there's a real danger of some units even having to shut down power generation.
    The fuel shortage situation has started telling on the performance of the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL). Currently operating nuclear power stations with a capacity of around 4,000 MWe, it has been forced to slash power production levels.
    • The overall plant load factor (PLF) has come down from a high of 80-90 per cent to around 60 per cent in some three years - a drop of 30 per cent when there's power shortage in the country.
    • Despite commissioning new reactors for power generation, income from sale of power has remained stagnant at around Rs 3,000 crore for the past three years - NPCIL calls it "mismatch" in demand and supply of fuel.
    • NPCIL Chairman-cum-Managing Director S K Jain says the fuel shortage-led fall in PLF has already resulted in a loss of Rs 800 crore potential revenue.
    While NPCIL officials do not openly admit that there could be closure of units in case supplies of uranium are not augmented, they do say that the current situation is "very bad". A delay in the commissioning of the milling system (the process by which the mined ore is finally converted into "yellow cake" for use in the reactors) at the Jaduguda mines in Jharkhand is a major factor behind the current fuel shortage.
    Jain told The Indian Express that they expect this system to be operational in a few months which would improve the fuel supply situation. But he also said that "there is a theoretical possibility of further delays in the commissioning" which would then lead to a situation of NPCIL cutting generation further "from 18 reactors" to around "50-55 per cent" in the next few months.
    http://in.news.yahoo.com/070819/48/6jn2e.html
    Security Environment - An Overview
    India ’s security concerns are defined by a dynamic global security environment and the perception that South Asia region is of particular global security interest. The continuing presence of terrorist and fundamentalist forces in its neighbourhood has prompted India to maintain a high level of defence vigilance and preparedness to face any challenge to its security.
    The security challenges facing India are varied and complex. The country faces a series of low intensity conflicts characterized by tribal, ethnic and left wing movements and ideologies as also the proxy war conducted by Pakistan and various radical jehadi outfits through the instrumentality of terrorism. India is also affected by the trafficking in drugs and proliferation of small arms and the fact that it is surrounded by two neighbours with nuclear weapons and missiles and history of past aggressions and war. There is also the ever present possibility of hostile radical fundamentalist elements gaining access to the weapons of mass destruction in Pakistan . The country has experienced four major conventional border wars besides an undeclared war at Kargil. India ’s response to these threats and challenges has always been restrained, measured and moderate in keeping with its peaceful outlook and reputation as a peace loving country
    National Security Objectives
    India's national security objectives have evolved against a backdrop of India’s core values namely, democracy, secularism and peaceful co-existence and the national goal of social and economic development. These are:-
    defending the country’s borders as defined by law and enshrined in the Constitution;
    protecting the lives and property of its citizens against war, terrorism, nuclear threats and militant activities;
    protecting the country from instability and religious and other forms of radicalism and extremism emanating from neighbouring states;
    securing the country against the use or the threat of use of weapons of mass destruction;
    development of material, equipment and technologies that have a bearing on India ’s security, particularly its defence preparedness through indigenous research, development and production, inter-alia to overcome restrictions on the transfer of such items;
    promoting further co-operation and understanding with neighbouring countries and implementing mutually agreed confidence-building measures; and
    pursuing security and strategic dialogues with major powers and key partners
    http://mod.nic.in/aforces/body.htm
    New hydro electricity policy in two months: Govt
    Daily News & Analysis - 17 Aug 2007
    PTI NEW DELHI: A new hydro electricity policy will be unveiled in two months, government told the Lok Sabha on Friday while acknowledging that the target of producing 41110 MW of power fell short by about a half in the 10th Plan.
    Govt may lose Muslim favour
    By HT
    Monday August 20, 01:53 AM
    JUST LIKE it happened on the Bofors issue in the run-up to the 1989 general election, the possibility of a rallying of forces against the Congress on the Indo-US nuclear deal issue cannot be ruled out, according to former prime minister V.P. Singh. And the danger of Muslim opinion being swayed by anti-US rhetoric isn't lost on anyone, including the UPA leadership.
    Talking to HT, Singh said Muslims and Hindus alike were resentful of the unequal deal that would compromise India's sovereignty and reduce it to a slave of the United States. "I was not for bringing down this government but the issue is not about the government but about the country. And the Congress will have pay a heavy political price," he said. Singh is understood to have approached the DMK, a UPA ally, to oppose the deal but the party did not respond.
    Sharing Singh's views are leaders of the third front, or United Nationalist Progressive Alliance. The Samajwadi Party and Telegu Desam Party, in particular, are pleased with the perceived advantage they hold in case of mid-term polls banking heavily on the Muslim vote. According to the SP's Shahid Siddiqui, coming after India's controversial decision to align with the US-led campaign on Iran at the International Atomic Energy Agency, the nuclear deal comes as a complete sell-out. "My assessment is that both the Congress and BJP will suffer heavily in the next general election," he said.
    http://in.news.yahoo.com/070819/32/6jmyy.html
    No question of truck with BJP: Karat
    By HT
    Monday August 20, 01:53 AM
    The CPI-M on Sunday said the Left parties would never join the "pro-imperialist" BJP to oppose the Indo-US civil nuclear deal or topple the UPA government. Party general secretary Prakash Karat's statement was an attempt to correct the popular perception that the Left is on the same side as the saffron party on the issue.
    Karat was also reacting to BJP president Rajnath Singh's remarks on Saturday that the Left's refusal to join hands with the BJP was proof that it wasn't serious about opposing the deal. "The CPI-M is certain not to have any truck with such a pro-imperialist party," the Marxist leader said.
    The UPA-Left standoff on the deal had emboldened the BJP to call for political solidarity with its worst ideological rival. It had asked the Left to choose between power and national interest and withdraw support to the Congress-led government. Leader of the Opposition L.K. Advani had even taken the unprecedented step of calling up Karat and sending him a copy of the BJP's draft note for a discussion on the issue, under a voting rule, in Lok Sabha. To that, the CPM said it would thrash out its own strategy in the House.
    http://in.news.yahoo.com/070819/32/6jmyy.html
    'N-deal no solution to India's energy crisis'
    Enlarge PhotoBy IBNlive.com
    Sunday August 19, 05:32 PM
    New Delhi: Nuclear affairs analyst Praful Bidwai is not in favour of the Indo-US nuclear deal. Bidwai vehemently opposed the nuclear deal saying it was not a long-term solution to India's energy crisis.
    "It is going to promote nuclear power which is a very dangerous, highly uneconomical and flawed source of energy which cannot be a long term solution to India's energy security issues. So I am opposed to the nuclear deal," Bidwai said.
    Bidwai also said that rather than put a cap on the weapons programme the deal will give India more nuclear weapons.
    "Rather than promote restraint either globally or regionally. The deal will allow India to make five-six hundred nuclear weapons every year by diverting uranium to military use, and reprocessing nuclear fuel in unsafeguarded nuclear reactors," Bidwai added.
    http://in.news.yahoo.com/070819/211/6jmpk.html
    With the India-US civilian nuclear deal coming under a shadow, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Monday emphasised that the country needed a new paradigm on energy security and urged all political parities to recognise this vital aspect.
    'I urge all political parties to appreciate the vital national interest of pursuing a sound energy security strategy,' the prime minister said while laying the foundation stone for the Rajiv Gandhi Urja Bhavan in south Delhi.

    'India is on the move and we must be able to address its growing energy demand. No government can afford to shirk this responsibility and hope to find favour with the people,' he said.

    'It is extremely important that our people are made aware of the economics of energy,' he said. 'From a long-term perspective, nuclear energy and solar energy can play an important role in addressing our energy security needs. Our government is committed to the development of nuclear energy.'

    Manmohan Singh's comments on the need for nuclear energy come at a time when his government faces its biggest ever crisis, with the Left and opposition parties protesting strongly against the civilian nuclear deal with the US.

    Stressing on new strategies to deal with the rising energy demand, he said India's energy needs cannot be met with oil and gas for long as the economy was growing.

    Accordingly, he emphasised that research that would be taken up at the Rajiv Gandhi Urja Bhawan must be holistic in all forms of clean and renewable energy and the technologies that emerge must be commercially viable.

    Among those present at the event were United Progressive Alliance chairperson Sonia Gandhi, Petroleum Minister Murli Deora, his deputy Dinsha Patel, Lt, Governor of Delhi Tejinder Khanna and Delhi Chief Minister Shiela Dikshit.
    'Currently, the total domestic production by Indian companies is less than one third of current domestic consumption. As we know, oil and gas reserves in India are quite limited,' the prime minister said.

    'As we grow, our growing import bill for imported crude oil will put unbearable burden on our economy. We need a new paradigm of energy security to address our developmental needs,' he said.

    'This paradigm would have to focus on several issues - a less-energy intensive path of development, increasing use of non-conventional and renewable energy sources, also aimed at reducing carbon emissions, and improving efficiency in production and consumption.'

    Such a strategy, Manmohan Singh said, would have to be based on coordinated development and judicious use of domestic and global resources.

    'This will require exploring new technological options, new financing means, identifying new sources and building new bridges with new partners.

    'We need to develop all our energy resources - coal, gas, oil, hydro and nuclear along with renewable, such as wind and solar. Moreover, there are many options of using alternative fuels and technologies,' he said.

    'In our country we have excessively interfered with energy pricing. Each time our utilities have to raise rates and our oil companies have to raise prices, extraneous considerations come in.'
    Meanwhile, accusing Prime Minister Manmohan Singh of "trying to foist" the India-US nuclear deal on the nation, AIADMK Chief J Jayalalithaa has said in Chennai that Singh must resign as he had lost "credibility" "The prime minister has completely lost the confidence of parliament and the people of India. In fact, he has totally lost all credibility in the eyes of the nation," Jayalalithaa said in a statement. On the other hand,commenting on the formation of an expert committee to look into the nuke deal concerns of Left parties, the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) today demanded the appointment of a Parliamentary panel to study the pact.Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesman V K Malhotra said if any mechanism or committee had to be formed, it should involve all political parties.
    Meanwhile, the Third Front or the UNPA has also demanded the setting up of a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) to look into the matter.
    Samajwadi Party General Secretary Amar Singh said: "The Government has said the treaty has been ratified by the Cabinet, which is a handful of people picked up by the Prime Minister, but since in a democracy like India, Parliament is supreme, the deal should be ratified by both houses."
    The Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) had suggested the setting up a panel or mechanism to study the implications of the Hyde Act and putting any further progress on the nuclear on hold till it submits its report.
    However, the UPA leadership, which met late Sunday and decided to set up the experts' panel, refused to put the deal on hold.

    "The talk of mid-term elections is all useless," Parliamentary Affairs Minister P R Dasmunsi told reporters maintaining that there was neither a crisis for the government nor there was any threat to its stability.

    He wondered why the Leader of the Opposition L K Advani was not bringing a no-confidence motion against the Manmohan Singh government when he was projecting himself as the "real patriot" in the backdrop of the deal. "Nothing will happen to benefit the communal forces," he said.

    Dasmunsi also rejected the Opposition demand for a joint parliamentary committee to go into the deal, saying such committees were constituted to go into scams and "how can the deal can termed as a scam"?

    The Union Minister also made light of reports that

Widgets

Footer

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.