Search blog.co.uk

Archives for: May 2007

Wellness Index

by palashbiswas @ 2007-05-31 - 19:49:50

Wellness Index
Palash Biswas

Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
Email: palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com

The government has picked its Special Economic Zones or SEZs. The Navi Mumbai SEZ is deferred, but the Tatas' Gopalpur SEZ and 30 others are through, reports CNBC-TV18.India's fast changing skyline in Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata and even in smaller towns like Ludhiana and Jalandhar is changing the size of corporate profits.Large order book from both domestic and international projects has kept the capital goods and infrastructure sector on the move.

In one go, Simplex bagged an order of over Rs 1,000 crore, taking the order book to Rs 6,500 crore. Patel Engineering also slipped in a contract of over Rs 518 crore and that's not where it may end. Its all this building up action that's got the PE investor hooked on.

Hyderabad based KMC has got investments worth nearly $60 million with plans to bid for more than 25 airports and an expected turnover of over Rs 400 crore.

So even as experts get a tad worried about infrastructure stocks towering on the BSE, the bulls of the infrastructure boom will not yet turn shy of the growth so long Indian government continues its focus on building India.

Incidents of firing and bomb explosion were reported from Nandigram on Wednesday in a fresh spurt of violence. There was no report of any injury and casualty in the incidents of firing and bomb explosion at Adhikaripara and Satengabari areas, Superintendent of Police G A Srinivas said. He said police personnel at Tekhali Bazar camp were monitoring the situation. Patients recovering from injury caused in the police firing on March 14 at Nandigram were threatened by some armed youth in a ward of SSKM hospital, alleged members of the Trinamool Congress today. The activists informed Ashok Ghosh, the superintendent cum vice-principal of the hospital about the incident.
A day after Forward Bloc leader Ashok Ghosh said he was ready to go to Mamata Banerjee’s house to discuss the Nandigram peace process, the Trinamul Congress leader met the party’s core committee and vowed to continue the agitation in Nandigram and Singur.

Presiding over the meeting in her Kalighat house, Mamata said: “The agitation in Singur will continue until the land forcibly acquired is returned to the owners. Our movement in Nandigram should be intensified.”

Contrarily, West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadev Bhattacharya today said that people of the State are in favour of industrialization and creation of Special Economic Zones (SEZs).

Addressing a huge rally here, Bhattacharya referred to the recent victories of his party CPI (M) in Singur by-polls and panchayat elections in Nandigram, to drive home his claim.

He said the verdict showed that contrary to claims by opposition parties, the people were in favour of the Left Front's industrial policy.

Centre holds emergency meet as Gujjar protests spread .The Gujjar community, which is at the centre of the storm, is spread across 15 states in north and west India and is said to comprise more than 10 percent of the country's population.Their population is the highest in Gujarat, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. In states such as Jammu and Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh they have been given ST status.But in Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, and Gujarat they are more involved in agriculture and are categorised as OBCs.In these states the community believes a lion's share of the jobs reserved for OBCs go to other castes like Jats and hence the demand for ST status.A ripple that jolted the CPM boat, but failed to rock and overturn it except in the waters closest to Nandigram. The first elections in Bengal after the political turmoil over the Singur-Nandigram land wars showed the cup of joy half-empty or half-full for Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee and Mamata Banerjee.But if the results showed no big changes in the state’s political equations, they re-confirmed that the Red rule in villages remained unshaken.

This is nothin g new. incomplete and discriminatary Reservation in different states is an old story. So the santhal and mundas don`t have any reservation in Assam. While dalit Namoshudra and POD Bengali refugees out of Bengal are deprived of reservation. UP and Uttaranchal settled dalit Bengali refugees are fighting for reservation for almost Six decades without any hearing. However, they refarained fro Violence!

At the same time, Undoing injustice is impossible through embracing secularism and liberalism. The aforementioned repression has spread to the international level. Obstruction of justice, denial of basic human rights and marginalisation in every sphere of life has become a global phenomenon for Muslims. Local dictatorship has paled before the tyranny of global dictatorship. And thus needs a global solution, starting with local revolutions against tyranny and injustice.

Unfortunately, time has changed. Muslims have touched the same depth of degradation and humiliation from which they liberated the untouchables not long ago.

Congress president Sonia Gandhi today accused the Gujarat Government of treating the farmers in the state as “criminals”, saying it is not bothered about farmers’ welfare.

Thus, Nandigram and Kaling Nagar are followed by Dausa.
The enslaved rural dalit eighty five percent population of India is at the mercy of Brahminical political parties loyal to US zionist Imperialsm, Hindu rashtra ideology including secular and progrresive marxism Leninism and Post Modern Manusmriti of MNC global Order!Awaiting reports from the Maharashtra Government and developers, the Board of Approval (BoA) deferred decision on Mukesh Ambani-promoted Navi Mumbai SEZ but approved the Tata's Gopalpur SEZ in Orissa.Commerce Secretary and BoA Chairman G K Pillai stated that the government had received a report from the Revenue Department on the Navi Mumbai project, but was awaiting views from the State Government and the developers.

"We wanted to get comments from the developers and the state government on the report of the Revenue Department," Pillai said.

The Revenue Department wanted to know whether arrangements had been made for plugging possible revenue leakages because of a road passing through the zone being promoted by Ambani and his close aide Anand Jain.The 1,173 hectare Gopalpur SEZ, promoted by Tatas in Ganjam district of Orissa, was deferred in September last year as the BoA wanted to ensure that it posed no problem to a security facility nearby.

The ruling Left Front in West Bengal got the first electoral jolt after violent protests over land acquisition for industry in Nandigram as it lost the Panskura municipal body elections in East Midnapore to the Trinamool Congress-Congress combine.All eyes were on Panskura, closest to Nandigram under the same East Midnapore district, with Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharya matching a gruelling campaign by Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee.

At least 14 people were killed in police firing in Nandigram March 14 in a protest against a Special Economic Zone (SEZ).

Of the 17 seats of the Panskura municipality, the combine won 10 while the Left lost its stronghold in the area as it managed to win only seven. Trinamool alone got eight seats while Congress bagged two.

Buoyed by the victory, Trinamool chief Banerjee said the local body election result had clearly indicated the huge support of people to the opposition parties in the backdrop of an anti-land acquisition movement in the state.

"The victory comes after the movement against the SEZ in Nandigram and the brutal police firing that killed 14 and left over hundreds injured in the trouble-torn area. The victory in Panskura is a tribute to those who lost their loved ones in the March 14 police firing and still suffering from spiralling tension," Banerjee told a press conference here after the victory.

THE Trinamool Congress has been kept out of the “All India People’s Convention on Nandigram and Special Economic Zones (SEZs)” being hosted in the city by the Gana Unnayan O Jana-Adhikar Sangram Samiti. It is an important constituent of the Bhoomi Ucched Pratirod Committee at Nandigram, where the Trinamool and the Samiti have been close allies in protests against the land acquisition drive.

The proposed convention, scheduled to take place on June 2 and 3, is expecting around 1,000 delegates which include activists from the state, Orissa, Maharashtra, Punjab, Jharkhand and Tripura. Arundhati Roy, Mahasweta Devi, Medha Patkar, Dipankar Bhattacharya, Debabrata Bandyopadhyay, G N Saibaba, Ulka Mahajan, Vara Vara Rao are among those expected at the convention.

Elections were held Sunday for 104 seats of five municipalities - Panskura, Dhupguri, Durgapur, Nalhati and Cooper's Camp. Also, by-elections were held in 11 wards of 10 municipalities as well as 516 panchayat seats comprising 24 zilla parishads, 94 panchayat samities and 398 gram panchayats.

The Left Front retained its power in Durgapur (Burdwan district of south Bengal) and Dhupguri (Jalpaiguri in north Bengal) municipalities while the Congress retained both Nalhati and Cooper's Camp municipalities (in Birbhum and Nadia districts of south Bengal, respectively).

And enjoy the game!
The CPI (M) on Wednesday condemned the police firing in Dausa, Bundi and other places in Rajasthan, and demanded a judicial enquiry into the incidents.

The agitation by the Gujjar community took place because of the promise made by the BJP before the elections to include them in the scheduled tribe category. ``The failure of the government to deal with the matter politically has led to the violence and the needless deaths in police firing,'' the party said in statement.

The statement added that the BJP government headed by Vasundhara Raje has become notorious for its heavy-handed police repression on popular movements. ``The kisan movement faced brutal repression and six people were killed. The BJP leadership, which hypocritically tried to exploit the Nandigram incident, should take strong action against its state government,'' it said.

Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil held an emergency meeting to discuss the situation in Rajasthan with the violence spiraling out of control.Meanwhile, Gujjar leaders from Dausa have agreed to meet Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje but they have refused to back down on their demand for Scheduled Tribe status.
Now the chief minister has called an all-party meeting.Rajasthan is on high alert as Gujjar protests spread beyond the state. There are reports of violence and arson from many districts.The Army is on standby and highways are blocked at many points.All major highways and roads in the state remained blocked for the third day on Thursday with Gujjars sticking to their demand for an ST status.

The number of dead across Rajasthan has climbed to 19 after two people were killed in a violent clash on Thursday between security forces and Gujjar protesters in the Sawaimadhopur district.
The protests spread across the state as well other parts of the country. Ajmer saw a bandh on Thursday. There were series of violence related incidents in Dausa, Jaipur, Kota and Bharatpur, and Karauli where protesters blocked roads and burnt vehicles and even police stations.Gujjar protesters torched police pickets in Kota and Bharatpur and also damaged railway tracks, which affected train traffic in these parts.

Outside Rajasthan, violence in Gurgaon saw road blockades and burnt vehicles and Yamunanagar police lathicharged angry protesters.Around 100 people of Gujjar community were detained and later released at Delhi's Jantar Mantar. They were trying to jam the traffic.Protests and minor clashes were also reported in Haryana, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh.

Track wellness index, Amartya style
- Professor’s theories inspire centre at Oxford
AMIT ROY

Amartya Sen
London, May 30: A poor woman in Kerala who can decide what to do with her life is in some ways better off than a richer woman who is told what she can or cannot do by her husband or father.

This is one of the radical ideas on the human development index being tested at a new research organisation which was launched in Oxford today by professor Amartya Sen.

The Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative, part of the department of international development at Oxford University, has been “inspired by Amartya Sen’s theories of human development and capability”.

Its declared aim is “to build a new economic framework for reducing poverty grounded in people’s experiences and values”.

Sen is known for his view that a democratic society, where people are free to make choices, is much better equipped to tackle poverty.

Today, the Nobel laureate and Lamont University Professor of philosophy and economics at Harvard gave an inaugural address: “What Theory of Justice?” at the Sheldonian Theatre in Oxford.
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070531/asp/nation/story_7855551.asp

The chief priest of the Guruvayur Sri Krishna temple, Raman Namboodiri, has said that he is not willing to let non-Hindus into the temple .However, he said if the government brought in a law allowing entry to non-Hindus, he will go with it.This was announced by his son Satishan at a press conference in Guruvayur on Thursday. The move comes just three days after a majority of priests at a meeting of religious heads in Thrissur spoke in favour of temple reforms.

On the other hand, Maintaining that MPs cannot be made chief ministers or ministers in a state unless they resign from their seats, a writ petition seeking quashing of appointment of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati and Minister of State Satish Chandra Mishra has been filed in the Supreme Court. The petition filed by UP-based advocate and president of the Hindu Personal Law Board, Ashok Pandey, claimed that under the Constitutional provisions an MP has to resign his seat before getting elected to the state legislature. The petitioner urged the court to issue a "quo warranto" (court's direction to a particular authority to explain under what authority he/she was discharging such powers) to the Chief Minister and the Minister. In the case of Mayawati and Mishra, it was submitted the two were sitting Rajya Sabha Members and hence stood disqualified from being the Chief Minister and Minister at the State level. Quoting Article 164 (4) of the Constitution, the petition stated that even a non-member of the Legislative Assembly can be appointed as a minister, provided he/she gets elected to the Assembly within a six months period from the date of appointment. The same principle applies to the post of Prime Minister or a Minister at the Central level.

BSP MP from Machchlishahr Uma Kant Yadav, who was arrested in Lucknow on Wednesday in connection with a land grabbing case, was sent to judicial remand for 13 days by a local court.He was brought on transit remand and was produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate.Yadav, arrested from outside the residence of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati in Lucknow, was charged with attempting to grab land in Palia Mafi village under Pholpur police station area of Azamgarh. Yadav with his son and five others had allegedly razed some shops and house in the village on May 28.

While the MP and two others have been arrested, raids were on to arrest his son and three others.

In the pink of health
BARKHA DUTT
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/opinion/2007/May/opinion_May109.xml&section=opinion&col=
Celebrated Indian television star and host Barkha Dutt is Managing Editor of NDTV 24x7.

BY NOW, miles of newsprint and hours of airtime have already been devoted to deconstructing Mayawati. You have heard all that you possibly could about her historic victory, her political acumen, her earthy charisma and her iconic hold over the Dalit community. You even know that strawberry pink is her favourite colour.
So why am I spending another weekend talking about an over-saturated subject? Because, even more than her well-documented achievements, it’s the reaction of people that has been fascinating, contradictory and, in some cases, downright disgusting. And in many ways, the schizophrenia of India’s response to Mayawati is a symbol of the country’s larger battle within.

As far as I can tell, there have essentially been two extreme responses to Mayawati’s ascent in Uttar Pradesh.

The first is the panic and thinly disguised contempt of the yuppie, English-speaking, America-educated urbanite. He’s shrewd enough to never acknowledge it in public, but in private conversations will openly lament the future of India if "such politicians" continue to grab centre-stage. Mayawati’s hard-nosed Hindi, unapologetic aggression and shimmering salwar- kameez make him nervous. If his scathing (and often deeply personal) criticism of her makes him sound like a horrible snob, he isn’t even slightly embarrassed. He worries that when Mayawati declares that she is aiming to be prime minister within the next decade, she means it. He knows he may not even be a milestone in her political journey from Lucknow to Delhi, and can’t bear being that irrelevant. He has made his millions on Wall Street and wonders how "someone like her" would fit in at the White House. He believes he is beyond social prejudice, but is likely to have been born into an "upper caste" and thus never experienced discrimination. The burgeoning growth rate is primarily what defines his dreams and possibly what blinds him to an India that is both changing and challenging class hierarchies.

This is the sort of Indian citizen who has contempt for all politicians and only wants to see dapper city slickers in parliament — the sort who lug their laptops, know their wine from their whiskies and are eloquent in English. And now, he’s alarmed that the rest of India is tearing down the barricades, making its way inside his No Entry clubs and turning all the old rules on their head. He feels like a man without a passport in the New India that Mayawati represents. As social churning jumbles up existing equations and gives birth to a new elite, he may well get left behind on the periphery, if he doesn’t make peace with how dramatically his country is poised for change.

Log on to the Internet, and you will be stunned to discover how many bloggers — anonymous, or otherwise — have worn their obvious bias on their computer screens. Some even write about wanting to "leave India if Mayawati ever became prime minister" — all this without a trace of irony or shame. Their delusion is not just offensive; it’s positively frightening.

At the other end of the spectrum is the equal and opposite response. This is the world of the eulogy writers. In this corner of India, Mayawati has been romanticised and revered to a degree that makes her sound almost unreal. Of course she is a dramatic and powerful symbol of Dalit assertion and so it’s not her voters I’m writing about here. I’m talking about the awe-struck observers and commentators who believe that she must be evaluated by a different set of parameters than other politicians. You only have to look back at some of the breathless editorials and columns of the last fortnight. Perhaps worried that any circumspection could sound dangerously like caste bias, most of the media have stayed away from past controversies and awkward questions. Not many are willing to revisit the Taj Corridor controversy that cost Mayawati a stint in power. How many editorials have commented on the mass transfer of more than a hundred bureaucrats within a day of her taking over as chief minister?

What about the whiff of vendetta politics as business decisions made by the previous government come swiftly under the knife? And how many writers are actually willing to examine the more complex dimensions to Mayawati’s persona? Yes, she is a powerful grassroots politician who has given the marginalised a voice and an identity. But in her personal working style, is she in danger of embracing the very feudalism her party has fought against? Is the BSP a one-woman shop? Is Mayawati autocratic, dictatorial and unwilling to share power within the party?

Now that the dust has settled and the celebrations are winding down, will her government now be measured by actual performance rather than symbolic value?

Yes, many of the criticisms that have tailed her career, apply just as much to other parties and politicians. Mulayam Singh Yadav’s government made no apologies about promoting a cartel of personal friends when it came to business or pleasure. It’s only natural that the next government will come along and undo some of that. That said, the real assimilation of Mayawati into mainstream politics will happen only when we are able to critique her without fear, favour or prejudice. And besides, as she has shown in election after election, she hardly needs our supercilious generosity.

Now that she is Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh for the fourth time, this then will be Mayawati’s real challenge. She has built an unlikely camaraderie between the Brahmins and the Dalits of one state. Can she now reinvent herself further? Can she shrug off the clichés that have defined her and emerge into a politician who Indians dare not scorn, but need not be scared of either. Will she now set an agenda for governance and development? Will the security of success make her more willing to share power? Now that she has every political party lining up at her doorstep, can she finally afford to be a little less abrasive? She has already created a successful coalition across antagonistic castes. Can she now bridge the divide across classes? In many ways where she goes from here may define how India resolves her own contradictions.

Meanwhile,Two persons were killed and five others injured in police firing on Thursday when Gujjar protesters indulged in arson at Bonli in Rajasthan's Sawai Madhopur district, a senior official said.
Army was called out to assist the civil administration, the Superintendent of Police of Sawai Madhopur Jose Mohan told PTI over telephone.With Thursday's violence in Sawai Madhopur and in Kotputali on Wednesday night, the death toll in Gujjars' stir in last three days has risen to 18.

One protestor was killed in police firing in Paniyala village in Jaipur's Kotputali block on Wednesday night, a senior police official said.The agitation continued to paralyse normal life across the state and road blocks across state highways broughtvehicular traffic to a grind. Security was stepped up in the state with hundreds of army personnel deployed along thehighways.

A report from Kota, quoting official sources, said the bandh supporters gathered at Jagpuri police post in Kota this morning, clashed with the police and set a police post afire. A sub inspector sustained injuries, while six police personnel managed to run for safety, says UNI.

Sob rises above wail of rudaalis
Grandson killed, only son beaten up
CHARU SUDAN KASTURI

Ramdeer’s grandmother and sister (behind) mourn outside their home. Picture by Prem Singh
Peepalkheda village (Dausa) May 30: The wail of death is audible over a hundred metres away.

In the chorus of collective cries and synchronous chest beating — which traditionally follow a death in Rajasthan — one voice stands out.

Sitting with 20 other women — known as rudaalis — in the shade of a peepal tree outside grandson Ramdeer Gujjar’s mud house, Dhapabai’s screams are punctuated by loud, uncontrollable sobs.

The 75-year-old has nursed two generations of her family, and was waiting to do the same with the third.

But Ramdeer didn’t live to give her a great-grandchild — five bullets from the barrel of a policeman’s rifle, as he was walking on the Jaipur-Agra highway, didn’t let him.

His uncle — Dhapabai’s sole surviving son — Bachchan Singh lies on a cot nearby. He is barely conscious and his forehead is swathed in blood-soaked bandages.

Villagers claim that Bachchan was beaten up by police at home, some 2 km north of the Jaipur-Agra highway, where his nephew’s bullet-riddled body lay.
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070531/asp/nation/story_7855086.asp

Fodder scam case: 58 convicted, given jail terms
Times of India - 4 hours ago
RANCHI: A local court on Thursday convicted 58 people and awarded them five to six years in prison in a fodder scam case involving embezzlement of millions of rupees from the treasury of pre-bifurcation Bihar.
39 convicted in fodder scam Hindu
13 fodder scam convicts jailed for three years Monsters and Critics.com

Tabletop touch screen tipped as next big thing
Guardian Unlimited - 14 hours ago
In an era when computers get ever smaller and more portable, it seems almost a throwback; but software giant Microsoft hopes a £5000 coffee table bristling with technology could be the next big step forward.
T-Mobile Washington Post
Microsoft Unveils "Surface" Computing InternetNews.com

Raje briefs Governor on Gurjar stir
Jaipur, May. 31 (PTI): Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje today met Governor Pratibha Patil and updated her on the issue of the ongoing Gurjars' agitation for Scheduled Tribe status, which has claimed 16 lives so far. Accompanied with Home Minister G C Kataria, Raje is also said to have apprised the Governor of the law and order situation in the state, an official said. The Governor met the Union Home Minister Shiv Raj Patil and the Congress President Sonia Gandhi in Delhi yesterday. The Chief Minister is also planning to hold an all party meeting here in the afternoon to discuss the Gurjars' demand of shifting from OBC to Scheduled Tribe category to avail the benefits of reservation, the official added.

MP held at Maya door
OUR SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT

Yadav in Hazratganj police station in Lucknow. (PTI)
Lucknow, May 30: Mayavati today got a party MP arrested after inviting him to her residence, attempting to show herself as impartial in cracking down on politicians facing criminal charges.

Uma Kant Yadav, 65, MP from Machhlishahr in Jaunpur, had been accused of razing several shops and a house to grab a piece of land in neighbouring Azamgarh on Monday night. His men allegedly fired at local people, injuring three.

After the information reached Lucknow, Mayavati is believed to have ordered the state police chief last night to arrest Yadav, who was named in the FIR.

Within an hour, the MP called up the chief minister and asked for a meeting this morning. Mayavati granted the interview but tipped off director-general of police Giridhari Lal Sharma.

“Make the arrest before he (Yadav) gets a chance to see her. That’s what the chief minister wants,” a top bureaucrat told Sharma, according to police sources.

Yadav, accused in about a dozen criminal cases, arrived at the chief minister’s residence around 11.45 am. He had stepped out of an air-conditioned car and was walking towards the house with two associates when the police stopped him. Two senior officers went into the house for a final go-ahead, which came through Mayavati’s secretary.

A Lucknow court ordered three days’ transit remand so that Yadav could be produced in an Azamgarh court on the charges of attempt to murder, intimidation and illegal assembly.

Principal secretary (home) K. Chandramauli soon called a news conference. “The MP had called up the chief minister seeking an appointment. She informed the police.”

“The chief minister’s message to us is clear: take stern action against outlaws no matter which political party they represent,” the DGP said.

Yadav has been suspended from the party and his son Dinesh, a BSP worker, expelled.

Yadav, a policeman-turned-politician, is said to have been eyeing a plot some 200 metres from a house he possessed in Pallia Udai village, Phoolpur. On Monday night, Dinesh and five others allegedly arrived with a bulldozer and firearms and razed the shops and the house, belonging to a certain Feroz Ahmed, that stood there.

When some villagers tried to resist, Yadav’s men fired and hit three.

Nobel prize winner talks at PEP conference
by Anjli Raval | May 31st, 2007
Email Print Leave a Comment RSS 2.0 Feed Nobel prize-winning economist Amartya Sen was the focus of a conference hosted by the PEP club on the theme of ‘Identity, Community and Justice’ at the King’s Manor on May 23 and 24. Sen’s ideas on the subject were brought forward as a starting point for discussion, with leading academics invited to speak. In addition to Professor Sen, the list included Professors Akeel Bilgrami, Kaushik Basu, David Miller and Lord Bhikhu Parekh.

The University of York’s Professor Haleh Afshar (Politics) and Professor Tom Baldwin (Philosophy), currently working on areas related to ‘Identity, Community and Justice’, also spoke.

In light of recent debate at the University with regards to multiculturalism, the conference could be described as highly timely.

After the two-day conference, Sen took part in an exclusive question-and-answer session on Thursday evening, where the theme of ‘Identity’ seemed to be at the core from the very start. Given the speaker’s Indian heritage and extensive knowledge of Eastern philosophy, he refuted American and Eurocentric approaches to politics, economics and philosophy, dismissing the idea that developing nations are backward.

Later, talking exclusively to Nouse, Sen declared global and national identity, rather than sectarian identity, to be crucial in eliminating tensions, with particular reference to conflict in the East. He emphasised the importance of political participation in the augmentation of democracy within a state, dismissing the idea that it can have a negative economic effect.“I’ve never understood how political participation can be inimical to economic growth”, he said.

Commended for his work on famine, human development theory, welfare economics, the underlying mechanisms of poverty and political liberalism, Sen expressed his ideas in an inspiring manner.

Henry Smith, President of the PEP Club, said, “I thought the night was a great success. It was a testament to Sen’s intellect that he was able to answer the range of questions in such depth without any warning as to their content”.

Smith confirmed the opinion of many students present at the conference, saying Sen was “thought-provoking” in his bringing together of the interdisciplinary nature of the subjects.

26 trains cancelled due to Rajasthan violence

No TV tuner /any hardware required.

Train services in violence-hit Rajasthan continued to be affected for the second day today with as many as 26 trains passing through the state, including the Delhi-Ajmer Shatabdi Express and the Delhi-Ahmedabad Rajdhani Express, being cancelled and one train rescheduled in the interest of passenger safety.

The decision to cancel and reschedule trains passing through the desert state was taken following a high-level meeting by the Railway Board officials here.

A ministry official said train movement in the North Zone, North Western zone, West Central zone and North Central Zone had been severely affected by the agitation by the Gujjars, demanding Scheduled Tribe status for their community.

Northern Railway cancelled 12 trains, followed by North Western Railway with 7, Western Railway with 4 and North Central Railway with 2. West Central Railway cancelled one train.

Among the cancelled trains are:

Delhi Sarai Rohilla-Porbander Express;
Bareilly-Bhuj via Delhi Express;
Delhi-Ahmedabad Ashram Express;
Jaisalmer Intercity Express;
New Delhi-Ahmedabad Rajdhani Express;
Nizamuddin-Udaipur Mewar Express;
New Delhi-Mumbai Rajdhani; and
Nizamuddin-Mumbai August Kranti Rajdhani Express.
Further,

the Nizamuddin-Indore Express,
New Delhi-Ajmer Shatabdi Express,
Nizamuddin-Bandra Sampark Kranti Express and
Jammu-Tawi-Jaipur Pooja Express
were the other trains, which were cancelled by Northern Railway, which also rescheduled the Nizamuddin-Ahmedabad Sampark Kranti Express.

The seven trains cancelled by North Western Railway for today are:

the Jodhpur-Marudhar Express;
Jodhpur-Banares Marudhar Express;
Jaipur-Gwalior Express;
Udaipur-Nizamuddin Mewar Express;
Amritsar-Jaipur Express;
Ajmer-New Delhi Shatabdi Express; and
Jaipur- Sealdah Express.
Western Railway cancelled four trains. These are

the Ahmedabad-Haridwar Mail;
Mumbai-Nizamuddin August Kranti Express;
Bandra-Nizamuddin Garib Rath; and
Ahmedabad-New Delhi Rajdhani Express.
North Central Railway cancelled two trains:

Mathura-Lucknow Express and
Gwalior- Jaipur Express
The lone train cancelled by Central Railway was the Nizamuddin-Kota Jan Shatabdi.


 
 

Indo US Nuclear Sexy Tango

by palashbiswas @ 2007-05-31 - 18:07:30

Indo-US Nuclear Sexy Tango

Palash Biswas

Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551
Email: palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com

While the US INDO Nuclear Tango is the highlight of the day, US President George W Bush has unveiled a long-term strategy on climate change, with plans to gather the countries that emit the most greenhouse gases and set a global emissions goal. On the other hand,Differences continued to nag the talks between India and the US on Thursday on an agreement to operationalise the civil nuclear deal, with Washington saying the two sides were working "very hard" to conclude the pact.

Mind you, Indian polity is headed by the World Bank IMF team and post modern Manusmriti is the Mantra of the zionist hindu imperialism. The left cries against US imperialism and opposes the nuclear deal but it does not hesitate to help the US based MNCs to make Rural dalit enslaved underprevileged India a hunting ground! Indian politicians are best known to serve US interests worldwide, so left pushes Pranab Mukherjee to Raiseena! Chemical Hub is being created to repeat Bhopal tragedy and import of Hiroshima and nagasaki seem to be next destination.

Leftist hue and crue seems to me nothing but a FARCE to dupe the particular VOTE Bank in left Ruled states where MUslim support sustains the Ruling Front without doing any governance at all. Left is doing nothing to stall the deal. So, same is the RSS stance which advocates a Hindu Rashtra, Super Power.

India and the US on Thursday began crucial talks on ironing out differences on a path-breaking civilian nuclear deal ahead of a meeting between their top political leadership in Germany next month.India and the United States have considerable 'hard work' to do, to resolve their differences over July 18, 2005 the civilian nuclear deal between the two countries, US Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns said on Thursday.Burns holding negotiations with Foreign Secretary Shiv Shanker Menon and other officials of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) in New Delhi, over the nuke deal regarded as a major test of friendship between both countries. INTENSE negotiations over the detail of the crucial Indo-US nuclear deal were under way in New Delhi last night amid signs of fierce new opposition from Indian political parties and scientists.

Meanwhile, M R Srinivasan and P K Iyengar, two of India's eminent scientists and nuclear experts have shared their apprehensions regarding the deal.

"The U.S. administration has to find a way to accommodate fully agreement reached with India in July 2005 and March 2006. If the only was to do so is to amend the Hyde Act, then the U.S. should plan to do so rather than press India for more compromises", said Srinivasan.

Iyengar who has been critical of the deal wrote in an editorial: "Once we sign the deal we will be at the mercy of the U.S. and the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG)."

With leaders of the influential Communist Party of India (Marxist) aligning with the main parliamentary opposition, the right-wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), to oppose the deal, such approval is at best uncertain.

After months of protracted negotiation over the "123 Agreement" that is supposed to provide the detail of the basic civilian nuclear deal concluded between India and the US in 2005, negotiators hope a final accord can be reached over the next 72 hours while Mr Burns is in New Delhi.

The intention is to conclude this before US President George W.Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh meet at the G8 summit in Berlin.

This appears doubtful, with technical teams from both countries scrabbling for a formula that will break the deadlock.

US ambassador to New Delhi David Mulford was quoted last night as declaring that "the big stuff has been done, but the devil is in the details".

The difficulty is India's unwillingness to sign away its right to conduct strategic nuclear weapons tests in the future, even though it has pledged it has no intention of doing so. There is also a dispute over the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel.

Domestic Indian political pressure is such that, in the view of most commentators, it would be political suicide for Dr Singh's ruling United Progress Alliance coalition to sign away testing rights. Equally, Washington insists it is bound by law to ensure the deal will be terminated the moment the country carries out another strategic nuclear weapons test.

India's ruling coalition relies heavily on leftist support for its political survival. In parliament last night, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat insisted "the Government must not proceed without bringing the 123 Agreement before parliament".

As well, Hindu nationalists coalesced around the BJP are outraged by the sovereignty issue over nuclear testing and determined to bring down any deal that compromises this.

Also overhanging the summit is a likely clash between the US and Russia over Washington's proposal to base parts of a missile shield in Eastern Europe.

The two countries have struggled to overcome the differences over the fine print of the deal, after the U.S. Congress, concerned about preventing nuclear proliferation, introduced amendments to a law it approved in December backinghe deal.As a result, the two sides have been unable to finalise a deal governing nuclear trade. India says it cannot accept changed goalposts in the deal, which it views as an infringement of its sovereignty.The deal aims to overturn three decades of U.S. sanctions on the sale of nuclear reactors and fuel to India to help it meet its soaring energy needs, even though New Delhi has not signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and has test-fired nuclear weapons.

"Some hard work has to be done. As this agreement is very much in the interest of both the governments. I think it represents the most ambitious proposal, we have put forward in the last 30 years", Burns told reporters in New delhi.

"It allows us to correct major problems in relations with India. So, there are lots of reasons to feel optimistic about this agreement. We hope to make some progress over the next day or two in this regard," Burns added.

India says it cannot accept new terms included in the deal (the Hyde Act), such as the U.S. decision to end nuclear trade with India, if New Delhi conducts another nuclear test, and not permitting India to reprocess spent fuel.

Although both sides say there is a strong political backing to push the deal through, Washington is apparently getting impatient with the delay in concluding it.

Some Indian officials' attribute this frustration to what they say is a feeling in Washington that the time is running out as President George W. Bush nears the end of his term.But they say it would be difficult for India to compromise in the face of fierce political opposition from within and allegations of a possible sell-out to the US.

Before going in for talks, Burns told media persons that the two countries had come a long way in the talks on the agreement since the negotiations began two years ago.Burns said the two sides are almost there and little more work was needed to conclude the pact.He expressed confidence that the agreement would be clinched.

Washington has said that both countries are 'well on the way' to conclude the pact and that it did not believe any of the remaining differences were 'insurmountable.'

The two sides will seek to wind up the year-long negotiations ahead of the meeting between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and US President George W Bush in Germany next week on the sidelines of the G-8 Summit.

• Coverage: Indo-US Nuclear Tango

http://www.rediff.com/news/nukedeal05.html?zcc=rl
See also:
http://ipcs.org/IPCS-IssueBrief-No42.pdf
http://www.fff.org/webAv/index.asp
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/aug252006/408.pdf
http://www.countercurrents.org/ind-subbarao090306.htm
http://www.hindustantimes.com/storypage/storypage.aspx?id=1a7f273a-3bff-4897-a5b4-83d313c22b21&&Headline=Indo-US%2Bcivil%2Bnuclear%2Bdeal%2Bis%2Bback%2Bon%2Btrack
What’s the real deal?
Nilotpal Basu
Tuesday, May 29, 2007 21:48 IST

Email Article Print Article
Most Emailed Articles Most Viewed Articles
Share this article RSS Feed
Digg it
Add to del.icio.us
Google bookmarks
Yahoo! bookmarks
Add to Newsvine
Add to Reddit
To reprint this article, contact 3DSyndication

Excitement is running high in South Block over the visit of US Deputy Secretary of State, Nicolas Burns’s visit to New Delhi on May 31. This is being widely speculated as the ‘final push’ by the Americans to clinch the final conclusion for the ongoing discussions on the 123 agreement to officially seal the Indo-US Nuclear Accord. The parleys between Burns and foreign secretary Shiv Shankar Menon will constitute an important phase in the run-up to the summit engagement between Manmohan Singh and George Bush on the margins of the G-8 Summit.

It is now clear that major differences do exist over the proposed Indo-US Nuclear Cooperation Agreement. But Burns has tried to run roughshod over the protestations of Indian negotiators. In the aftermath of the negotiations between the two technical teams, Burns was emphatically dismissive of the persisting concerns. Without spelling out the details of what will be the nature of give and take, he had observed — “it is going to be hard work on the part of both the United States and India” and added “both sides need to compromise in order to reach a final agreement. Both of us are responsible for this agreement.”
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1099920

The truth behind the Indo-U.S. nuclear deal

by Siddharth Varadarajan

In opening the door to nuclear commerce with India, Washington has confirmed how much an alliance with New Delhi is worth to it. But is anybody on the Indian side doing the math?

IN THE fullness of time, last week's nuclear agreement between India and the United States will be seen as one of those decisive moments in international politics when two powers who have been courting each other for some time decide finally to cross the point of no return. The U.S. and India have `come out', so to speak, and the world will never be the same again.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=VAR20050729&articleId=756
Bumpy Ride for Indo-US Nuclear Deal

by Praful Bidwai
NEW DELHI - The "nuclear cooperation" agreement signed by United States President George W. Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, six months ago in Washington, has run into trouble over separation of India's civilian installations from the military.

As a result of this major hurdle, the "one of a kind" deal is unlikely to be fleshed out and approved by the two sides before Bush's first-ever visit to India, expected to begin on March 1.

The July 18 deal is meant to legitimize and "normalize" India's nuclear weapons and facilitate resumption of civilian nuclear commerce with this country, which has been under technology embargoes since it first exploded a nuclear device in 1974.

The unsuccessful outcome of the third round of talks on the agreement on Jan. 19-20 in the Indian capital is likely to dampen the high tone that was originally set for the Bush visit, which takes place amid Washington's offer to "help India become a Great Power in the 21st century."

Until India's nuclear facilities are separated under civilian and military categories, the former cannot be placed under the safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations nuclear watchdog.

India has over 80 nuclear facilities and installations, including 15 power reactors and an unspecified number of military-related installations.

India and the U.S. have been doing some hard bargaining over which facilities should be included in the civilian and military lists. The U.S. is pressing India to expand the list of facilities to be brought under IAEA safeguards.

But India says safeguards should be "voluntary," as applicable to the nuclear weapons-states (NWSs) recognized under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT).

Disagreements between the two governments are now spilling over into the Indian media in the form of polemical attacks, in which India's Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) figures prominently.

Supporters of the U.S. position say there is a sharp divergence in approach between the DAE and the prime minister's office (PMO). The DAE is accused of being insular, inflexible, and resistant to international cooperation.

Supporters of the Indian government's stance say the DAE's proposal was approved by the PMO before being put on the table and is meant to maximize India's future options and not limit the size of its nuclear arsenal.

"This reflects only one side of the debate on the nuclear deal," says M.V. Ramana, a physicist and researcher at Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Environment and Development, located in the southern city of Bangalore.

"This is the nationalist or pseudo-nationalist side, which assumes that nuclear weapons are necessary for India's independence and sovereignty. But the real debate is between the pro-bomb and peace viewpoints. The peace movement holds India doesn't need nuclear weapons for its security. Nor does the U.S.," Ramana told IPS in an interview.

http://www.antiwar.com/bidwai/?articleid=8446

War Is a Government Program
by Sheldon Richman, May 30, 2007

June 1 is the 227th anniversary of the birth of Carl von Clausewitz, the influential Prussian military theorist and historian. Clausewitz is best known for writing in his book, On War, “War is not merely a political act, but also a real political instrument, a continuation of political commerce, a carrying out of the same by other means.”

These words come to mind whenever I hear conservative enthusiasts for the Iraq occupation complain about political interference with military operations. They don’t understand the most basic fact of war: it is a government program. So why aren’t people who claim to be suspicious of other government programs suspicious of war? I can see only two reasons, neither of them flattering: power lust or nationalistic zeal.

Many of us grow up believing that government reflects the will of the people. But skeptics know better. Government has assumed more and more control over private life not because the people demanded it, but because power-seekers and privilege-seekers sought outlets for their ambitions. They then propagandized the public until a sufficient number of people came to believe government control was good for them. (“Public” education has been remarkably effective in this regard.)

http://www.fff.org/comment/com0705l.asp

Thursday, May 31, 2007 (Berlin)
India and the European Union have reviewed the entire gamut of the strategic partnership between them and prepared for their summit-level interaction later this year.

The review was made during the meeting visiting External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee had with the EU Troika involving the past, present and future presidencies of the European Union.

The meeting was hosted by German Foreign Minister Franz-Walter Steinmeier in his capacity as the current president of the European Council of Ministers.

It gave an opportunity for the two sides also to exchange views on regional and international issues of mutual interest such as the fight against terrorism, Afghanistan, Iran, energy and climate change issues.

On the European side, the meeting held at the German Foreign Ministry was also attended by representatives of the European Commission and the Council Secretariat of the EU and Portuguese Foreign Minister M Luis Amado, whose country takes over the six-month rotating EU presidency from Germany in July.

Addressing a joint press conference with Steinmeier and Amado, Mukherjee said their meeting was a good opportunity to take stock of the progress made since the seventh India-EU summit held in Helsinki in October, 2006.
Nuke appetiser, served on US telly
- Atomic chief in tough talk
OUR CHIEF DIPLOMATIC EDITOR

Nicholas Burns: Positive
Washington, May 30: On the eve of President George W. Bush’s nuclear negotiator’s trip to India, the chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, Anil Kakodkar, has appeared on prime time American television and warned that “what India should have and should not have is for India to decide”.

Kakodkar had the ominous last word when he said, “I will leave it at that”, in a long programme on Delhi’s nuclear ambitions that was aired here last night on News Hour with Jim Lehrer, a highly regarded news programme watched by decision-makers across the US.

The Atomic Energy Commission chairman used his appearance on American television as the Indo-US nuclear talks are entering one of its most delicate phases to bluntly convey the long-held view of the Indian nuclear establishment on the so-called 123 agreement to facilitate nuclear cooperation with the US.

“India is a sovereign country. India has to take care of its own security requirements. And India has a right to do this, maintaining its own international commitments. So I think it is straightforward.”

The news programme, which was put together with the active cooperation of the Atomic Energy Commission and the state-owned Uranium Corporation of India, was a clear indication that the country’s nuclear establishment was now looking beyond the nuclear deal with the US and towards active involvement in global nuclear commerce pending normal ties between New Delhi and the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group.

News Hour with Jim Lehrer acknowledged that this was the first time American television cameras had been allowed into an Indian uranium mine, this one in Jaduguda in Jharkhand.

Uranium supplies are central to realising the objectives of the Indo-US nuclear deal, which will be further negotiated when the American under-secretary of state for political affairs, Nicholas Burns, arrives in India tomorrow on a three-day visit.

Jaduguda is central to the uranium needs of India’s pressurised heavy water reactors. The Uranium Corporation of India’s chief, Ramendra Gupta, said on last night’s programme: “It is good if we have access to uranium resources outside India, but suppose it is not coming.… We are going ahead with our programme.”

The external affairs ministry and the US embassy in Delhi today simultaneously issued statements, clearing several days of confusion about the arrival of Burns in India.

Yesterday, the US state department’s deputy spokesman, Tom Casey, was asked if Burns was on vacation in India. He said Burns was in Berlin “as far as I know” and added that “there is no confirmed travel plans (to India) at this point”.

“The visit will also be the occasion for further discussions on the proposed bilateral civil nuclear cooperation agreement,” South Block said.

US ambassador to India David Mulford underlined difficulties in the way of concluding the 123 agreement.

“There is considerable work to be done on what is a very technical and detailed agreement. We want to finish as soon as we can.”
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070531/asp/nation/story_7855593.asp

India, S Korea to hold joint naval exercise
New Delhi, May 31 (PTI): Seeking to upgrade their ties to strategic partnership, India and South Korea have resolved to enhance defence cooperation by holding joint naval exercises on annual basis and to work together for speedy resolution of the ... More

Indian, Chinese defence leaders meet in Singapore
New Delhi, May 31 (PTI): Top Indian and Chinese Defence leaders will chalk out the progress of their bilateral dialogue and their approach to building international stability at the Sixth Asian Security Council meeting being held in Singapore on ... More

Plea against Pandher: CBI court reserves order
Ghaziabad, May 31 (PTI): A special CBI court today reserved its order till tomorrow on a petition challenging the clean chit given by the CBI to Mininder Singh Pandher, an accused in Nithari killings cases, in the murder of 14-year-old ... More

China to open nuclear power industry to private, foreign firms
Beijing, May 31 (PTI): Energy-hungry China is considering open up its nuclear power industry to domestic and foreign firms, who will be allowed to invest in atomic power generating projects but cannot hold a controlling stake.

"China is considering opening the nuclear fuel sector to foreign investors as the nation is keen to boost its nuclear power sector," Wang Yiren, head of the No.2 system engineering department of the State Commission of Science and Technology for National Defence Industry said.

The country's draft nuclear energy law is being revised, he added.

According to China's longer-term development plan for the nuclear power industry, nuclear power capacity will increase to 40 million kw in 2020, with construction work beginning on at least three nuclear power generating units in each of the coming 10 years.

Currently, there are 10 commercial nuclear power generating units operational in China, including the No 1 unit at Tianwan nuclear power station in east China's Jiangsu Province, which came onstream on May 17. Their combined installed capacity stands at eight million kw.

The other nine units included Qinshan, Dayawan, and No 2 and 3 phases of Qinshan and Ling'ao. Four units are being built as the second phase of the Ling'ao project in south China's Guangdong Province and the second phase of the Qinshan project in eastern China's Zhejiang Province.

According to Wang, China's nuclear industry generated 54.8 billion kw/h of electricity last year, less than two per cent of the nation's total.

The government wants the nuclear industry to contribute four per cent of the nation's energy needs by 2020, Xinhua news agency reported.

Wang said the Chinese government has strict controls on uranium ore prospecting and mining but allows foreign experts to assist Chinese geological authorities in their exploration efforts.

Wang noted uranium was mainly distributed in two huge inter-continental metallogenic zones, which both traverse the Chinese mainland. This is encouraging for China's chances of finding uranium.

China now has 300-plus research institutions and production firms devoted to nuclear technology, employing approximately 50,000 people.

US has won over Indians with nuclear deal EnlargeUS has won over Indians with nuclear deal
Ads By Google
UN, NGOs, Non-Profit Jobs
Apply to 2550 jobs, 5450 Recruiters Over 990 jobs filled since Jan 2006
www.devnetjobs.org

ALSO READ
Burns visiting India to try and seal the 123 pactMay 30, 2007
N-deal will help peace: TharoorDecember 19, 2006
Manoj Joshi on nuke dealMay 30, 2007
YOU WERE READING
Burns visiting India to try and seal the 123 pact
The next three days could see the differences on the deal being sorted out and closure reached, reports Nilova Roy Chaudhury. Read on...
'Differences over nuclear deal not insurmountable'
Fission for trouble | More...

Opinion | Fission for trouble

Right to reprocess spent fuel major snag

Pramit Pal Chaudhuri, Hindustan Times
Email Author
New York/Washington, May 30, 2007
First Published: 01:55 IST(30/5/2007)
Last Updated: 06:00 IST(30/5/2007)

Print
Email
IM on Yahoo
Add to Del.icio.us

The Indo-US civilian nuclear agreement is the primary driver behind a 10 year-high in Indian public approval for the US, indicates a recent opinion poll.

A record 86 per cent of urban Indians had “very or fairly good” opinions of the US. Over a quarter cited the nuclear deal as the primary reason bilateral relations had improved — more than any other reason.

The survey, taken in March in India’s four largest cities, was done by a polling agency for internal US State Department use. The results broadly reflect several different opinion polls over the past few years showing Indians to be increasingly favourably inclined towards the US.

For example, a poll taken in July last year by WorldPublicOpinion.org showed 58 per cent of Indians said relations with the US were improving, the highest such figure in 10 nations.

There is little collaborative evidence about public views regarding the nuclear deal. But nation-wide surveys last year by magazines like India Today showed 70 per cent of the respondents supporting the deal.

Experts say the nuclear deal is starting to influence public views about the US even though, as South Asia expert Teresita Schaffer of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies says, the deal is “mind-numbing in its detail”.

Walter Andersen of Johns Hopkins University agrees. He says the deal will have “a ripple effect” even among those who are not following the negotiations closely.

The survey tends to support this. Even in urban India, 46 per cent of the respondents said they had heard or read nearly nothing about the deal. Of the four major metropolises, Delhiites were the least informed. A plurality (28 per cent) felt the deal’s main benefit would be in the military sphere — an issue that has been secondary in the debate within India’s strategic community.

Craig Charney, whose agency Charney Associates has done polls measuring anti-Americanism in various countries, explains, “By our research, the prime determinants of attitudes to America is how people see the overall relationship between their country and America — which in India’s case is overwhelmingly positive.” He said a new Pakistan poll will show the exact opposite sentiment, because Pakistanis feel “neglected and threatened” by Washington.

The survey also says anti-Americanism has fallen to a mere 4 per cent, more or less running counter to a global trend. Says Sumit Ganguly of Indiana University-Bloomington, “In large part, apart from the likes of [communist leader] Prakash Karat and his ilk, no one in India has the time or patience to beat the anti-American drum.” It helps, says Andersen, that “We are not seen as backing Pakistan in a knee-jerk way as we did in the past.”

Charney says the improved Indian view about the US was driven by both “positives and negatives”. The positives included growing economic ties, increased migration and shared democratic systems. The negatives was a “common confrontation with Muslim extremism.”

In the final analysis, says Schaffer, “India sees itself on the rise and the US as making that rise easier — and this eclipses things like Iraq.”
http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=e49ca090-30ad-4433-a322-64069118ccb1&ParentID=99f4907a-dc7d-4448-9b09-0e13fb223917&&Headline=US+has+won+over+Indians+with+nuclear+deal

Wal-Mart says its entry will benefit India

Suman Guha Mozumder in New York

Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, says that its goal in India is to establish a relationship with the small business community by partnering with them and helping them lower costs and increase profits resulting in benefits for multiple aspects of the country's economy.

"As per current guidelines, Wal-Mart will enter into a joint venture with Bharti for our wholesale cash-and-carry business in India that will sell goods to retailers, including small store owners -- or kirana stores -- at very low prices," Kevin Gardner, senior manager, international corporate affairs, Wal-Mart, told rediff.com.

Gardner's comments came in reaction to a protest organised by ACORN India and its affiliates during last weekend's Bollywood awards ceremony in Nassau County in Long Island. The protestors were urging awards chair Kamal Dandona to drop Wal-Mart's sponsorship of the event for the company's alleged human rights abuses.
http://www.rediff.com/money/2007/may/31wal.htm

India's GDP grew by 9.4% in 2006-07

Indian economy grew by 9.4 per cent in 2006-07 against 9 per cent in the previous year as robust growth in manufacturing and services sector more than made up for a slowdown in agriculture and construction sector.

However, gross domestic product growth slowed down to 9.1 per cent in the fourth quarter (Jan-March) of 2006-07 against 10 per cent in the same quarter of the previous fiscal, pulled down by slow agriculture, construction, financial and social services growth.

GDP growth during the fourth quarter was, however, higher sequentially as it was 8.7 per cent in the previous quarter of 2006-07.

Manufacturing grew by 12.3 per cent in 2006-07 against 9.1 per cent in the previous year, while trade, hotels, transport and communication grew by 13 per cent against 10.4 per cent.

Agriculture and allied sector's growth, however, slowed down to 2.7 per cent against six per cent and construction to 10.7 per cent against 14.2 per cent.

Mumbai, 7th most expensive city in the world

As India witnesses a spurt in property prices, its financial capital Mumbai has been ranked as one of the world's top 10 most expensive locations, in terms of accommodation cost.
Mumbai, which is ranked seventh, is followed by Shanghai, on whose lines the government is planning to develop the Indian financial hub.

The list comprises Hong Kong, Tokyo, New York, Moscow, Seoul, London, Mumbai, Shanghai, Caracas (Venezuela) and Paris (in order of their position), according to a study by International Human Resource organisation, ECA International.

"High rentals in Tokyo, New York, Seoul, Moscow, London and Paris largely reflect high living costs in these locations, while Mumbai, Shanghai and Beijing suffer from a shortage of modern and well equipped properties, pushing prices up for those properties that do," ECA International Hong Kong General Manager Lee Quane said.

However, Caracas, capital of Venezuela, makes to the list of top 10 expensive cities for renting an apartment as people have to spend huge amounts on security, Quane said.

In April, Finance Minister P Chidambaram said the government will shortly set up a committee to lay a roadmap to make the city the heart of international financial activities.

Mumbai is the prime choice for many multinational firms for establishing their base as they expand operations, which is on the way to be transformed into international financial hub, Quane said.

Though five of the top 10 most expensive locations are in Asia, the list of world's cheapest locations to rent a three-bedroom apartment does not include any Asian city.

H-1B visas: Which company got how much

BusinessWeek
http://www.rediff.com/money/2007/may/18bweek.htm

H-1B issue: Nasscom seeks more visas
http://www.rediff.com/money/2007/may/31visa.htm

May 31, 2007 15:48 IST

The National Association of Software and Services Companies (Nasscom), the premier trade body of the IT software and services industry in India, has sent a letter on behalf of the nine Indian companies to US Senators Durbin and Grassley, addressing the issues raised by them in their letter of May 14, 2007 (addressed to nine Indian IT companies) about reported fraud and abuse of the H-1B visa programme, and its impact on American workers.

The Nasscom response represents the viewpoint of these nine Indian companies and the industry. The letter assures the Senators of support and co-operation by Nasscom and its member companies on the larger issue of visa fraud and also echoes the Senators' belief that any fraudulent activity should be dealt with in the strictest possible manner.

The letter highlights that H-1B visas are beneficial to, both, the United States and Indian companies, and also to the US economy. It also draws attention to the fact that many US industry leaders have repeatedly stressed the need to raise the H-1B visa cap, which was reduced from 195,000 to 65,000 two years ago.

H-1B visas: Which company got how much
On the linkage between layoffs and the H-1B visa, the letter notes that these two do not seem to go hand in hand as exhibited through the 2006 survey by Money Magazine. It also iterates that while the number of H-1B visas is currently very limited (currently capped at 65,000 a year), the H-1B visa is not limited to the IT sector nor to Indians alone.

In fact, of the H-1B visas granted in the year 2006, nearly 14,000 (more than 20%) visas were granted to American educational institutions.

Among other significant areas of note, one at a broader level is addressing the mistaken belief that US-India trade is flowing primarily in one direction. As has been recognized widely, India is a major buyer of a whole host of US goods and services, including aircraft, wheat, branded garments and accessories, et cetera.

An overwhelming majority of the computer

title~2363426

by palashbiswas @ 2007-05-30 - 20:26:39
Genocide of India's daughters Palash Biswas Contact: Palash C Biswas, C/O Mrs Arati Roy, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-033-25659551 Email: palashchandrabiswas@gmail.com Do women have any rights in Hinduism?! Or are they just sex objects and to be sold off by their Hindu husbands?! How do the Hindus know which child is bastard and which is legitimate? Can they trace to 30 generations back?! Lol. Between the beginning of the Christian era and the advent of invasions around 10th century for about 1000 years women?s status slowly went down. ?Sex polarity? became the type of sex identity. Roma Chaudhury (?Some Reflections on the ideals of Indian Womanhood?) wrote: "The position of women in India gradually deteriorated as the golden Vedic ideals of unity and equality began to fade through the passage of time. During the period of the Smritis, the period of codification of social laws - women were bracketed with the shudras and were denied the right to study the Vedas... Marriage or domestic life became compulsory for women and un-questioning devotion to, and self-effacing service of husbands their only duty." Representations of Women in Popular Indian Cinema http://www.english.emory.edu/Bahri/Film.html It is the Brahminical Sytem that Indian daughters have no right! The sytem prevails as the Woman`s Quota in parliment and legislature is still in deep freez! Political parties damn care for woman`s representation. CPI demanded a Woman for the presidential post but is backing a Brahmin candidate like Pranab and Somnath. Both happen to be kuleen Brahmins from Bengal where the left ensures the Brahminical dominance with Ideology and Cadrepower. The daughters of India in Nandigram Resist valiantly against indiscriminate land aquisition for Blue Revolution of capitalist development and post modern Manusmriti! The Manusmriti (Sanskrit ?????????), translated smriti of Manu is a work of Hindu law and ancient Indian society. It is one of the eighteen Smritis of the Dharmasastra; and is a part of the Smriti literature. It contains laws, rules and codes of conduct to be applied by individuals, communities and nations. Some of these laws codify the Hindu caste system and discuss the "stages of life for a twice-born man". It explains itself as a discourse given by Sage Manu to rishis having begged him to enlighten them on the topic. The book is ascribed to Manu, according to the Hindu mythology, the forefather of all humans. The text as preserved is generally dated to ca. the 1st century CE[1] There are 2,031 verses (laws) of Manusmrti. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manusmriti http://www.answers.com/topic/manu-smriti http://www.countercurrents.org/comm-yechuri120803.htm The role of Women in Hinduism is often disputed, and positions range from quite fair to extremely intolerant. Hinduism is based on numerous texts, some of which date back to 2000 BCE or earlier. They are varied in authority, authenticity, content and theme, with the most authoritative being the Vedas. The position of women in Hinduism is widely dependent on the specific text and the context. Positive references are made to the ideal woman in texts such as the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, while some texts such as the Manu Smriti advocate a restriction of women's rights. In modern times the Hindu wife has traditionally been regarded as someone who must at all costs remain chaste or pure.[1] This is in contrast with the very different traditions that have prevailed at earlier times in 'Hindu' kingdoms, which included highly respected professional courtesans (such as Amrapali of Vesali) sacred devadasis, mathematicians and female magicians (the basavis, the Tantric kulikas). Some European scholars observed in the nineteenth century Hindu women were "naturally chaste" and "more virtuous" than other women, although what exactly they meant by that is open to dispute. In any case, as male foreigners they would have been denied access to the secret and sacred spaces that women often inhabited. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Hinduism India has a law barring medical personnel from from using prenatal diagnostic techniques to determine the sex of an unborn child. But the law is widely ignored because local officials are reluctant to fight the will of the people, the Daily Mail said. Generally, in Indian society, woman who produce only daughters are pitied, in some cases abused and in many cases regarded as betrayers. By conservative estimates, sex-selective abortion in India accounts for the termination of about 10 million females over the past 20 years. "This is the world's biggest genocide ever," Chetan Sharma, a campaigner against female feticide, told the Daily Mail of London. Chetan is founder of the Delhi-based group Datamation. India's 2001 census shows a drop in the number of girls 6-years-old and under per 1,000 boys, to 927, compared to 962 in 1981. "The future is frightening. Over the next five years we could see more than a million fetuses eliminated every year," said researcher Sabu George."At this pace we'll soon have no girls born in the country. We don't know where it will stop." The problem of undervaluing women is an old one. In the 19th century, British leaders tried to eradicate female infanticide. Female feticide, however, is a new phenomenon brought about by advances in technology along with liberal attitudes toward abortion, which was legalized in India in 1971. Kalpana Sharma, a columnist in The Hindu newspaper, says "anyone can walk into a government hospital and ask for an immediate abortion up to the 20th week of pregnancy, free, merely by saying there has been a failure of contraception. " Subject: Daughters of the 73rd Amendment with Dr. Bidyut Mohanty Posting Date: 24 Oct 03 Author(s): The 73rd Constitutional Amendment that was passed in India in 1992 gave formal constitutional recognition to local self-governance units. Most significantly, it reserved 33 per cent of seats for women. Today, an estimated one million Indian women hold political office at that level. In September 2001, SAP Canada?s India Linkage Program brought Dr. Bidyut Mohanty of the Institute for Social Sciences (ISS), New Delhi, on a four-city tour of Canada to speak on the impact of this landmark amendment. Attached are her speaking notes on the subject. Genocide of India's daughters Ten million female foetuses have been illegally aborted in India by mothers desperate to bear a son. What will become of this nation of ever fewer women? ANNE SEBBA investigates: May you be the mother of a hundred sons - this is the Sanskrit blessing given to a Hindu woman in India on her wedding day. And the minute she falls pregnant, there is the traditional chanting of mantras by the other women of the family, calling for the foetus, if female, to be transformed into a male. Increasingly, such age-old beliefs are becoming a curse in India, as, in this deeply patriarchal society, women have become obsessed with giving birth only to sons. ?Asking me why I need a son, instead of a daughter, is like asking me why I have two eyes and not one,? says one woman in the northern district of Haryana, who has just had an abortion after discovering that the baby she was carrying was female. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=393896&in_page_id=1770 For India's daughters, a dark birth day Infanticide and sex-selective abortion yield a more skewed gender ratio. By Uma Girish | Contributor to The Christian Science Monitor MADRAS, INDIA ? The oleander plant yields a bright, pleasant flower, but also a milky sap that, if ingested, can be a deadly poison. It's one of the methods families use to kill newborn girls in the Salem District of Tamil Nadu, a part of India notorious for female infanticide. Though the government has battled the practice for decades, India's gender imbalance has worsened in recent years. Any progress toward halting infanticide, it seems, has been offset by a rise in sex-selective abortions. Too many couples - aided by medical technology, unethical doctors, and weak enforcement of laws banning abortion on the basis of gender - are electing to end a pregnancy if the fetus is female. The vanishing girls of India The consequence of female infanticide and, more recently, abortion is India's awkwardly skewed gender ratio, among the most imbalanced in the world. The ratio among children up to the age of 6 was 962 girls per 1,000 boys in 1981, but 20 years later the inequity was actually worse: 927 girls per 1,000 boys. Infanticide is illegal in India (though never prosecuted), and laws are also in place to stop sex- selective abortions. But in some places, national rules don't hold enough sway to overcome local religious and social customs - which remain biased in favor of sons over daughters. http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0209/p11s01-wosc.html Brothel Boom Ensnares More of India's Daughters Run Date: 05/17/07 By Swapna Majumdar WeNews correspondent In certain rural villages in India it is traditional for low-income families to send daughters into prostitution. Some girls are being protected from that dangerous fate in the age of HIV-AIDS, but far more are falling into brothels' economic grip. http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm?aid=3171 BHARATPUR, Rajasthan (WOMENSENEWS)--Kamla was just 12 years old when she was initiated into the sex trade in the brothels of Delhi. After working as a prostitute for 14 years she found a man who was willing to marry her. But Kamla (her name has been changed to protect her) knew that leaving the trade would not be easy. Disappearing Daughters : The Tragedy of Female Foeticide Author: Aravamudan, Gita Year: 2007 ISBN : 0143101706 [ pp. 208, pb ] [ Price: RS. 250.00, US$ 6.25 ] 10 million females illegally aborted in India Parents desperate to bear son changing nation's demographics Posted: July 7, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern Main Features » Now they no longer feed them paddy husk or poisoned milk?they stifle them with a pillow or with a cloth.? (Kanchamma, a midwife from Alligundam village in Tamil Nadu) ?We knew the doctor at the scan centre and?went to the clinic that he suggested and had the foetus removed. The next two times were also okay except that I got very tired and had to give up my job. My husband said having a son was more important than having a job.? (Renu, from Chandigarh, who has had four abortions in five years) India has historically had a deficit of women compared to most other countries, but we now live in a time when a systematic extermination of an entire gender is taking place right before our eyes. Until the 1980s, women and girls were dying either of neglect or were killed soon after they were born. Today, the horrifying reality is that, thanks to ?advances? in medical technology, they are now eliminated while still in the womb. Female foeticide has become an organized crime and the ultrasound machine has mutated into an instrument of murder. In Disappearing Daughters Gita Aravamudan uses the tools of investigative reporting to expose the imperatives that drive this horrific phenomenon. She unravels an appalling story of deeply embedded and destructive patriarchal beliefs, disempowered women who have no claim on their own bodies and the active complicity of a ruthless and callous medical and social system. This book makes it chillingly clear that the macabre practice of eliminating female foetuses spells doom for our sons as well as our daughters and is bound to have a disastrous impact on future generations. Scroll down for media reports and reviews ?This book touches our conscience? ­from the Foreword by A.P.J. Abdul Kalam ?Now they no longer feed them paddy husk or poisoned milk?they stifle them with a pillow or with a cloth.? (Kanchamma, a midwife from Alligundam village in Tamil Nadu) ?We knew the doctor at the scan centre and?went to the clinic that he suggested and had the foetus removed. The next two times were also okay except that I got very tired and had to give up my job. My husband said having a son was more important than having a job.? (Renu, from Chandigarh, who has had four abortions in five years) About India has historically had a deficit of women compared to most other countries, but we now live in a time when a systematic extermination of an entire gender is taking place right before our eyes. Until the 1980s, women and girls were dying either of neglect or were killed soon after they were born. Today, the horrifying reality is that, thanks to ?advances? in medical technology, they are now eliminated while still in the womb. Female foeticide has become an organized crime and the ultrasound machine has mutated into an instrument of murder. In Disappearing Daughters Gita Aravamudan uses the tools of investigative reporting to expose the imperatives that drive this horrific phenomenon. She unravels an appalling story of deeply embedded and destructive patriarchal beliefs, disempowered women who have no claim on their own bodies and the active complicity of a ruthless and callous medical and social system. This book makes it chillingly clear that the macabre practice of eliminating female foetuses spells doom for our sons as well as our daughters and is bound to have a disastrous impact on future generations. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ A woman who had nine abortions of females said it's important to have a son because of the family's big business. "I want what my husband has built from scratch to go to his own blood," she said. It's not just the assets of having a son that motivate feticide ? carrying on the family name or business and taking care of elderly parents. The practice of providing a dowry to the grooms' family creates an enormous financial burden on parents who have a daughter. Kalpana Sharma said the dowry demands today are nothing short of extortion. Many families sell off land and are forced into debt they can never pay off. The affluent also are choosing feticide, as evidenced by the fact that states with the lowest ratios of girls to boys also are the most prosperous, such as Punjab, Gujarat and Haryana. Affluent women, the analysts say, believe they will have a better standard of living if they have only sons. Land inheritance also is an issue, as daughters now are entitled legally to an equal share of land when their parents die. Many unqualified technicians are operating ultrasound machines throughout the country, finding it relatively easy to get a license. While there are 25,770 officially registered pre-natal units in India, one doctor estimates as many as 70,000 ultrasound machines are in operation. Long-term consequences of the gender imbalance include the rise of prostitution and sex trafficking and the danger to women's emotional and physical health from repeated abortions. The Indian government is taking steps to impose regulations on the registered ultrasound clinics throughout the country, but Chetan Sharma, of Datamation, says that local officials are guilty of corruption and will simply continue to turn a blind eye. As WorldNetDaily reported in 2004, the Bush administration withheld a $34 million payment from the United Nations Population Fund to China over the issue of forced abortions. The communist government of China maintains, at least in some areas of the country, a one-child policy sometimes enforced through a policy of forced abortions. It is believed China performs some 10 million involuntary abortions a year. The abortions disproportionately affect female babies. Facing a critical shortage of women that could leave millions of men without wives, China is trying to convince its populace of the value of girls, who have been systematically killed during birth or after as a result of the one-child limit on most families. Beijing has developed a five-year plan to correct the alarming disparity in the numbers of males and females in the country. First exposed by WND in 1997, what has come to be known as "gendercide" in China has resulted in the deaths of at least 50 million girls. Related offer: Get "Struggling for Life: How Our Tax Dollars and Twisted Science Target the Unborn" by Kelly Hollowell. Previous stories: Mandatory abortion proposed in Holland Congress to restore funding for 'gendercide' Bush withholds funds to China China battles 'gendercide' China's gendercide crisis Cover-up of China's 'gendercide' SC issues notices to Maharashtra, Gujarat governments The Supreme Court today issued notices to the governments of Maharashtra and Gujarat and Bajrang Dal activist Babu Bajrangi on a petition accusing him of running a racket which prevented Hindu girls from marrying outside their caste. The notices came on the petition filed by Ajay Nikam, Naval Medige and others. The petitioners alleged that Bajrang Dal's Nav Chetan Trust was forcibly separating girls, who had married outside their caste, from their husbands, at times with the consent of their parents. The petition also alleged that divorce proceedings in such cases were either obtained under duress or not being obtained at all. The petition had came after the Bombay High Court had dismissed their habeas corpus petition seeking to know the whereabouts of the missing wives. The High Court also ignored the report of its own inquiry committee which had recommended the registration of FIRs against Bajrangi and others. Rent wife for Rs 8,000 a month in Gujarat 18 Jun, 2006 l 2352 hrs ISTlTIMES NEWS NETWORK Write to Editor SURAT/VADODARA: You might have heard of rent-a-womb, but who ever heard of rent-a-wife! Certain people, especially in tribal belts of Gujarat, have smelt an irresistible business opportunity in the skewed sex ratio in the state. If many tribal daughters are being sold in marriage, there are also reports of husbands agreeing to their wives staying with higher caste men, who are not able to find a wife in their own community, for a monthly rental. In Netrang taluka in Bharuch, police officials quote the recent instance of Atta Prajapati allowing his wife Laxmi to stay with a Patel in Mehsana for a monthly rental of Rs 8,000. Laxmi has two children back in Netrang, and used to work as a farm labourer at Patel's farm. The demand of brides fuelled by the dwindling number of girls in Mehsana, Patan, Rajkot, Gandhinagar and other districts has inspired many agents and poverty-struck families to capitalise on the situation and make a quick buck. In certain pockets of Netrang, Valia, Dediapada, Sakbara, Rajpipla and Jaghadia, Tribals from Vasava community families can be witnessed entering into financial agreements with brokers, called 'Vachetias' from Banaskantha, Mehsana and Ahmedabad districts to marry off their daughters to Patels or those from the Thakur community for a price. The broker charges anywhere between Rs 65,000 to Rs 70,000 from the Patel and then pay the Vasava families Rs 15,000 to Rs 20,000 for their daughters. Rights for war-scarred women May 23, 2007 04:30 AM Carol Goar The passion built slowly until it became an obsession for Ariane Brunet.First, she opened a women's bookstore in Montreal. Then she headed the Third International Feminist Book Fair. Then she joined the newly founded International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, as co-ordinator of its women's rights program. That was where her commitment became all-consuming. She remembers the exact moment it happened. She was monitoring the tribunal set up in 1994 by the United Nations to bring justice and reconciliation to Rwanda after its horrific genocide.Time after time, the same scene would play itself out. Women who had been brutally raped and infected with HIV would appear before the tribunal pleading for antiretroviral drugs. The men who had attacked them had been receiving treatment for years. This wasn't justice, Brunet fumed. It was humiliation. She went to Ed Broadbent, founding president of the centre, and said she had to organize an international women's coalition to speak for female victims of war. Broadbent gave her his enthusiastic support and the financial resources to get started. In 1997, the Coalition for Women's Human Rights in Conflict Situations was born. Ten years later, it has members in Rwanda, Burundi, Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Africa, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Serbia, Peru, Colombia, Chile and Guatemala ? all countries scarred by violence ? as well as Britain, France, Japan, the United States and Canada. This spring, 30 of its leaders gathered in Nairobi, Kenya, to draft a declaration intended to guide jurists and policy-makers, when dealing with women and girls brutalized in conflict situations. The document was unveiled in Toronto last week, kicking off a global campaign to make it part of international law."Sexual violence is a long-standing weapon of war," said Jean-Louis Roy, current president of the International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development. "The remedies must correspond to the abuse committed and the harm inflicted." The Nairobi Declaration rests on four basic principles: 1.) That women and girls who are victims of sexual violence in conflict situations have an absolute right to reparations. 2.) That women in nations ravaged by war, genocide or ethnic cleansing must be full participants in designing and implementing programs to expose the truth, hold the perpetrators to account and compensate the victims. 3.) That post-war settlements must go beyond financial redress. They must provide women and girls with the tools to build better lives than they had before the conflict. 4.) That national governments bear primary responsibility for providing post-conflict reparations, but it is up to the international community to act as a watchdog and, in some cases, as a megaphone for victims. "We are small so we need you, the big voices, to speak out," said Sonia Kambie-Kabbia of Sierra Leone, who helped found the Mano River Women Peace Network in her country. Her group works with rape victims, orphans, street kids, amputees and unlawfully detained women and girls. Her plea was echoed by Gladys Canales Martinez of Peru. She was arrested, tortured and incarcerated for eight years during the brutal regime of former president Alberto Fujimori. After proving her innocence, she received a special pardon from president Alejandro Toledo. She now travels the country organizing other unjustly imprisoned people to speak out and seek reparation. "It is hard to make progress alone," she said. "We rely on the support of the international community to move forward." Brunet stayed out of the limelight at last week's event, letting women who had experienced war crimes tell their stories and explain the importance of the Nairobi Declaration. It was never her intention that she ? or Canada ? would shape or drive the coalition. Her aim was give the movement an institutional home and an international voice. She's achieved the first goal. She's consumed with the second. "It's become an obsession with me to raise awareness, to make people see what they don't want to see." Brunet is proud of the way female survivors of war crimes from five continents have come together to overcome the stigma, prejudice and exclusion they face. But she is under no illusion that civil society can fix what armies, governments and guerrilla forces have broken. Until the principles of the Nairobi Declaration are entrenched in law, and world leaders accept that women have an equal right to justice and restitution, Brunet will not rest. http://www.thestar. com/opinion/ article/216558 WaheGuru Ji Ka Khalsa WaheGuru Ji Ke Fateh See interesting article below Kashmir Singh LL.B, LL.M, C.Eng, Project Management NVQ, Parliamentary Committee Advisor; former member of statutory OFWAT water industry customer services committee for England and Wales, IEE Council 07721-507055 General Secretary British Sikh Federation PO Box 242, Wolverhampton WV4 5DH, England, UK Visit the BSF website at www.british- sikh-federation. org to see details of previous successful campaigns to safeguard Sikh Rights over many years, e.g. work as bus drivers and conductors wearing turbans (1966), wear turbans on construction sites (1989), overwhelming support in the European Parliament on an Urgency Resolution for a Sikh newspaper editor's release from prison against the then UK Government (1996), right to wear Kirpan in courts (1999), defence for Sikh school children to wear Kirpan (1996), right for Sikh workers at UK airports to wear Kirpan (2002), opening British Embassy offices in Panjab and Gujarat (2003), Government commitment to set up Commission for Equalities and Human Rights (2004), etc Posted by: "Dalits; The Seeds of India .." india4dalits@ gmail.com Wed May 23, 2007 5:14 am (PST) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: pardeep attri > Date: May 23, 2007 8:09 AM Subject: Genocide of Women in Hinduism To: hahahaharsha2020@ yahoo.com , *G**enocide of **W**omen in **H**induism* by Sita Agarwal "In memory of my late sister, who died as a result of the inherently anti-woman religion of barbarian Hinduism." *Introduction* > *Vedic Obliteration of Girls ~~ Chapter 1*> * **Aryan Hindu Annihilation of Women ~~ Chapter 2*> * **Inhuman Persecution of Women in Brahmanism ~~ Chapter 3*> * **Severe Restrictions Enforced upon Women ~~ Chapter 4*> * **Sati - Brahmin Annihilation of Widows ~~ Chapter 5*> * **Hindu Scriptural Sanction for Crushing of Women ~~ Chapter 6*> * **Hindu Gods' Subjugation of Women ~~ Chapter 7*> *References *> *Source of this book: **Internet Ambedkar Library<> * *Introduction* I dedicate this book to my late younger sister, who was murdered as a result of a dowry-related incident while in full blossom of youth. Like most sisters, we were very close to one another, and her early death had a deep impact on me. This tragedy inspired me with the will to join the Indian feminist movement, and to eventually write this book. I hope that this work may save the lives of some of my Indian sisters and help reduce the suffering of Indian womankind. The reason for writing this book is purely humanitarian, so I have made this book available in the public domain. The more widely this book is read, the more innocent lives shall be saved. Please distribute it freely, and help save Indian women. Thank you in advance for your efforts. After my sister's death, I joined the Indian feminist movement. I read the usual feminist literature, took part in the usual demonstrations in support of women's' rights, and attended the usual women's rights conventions. However, it soon dawned on me that the movement was quite hollow, and, despite several decades of existence, had failed miserably in its objectives. At the time I write this book, in June 1999, the status of women in India has sunk to its lowest ebb. After 50 years of Independence, cases of female infanticide, sati, dowry-related murders and crimes against women are on the increase, and in many cases are at their highest levels seen since the birth of the Indian Republic. I soon realized that the reason is that Indian feminism has not tackled the core of the evil, but has only squabbled about superficial aspects of the problem. Western feminism was merely transplanted onto the subcontinent, and like many plants, had been unable to thrive in its new environment. It is only by tackling the root of the problem that this plant can grow. I hope that this book shall enlighten all Indian women as to the true reasons for the abject state of subjugation we are in. *Real Reason for Oppression of Indian Women* Everyone has heard the Brahmin male propaganda that the customs of sati, dowry, female infanticide and all other social suppression of women in India is the result of `social degeneration' , 'corruption' , or still worse, `foreign Christian or Muslim influence'. This is all one big lie designed to fool women. The reasons are far more deep-rooted, and are