Search blog.co.uk

Posts archive for: 28 July, 2007
  • Left parties Have Failed to Defend Tribals and Refugees Facing Polavarm Submergence!

    Left parties Have Failed to Defend Tribals and Refugees Facing Polavarm Submergence!

    Would the Intellegentsia Kolkata, Mahashweta Devi and Sanhati Udyog clear their satnd ?
    Would Mamta Bannerjee speak out to defend the partition Victim dalit Refugees?

    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com
    Would the Intellegentsia Kolkata, Mahashweta Devi and Sanhati Udyog clear their satnd on Polavaram dam?
    I am waiting!
    Police lathicharge on protestors in Khammam district of Andhra Pradesh has left eight people dead and several others injured on Saturday.The incident took place when police opened fire on protestors who were demanding land reforms in the district.The bloodshed could prove costly for YS Rajasekhara Reddy's government in the state.However,Chief Minister Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy announced a judicial probe into the police firing on communist parties' agitation seeking land for the poor.
    Since May, Left parties have led the landless poor to forcibly occupy vacant lands all over the state. It culminated in a hunger-strike this week and Saturday's protest bandh in the state.
    But the Left parties have failed to defend Tribals and Refugees facing Polavarm Submergence! The protest turned violent in Modugonda village in Khammam district where police opened fire to quell a stone pelting group in which six activists were killed and several others injured. coincidentally, Anti Polavarm agitation has got its epicentre in Khammam itself. But left does not care for the declining dalits and tribals. they want only political milage and want a better image after Nandigram singur episode. Nothing else!

    Meanwhile, UPA Chairperson Sonia Gandhi has asked Chief Minister YSR Reddy for a report on the police firing.
    The CM has transferred the district police chief and suspended the additional SP. A judicial probe has also been ordered into the incident.
    ''The police were overpowered and pushed around. Without provocation, they (protestors) pelted stones at the police,'' Reddy said.
    Dear Palash Babu,
    I have tried to understand the suject mentioned above.
    It is seen that the polavaram-vijaywara canal project
    is going to uproot 250 villages and about 2 lakhs of
    people will become shelterless. I am very much worried
    and feel agony that about twenty thousand kutcha
    houses fall within the zone and it is a fact that the
    owner of those houses are the people of dalit and
    tribal communities. It needs agitative protest from
    all corner all over India to safeguard their
    displacement. Sharing your thought and endeavour to be
    beside the Dandakaranya (Malkangiri in Orissa and
    Bastar in Chattishgarh)refugees particularly the
    namasudras who will become refugee once again.
    -----Manohar Mouli Biswas
    General Secretary, Bangla Dalit Sahitya Sanstha
    Manohar Biswas
    651 V.I.P nagar.
    Gouranga Palli.
    Kolkata 700100
    Tel # : (033) 23451294
    Cellular : +919433390044
    thanks!
    Manohar Babu!
    We want a initiative right from you.
    Mamata slams CPI(M) government over Nandigram
    Bolpur: Trinamool Congress supremo Mamata Banerjee today came down heavily on the Left Front government over the Nandigram issue.Addressing a rally at Nannur near here, Ms Banerjee alleged that appropriate punishment had not been meted out to the responsible for the Nandigram massacre.
    '' The Left Front government is giving false assurances to the poor farmers that they would be given employment in the Tata factory. All the claims of the government about making West Bengal an industrialised and prosperous state are hollow, '' Ms Banerjee said.
    She stated that the farmers would not be able to get justice unless the CPI(M) was ousted from power.
    Well, Mamata Bannerjee also habitual to quote Dandakarny Refugees and Marichjhanpi Genocide! Would she speak out to defend the partition Victim dalit Refugees?

    Maoist bandh hits life in Malkangiri, PTI reports.
    Normal life was affected in some interior areas of Malkangiri district following a bandh call by the CPI(Maoist) in protest against alleged police repression on people, corruption and in memory of 'martyrs' killed in encounters with the police.
    Mind you, Motu Tehsil has to be submerged by Polavaram and the bandh had its maximum impact in the Motu tehsil where traffic had come to a standstill and shops and business establishments closed, reports from the interiors said. The large weekly market held at Kalimela on Thursdays also had thin attendance. It was also heavily raining in the area, the reports said.
    CPM, BUPC men clash in Nandigram
    Statesman News Service
    HALDIA, July 27: Fighting broke out in Nandigram along the Talpati canal this afternoon when CPI-M cadres and supporters of Bhumi Uched Pratirodh Committee opened fire and hurled bombs at each other. BUPC members alleged that CPI-M cadres attacked them from the other side of the canal when they were marching in a rally to the Tekhali bridge. However, nobody was injured. The protesters, too, reportedly responded with bricks and bombs. The violence was primarily concentrated in Gokulnagar, Maheshpur and Parulbari. Women protesters have threatened to gherao Nandigram police station on Wednesday.
    Meanwhile, the state government resumed peace process in Nandigram today. “The chief minister informed us that peace process will resume from today. All parties will be part of it. We are concerned about Nandigram. It can’t be allowed to remain a no man’s land forever”, former chief minister Mr Jyoti Basu said today in Kolkata. n SNS

    Intellegentsia Bengal is posing as great sympathiser of the Peasants Uprising in Singur and Nandigram. But except Mr Sunanda Sanyal none of them was seen present during No SEZ National convention. Rashida B and Bhopal gas Tragedy victims, Arundhati ray, Medha Patekar and NBA along with mass organisations countrywide and delegates from abroad participated in this convention held on 2nd and 3rd June, 2007. Muslims and dalits participated in this convention on large scale. Afraid of Dalit Muslim United Insurrection, two arch rivals of West Bengal Geopolitics and both representing the brahminical Ruling Class met next day!
    Would Mahashweta Devi who has written on Marichjhanpi Genocide so many times in her regular colum stand united those very Dandakaranya Refugees, the victims of Partitition Haolocaust as well as state sponsered Violence in Marichjhanpi who face another displacement and have to be evicted for Polavaram Dam?
    I am waiting for her writeup. I appreciate her and support all the causes she fights for. But I am disappointed when I she that she reluctantly refuses to write or say anything for Dalit Refugees. I know, she does not believe in Caste and rather believes in Class struggle! This is also a classical game of Brahmin dominated Marxist Ideologues and politicians in India!
    I would like to see what stand the Sanhati Udyog takes, too!
    Mind you, Polavaram Dam Project has to submerge Malkan Giri in Orissa and Dantewara in Chhattishgargh. Both the governments have opposed the project. Orissa Chief minister naveen Patnike, despite his drive for urbanisation and Industrialisation and Eviction Bengali speaking resettled refugees Drive, has come out openly to defend Malkangiri perhaps because not only Bengali Refugee colonies but tribal villages also have to be wiped out if the project goes on.
    Medha Patkar has centred her agitation basically in Andhra. Malkangiri and Dantewara people along Sharbari river do not know about submergence destiny! This is perhaps RTI effect. Orissa Government or Chhattishgargh Governments have not circulated any information. Thus, there is virtually no agitation in Malkangiri or Dantewara. No survey or public hearing is reported. would Medha Patkar go there?
    We know Mahashweta Devi`s lifelong fight for civil and human rights of Indian tribals. A whole tribe named Koya has to be wiped out. Tribal and refugee population of three Indian states face immediate danger to their life, liberty and livlihood. Benagli Refugees have to suffer most as they have no political support. Kolakta Media has not published a single report. I am sending daily updates. They have their own hifi Network. But they are not interested.

    What about the Marxists who have launched an agitation in Andhra already, but has failed to make an issue of Polavarm Project! Is it necessary to stay away from any agitation against so called development, to defend the inhuman acts of WB Government. Perhaps may be. Technically, they should come forward as Mr Naveen Patnaik also opposes the project. So does Mr Raman singh!
    CPM General Secretary Prakash Karat on Saturday condemned the police firing in Khammam district and said the party would stage dharnas all over the country in protest against it and press the Andhra Pradesh government to accede to their demand on land for the landless.
    "I strongly condemn the police firing and attitude of the Andhra Pradesh government," Karat told reporters here.
    Karat said when Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Y S R Reddy met him in Delhi a month ago, he had suggested resolving of the issue pertaining to demand for land for the landless through negotiations with local left leaders.
    Instead, the Andhra Pradesh government has resorted to "police repression", he alleged. Casualties in the police firing is "highly unfortunate" and it`s regrettable that the situation has come to such a pass, he said.
    The shutdown threw normal life out of gear in Guntur, which witnessed peaceful protests.
    On the Chennai-Kolkata National Highway 5, vehicular traffic was obstructed for over an hour near Kakani village, a suburb of Guntur city.
    Traffic was allowed to move after 12 noon, Sub Inspector S Ravi said.
    Educational institutions, shops and financial institutions like banks remained closed in view of the shutdown.
    However, attendance in government offices was normal.
    SUCI demands fresh lists of abandoned CPI(M) activists in Nandigram
    Kolkata: The Socialist Unity Centre of India (SUCI) today demanded a fresh list of CPI (M) supporters, who lost their homes after the March 14 incident in Nandigram.
    The CPI(M) had claimed that thousands of their party activists were still homeless since the masscare that took place at Nandigram.
    However, SUCI state secretary Provash Ghosh told mediapersons that the CPI (M)'s claim was baseless.
    ''The ruling party should release a fresh list of their marooned party workers at Nandigram mentioning the camps they were taking shelter at,'' he said.
    He said, after the Haldia Municipality poll's victory, the CPI(M) 'miscreants' had started fresh violence in Nandigram.
    Veteran marxist leader Jyoti Basu yesterday said the efforts were on to resume peace talks in the troubled area but peace could not be resumed in the area if appropriate punishment were not given to those responsible for the Nandigram carnage.
    Haldia in pocket, the CPM would now be tough with the Opposition in nearby Nandigram, Jyoti Basu said today.
    “Efforts to restore normality in Nandigram had been suspended because of the municipal election. The process will be renewed from today,” the CPM patriarch said a day after the Trinamul Congress spurned Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee’s talks offer yet again.
    “Nandigram can’t be allowed to run as a liberated zone for long. We have won the Haldia poll, even in the areas close to Nandigram, after so many incidents in the zone,’’ Basu said after the weekly meeting of the CPM state secretariat at the party headquarters.
    He lashed out at the Opposition parties for their “opportunist alliance” in Haldia.
    Tension prevails ahead of "martyr day" , a Hindustan times Report:

    Tension prevails in the jungle areas of Gadchiroli, Chandrapur and Gondia districts, bordering Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh over the week-long bandh call given by the banned naxalites outfit, CPI (Maoist) to commemorate its "martyr day", beginning from July 28.
    According to reports reaching Nagpur on Saturday, the naxalites have given the call ostensibly to commemorate the 35th death anniversary of their founder, Charu Majumder, who died in police custody in Kolkata on July 28, 1972. The state police are taking adequate precautions in view of the bandh and sounded a high alert in the naxalites-prone border districts.
    The Maoist rebels are determined to bring these districts, particularly the interior areas, to a complete standstill during the period. They are distributed pamphlets and leaflets in this regard and appealed to villagers to ensure its success. The police recovered 23 kg explosive from two different places. The naxalites had planted explosives with a view to trigger explosions and blow up vehicles and create terror in the area.
    The anti-naxalite squad in Gadchiroli was on way to patrolling Korchi area to thwart any attempt to disrupt peace when they discovered explosive plated on Bori route with the intention of blowing up passing vehicles. The police also recovered two detonators from the spot. Similarly, the patrolling party recovered 9 kg explosives near Jafrabad Hills in the district.
    Talking to Hindustan Times, the additional director general of police (ADGP), anti-naxal cell, Pankaj Gupta asserted that the police were also determined to scuttle any naxalite design. “A massive police bandobast has been made in all the affected districts. Moreover, police patrolling in all the sensitive areas have also been spruced up in view of possible violence,” Gupta further informed.
    Operation Munnar not wound up: Kerala CM

    Thiruvananthapuram: Refuting reports that the campaign against land encroachment at Munnar was wound up, Kerala Chief Minister V S Achuthanandan on Saturday said the operation at the hill station would continue till the area was freed from land-grabbers.
    "The Munnar campaign has only been suspended due to inclement weather following torrential rains and land-slips. It would be resumed in another two weeks when the weather becomes conducive for that," he said.
    The impression created by the media that the Munnar operations had been called off even prompted the Supreme Court to remark that it would be 'unfortunate' if the government had left it half-way, he said.
    Defending the removal of a sign board put up by Tatas in the area, he said the board was taken away as it stood on public land. After that the company itself had taken it away.
    The head of the task-force carrying out the Munnar eviction drive was now under treatment. In a fortnight the same team would be back in operation or a new team would be assigned, he said.
    The goal of the campaign was to save Munnar's ecosystem and natural beauty to make it a leading tourist spot. Also, part of the reclaimed land would be distributed to the landless, he said.
    On the dispute over Mullapperiyar dam with Tamil Nadu, Achuthanandan said Kerala was firm on building a new dam in place of the 110-year-old structure which posed a threat to 3.5 million people living downstream.
    Construction of the new dam was estimated to cost Rs 300 crore. A lion's portion of this amount would be met by the exchequer and the rest raised from the people, he said.
    Achuthanandan expressed strong resentment at the Railways' plans to inaugurate the Salem Division in September.
    This was against the assurance given by Railway Minister Lalu Prasad that any final decision would be taken only after consultations with Chief Ministers of Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
    The Centre's unilateral decision would mean that the Railway minister was going back on his assurance under pressure from Minister of State for Railways, R Velu, he said.
    Achuthanandan said a massive sanitation campaign would be launched across the state to tackle serious health threat posed by piling up of wastes.
    He said he would take personal initiative with regard to the drive which would be carried out with the participation of local bodies and all sections of people.
    The Legacy of the plight of Hindus in Bangladesh - Part-IX
    Thu, 2007-07-26 02:31
    By Rabindranath Trivedi - for Asian Tribune from Dhaka
    Part-IX: Genocide In Bangladesh By Pakistani army 1971
    Dakah, 26 July, (Asiantribune.com): Bangladesh was created after the India-Pakistan War of 1971, a conflict—elaborated in this report—that was preceded by the massacre of an estimated two million East Pakistani citizens and the ethnic cleansing of 10 million (mainly Hindus), who fled to India from that country. In the summary of his report dated November 1, 1971, US Senator Edward Kennedy (D - Massachusetts) wrote:
    Field reports to the U.S. Government, countless eye-witness journalistic accounts, reports of International agencies such as World Bank and additional information available to the subcommittee document the reign of terror which grips East Bengal (East Pakistan). Hardest hit have been members of the Hindu community who have been robbed of their lands and shops, systematically slaughtered, and in some places, painted with yellow patches marked ‘H’. All of this has been officially sanctioned, ordered and implemented under martial law from Islamabad.”
    "They (Hindus) come out of East Pakistan in endless columns, along trails stained with tears and blood. They are dressed in rags, robbed of everything they owned, the women raped, the children gaunt from hunger. They have been on the move for up to a month, hiding from Pakistani soldiers by day, slogging through flooded rice paddies at night. A vengeful army pursues them to the very border of India. Rifle and machine gun fire crackles.
    The bedraggled columns scatter for cover. But soon they are moving again, streaming into India. Sobbing violently, a middle-aged man says, “The soldiers took my two nephews. They kicked them with their boots, ducked them in an open sewer, then machine-gunned them. After that, they took 50 to 60 young men of our village into a field and killed them whit bayonets”.
    A woman who was shot in the leg clutches her daughter and says, “ We were just about to cross the border when they started shooting at us. I don’t know what happened to my husband”. A ten-year old boy, who lost an eye when an army patrol threw a grenade at him as he was ending cattle in a field, says, “ Can anyone tell me what happened to my parents ?”Since late last March in 1971, when the Pakistani army launched this genocidal attack on the defenseless population of East Pakistan, more than eight million people have been driven from their native land. Millions more will surely follow. Moreover, the refugees have put grave strains on India, pushing India and West Pakistan to the brink of a war that could involve the two arch rivals of the communist world, the Soviet Union and China, The Readers' Digest wrote in November 1971
    . ..While the horrors of the refugees are bad enough, something even more ghastly is going on inside East Pakistan, also known as East Bengal, Reader Digest added: An American missionary in Dacca grits his teeth and says, “ It’s murder - mass murder”. The military junta that Pakistan has tried to cover up the atrocities, and maintains that East Bengal has largely returned to normal. But one of the authors of this article, who spent two weeks there last August, found evidence to the country on every hand. Touring three districts of East Bengal by car, he found not a single village or town that had not suffered at the hands of the troops. Many towns were half-empty, homes and shops looted and burned, people either dead, driven into exile or hiding in the country side. Perhaps a third of Dacca’s population is gone; its economy is crippled and its people are so terrified that no one ventures outdoors at night. Not far from Dacca, a missionary said, “The soldiers killed 249 people in our village. Fortunately for the wounded, high-powered bullets tear right through them, so the doctors didn’t have to probe.” A farmer in a refugee camp along the Indian side of the border said, “The headmaster of our school was sitting on the veranda of his home, grading examination papers, when the soldiers dragged him out into the road and cut his throat.” Said another refugee, “The soldiers forced the doctor in our village to dig his own grave; then they shot him.” A doctor in a border hospital pointed to a woman who had been raped repeatedly by the troops in the presence of her four children after the soldiers had killed her husband
    “On the afternoon of March 25, Yahya, having broken off the talks with Mujib, returned to West Pakistan. At 11 O’ clock that evening, Tikka Khan was unleashed.Suddenly, all of Dacca rocked with explosions. Troops opened fire with artillery on the city; tanks rumbled throughout he streets, gunning down anything that moved. The dormitories of the university, a stronghold of Bengali nationalism, were riddled by machine-gun fire. The invading soldiers went on a rampage in the old city, a particular political stronghold of Mujib, breaking down doors, dragging people into the street and shooting them. Shops were looted and burned. the barracks of the pro-Mujib Bengali police were gutted by tank cannon. Troops burst into a telephone exchange and killed 40 persons on duty.Special West Pakistani army squads had lists of people-professors, doctors, businessmen and other community leaders - whom they dragged off to army headquarters. Most have never been seen again. Although Mujib’s followers urged him to go into hiding, Mujib refused. Tikka’s troops took him off to imprisonment and an uncertain fate in West Pakistan.With Dacca in ruins, Tikka sent his troops into the countryside, and in each town the ghastly pattern was repeated. Anyone associated with the Awami League was killed. Young men, Muslim and Hindu alike, were rounded up and murdered. In almost everytown, refugees report, women were raped.
    …The Indian government is making every effort to care for these piteous people, but the influx is so staggering that new miseries await them there. For instance, in one of more than a thousand squalid refugee camps in India, 150,000 people live in straw hovels surrounded by mud and filth. There are few latrines. and the stench is such that people cover their faces with cloth.
    Because of the vast numbers, refugees have to wait in line for as long as ten hours for their food rations - ¾ pound of rice a day per adult, plus some lentils, vegetables when available, and a little salt and cooking oil.The children suffer the most. Many are beginning to look like the starving children of Biafra, their ribs protruding, their stomachs distended. Almost all suffer from malnutrition or dysentery. Life-giving milk and other protein foods are available in some of the camps, but the rush is so great that many children never get any. A doctor at a border hospital says, “the children die so quickly that we don’t have time to treat them.” [ *Article by David Reed and John E. Frazer, Readers’ Digest, November, 1971. ] "
    The birth of Bangladesh in 1971 was a unique phenomenon- it was the first nation state to emerge after waging a successful liberation war against a post colonial state. The nine-month-long liberation war in Bangladesh drew world attention because of the genocide committed by Pakistan which resulted in the killings of approximately three million people and raping of nearly a quarter million girls and women. Ten million Bengalis reportedly took refuge in India to avoid the massacre of the Pakistan army and thirty million people were displaced within the country(Loshak,1971; Marcarenhas, 1971; Payne, 1973 ;Ayoob and Subramanyan, 1972; O’Donnell, 1984,Rounaq,2005,p.65)
    Eye Witness Accounts
    On the night of 25-26 March on the orders of General Yahya and the Pakistani ruling clique the Pak forces armed with mortars, cannons and recoilless guns attacked the citizen in their sleep.
    In an attempt to drown in blood and silence in terror the upsurge of Bengali Nationalism, the military junta of Yahya Khan unleashed the most barbaric war of extermination against the entire people of Bangladesh. In the wake of this war the occupation Pakistani Army indulged in an unparalleled orgy of wanton loot, rape, murder and destruction. It is these gruesome happenings which have been characterized by U Thant, the Secretary General of the United Nations, as “one of the most tragic episodes in human history” and as “ a very terrible blot in the page of human history.”
    Loren Jenkins of Newsweek, New York, was in Dhaka on March 25-26 and here is what he reported: “When the army decided to strike, it attacked without warning. Houses were machine-gunned at random. It was a blatant exercise in terror and vengeance, there can never be any excess for the sort of fire-power we saw and directed against unarmed civilians. There can be no excuse for the mescals burning of the shanty homes of some of the most impoverished people.” (April 12, 1971).
    On March 25, 1971, the Pakistan army launched Operation Searchlight to 'eliminate' the Awami League and its supporters in East Pakistan. The goal was to 'crush' the will of the Bengalis. The killing began shortly after 10 pm. In the first 48 hours the orgy of killing had ravaged Dhaka city.
    The Hindu population of Dhaka took the brunt of the slaughter. Dhaka University was targeted and Hindu students were gunned down. Mujib was arrested shortly after declaring Bangladesh independent. The rest of the Awami League leadership went into hiding and those that survived eventually fled to India. The genocide had just begun.
    On February 22, 1971 the generals in West Pakistan took a decision to crush the Awami League and its supporters. It was recognised from the first that a campaign of genocide would be necessary to eradicate the threat: 'Kill three million of them,' said President Yahya Khan at the February conference, 'and the rest will eat out of our hands.' (Robert Payne, Massacre [1972], page 50.)
    On March 25 the genocide was launched. The university in Dhaka was attacked and students exterminated in their hundreds. Death squads roamed the streets of Dhaka, killing some 7,000 people in a single night. It was only the beginning. Within a week, half the population of Dhaka had fled, and at least 30,000 people had been killed. Chittagong, too, had lost half its population.
    All over East Pakistan people were taking flight, and it was estimated that in April some 30 million people were wandering helplessly across East Pakistan to escape the grasp of the military. (Payne, Massacre, page 48.) Ten million refugees fled to India, overwhelming that country's resources and spurring the eventual Indian military intervention. (The population of Bangladesh/East Pakistan at the outbreak of the genocide was about 75 million.)
    But the will of the Bengali people was not broken on the night of March 25, 1971. On the contrary, while Dhaka burned, so did the illusion of a united Pakistan.
    Yahya Khan and the Pakistan army planned their genocide well. Yahya Khan aimed to crush the Bengali spirit once and for all. Before the crackdown all foreign journalists were expelled from East Pakistan. Only a handful managed to evade the Pakistani army.
    One of them was Simon Dring. On March 30, 1971 he filed a chilling report of the massacre that took place in Dhaka on the night of March 25. Dring reported that in 24 hours of killing, the Pakistan army slaughtered as many as 7,000 people in Dhaka and up to 15,000 people in all of Bangladesh.
    The Pakistan army employed tanks, artillery, mortars, bazookas and machine guns against the unarmed population of Dhaka. Their targets were students, local police, intellectuals, political leaders, Awami League supporters, Hindus and ordinary citizens. They carried out their ruthless killing spree with military precision.
    Dring described the attack on Dhaka University as follows:
    'Led by American-supplied M-24 World War II tanks, one column of troops sped to Dacca University shortly after midnight. Troops took over the British Council library and used it as a fire base from which to shell nearby dormitory areas.
    'Caught completely by surprise, some 200 students were killed in Iqbal Hall, headquarters of the militantly antigovernment students' union, I was told. Two days later, bodies were still smoldering in burnt-out rooms, others were scattered outside, more floated in a nearby lake, an art student lay sprawled across his easel.
    'Army patrols also razed nearby market area. Two days later, when it was possible to get out and see all this, some of the market's stall-owners were still lying as though asleep, their blankets pulled up over their shoulders.'
    The 'old town' quarter of Dhaka city was singled out for destruction by the Pakistanis because of strong Awami League support there and because there were many Hindu residents in the area. Here is how Simon Dring described the attacks on unarmed civilians:
    'The lead unit was followed by soldiers carrying cans of gasoline. Those who tried to escape were shot. Those who stayed were burnt alive. About 700 men, women and children died there that day between noon and 2 pm, I was told.
    'In the Hindu area of the old town, the soldiers reportedly made the people come out of their houses and shot them in groups. The area, too, was eventually razed.
    'The troops stayed on in force in the old city until about 11 pm on the night of Friday, March 26, driving around with local Bengali informers. The soldiers would fire a flare and the informer would point out the houses of Awami League supporters. The house would then be destroyed -- either with direct fire from tanks or recoilless rifles or with a can of gasoline, witnesses said.'
    After having massacred 15,000 unarmed civilians in a single day, the Pakistani soldiers bragged about their invincibility to Simon Dring:
    '"These bugger men," said one Punjabi lieutenant, "could not kill us if they tried."
    '"Things are much better now," said another officer. "Nobody can speak out or come out. If they do we will kill them -- they have spoken enough -- they are traitors, and we are not. We are fighting in the name of God and a united Pakistan."' In the name of God and a united Pakistan, genocide had just begun.
    Don Coggin, correspondent of Time, New York, reporting from Dacca wrote: “Before long, howitzer, tank, artillery and rocket blasts rocked half a dozen scattered sections of Dacca. Tracers arched over the darkened city. The staccato clatter of automatic weapons were punctuated with grenade explosions and tall columns of black smoke towered over the city. In the night came the occasional cry of ‘Joi Bangla’ (victory to Bengal) followed by a burst of machine gun fire” (Time, New York, April 5,1971).
    Saturday Review, edited by Norman Cousins, reported : “A machine gun was installed on the roof of the terminal building at Sadarghat, the dock area of old Dacca. On March 26, all civilians within range were fired upon. After the massacre, the bodies were dragged into buses, some were burned. Some were dumped into the Buriganga river, adjacent to the terminal,” (Saturday Review, May 22,1971).
    Quoting reports from British citizens who were evacuated from Dacca a few days after the start of the military operations, Guardian, London, April 5 wrote.
    Another British eyewitness account described how troops in Dacca shot nine professors, their families, and 21 students in one of the University resident buildings. Similar attacks were alleged to have taken place in three halls. At Tanti Bazar, troops surrounded the area and set fire to the bamboo and thatched houses in an area of a quarter of square mile where thousands lived. Women and children who attempted to flee were machine-gunned and bayoneted.
    “Two small Hindu villages on the infield of the Dhaka horse-racing tract (near the central district) were surrounded by the army and every man, woman and child was massacred. Three days later, a heap of bodies, three feet high, remained where they fell when they were machine-gunned.”
    Sanders, an Englishman, is an eye-witness to the ghastly rape of the Bengali girl students at the Rokeya Hall of the Dacca University. In an impassioned letter to the editor of the Blitz, Bombay (April 11), Sanders wrote: “April 2, 1971. It was around 5 p.m. when about 350 to 400 Pakistani troops attacked the hall. They entered all the rooms lodging the girls and dragged them out, tearing off their clothing one by one. The girls were pinned down to the floor, face upwards, leg mercilessly pulled apart and fully stretched then finally the brutal act of ramming. It was at this juncture that 50 brave girls jumped to their death from the hall

  • Most Needed is a Passport to Reach the Village!

    Most Needed is a Passport to Reach the Village!
    No one imagined disintegration of USSR even during first Gulf War!
    Deepening Strategic Partnership with India : Bush
    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com

    The question that remains is: how much of what happened to the USSR was going to happen anyway, and how much resulted from the efforts of President Reagan and hisadministration? Was it just coincidence that the closing years of the Soviet empire mirrored those of the most anti-Communist President in U.S. history? The purpose of this paper is to inquire as m to the specificity of President Reagan's plan to bring about the downfall of the Soviet Union and
    to discover if his policies constituted a new form of containment. This Study is germane to a complete understanding of the United State's part in the decline and fall of the Soviet Union and to the larger issues surrounding the appropriate application of national power to "contain" another nation's growth. I have chosen recent works by former U.S. government and administration officials, and journalists for my research. These sources represent the continuum of opinion that places President Reagan, on one end, as the mastermind behind the demise of the USSR and, on the other, as an ill-informed, passive by-stander. I have chosen these particular works in order to highlight current disagreements on President Reagan's rightful place and to offer a synthesis of
    these views. Additionally, I have supplemented these sources with interviews from Johnn enczowski, Peter Rodman and Angelo Codevilla -- all mid-level insiders during the Reagan years. Their perspectives, generally unbridled by concerns about attribution, assisted greatly in penetrating much of the myth about President Reagan and his administration.
    My line of inquiry will begin with an overview of U.S. containment policies (1947-- 1981) highlighting differences in President Reagan's approach to containing the Soviet Union. I will then offer case Studies of the top five external events leading to the disintegration of the Soviet Union: the insurgencies in Angola, Afghanistan and Central America; the Solidarity movement in Poland; and the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) to see if they reveal a coordinated anti-USSR effort. I will then address the effects of these activities inside the Soviet Union and finish with my Ronald Reagan And The Fall Of The Soviet Union: Plot Or Serendipity
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1995/BMH.htm
    As Reagan emerged as the God for the Western Capitalism and Imperialism to annihilate the Communist World, Bush is emergeing with similar images. Unfortunately, now we don`t refer USSR or Europe. It is India and Asia respectively. Indo US Nuclear Deal has opoend all military avenues for US strike power to disintegrate Asia and essentially India!
    The US has announced it has taken the unprecedented step of agreeing to the creation of a civil nuclear enrichment facility in India even though India is not a signatory to the international nuclear non-proliferation treaty. The deal, which has taken almost two years to finalise after it was announced by Manmohan Singh and George W.Bush in Washington, is likely to face tough questions from the US Congress, which now has to approve it.
    In a statement on Friday President Bush said that the deal marked an important step in “deepening our strategic partnership with India – a vital world leader”.

    My usndergraduate son reacted sharply watching News Updates on TV channels and opined that India is not safe! They are going to break it as they succeeded to break soviet Union.
    I rplied, ` I may not visit my anchestral village somewhere in Narail district (Jassore) and I am afaraid they won`t allow you to visit my village in Uttarakhand!
    When I shifted from Bareilly, just one hour from my village, my father was living and he was pained. He objected. It was 1991. Soviet union was no more. I told him that if Soviet Union may be diluted, the turmoils within tyhecountry are enough indication for our fate. We are deprived of our identity and it is better that I should shift myself to West Bengal. my father disagreed and hoped that India is somewhat a different polity and despite the experience of partition holocaust we have to survive as Indian Nation!
    No one imagined disintegration of USSR even during first Gulf War!
    Well, I may not repeat the same words at present as it is quite transparent that disintegration is the agenda of zionist hindu US post modern Manusmriti Galaxy order and there happens no resistance at all.

    The nationalities question in the Soviet Union was long an esoteric topic that Western specialists saw little purpose in studying. The Soviet authorities claimed to have resolved the national question, and Westerners who did not have a special interest in one or another region tended not to challenge that thesis. The collapse of the Soviet Union brought new interest, but not all the results of this suddenly refocused attention have been very satisfying. The book at hand, fortunately, is one of the better ones.
    We have not even addressed the Nationality questions despit AFPSA experiences in Kashmir and entire North East, Khalistan Movement , Assam Movement, Gorkhaland movement and the latest one, Kamtapuri movement! Rather we seek military solutions! RAW is assisted by MOSAD! US presence is felt in our internal affairs since Indira days very well! Now, we have opend all doors and windows of terrorism and foreign interference!
    Indian enslaved Masses are no better than detached, entertaining WWF audiance. The power game is another enterment for the people and the informations are nothing better than packed Entermaent or showbiz!
    Well, sometime during 2001 or 2002, I am not sure, I wrote a paoem titled `Passport’ which was published in SHAKSTKAAR”, a reputed hindi monthly published from Bhopal, MP. I haven`t got the issue as I am not able to accomodate all published writeups in my rented room!
    I wrote:
    SABSE JAROOREE HAI PASSPORT
    GAON TAK PAHUNCHNE KE LIYE
    MOST NEEDED IS A PSSPORT
    TO REACH ONE`S OWN VILLAGE
    They published some of my poems on globalisation and information technology.Bengali poet sukana bhattachary once wrote that there should not be any place for poetry in a country of Hunger. I am writing hard prose nowadays!
    The United States sees India as a key strategic partner and as a potential balance against China`s potential dominance of Asia, and is prepared to equip India for the role. Already one of the world`s biggest customers for arms, spending over $10 billion in the last three years, India is now planning to buy 126 multi-role combat jets. The US F-16 and F/A-18 Super Hornet are seen as the main contenders in a deal that could be worth another $10 billion. A new study by India`s Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry, 'Private Sector Participation in Defense,' suggests that India`s imports of military hard and software should reach $30 billion by 2012.
    This is the strategic context for the nuclear deal, which ends the isolation from the nuclear community that was imposed on India when it staged its first nuclear tests in 1998, and will allow India to import nuclear fuels and technology under the terms of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. This will be important for India`s civilian nuclear power program, but its main impact is symbolic in asserting the new closeness of the U.S. strategic partnership.
    My son is an engaged boy with his video games and virtual world and he is nowhere concerned with the day today world. But I am happy that he is worried of National unity and integration. But he and generation Next may not help it all as everything seems predestined in accordance with the great Karam theory. Our national leadership, political parties and intelleigentsia is least concerned for the future of Nation India until they lose the power game. No body cared for the outcome and suffring of the corores of Indians after Partition as our leaders were engaged in power transfer in favour and best interests of the ruling Brahminical Class.
    It is a striking coincidence that the Indian and U.S. governments should have announced the successful conclusion of their long-stalled nuclear cooperation deal in the same week that India established its first overseas military base.
    India`s new base, an electronic listening post and radar station on the island of Madagascar, is perfectly situated to monitor the international waterways around South Africa and the Indian Ocean with its oil tanker routes to Asia. India has also leased an atoll from Mauritius on which a similar facility is to be built. Its navy has secured berthing rights in Oman, and signed an agreement last year to patrol the Mozambique coast. In 2003, the Indian navy provided seaward protection for the African Union summit at Mozambique.
    The Indian Ocean is increasingly under Indian management, led by a fast-growing navy that is buying advanced French-made Scorpene 'stealth' submarines and has just acquired its first ever U.S. warship, the former USS Trenton, a large amphibious transport and landing ship, along with U.S. UH-3H helicopters. Three months ago, India completed a $1.1 billion deal with the United States for Hercules military transport.

    Nicholas Burns, the US undersecretary of state, who led the often difficult negotiations with his Indian counterparts, said it removed the “fundamental roadblock” in the way of a full global partnership between the world’s largest democracy and its richest.
    Mr Burns denied the deal would act as an incentive for other countries to develop nuclear weapons outside the NPT. He said that Iran was “inside the NPT but cheating” whereas India was outside the NPT but had a good record of non-proliferation. “This agreement sends a message to outlaw regimes such as Iran that if you behave responsibly you will not be penalised,” said Mr Burns.
    India denied that the agreement, which non-proliferation hawks say will free up indigenous Indian fissile material for use in the country’s atomic weapons programme, would contribute to an arms race in south Asia, destabilise the balance of power in the region and potentially prompt a copycat deal between Pakistan and China.
    According to Indian negotiators, the agreement makes no explicit reference to the US Hyde Act, which allows the US to demand the return of all fuel and technology supplied under the deal in the event that India tests a nuclear weapon.
    Shiv Shankar Menon, the Indian foreign secretary, said: “This is an agreement between two governments. It meets the concerns of the two governments. It’s not for us to interpret their laws, nor for them to interpret ours.” Mr Narayanan added: “We dealt with the administration and we believe they know how far they can go.”
    However, Mr Burns yesterday said the deal left untouched Washington’s rights under the law, which was passed by an overwhelming majority in both houses of Congress last December.
    Mr Burns said he hoped the International Atomic Energy Agency and the 45-member nuclear suppliers group, whose agreement is essential for the deal to become operational, would approve it within “several months”.
    The Indian nuclear establishment, represented in the negotiations by Anil Kakodkar, chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, has set aside its earlier reservations that the deal would compromise New Delhi’s strategic weapons programme. Mr Kakodkar said: “I don’t think there’s any reason for people to be concerned on that front.”

    Nuclear security and the Green Revolution
    During the 1971 War, the US had sent its Seventh Fleet to the Bay of Bengal as a warning to India keep away from East Pakistan as a pretext to launch a wider attack against West Pakistan, especially over the disputed territory of Kashmir. This move had further alienated India from the First World, and Prime Minister Gandhi now accelerated a previously cautious new direction in national security and foreign policy. India and the USSR had earlier signed the Treaty of Friendship and Mutual Cooperation, the resulting political and military support contributing substantially to India's victory in the 1971 war.
    But Gandhi now accelerated the national nuclear program, as it was felt that the nuclear threat from the People's Republic of China and the intrusive interest of the two major superpowers were not conducive to India's stability and security. She also invited the new Pakistani President Zulfikar Ali Bhutto to Shimla for a week-long summit. After the near-failure of the talks, the two heads of state eventually signed the Shimla Agreement, which bound the two countries to resolve the Kashmir dispute by negotiations and peaceful means. It was Gandhi's stubbornness which made even the visiting Pakistani Prime Minister sign the accord according to India's terms in which Zulfikar Bhutto had to write the last few terms in the agreement in his own handwriting.[citation needed]
    Indira Gandhi was criticized by some for not making the Line of Control a permanent border while a few critics even believed that Pakistan-administered Kashmir should have been extracted from Pakistan, whose 93,000 prisoners of war were under Indian control. But the agreement did remove immediate United Nations and third party interference, and greatly reduced the likelihood of Pakistan launching a major attack in the near future. By not demanding total capitulation on a sensitive issue from Bhutto, she had allowed Pakistan to stabilize and normalize. Trade relations were also normalized, though much contact remained frozen for years.
    In 1974, India successfully conducted an underground nuclear test, unofficially code named as smiling Buddha, near the desert village of Pokhran in Rajasthan. Describing the test as for peaceful purposes, India nevertheless became the world's youngest nuclear power.
    Main article: Green Revolution
    Special agricultural innovation programs and extra government support launched in the 1960s that had finally resulted in India's chronic food shortages were gradually being transformed into surplus production of wheat, rice, cotton and milk. The country became a food exporter, and diversified its commercial crop production as well, in what has become known as the Green Revolution. At the same time, the White Revolution was an expansion in milk production which helped to combat malnutrition, especially amidst young children. 'Food security', as the programme was called, was another source of support for Mrs. Gandhi in the years leading up to 1975. [1]
    Established in the early 1960s, the Green Revolution was the unofficial name given to the Intense Agricultural District Programme (IADP) which sought to insure abundant, inexpensive grain for urban dwellers upon whose support Gandhi -- as indeed all Indian politicians -- heavily depended. [5] The program was based on four premises: 1) New varieties of seed(s), 2) Acceptance of the necessity of the chemicalization of Indian agriculture, i.e. fertilizers, pesticides, weed killers, etc., 3) A commintment to national and internatonal cooperative research to develope new and improved existing seed varieties, 4) The concept of developing a scientific, agriculturial institutions in the form of land grant colleges. [6]. Lasting about ten years, the program was ultimately to bring about a tripling of wheat production, a lower but still impressive increase of rice; while there was little to no increase (depending on area, and adjusted for population growth) of such cereals as millet, gram and coarse grain, though these did, in fact, retain a relatively stable yield. Yet by the mid 1970's the IADP and its "Green Revolution" had collapsed in all but name due to bad administration, human greed, and heavy-handed politics among all parties on both state and national levels.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indira_Gandhi
    The deal has been stalled over some of the terms imposed by the U.S. Congress under the Hyde Act, which sought to impose certain restrictions on India. The first was to hold the deal hostage, allowing it to be suspended if India staged more nuclear tests. The second was to bring some, but not all, of India`s nuclear rectors under the intensive inspection regime of the NPT and the International Atomic Energy Agency.
    The most authoritative opposition to the deal has come from Peter Iyengar, former chairman of India`s Atomic Energy Commission, who listed his concerns in an exclusive United Press International interview at his home in New Delhi with this reporter in February this year.
    'As currently drafted, the agreement would force us to stop re-processing nuclear fuel, something we have been doing for thirty years,' Iyengar said. 'It would terminate our strategic program (India`s nuclear weapons program) by exposing us to sanctions if we conducted nuclear tests. And it puts impossible barriers in our path to ongoing and future research, including our well-developed programs for fast-breeder reactors and to use thorium rather than uranium as a nuclear fuel,' he added.
    'By saying that India shall not re-process fuel and not develop the fast-breeder reactors, this deal undermines our ability to produce energy in the future when uranium runs out,' Dr Iyengar went on. 'This is a question of national sovereignty, of India`s right and ability to decide such things for ourselves.'
    The Hyde Act was designed to be watertight, but somehow the Bush administration has managed to accommodate India`s concerns. This was done, to widespread surprise last week, when Vice President Dick Cheney took personal charge of the talks in Washington with India`s National Security adviser M.K. Narayanan, Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon and Anil Kakodkar, secretary of India`s Department of Atomic Energy
    Menon was packed and about to check out from his hotel when Cheney intervened and brought Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice into the final phase of talks, which opened with Cheney saying, 'This deal must be done.' The White House national security adviser Steven Hadley was also brought into the talks to fine tune the text of a document called 'The 123 agreement' that spells out the details of the deal.
    The precise terms have not yet been made public, and the final document is a frozen text, which means that it can now only be voted up or down, and not amended further. According to U.S. sources, it is based on Cheney`s traditionally robust view of the president`s prerogative over foreign policy and strategic issues, and allows George W. Bush or future presidents to give India a form of waiver under the terms of the Hyde Act when supreme U.S. national interests are deemed to be at stake.
    The Democratic-controlled Congress may have doubts about this, but potential presidential candidates may see its usefulness. The increasingly conservative U.S. Supreme Court, with two new Bush-appointed justices, is likely to sympathize with Cheney`s view of the presidential prerogative.
    The deal has been strongly backed by the wealthy and influential Indian community in the United States. Sanjay Puri, chairman of the U.S.-India Political Action Committee commented: 'The United States and India have achieved what everyone thought was impossible when President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh announced their plan for a civil nuclear agreement in July 2005. Exactly two years later, the two nations have not only reached an agreement, but created a lifelong partnership between two nations that are committed to democratic principles and the idea of energy independence.'
    This also seals the presence on the world stage of India`s emergence as a regional superpower in Asia, while becoming a close U.S. ally and a major economic and technological force. Next month, India will launch its first dedicated military reconnaissance satellite, CARTOSAT 2A, on one of its own launch vehicles. Two more advanced imaging satellites with Israeli synthetic aperture radars are to be launched next year for all-weather monitoring of Asian airspace, including China
    It may also not be a coincidence that these developments come as China is upgrading its ballistic missile facility at central-north Delingha, where launch pads for older Dong Feng-4 intercontinental ballistic missiles are being modernized for new DF-21 medium-range missiles. A report this month by the Nuclear Information Project for the Federation of American Scientists concluded that the DF-21s 'would be able to hold at risk all of northern India, including New Delhi.'
    End of the Soviet Union
    The August 1991 coup, designed to halt the weakening of the centralized USSR, ironically hastened the Union's dissolution. Declarations of independence by the constituent republics, the abolition of all-Union institutions and the transfer of their assets to the republics, and increasing international acceptance of these developments sapped what little strength there had been in the Union. While Gorbachev tried desperately to find a formula to halt the centrifugal process, his former political allies, reading the signs, abandoned him one after the other. And yet, there was no inevitability about the decision to replace the Soviet Union with a Commonwealth of Independent States. That decision, adopted by the leaders of Russia, Ukraine, and Belorussia, seems to have been made hastily if not whimsically.
    On August 23, 1991 Boris Eltsin, as President of the RSFSR, decreed the suspension of the Russian Communist Party on the grounds that it had lent its support to the coup attempt and had otherwise violated Soviet and Russian laws. Gorbachev, who upon returning to Moscow after the coup had tried to absolve the party of any blame and announced his intention of continuing his efforts to reform the party, was left with little choice but to resign as General Secretary of the entire (All-Union) party, which he did two days later. Seeking to counter the further erosion of central authority, Gorbachev persuaded a majority in the Congress of People's Deputies in early September to dissolve that body in favor of a State Council which would consist of republic leaders and Gorbachev and act in a temporary capacity until a new bicameral legislature could be elected. Aside from approving independence for the three Baltic republics, the State Council accomplished nothing and was largely ignored by republic governments. Eltsin, swelled with new powers granted by the Russian parliament, meanwhile accelerated the transfer of central institutions to Russian authority.
    December turned out to be the month in which the fatal blows to the Soviet Union were delivered. On December 1, voters in Ukraine overwhelmingly approved a referendum on independence and by a smaller margin elected Leonid Kravchuk, a former Communist Party boss turned nationalist, as their first president. A week later, at a hunting lodge in Belovezhskaia Pushcha, not far from the Belorussian capital of Minsk, Eltsin, Kravchuk and the Belorussian leader, Stanislav Shushkevich, signed a declaration terminating the Soviet Union and replacing it with the Commonwealth of Independent States. Gorbachev, who had not been consulted or informed beforehand, publicly responded by declaring his "amazement" and urging republic parliaments to discuss the draft Treaty on the Union of Sovereign States on which he had worked tirelessly over the previous months. On December 21, the presidents of all the other republics with the exception of Georgia (already embroiled in civil war) and the three Baltic states, declared their willingness to enter the Commonwealth. Finally, on December 25, Gorbachev announced his acceptance of the dissolution of the Soviet Union and his resignation as its president.

    In Lenin's party-state, the nationalities question was supposed to occupy only a minor role, a question of form in the constitutional structure that in turn had to carry Out the directions of the superior party structure. While critics now may point to failures in Soviet nationalities policy, they should remember that relatively few saw this as a significant question before the mid-1980s - least of all, most major Western Sovietologists. As late as January 1990, when Gorbachev made his vain pilgrimage to Lithuania, he and his entourage were still insisting that 'the national question is not the most important question in life'. As it turned out, this was a question of life and death for the Soviet Union.
    Gorbachev inherited a centralised party-state that faced serious economic problems. As Fowkes points out, he experimented with both party reform and political decentralisation, but through it all he wanted to keep his own position as the leader who maintained the integrity of the Soviet Union. When the going became rough, he tried to make his peace with the conservatives. He failed: the Soviet Union collapsed, and he lost his job.
    Please read:
    History of the Soviet Union (1985–1991)
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Soviet_Union_(1985-1991)
    The Causes and Consequences of the Collapse of the Soviet Union
    http://newarkwww.rutgers.edu/guides/glo-sov.html

    What were the causes of the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a socialist one party state?
    Firstly, it is important to highlight that the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 can be examined in two ways. It can be looked at in terms of the break-up of an empire; the reasons why the Soviet Union no longer exists as a federation of nations including Russia, the Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Armenia etc. Alternatively, it can be looked at in terms of reasons why the political system that governed the state collapsed. It is this latter perspective that will be examined in the course of this essay. While the former is no doubt an important question, it will only be considered to the extent that there is naturally a link between the government of a state and its component parts. Regional nationalism therefore shall only be examined in light of the effect...
    http://www.coursework.info/I_B_/History/What_were_the_causes_of_the_disintegration_of_the_Soviet_L10411.html
    Fall of the Soviet Union
    Back to Links

    In December of 1991, as the world watched in amazement, the Soviet Union disintegrated into fifteen separate countries. Its collapse was hailed by the west as a victory for freedom, a triumph of democracy over totalitarianism, and evidence of the superiority of capitalism over socialism. The United States rejoiced as its formidable enemy was brought to its knees, thereby ending the Cold War which had hovered over these two superpowers since the end of World War II. Indeed, the breakup of the Soviet Union transformed the entire world political situation, leading to a complete reformulation of political, economic and military alliances all over the globe.
    What led to this monumental historical event? In fact, the answer is a very complex one, and can only be arrived at with an understanding of the peculiar composition and history of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was built on approximately the same territory as the Russian Empire which it succeeded. After the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, the newly-formed government developed a philosophy of socialism with the eventual and gradual transition to Communism. The state which the Bolsheviks created was intended to overcome national differences, and rather to create one monolithic state based on a centralized economical and political system. This state, which was built on a Communist ideology, was eventually transformed into a totalitarian state, in which the Communist leadership had complete control over the country.
    http://www.coldwar.org/articles/90s/fall_of_the_soviet_union.asp
    What are the main factors responsible for the disintegration of the Soviet Union?
    First answer by anonymous. Last edit by 84.217.153.170. Question popularity: 146 [recommend question]
    Answer
    one very big factor was the economy or lack of one, the cold war was a full fledged war between the united states and russia, but rather than killing each other it was a war of weapons and development. we build a new rocket and they would try to build a better one to try to keep ahead, they send a man in orbit. we send one to the moon, they build a bigger bomber we build a faster one, etc.etc.etc.... this is a very expensive process on both sides, soon russia just could not keep up financialy any more. this was just one factor.

    Answer
    Russia fell primarily because the Great God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob caused it to fall. For more than 60 years Godless communism had enslaved and murdered people all over the globe and espoused that the state was God. It is humorous that He also used the false religion on Islam to break up the Soviet Union. Afganistan was the first chink in the mighty soviet armour. Then the other "stans" broke away. All those soviet vassel states with great numbers of muslems broke away and the communist lost control of their empire. Mainly God allowed thousands of Jews to return to return to Israel from Russia. The great red bully of the world was shaken to the core and split up when God decided that enough was enough!

    Answer
    The Soviet's command-economy was not able to compete with the free-market economy of the US and its allies. In almost every area of competition - excepting only nuclear armaments - the Soviet system fell behind. One example of this can be found in the production of Soviet steel. Around and after WWII, the Soviet system was behind the US in steel production. Since they used a command economy, this was a factor that had to be settled not via supply and demand but rather through the Soviet government's use of limited resources and time (e.g. currency and time). By the 1990s, Soviet steel production surpassed that of the US. Unfortunately for the Soviets, by this time there was a plethora of steel traded on the open markets. So while they did indeed begin to produce more steel than the US, it was more expensive for them to produce steel domestically than it was for the US to import it. This left the US with resources to spend on other "projects" - such as computer technology. This phenomenon was to repeat itself in a variety of other manners as well.
    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_main_factors_responsible_for_the_disintegration_of_the_Soviet_Union
    One indicator that has been tabulated, if not quantified, to everyone's satisfaction is that of the Soviet economy. It is know, for example, that in the 60s and 70s Soviet productivity in steel and coal caught up with and even surpassed that of the United States. But declines already had commenced in labor productivity and the quality of machine tools, while advances in science and technology increasingly proved illusory.
    Nevertheless, economic reports drawn by Western experts basically found that the Soviet situation, while somewhat gloomy, was still redeemable. These half-way optimistic measurements were even seized upon by the Soviet leadership to buttress their own traditionally overly optimistic assessment. Consumer goods, meanwhile, increased in number during these years but the distribution system was so broken down that milk rarely got delivered before souring and, though Soviets produced more shoes than anyone else in the world, customers were forced to stand in line time and again to buy several pairs because the sizes were so askew that it was necessary to acquire many pairs to make a fit. Housing meanwhile was atrocious with couples required to wait years before qualifying for a small apartment; the wait for cars also dragged on interminable, and after one finally arrived, it was not unusual for it almost immediately to experience mechanical problems.
    Defense costs, furthermore, were eating up an inordinate portion of Soviet expenditures. Because of the difficulty in measuring the Soviet GNP it was not always clear what percentage was being spent to this end. Experts now claim the West routinely underestimated the numbers. It is now believed that in years just prior to 1991 as much as 30 percent of the economy went toward the defense sector putting an enormous burden on the average citizen in terms of delayed consumer satisfaction. Then there were the costs incurred by shoring up overseas adventures such as those in Africa, not to mention the drain of the war in Afghanistan and the expense involved in maintaining Castro's lifeline.
    But all of this is preliminary to asking and attempting to answer what clearly has becom

Widgets

Footer

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.