Search blog.co.uk

Posts archive for: 23 June, 2007
  • Police Enters Nandigram

    Police Enters Trouble Torn Nandigram

    Palash Biswas

    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com

    German co to invest Rs 25 cr in West Bengal
    Economic Times, India - 5 hours ago
    ... of seals for hydraulics, steel plants and defence sector, Hunger GmBH will set up a unit at Sankrail, West Bengal, at an investment of Rs 25 crore. ...
    West Bengal a favourable investment destination: French envoy Times of India
    'French cos keen to invest in Bengal now' Financial Express
    Bengal a favourable investment destination: French envoy Mangalorean.com

    Left Fron is quite successful in its campaign of Damage control as nearly five months after they were barred from entering into the trouble-torn Nandigram, the West Bengal police have been able to set up camps in eight villages in the area.The state government is trying to broker talks between political parties at the local level at Nandigram to break out of the impasse ...The police on Friday entered to stop attacks from Marxist-dominated Khejuri on Nandigram and vice-versa, East Midnapore Superintendent of Police G A Srinivas said on Saturday. The SP hoped that the police presence would help in resuming development work in the area which was halted following violence. The Bhumi Ucched Pratirodh Committee convenor Sheik Suffian said that villagers of the troubled block had been initially apprehensive of the entry of police, but had accepted it as it would bring peace.

    Mamat Bannerjee isolated. Sidkullah Chowdhari has little impact. the left has got so many mass organisation besides its well trained cadres. Kisan sabha has got fifteen million mebers ! More over, CPIOM has got Multi Tier autonomous party organisation and the Local Committtees virtually dictate the police and administration. While the opposition has no organition at all! No grass root connection! No secoond string leadership. Thus, sustained Resistance is so impossible in West Bengal!

    Imam Bukhari was imported to convince Muslim Vote Bank in Bengal. he failed. Marathi writer Sahitya Academy winner Laxam Mane was the chief guest in Katha Sahitya Utsav, a gov sponsored proggramme. Though the representative of Bengal dalit Movement Manohar mauli Biswas was not allowed to say anything on Dalits` plights in Bengal. He was interrupted and ousted from the stage.All contemporary prose writes were present there. Poet Nirendra Nath Chakrabarti was Fecilated in another event by the Kolkata Mayor. Thus, after Media the most of the vocal inmtellectuals also have been managed well. Only Mahashweta Devi continues to write!
    Left has now the greatest challange to mange the Mini Front within Left Front. Nonagenerian Comrade Jyoti Basu has got the job!

    The fate of Kerala`s two top ruling party leaders chief minister V S Achutanandan and state-unit chief Penirayi Vijayan, who had been suspended from the politburo of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) for infighting, is to be decided at the three-day meeting of the party?s central committee beginning here tomorrow. The 85-member central committee, which has veterans like former West Bengal chief minister Jyoti Basu and Harkishen Singh Surjeet as members, is CPI(M)?s supreme elected body that meets occasionally to take key policy decisions.
    The CPI(M) is likely to discuss the situation in West Bengal where the leftists are faced with a dilemma of industrialisation versus rights of farmers. The party?s strained relations with the Congress government in Andhra Pradesh over the land rights issue is also likely to be discussed.

    The presidential elections, in which the CPI(M) and other Left parties have sided with the UPA, are also likely to figure in the meeting as would be the forthcoming elections for the post of vice-president.

    On the backfoot over the Nandigram issue, West Bengal's ruling Left Front major CPI(M) today sprang a surprise peace icon -- former Congress chief minister Bidhan Chandra Roy -- saying it would observe his birthday on July one as 'Peace Day for Nandigram.' As it progressively transpires, it is not just a captive police and a cowering administration that is to blame for the simmering violence in Nandigram.

    "July 1 is Dr Roy's birthday. Our party will take up state-wide programmes on that day to demand restoration of peace in Nandigram," CPI(M) state secretary Biman Bose said. Roy, a medical practictioner whose diagonistic ability was legendary, still commands respect among the people of West Bengal for his succesful efforts in setting up industries in the state from the late forties to the early sixties.

    "It was under Dr Roy's chief ministership that the Durgapur Steel Plant and a number of other industries were set up in the state. Since then there had not been any industry in the state. Only now are industries coming up," Bose said, explaining why Roy's birthday was chosen for the programme. Bose said a state-wide fund-raising programme to rehabilitate the homeless in Nandigram would be taken up from July eight to 14, involving the mass organisations, clubs, voluntary organisations and the common people.

    "This programme will not be taken up by the party. It will involve various organisations, clubs, institutions and the common people. The idea is to involve the people, irrespective of political views, in the rehabilitation of the homeless in Nandigram and the adjoining areas.

    When pointed out that July eight was the birthday of party leader Jyoti Basu, he asked journalists not to 'read' into the choice of date, saying it had nothing to do with the choice of date for the programme.

    Not even one note was out of tune as singers enthralled the audience at the Netaji Indoor Stadium in Kolkata for nearly two hours on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Left Front rule in West Bengal on Thursday.

    But the note of discord was evident when it came to the speeches that followed and also when a sizeable section of the audience started leaving immediately after CPM patriarch Jyoti Basu finished speaking and much before chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee had delivered his speech. Asking the Opposition to be more responsible, Basu recalled how he, as Leader of the Opposition, had helped in B C Roy's industrialisation programme. But he did not utter a word on the policy unveiled by his successor.

    CPM and other Front partners differed on some political issues as well, with the CM calling for "alternative Leftism" to make the state front-runner in agriculture, industry, education and culture, while RSP leader Kshiti Goswami and CPI leader Manju Majumdar stuck to "fighting capitalism and changing society while staying within a capitalist system".

    The thrust of the CM's speech was the need for rapid industrialisation. Appealing to the Opposition not to derail that, he said: "We don't know retreat." While mentioning about land reforms and that vested land is still being distributed, he said the state would have to advance industrially as youth, passing out from engineering and other colleges and universities, wanted industry. But Goswami said: "We mustn't lose sight of our goal."

    Unhappy with the level of unity in the Front, Basu said: "It is okay in Kolkata. But in districts, meetings are not held regularly. There must be a monthly meeting of the Front in every district."

    Forward Bloc leader Ashok Ghosh, too, called for more unity.

    We'll question all the IMA members who watched the CD. We'll also question the boy. Their statements would be treated as the main evidence," he said. Vachchani on Thursday told TOI that the doctor-couple wouldn't be arrested for the present: "We've taken suo motto action based on newspaper reports. I've ordered an inquiry. I've asked my officials to complete the probe within seven days or before. We'll arrest the couple and seal their hospital once their criminal conduct is proved."

    The police had been unable to enter Nandigram since January when roads were dug up to prevent their entry. They again made an attempt to enter on March 14, which led to police firing in which 14 people were killed.

    The eight villages where police camps have been set up are Garchakraberia, Kalicharanpur, 7 No Jalpai, Khodambari, Satengabari, Basudevpur, Sonachura and Adhikari.

    Over three decades, the Left Front in power may have been able to perfectly conceal the tension within but over the last ten months or so, it has been coming to the fore every now and then since the government acquired land forcefully in Singur.

    "Who's going to convince them that industrialization in itself is not development? This drive for industrialization is obfuscating the difference between the two. Development means inclusive growth and this form of industrialization cannot guarantee that,” said RSP leader Kshiti Goswami.

    The rift has been widening and the CPI-M has been alleged of being arrogant.

    "This arrogance will lead to strong reactions within the Left Front. And in that situation we'll have to rethink our political positions within the Front,” said Goswami.

    This certainly is the first in a long time that differences are getting bluntly surfaced, that too, over a sustained period of time.

    But the CPI-M doesn't see its allies as a threat which is understandable because they haven't grown in strength over the last thirty years.

    The three key partners: Forward Bloc, RSP and CPI - had bagged as few as 45 seats in all in last year's Assembly election, which is less than a fifth of the Left Front's 235 legislators in the Bengal Assembly.

    "We are confident that whatever differences are cropping up among ourselves, we are really in a position to resolve those differences through discussion,” said Left Front Chairman Biman Bose.

    Discussions so far have failed and as the rift widens, the CPI-M too seems to be rethinking its position on industrialization and consequent displacement.

    While there's no going back on industrialisation, partners of the CPI-M have forced the government to think of models for development with a human face.

    Oil majors join hands to market natural gas, Kolkata first stop
    Kolkata Newsline, India - 19 hours ago
    Kolkata, June 22: GAIL (India) Limited and Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) had entered into an understanding in April 2007 for a joint venture for ...
    Gail’s breather The Statesman
    GAIL enters JV with IOC for gas distribution Times of India
    GAIL eying 45000 crore turnover by 2011 Deepika

    Job cry from Tata trainees

    Bandel/Howrah, June 22: More than 200 students of the Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) in Howrah and Hooghly districts today boycotted classes demanding a “definite” assurance of jobs to land losers in the Singur Tata Motors project.At the Ramrajatala ITI in Howrah, about 187 students staged a demonstration.Yesterday, the students had submitted a memorandum to the institute’s acting principal, Soumen Basu, who forwarded it to Howrah district magistrate Khalil Ahmed.

    Gautam Polen, one of the protesting students, said the government had promised them jobs at the Tata Motors ancillary units. “But it has gone back on its promise. We will flatten the boundary wall of the factory if denied jobs.”

    Abhijeet Das, training as an electrician at the Bandel ITI, said confusion had led to the unrest. “We have heard that only those who get 90 per cent and above will be given jobs. We are confused and so we have decided to protest.”

    Director of industries M.V. Rao clarified that 90 per cent attendance, and not marks, is a must.

    In Delhi, a Tata spokesperson said: “If they successfully clear the training and related tests, they will become eligible for employment.”

    Foreign Secy. holds talks with Buddhadeb
    On the eve of the Foreign Secretary-level talks in Dhaka, Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon today held discussions with West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadev Bhattacharjee. The Foreign Secretary-level talks, the first to be held in Dhaka during the caretaker regime in Bangladesh, would review bilateral relations and were likely to centre around infiltration and militancy issues in particular, officials said. Declining to divulge the agenda, Menon told reporters that he had taken the advice of the Chief Minister and the Chief Secretary "which will be useful in tomorrow's talks." "My talks covered almost all important issues that concern both West Bengal and Bangladesh," he said. The Chief Minister said his talks with the Foreign Secretary touched upon many important issues "which cannot be discussed with you."

    Thirty Years of Left Front Government in West Bengal

    Buddhadeb Bhattacharya

    THE Left Front government in West Bengal has been in office for the last thirty years since its first installation on June 21, 1977. The uninterrupted tenure of this government, elected by the people of the state for seven consecutive terms, is a significant event in the history of world democracy.

    CHANGED LIFE IN COUNTRYSIDE

    West Bengal is free from religious intolerance, caste conflicts and ethnic tensions. The state has a glorious tradition of communal harmony. The people of West Bengal take special care for strengthening the democratic secular polity of our country.

    The Left Front government in West Bengal is committed to pursuing an alternative path of development aimed at raising the common man’s standard of living. We have been implementing schemes and programmes to mitigate the hardships of the economically backward and middle class people.

    West Bengal has made significant strides in several directions over the last three decades. Thirty years ago, our government initiated land reform measures. Major emphasis was placed on the redistribution of ceiling surplus land among the landless poor agricultural labourers. It was also decided to ensure the rights of sharecroppers. As a result of these land reforms, small and marginal farmers now own 84 percent of the total agricultural land in West Bengal. More than 55 percent of the beneficiaries belong to the SCs, STs and the minorities. The programme called Operation Barga has been successfully implemented and the names of a large number of sharecroppers have been registered in the record of rights relating to agricultural land in the state.

    In 1978, West Bengal gave a radically new orientation to its panchayat bodies following the electoral commitment of the Left Front. Since then, panchayats in our state, provided with decentralised powers, have been playing a very important role in building rural public assets and in executing the development schemes and projects in the countryside.

    We have taken steps to strengthen the institutional capacities of our panchayat bodies. Our efforts are being directed towards furthering gender equity and social inclusion. Our panchayats are also discharging their responsibilities of empowering women and of providing elementary education in various areas, along with promoting public health and livelihood options.

    The total number of Self-Help Groups (SHGs) in West Bengal is now 5.3 lakhs. These SHGs comprise 53 lakh members, of whom 90 per cent are women. The rural sanitation programme is progressing well in our state, and 74 percent of the rural households now have access to sanitation facilities. A number of gram panchayats and panchayat samities have been awarded Nirmal Gram Puraskar by the government of India.

    The land reform measures and the activities of village panchayats in West Bengal have brought about remarkable changes in the quality of life in the state’s rural areas. The effect of land redistribution has got reflected in the increase of foodgrain production. Irrigation facilities have been enhanced. Seeds and other inputs of cultivation are being provided to the peasants. The total foodgrain production, mainly rice, has been steadily increasing. Fish production, too, has reached new heights. West Bengal holds the top position in the inland fisheries sector in the country. The purchasing power of the rural people of West Bengal has significantly gone up, resulting in the increasing demand for industrial goods.

    SECOND STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT

    Now the state government is laying stress on the second stage of rural development programmes. Agri-business has been identified as one of the key areas of development in West Bengal. The state is now developing five agri-export zones, food parks, cold chain and other forms of infrastructure. A modern multi-food processing unit, set up by the Dabur in North Bengal, has started functioning. Frito-Lay India has established a food processing unit in the district of Howrah. Our government is striving hard to sustain its success on the agricultural front.

    Based on the significant growth in agricultural sector, West Bengal is moving fast to accelerate the pace of its industrial development. It is now recognised as one of the leading states in India in respect of industrial investment. The economic environment of West Bengal is conducive to the promotion of manufacturing and knowledge based industries.

    The economy of West Bengal has been growing at an average rate of more than 8 percent annum for the last few years. The state offers vast opportunities for investment in areas such as iron and steel, chemicals and petrochemicals, IT and IT enabled services, gem and jewellery, leather, engineering, agri-business, bio-technology, real estate, health services and tourism. The state government announced its industrial policy in 1994. West Bengal provides attractive facilities to investors. These include the availability of raw materials, an advantageous location, a good network of communications, low cost of operations, a sound agricultural base, a large and concentrated market, and a good pool of human capital and skills. I think investors are now convinced of the pro-active role of our government. The state government has been pursuing an industry friendly policy. For the last five years the annual industrial investment in West Bengal has been more than Rs 2,000 crore.

    West Bengal’s growth in some sectors deserves special mention. In the chemical and petrochemical sector, three major units --- Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation’s PTA plant, and South Asia Petrochemicals --- have been working successfully for the last few years. Japan’s single largest FDI in India has been made through the Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation’s PTA plant (MCC-PTA) at Haldia.
    In West Bengal, the iron and steel industry is regarded as one of the thrust areas of growth. West Bengal is a major leather producing state. The newly set-up Kolkata Leather Complex offers modern facilities for the development of leather related activities including tanning, manufacturing and designing. The West Bengal government is also concentrating on promoting micro and small scale enterprises and textiles. The state government is spearheading many initiatives and partnerships to develop West Bengal as the regional commercial hub in the East.

    Our government is stepping up efforts to develop the infrastructure sector. At present, the power position in the state is stable. We are proceeding with our plans for creating significant power capacity addition in the public sector. Three new satellite townships, world class expressways, ports, a seaport, a logistics hub, construction of roads and bridges are some of the important initiatives undertaken by us. It is necessary to appreciate the fact that the state government alone cannot develop, upgrade and maintain the infrastructure sector. We believe that the public-private partnership (PPP) can harmoniously work to offer adequate infrastructure facilities. We have already taken several effective initiatives in this area.

    SIGNIFICANT ACHIEVEMENTS

    Our state, though a late starter in the field of information technology, has achieved remarkable growth over the last decade. At the moment, there are more than 250 IT companies which are providing direct employment to over 50,000 professionals. These companies registered an export earning of over Rs 3,500 crore in the financial year ending March 2007. The IT industries in West Bengal are also creating jobs in the support service sector, housing projects, infrastructure etc. West Bengal today is the home to most leading names in the IT sector, including TCS, Wipro, IBM, Cognizant, PWC, HCL, Genpac, Skytech, Siemens, HSBC etc. Foreign as well as domestic IT companies are operating in the state, contributing to its economy.
    The department of information technology has been constantly striving to attract high-end IT companies, KPOs and BPOs to the state to generate more employment and increase export revenues. It is our vision to emerge among the top 3 states contributing around 15 percent to 20 percent of the total revenues generated by this sector in the country. The government is trying to focus on high-end and VLSI industry and to develop satellite IT hubs in towns such as Silliguri, Durgapur, Kalyani, Kharagpur and Haldia. While IT parks on PPP model have already been launched at Silliguri and Durgapur, efforts are being made to develop an advanced IT park near the IIT at Kharagpur.

    In the sphere of education, our government is making progress in spreading universal and free elementary education. We have accorded priority to the implementation of the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (Education for All campaign). A mass literacy programme has been continuing in the state over the years. West Bengal has achieved 75 percent literacy rate. Stress is being laid on extending and expanding the technical education schemes and vocational training programmes. Computer education has been introduced in the state on a fairly large scale. The number of schools has increased, and at the same time, the dropout rate is decreasing. The mid-day meal programme in schools is being carried out with the participation of all concerned. In new areas, colleges are being set up, and the growing number of students passing out from these institutions indicates the gradual improvement of our educational standards. Several universities with special orientations such as law, engineering, medicine, technology and animal and fishery sciences have been set up to meet the needs of a large number of students. All the universities of the state have been functioning creditably. The University of Calcutta has completed the 150 years of its existence. We are setting up some centres of excellence at the higher education level. Kolkata occupies an important place in the history of science education and research in India. Our state has the distinction of having a number of internationally reputed scientific research institutes. The Indian Institute of Science Education and Research at Kolkata, recently inaugurated by Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh, is a significant addition in the sphere of higher education and research in West Bengal. Our state is internationally acclaimed as a seat of culture. We must keep alive the cultural tradition of West Bengal.

    West Bengal has a comprehensive healthcare system. The state government caters to the healthcare needs of 72 percent of its people. Recently we have taken a number of steps to improve the condition of the state-run hospitals and health centres. Special care is being taken to improve the quality of the primary health centres in the state. We are concentrating on improving the health infrastructure.

    We are implementing and promoting different programmes to serve the interests of the scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, other backward classes and hill people. A minority sub-plan is going to be soon introduced in the state.

    West Bengal has a pioneering role in providing unemployment benefits to the workers of locked-out industries. The scheme, introduced in 1998, now provides financial assistance of Rs 750 per month to every worker of the registered factories and plantations that are locked out.

    We have already launched a scheme of provident fund for the unorganised sector workers in the state. Some schemes are being implemented for the welfare of the building and other construction workers of the state.

    It is incumbent on us to step up the all-round development of West Bengal. The process of economic development is moving from agriculture to industry. Thousands of young men and women are seeking jobs. It is they who will shape the future of our country. We cannot afford to fail them. We have to strive our utmost to live up to the people’s expectations.
    http://pd.cpim.org/2007/0624/06242007_buddhadev.htm

    Nandigram and After
    By Sudhanva Deshpande

    http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2007-06/24deshpande.cfm

    The small voice of history has delivered another statement in the local
    government by-elections in West Bengal. The people didn't write
    manifestos
    for or against this or that policy. They spoke at the polls.
    Even though these were by-elections, they were extensive enough, and
    given
    the acrimonious debates around the Singur and Nandigram issues, these
    elections had acquired an added importance. Since panchayat elections
    are
    fought around issues of local development, the questions of land
    acquisition, compensation and development were foregrounded.
    If the opposition charge of widespread resentment against the state
    government's drive towards industrialization, particularly in the rural
    areas, was correct, the elections results were expected to reflect
    that. On
    the other hand, if the Left Front's claim that it had the mandate of
    the
    people for industrialization was correct, the results would indicate
    that.
    What happened in the state as a whole? What happened in the two
    hotspots,
    Singur and Nandigram? And what happened at Salanpur, the site of the
    proposed Bhushan Steel plant?
    Two gram panchayats (local self-government bodies at the lowest,
    village
    level) fall in the Singur block of Hooghly district. These are
    Balarambati
    and Bora. The Communist Party of India (Marxist) won both.
    28 gram panchayats went to vote in Hooghly district. In the previous
    election in 2003, the Left Front had won 23, the Trinamool Congress 4
    and
    one seat had gone to an independent. In 2007, with greater political
    polarization, no independent candidate could win. The Left Front got
    23, the
    TMC 5.
    Nandigram falls within the Purba Medinipur district. Here, of the total
    25
    gram panchayat seats that went to vote, the Left Front held 16 and the
    opposition 9 (TMC 6, BJP 2 and 1 independent) in 2003. This time
    around, the
    opposition tally dropped to 6 (TMC 4, independent 2), while the Left
    Front
    tally increased to 19. The one seat in Nandigram itself voted left.
    At Salanpur, near Asansol, the Left Front retained its seat, with its
    victory margin going up from 600 the last time around to 4000 this
    time.
    In the state as a whole, of 398 gram panchayats under vote, the Left
    Front
    had won 249 in 2003, while the opposition had bagged 147 (Congress 37,
    TMC
    40, BJP 8 and 62 independents). This time, the Left Front increased its
    tally marginally, to 256, while the opposition got 142 (Congress 43,
    TMC 45,
    BJP 5, independents 49). In other words, in the state as a whole, while
    the
    Left Front and the opposition more or less maintained their overall
    positions, the greater political polarization meant that independents
    were
    squeezed out.
    These are the results at the lowest level, the gram panchayat, where
    the
    effects of land acquisition would be felt most sharply.
    At the next level, the panchayat samiti, of the total 94, the Left
    Front had
    won 64 in 2003, while the opposition had 30 (Congress 8, TMC 3, BJP 1,
    independents 18). This time around, the Left Front increased its tally
    marginally, to 65, while the opposition got 29 (Congress 6, TMC 9, BJP
    1,
    independents 13). In other words, once again, the independents tended
    to get
    squeezed out, while the TMC gained 6 seats over its previous tally of
    3.
    In Purba Medinipur (where Nandigram itself falls), of the 6 seats, the
    Left
    Front and TMC had 3 each in 2003. This changed to 4-2. The Left Front
    wrested one seat from the TMC. In Hooghly, site of Singur, which has 2
    seats, the Left Front had both in 2003. This time, it lost one to the
    TMC.
    At the next level, the zilla parishad, of the total 24, the Left Front
    had
    22 and the opposition 2 in 2003. This time around, the Left Front
    slipped to
    19, while the opposition got 5. This difference of 3 is accounted for
    by
    Howrah, which is really an extension of Kolkata and where the Left
    Front
    lost both the seats it held earlier, and by South 24 Parganas, where
    the
    Left Front lost one of the four it held the last time.
    In urban areas, the Left Front lost some of its edge. In the municipal
    elections, of 104 wards that went to poll this time, the Left Front won
    62
    and the opposition 42. This has to be compared to 72 and 32 the last
    time
    around.
    The TMC wrested the Panskura municipality from the Left Front. This was
    the
    one result the media went to town with. Why? Because this was supposed
    to
    show that the Left Front, the CPI (M) in particular, was losing ground
    in
    West Bengal, especially because of people's anger over land
    acquisitions.
    Some reports made it appear as if Panskura borders Nandigram.
    This is nonsense. Neither does Panskura border Nandigram (it is at the
    other
    end of the district), nor have the rural areas voted against the left.
    In
    fact, in Panskura, the anti-left forces ganged up to give Mamata
    Banerjee
    her dream mahajot, grand alliance. In areas where she had campaigned
    most
    vociferously, however, she lost. To reiterate what has been shown
    above, in
    Singur, in Nandigram and in Salanpur, people have voted left.
    The relative reverses suffered by the left have been in urban areas,
    not
    rural. Logically, it should have been the other way around. If farmers'
    lands were being expropriated forcibly to set up industries that would
    benefit urban consumers, as was the opposition charge, then surely the
    villages should have voted for the opposition and the urban areas for
    the
    left.
    Mamata Banerjee, incorrigible as she is, has made the usual shrill
    noises
    about the CPI (M)'s "strong-arm tactics." This is nothing new. She has
    made
    the exact same noises in each and every election she has lost, barring
    the
    2006 Assembly election, which the Election Commission watched over like
    a
    hawk. Even the Congress on the one hand and the news media on the
    other, no
    friends of the CPI (M), no longer makes this accusation. To be sure,
    some
    Maoists continue to shriek about CPI (M) intimidation, which seems a
    bit
    rich, given their own predilection to wanton violence.
    The left response to the election results has been more mature. Jyoti
    Basu,
    who had said he was "a little worried" about the elections, expressed
    "relief" after the result. Biman Bose, chairperson of the Left Front,
    said,
    "It is too early to interpret the results as a mandate for or against
    industrialisation." The implication is that the real verdict will come
    next
    year, when the scheduled panchayat elections will take place all over
    the
    state.
    A number of prominent intellectuals and activists have been unhappy
    with the
    CPI (M) over Singur and Nandigram. In our analysis of the political
    economy
    of the crisis, Vijay Prashad and I argued that these events must "give
    us
    pause." (http://www.counterpunch.org/prashad05232007.html). We had
    further
    stated that "the Left Front must be judged, and it must face as much
    materialist critique as possible."
    The same must apply to critics of the left. There is no question, as
    Vijay
    Prashad and I argued, that the critics of the left "could play a good,
    critical role in West Bengal, pushing from the left, criticizing and
    learning." However, this pushing, criticizing and learning can only
    happen
    if we, intellectuals and activists, learn to confront hard realities
    and
    listen to the people.
    The Left Front had sought the mandate of the people in the last
    Assembly
    elections (in 2006), on the plank of re-industrialization,
    employment-generation and development. In elections where its every
    step was
    closely scrutinized by a hostile Election Commission, through a
    campaign
    that was absolutely violence-free, with a massive voter turnout, the
    Left
    Front won a massive mandate, increasing its tally from two-third of the
    state Assembly to three-fourth. Even Mamata Banerjee had to admit that
    the
    elections were free and fair.
    The recent elections, though they did not cover the entire state, were
    still
    a massive exercise in popular democracy. The elections were remarkably
    violence-free. The voting percentage was 85%. The Left Front won 64% of
    the
    village-level gram panchayats, 69% of the block-level panchayat
    samitis, 79%
    of the d

  • Sunita`s Achievement REcord Breaking, But NASA Works With Pentagon

    Sunita`s Achievement REcord Breaking, But NASA Works With Pentagon
    AS an Indian-American astronaut Sunita Williams she has just made a crucial contributionto US plan of SPACE Domination!

    Palash Biswas
    Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
    Email: alashchandrabiswas@gmail.com">palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com
    After the Cold War: NASA’s Role in American Foreign Policy ...... The United States holds interests in protecting intellectual property ...

    Shuttle Atlantis Crew Returns Home After Successful Mission.Family and supporters across the country on Friday offered prayers for the safe-return of Indian-origin American astronaut Sunita Williams, whose return has been delayed due to bad weather.In Agra, thousands of Muslims at their Friday prayers fervently hoped that Williams returns home safely.
    Space shuttle Atlantis makes a safe landing at the Edwards Air Force Base in California at 1:19 IST, Saturday. Atlantis was carrying Indo-American astronaut Sunita Williams and six other astronauts.
    Space shuttle Atlantis descended to a smooth landing at Edwards Air Force Base, California, concluding a successful assembly mission to the International Space Station (ISS) today (June 23, 2007). Indian-American astronaut Sunita Williams returned to earth after a record 195-day stay in space. With Commander Rick Sturckow and Pilot Lee Archambault at the controls, Atlantis landed at 1:19 IST at the Mojave Desert where it was diverted after poor weather at the Kennedy Space Centre in Cape Canaveral forced mission managers to skip three landing attempts there over the last 24 hours. The STS-117 crew began its mission June 8 and arrived at the station June 10. They quickly began work to install the Starboard 3 and 4 (S3/S4) truss structure to the outpost and retracted a set of arrays on the Port 6 (P6) truss. The (S3/S4) contains a new set of solar arrays that increases station power-generation capabilities. The P6 will be relocated during a future assembly mission.

    Meanwhile, NASA Agrees To Cooperate With India On Lunar Mission (May 10, 2006) -- NASA will have two scientific instruments on India's maiden voyage to the .Moon!..
    Blind Nationalism kills our vision to judge objectively our position. Suniata may be a National Icon today, but she is an American citizen. AS an Indian-American astronaut Sunita Williams she has just made a crucial contributionto US plan of SPACE Domination!
    It sounds quite cruel! But it is hard ,real fact! Please do understand!
    Just take a look, how a developing country like India changed its reputation in International scenario by its consistent efforts! While our scientists late Kalpana Chawla and now, Sunita Williams work for Space domination for US Imperialism and we have no option to use our own talents and lag behind, it is quite easy to create a much hyped ICON readymade. As a sovereign and free Nation how do we ignore the global domination of zionist US imperialism!If anything should make people wake up and smell the coffee, it’s the US ‘posture’ on nuclear weapons. In a new round of accelerated development of so-called battlefield nuclear weapons, the US have signaled to the world that the use of nuclear weapons is a prerogative that they reserve entirely for themselves and that their use will now be part of a ‘conventional’ warfare scenario. Moreover, they project their development and use for the next 50 years including space-based weapons systems designed to ‘take out enemies’ from the safety of orbit.
    It is not likely that peace can be maintained in the longer term without sustainable development. Similarly, it is unlikely that sustainable development can take place in a climate dominated by war and the preparations for war. In order to assess the prospects for both peace and sustainable development, we must take into account the broad global trends of our time: political, economic, military and cultural.
    In a classified document entitled "The Nuclear Posture Review", portions of which have been leaked to the press, the US lays out exactly what it thinks about nuclear disarmament in the post-Soviet period – no can do. This in spite of its signing legally binding international agreements to ban the acquisition of a new generation of nuclear weapons, testing and the eventual elimination of its existing stockpile.
    Using the ‘war on terror’ as a pretext, thinking the unthinkable has become doing the undoable, for once the idea that the use of ‘mini-nukes’ is transformed into policy, the door is opened and a new propaganda offensive will be unleashed on the US public, to get them to accept the idea that in order to ‘survive’, deaths in the order of 20 million of its own citizens is acceptable. In a paper written by Keith Payne and Colin Grey, George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld’s very own Dr. Strangelove (twins), bizarrely entitled ‘Victory is possible’, they write.
    Sunita William's message
    Wednesday, June 13, 2007 07:37:35 pm

    SUNITA’S MESSAGE: Sunita Williams delivers her message from aboard Atlantis
    NASA to get shuttle tear stitched as concern over Atlantis crew mounts. Damage to Atlantis had raised alarms over the safety of the space shuttle crew. Sunita Williams also sends over her latest message from outer space.
    In a live satellite press conference, Sunita Williams spoke about her experience from aboard Atlantis. She participated in the Boston marathon from outer space, a stint never before completed by a woman astronaut.
    She quoted, "Our mission has been very satisfying and successful. I have felt homesick but I have enjoyed myself. I look forward to getting back to Earth now. I'm grateful for the warm support that I've received."
    The readers are all welcome to send in their sms'es for Sunita Williams. Here's wishing her a safe journey back home.
    Sunita lands safely at back-up site Commander Sunita Williams, who on Friday became the woman who has spent the longest time in space, joined Nasa as a navy experimental test pilot and flew helicopters in the 1991 Gulf war.Williams, 41, said her Indian heritage is a source of pride for her and others.
    "I am half Indian and I've got a, I'm sure, a group of Indian people who are looking forward to seeing this second person of Indian origin flying up in space," she said in a pre-flight NASA interview.
    "People on the ground being able to relate to those people in space really makes people start to wonder, 'Wow, what else can we do?'"
    Her parents live in the Boston area, where her father, Deepak Pandya, is a physician. She was born September 19, 1965, and is married to Michael Williams. They have no children.
    Williams left Earth on December 9, 2006 aboard a previous shuttle mission, and before returning aboard the Atlantis Friday set a record of four space walks by a woman, totalling 29 hours, 17 minutes.
    She became the only person, male or female, to run a marathon in space, finishing in four hours and 24 minutes according to the counter on the space station treadmill.
    Her self-effacing attitude deflates conventional wisdom.
    "I graduated from my high school OK. Not, not absolutely number one, I was just OK," she told Nasa.
    Neither was being an astronaut her number-one career choice.

    ISRO to slash fee after commercialising GSLV launches
    NewKerala.com, India - 22 Jun 2007
    ''We are the cheapest in the world, though Indian Space budget was just two per cent of NASA and nine per cent of European Space Agency,'' Mr Renganath said ...
    Indian origin Sunita Williams is true Miss Universe-The United ...CROWNED: Sunita Williams has emerged as a true Miss Universe - after she conquered space holding several space flight records (TOI Photo) ...
    timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2133770.cms - 43k - 22 Jun 2007 -
    Indian Space Research Organisation
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to: navigation, search
    Indian Space Research Organisation

    Established
    1969
    Administrator
    G. Madhavan Nair
    Budget
    815 million USD(2006)[1]
    The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) is India's national space agency. With its headquarters in Bangalore, the ISRO employs approximately 20,000 people, with a budget around 815 million USD at March 2006 exchange rate.[1] Its mandate is the development of technologies related to space and their application to India's development. The current Chairman of ISRO is G. Madhavan Nair. In addition to domestic payloads, it offers international launch services.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Space_Research_Organisation
    Imperial news and the new imperialism
    The prosecution by the US administration of the illegal war against Iraq was facilitated in no small measure by the collusion of the media corporations with the administration. As the following analysis shows, the major US television networks adopted a framework of war reporting almost totally compliant with the policies of the Bush administration.
    Oliver Boyd-Barrett
    SCHOLARS of media news reporting have long identified the importance of ?frames? in determining the events and issues that get to be reported, how they are covered, and how they are interpreted.? During the Cold War, for example, much reporting by Western media of international affairs was governed by the assumption that ?importance? was defined by whether events or issues had implications for the balance of global power between the US and the Soviet Union.?
    http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/twr151i.htm
    The NASA plan is portrayed as the next phase of the space agency's exploration agenda after space shuttles are retired in 2010. NASA's ambitious schedule includes a 2009 test of one of the lunar spaceships, a 2014 manned test flight of the new Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) without a Moon landing, and a 2020 flight with a four-astronaut crew that would land on the Moon for a short visit. NASA envisions people living on the Moon for six-month intervals beginning in 2024.
    According to a Pentagon website, "The principal objective of the lunar observatory mission though was to space qualify lightweight sensors and component technologies for the next generation of Department of Defense spacecraft [Star Wars]. The mission used the Moon, a near-Earth asteroid, and the spacecraft‚s Interstage Adapter (ISA) as targets to demonstrate sensor performance. As a secondary mission, Clementine returns valuable data of interest to the international civilian scientific sector."
    In the end, the NASA plan to establish permanent bases on the Moon will help the military "control and dominate" access on and off our planet Earth and determine who will extract valuable resources from the Moon in the years ahead. NASA’s space telescopes, present and future (also at Annex D), ... and to help Headquarters in its role regarding other US agencies and foreign activities. ...
    U.S. scientists have selected seven proposals for future lunar science activities and established two new space research programs.
    The proposals and programs are part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's planned renewal of human exploration of the moon.
    The space agency chose seven proposals from more than 70 plans submitted during the Lunar Sortie Science Opportunities Program. The proposals are designed to result in advanced development for simple, autonomous instrument packages deployed on the lunar surface by astronauts. Such "suitcase science" packages could open a wide variety of research applications regarding the moon and the lunar environment, NASA said.
    "The proposals we received show that the scientific community is excited about the opportunity to capitalize on the nation's planned lunar outpost," said Alan Stern, NASA's Science Mission Directorate associate administrator. "The moon has much to teach us about itself, the history of our solar system and even the history of the sun."
    NASA, later this year, will select researchers to perform detailed investigations using instruments aboard the lunar reconnaissance orbiter during its first years in lunar orbit.
    The space shuttle Atlantis and its crew are home after completing a 14-day journey of more than 5.8 million miles in space. Atlantis' STS-117 mission successfully increased the power capability of the International Space Station, preparing for the future delivery of European and Japanese laboratories.
    Atlantis' Commander Rick Sturckow, Pilot Lee Archambault and mission specialists Jim Reilly, Patrick Forrester, Steven Swanson, John "Danny" Olivas and Sunita Williams landed at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., Friday at 3:49 p.m. EDT.
    Atlantis' crew attached the new S3/S4 solar array truss segment on the right side of the station's backbone, deployed a new set of solar arrays, and retracted the Port 6 starboard solar array back into its box. The station has a new look with two symmetrical solar panels mounted on each end of the station's truss.
    Reilly, Olivas, Swanson and Forrester, with the help of crewmates, made four spacewalks to complete the construction tasks. They activated the truss segment and the Solar Alpha Rotary Joint, which allows the new arrays to track the sun, and helped fold the Port 6 array. During the third spacewalk, the crew repaired a 4-by-6 inch raised corner of a thermal blanket on the port side Orbital Maneuvering System pod. Aerodynamic forces during Atlantis' ascent lifted the blanket.
    While the crew worked in space, ground teams were troubleshooting a problem with Russian computers that help control the station's attitude. Russian specialists worked closely with teams in the United States to recover the computer capabilities.
    NASA astronaut and station Flight Engineer Clayton Anderson, who launched with the crew aboard Atlantis, remained on the station. He is scheduled to return home aboard space shuttle Discovery on a mission targeted for launch in October. Anderson replaced Williams, who set a new record for a single, long-duration spaceflight by a woman with 195 days. She arrived at the station in December 2006 aboard space shuttle Discovery.
    STS-117 was the 118th space shuttle flight, the 21st flight to the station, the 28th flight for Atlantis and the first of four missions planned for 2007.
    Several inspections in orbit revealed no critical damage, and Atlantis' thermal protection system was declared safe for re-entry on flight day 13. Weather concerns prevented the crew from returning to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center, Fla., the primary end-of-mission landing site. In 7-10 days, Atlantis will be transported approximately 2,500 miles from California to Florida on the back of a modified 747 jumbo jet. Once at Kennedy, Atlantis will be separated from the aircraft to begin immediate processing for its next flight, targeted for December 2007.
    With Atlantis and its crew safely home, the stage is set for the next phase of International Space Station assembly. Preparations continue for space shuttle Endeavour's launch, targeted for August, on the STS-118 mission to deliver the S5 truss segment to the station.
    For more on the STS-117 mission and the upcoming STS-118 mission, visit:

    Since its inception in 1958, NASA has accomplished many great scientific and technological feats in air and space. NASA technology also has been adapted for many nonaerospace uses by the private sector. NASA remains a leading force in scientific research and in stimulating public interest in aerospace exploration, as well as science and technology in general. Perhaps more importantly, our exploration of space has taught us to view Earth, ourselves, and the universe in a new way. While the tremendous technical and scientific accomplishments of NASA demonstrate vividly that humans can achieve previously inconceivable feats, we also are humbled by the realization that Earth is just a tiny "blue marble" in the cosmos. Check out our "Thinking About NASA History" folder online as an introduction to how history can help you.
    Click here to view our commemorative site on the 45th anniversary of the Mercury Friendship 7 mission (when John Glenn became the first American to orbit the Earth).
    http://history.nasa.gov/
    Why Explore Space?
    "Today," writes NASA Administrator Mike Griffin, "NASA is moving forward with a new focus for the manned space program: to go out beyond Earth orbit for purposes of human exploration and scientific discovery." Administrator Griffin makes the case for completing the International Space Station, "the most complex construction feat ever undertaken," as a stepping stone to future exploration.
    "Using the space station and building an outpost on the moon to prepare for the trip to Mars are critical milestones in America's quest to become a truly spacefaring nation," Griffin writes. "I think that we should want that. I want that. I want it for the American people, for my grandchildren, for my great-grandchildren."
    + Read More
    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/exploration/main/index.html
    What Does NASA Do?
    10.17.05

    NASA's mission is to pioneer the future in space exploration, scientific discovery, and aeronautics research.
    To do that, thousands of people have been working around the world -- and off of it -- for more than 45 years, trying to answer some basic questions. What's out there in space? How do we get there? What will we find? What can we learn there, or learn just by trying to get there, that will make life better here on Earth?
    http://www.nasa.gov/about/highlights/what_does_nasa_do.html

    [PDF] NASA takes lead U.S. role in Earth observation - IEEE Technology ...File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
    NASA. Takes Lead. US. Role in. Earth. Observation. A global view. of. the Earth’s biosphere. Shown are three-year composite images of ocean chlorophyll con- ...
    ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel1/44/3511/00124443.pdf?arnumber=124443 - Similar pages
    U.S. Imperialism - International Imperialism / War - AnarkismoThe following document of Basic Strategy, dealing with US imperialism, was adopted at .... NASA won the space race, producing incalculable repercussions on ...
    www.anarkismo.net/newswire.php?story_id=5032 - 53k - Cached - Similar pages
    America searches for a new imperialism - Opinion - www.theage.com.auThe Pentagon is talking about training other countries' peacekeepers to lighten the burden on the US. The State Department boasts of some NASA software that ...
    www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/05/10/1084041332251.html - 30k - Cached - Similar pages

    DOMINATION OF SPACE
    "The Imperialization of Space" by F.H. Knelman, Ph.D.
    The U.S. represents a stage of super-imperialization whereby it is planning to colonize the world from the bastions of outer space. The agenda consists of two basic elements. Firstly it is to facilitate the universality of capital investment based on an exclusive concern with economic growth in isolation from all other social concerns. The second element is to create a global enforcement system based on the militarization of space. Behind these policies, guiding them, is an elite group of strategic planning institutions - the National Security Council, The CIA, the National Security Agency plus a network of corporate -based ³think tanks², consulting firms and bogus organizations, all guided by the above agenda. This policy has become globalized, now operating on a planetary basis and prepared to intervene anywhere in the world with military support for its agenda. All of this, in effect, constitutes the force of Pax Americana, largely unopposed in a unipolar world. And the ultimate support for this state of organized exploitation is the strategic nuclear arsenal of the U.S., coupled to the building of an advanced national missile defense (NMD) system. A series of presidential directives from Reagan through George W. Bush have consolidated the policy of preparing to fight and win a nuclear war, including one against Russia. This is supported by a strategic nuclear ³hit list², identifying every enemy target, known as the Single Integrated Operational Plan or SIOP. The SIOP is an operational nuclear plan which identifies all enemy targets of value. This is coupled to the entrenched counterforce doctrine, i.e. to maintain a force capable of destroying all of the Russian nuclear targets identified in the SIOP, i.e. all its strategic nuclear weapons sites, all other launchers and its Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence centres (CCCII), performing nuclear lobotomy, in a single counterforce strike. It has been calculated that 15 million Russian civilians would be killed in such an attack, which is operationalized. (W.M. Arkin, The Bull. of the Atomic Scientists, Sept./Oct., 2000, p.72). This is equivalent to two holocausts, clearly an act of extreme criminality. China is also a target of a SIOP through a presidential directive signed by Bill Clinton (W.M. Arkin, The Bull. of the At. Sci., July/Aug., 2001, p.72). The Pentagon also prepares Integrated Strategic Offensive Plans (ISOPs) for Russia and China. All of this is coordinated by Strategic Command (STRATCOM) headquarters in Omaha. The role of STRATCOM is to develop SIOPs and ISOPs which are then codified by presidential directives. Thus the Pentagon identifies the targets and the plan becomes codified by the administration, a highly questionable role for a country claiming to be a democracy, particularly when these plans are not made public for debate and are intrinsically criminal in nature. Still other features of the global agenda of the U.S. relate to the geopolitics of oil. This is directed to secure the present and future sources of oil anywhere on the planet with a focus on the Persian Gulf and an increasing interest in the Caspian Sea region. In part this was the basis of the operation in Kosovo, with the additional bonus of ideological cleansing. In these respects the U.S. dominates and co-opts NATO. It is dedicated to remove all obstacles to the absolute freedom of enterprise, including the destruction of regions with social or socialist programs. This is a continuation of its historical intervention in the countries of Central America. The policy of ideological cleansing accounts for the U.S. activities in the Balkans, including Kosovo, of course. But in a subtle way it also accounts for the general attack on all countries with national social programs such as health care. The case of Canada is a classic example of the pressures exerted by the U.S. to erode our national programs, seize our critical resources and, in general, force us to privatize . The instruments for this are the so-called ³free trade² agreements supported by the U.S. control of the related international bodies such as WTO, IMF and the WB. The net result of this blind intractable support of free enterprise is to enrich the rich and impoverish the poor. The statistics of this deepening division are stark, with multinationals more powerful than entire countries and a growing concentration of wealth in the face of increasing global poverty. This trend is supported by the lie of ³trickle-down² economics. In the case of the remaining communist countries, aside from the deliberate isolation of Cuba, the U.S. is using the more subtle process of capitalist seduction in its relations with Russia and China, as well as North Korea and Viet Nam. In the case of Russia and China it has had some success, although there is a political backlash developing. In its military strategy vis-à-vis these two countries, it has used a crude deception whose centrepiece is its National Missile Defense (NMD) project. The heart of this deception is to offer some significant reduction in strategic missiles while building a favoring number of anti-missiles, i.e. in a ratio to neutralize offense. But even further, the U.S. is dedicated to the policy of counterforce or ³preemptive defense², a true oxymoron, as we have earlier described. The nuclear strategic policy was given its initial impetus under President Ronald Reagan, who was not only a captive of a group of visceral anti-communist advisers, but also a believer in the alleged biblical prophecy of Armageddon (see my book, ³America, God and the Bomb: The Legacy of Ronald Reagan², (Vancouver: New Star Books), 1987). Every president, in turn, supported the general thrust of this policy, but it has been given new life under George W. Bush, not merely more right-wing than most of the last few presidents, but an ideal dupe of his collective advisers including, of course, Vice-President Dick Cheney and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, a true conservative hawk, formerly with the Hoover Foundation. George W. Bush has placed the U.S. in increased isolation by threatening to bypass the 1972 ABM treaty, by refusing to support the international criminal court or to sign the Biological Weapons Convention or the Kyoto Protocol. Even his national rating is dropping as he eagerly supports a patient¹s right to be billed and promotes misled defense. His position on missile defence has strongly divided his NATO allies. In the rest of the world only Israel remains the U.S.¹s staunchest supporter. This is both the result of a powerful American Jewish lobby and the U.S. need to preserve the Persian Gulf oil fields. The ultimate means for the U.S. to impose a radical new global imperialism is the use and control of space. Several documents and key statements are frank in revealing this global plan. Among these are the ³Space Commission² cleared by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, the U.S. Space Command¹s ³Vision for 2020² and a U.S. Air Force board report, ³New World Vistas: Air and Space Power for the 21st Century². Following are some key findings of the Space Commission: The report by the Rumsfeld ³Space Commission² calls for U.S. ³power projection in, from and through space.² It seeks U.S. ³superior space capabilities.² It says the U.S. president should ³have the option to deploy weapons in space.² It emphasizes that it is ³possible to project power through and from space in response to events anywhere in the world. Unlike weapons from aircraft, land forces or ships, space missions initiated from earth or space could be carried out with little transit, information or weather delay. Having this capability would give the U.S. a much stronger deterrent and, in a conflict, an extraordinary military advantage.² It proposes the U.S. Space Command become the nucleus of a U.S. Space Corps, to be like the Marine Corps, and possibly ³transition² to a fully separate Space Force or ³Space Department² on a par with the Army, Navy and Air Force several years hence. In addition, it proposed that ³In the coming period, the U.S. will conduct operations to, from, in and through space in support of its national interests both on the Earth and in space.² Star Wars is back. However the full revelation of the U.S. plans for the imperialist control of space can be found in the U.S. Space Command¹s ³Vision for 2020² report: ³The globalization of the world economy will also continue with a widening between Ohaves¹ and Ohave-nots.¹² The U.S. Space Command, set up by the Pentagon in 1985, describes itself in ³Vision 2020² this way: ³U.S. Space Command dominating the space dimension of military operations to protect U.S. interests and investment. Integrating Space Forces into war fighting capabilities across the full spectrum of conflict.² ³Vision 2020² compares the U.S. effort to ³control space² and Earth below to how centuries ago ³nations built navies to protect and enhance their commercial interests², referring to the great empires of Europe that ruled the waves and thus the Earth to maintain their imperial economics. The ³Long Range Plan² of the U.S. Space command is candid: ³The U.S. will remain a global power and exert global leadership.² it says. ³The U.S. won¹t always be able to forward base its forces. Widespread communications will highlight disparities in resources and quality of life contributing to unrest in developing countries. The global economy will continue to become more interdependent. Economic alliances, as well as the growth and influence of multinational corporations, will blur security agreements. The gap between Ohave¹ and Ohave-not¹ nations will widen, creating regional unrest. One of the long-acknowledged and commonly understood advantages of space-based platforms is no restriction or country clearances to overfly a nation from space.² As ³New World Vistas: Air and Space Power for the 21st Century², a U.S. Air Force board report, states: ³In the next two decades, new technologies will allow the fielding of space-based weapons of devastating effectiveness to be used to deliver energy and mass as force projection in tactical and strategic conflict. These advances will enable lasers with reasonable mass and cost to effect very many kills.² But ³power limitations impose restrictions² on such-based weapons systems making them ³relatively unfeasible². ³A natural technology to enable high power,² it goes on, ³is nuclear power in space. Setting the emotional issues of nuclear power aside, this technology offers a viable alternative for large amounts of power in space.² The publicly alleged rationale for NMD is that it is to protect the U.S. from a missile attack by a so-called ³rogue state². This is a transparent scam, Russia still being viewed as the ultimate and inevitable protagonist, an obstacle to the fulfillment of a unipolar world. ³U.S. Space Command² Chief, General Joseph Ashby, has put it bluntly: ³It¹s politically sensitive, but it¹s going to happen. We¹re going to fight in space. We¹re going to fight from space...that¹s why the U.S. has development programs in directed energy and hit-to-kill mechanisms...We will engage terrestrial targets some day - ships, airplanes, land targets - from space. We will engage targets in space, from space². The motto of the Air Force¹s 50th Space Wing is ³Master of Space². Spurgeon M. Keeny, of the conservative U.S. Arms Control Association, has stated the case clearly: ³Russia is the only country which threatens the existence of the U.S.² (Time, 8 May, 2000, p.19). This is the ³politically sensitive² essence of General Ashby¹s statement. For a candid description of the U.S.¹s real purpose for the dominance of space we need only record the statements of the ultra right-wing Republican Senator from New Hampshire, Bob Smith: ³With the technology that we have already developed and demonstrated, we have the opportunity today to move forward to the comprehensive missile defense architecture that President Reagan envisioned almost 20 years ago, more than the marginal defense this Administration has been struggling with for the past few months. We need to incorporate forward-deployed capabilities like the Navy Theater Wide program and the Air Force Airborne Laser and space-based missile-defense programs to ensure we can stop missiles in their boost phase, dropping the debris fallout over our adversary¹s homes, not ours. We also need to incorporate space sensors and integrate everything together with our theater defense systems to form a comprehensive architecture to defend this nation and our deployed troops². Smith says, ³Space is absolutely critical to future war fighting! This increasing importance was demonstrated in the Gulf War and in the Balkans. I firmly believe that whoever controls space will win the next war². The policy message of the U.S. is absolutely clear. It is a description of a new imperialism in which the entire planet becomes a colony ruled from space. The remaining obstacles are Russia, firstly, and China secondly. The current strategic policies of the U.S. are designed to negate these obstacles to its hegemonic rule of the world. They are not designed against the lesser powers which the U.S. identifies as rogue states, as alleged. U.S. policy is thus in direct conflict with the World Court decision on the intended use of weapons of mass destruction, since the U.S. has operationalized the first use of nuclear weapons. In support of this the U.S. pulled out of the attempt to devise a protocol on the enforcement of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention arguing that it posed risks to their national security and commercial secrets of their biotech industry. The U.S. is determined to abrogate the 1972 ABM treaty and, of course, violate the Outer Space treaty. But all these plans are not without significant opposition, major opponents being not only Russia and China but also the Democratic opposition. Not only are the majority of Democrats opposed to the House bill on the right of patients to be billed but recently Joe Biden, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has stated, regarding the abrogation of the ABM treaty: ³I think we have t

Widgets

Footer

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.